Virginia senator’s case is two different stories, depending on who’s telling it

The article, with notes

underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words dashed edge: in a quote, not counted tap a technique for why

1 paragraph with no finding

Paragraph 2 of 27

“is either the head of a $4.5 million criminal weed enterprise or the latest critic of President Donald Trump”

↓
The article’s own words
Black-and-White Fallacy · “is either the head of a $4.5 million criminal weed enterprise or the latest critic of President Donald Trump”Why › Frames the case as only two possible readings (criminal kingpin or politically targeted critic), ignoring other possibilities.

3 paragraphs with no finding

Paragraph 6 of 27

“s— house”

↑
President Donald Trump’s words · not counted
Loaded Language · “s— house”Why › The crude, derogatory epithet for Somalia is meant to provoke contempt for a country and its people rather than convey facts.

21 paragraphs with no finding

Only the words each finding rests on are shown here. Read the original ↗ · Open the full analysis →

Analyzed 2026-10-23 04:12 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.

Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →

Get notified about new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time