Get the result by email the day it’s called, then what the winner says in office, analyzed. And an email if it changes: a recount, a runoff, a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Eli Crane (Republican) and Jonathan Nez (Democrat) are the nominees for Arizona's 2nd congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. Eli Crane is the incumbent. By their latest FEC reports, Eli Crane's campaign had raised $11.9 million (through October 14, 2026) and Jonathan Nez's campaign $5.8 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $4.1 million for Eli Crane and $3.3 million against; $900,000 for Jonathan Nez and $3.7 million against.
Eli Crane (REP, incumbent), Jonathan Nez (DEM).
0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Fri, Oct 23 (Request ballot-by-mail by this date (11 days before Election Day)) (passed)Source: azsos.gov ↗Source: azsos.gov ↗
Election Day
Tue, Nov 3 (passed)
ID at the polls
One photo ID with name and address, or two non-photo documents (List #2 or 3)Source: azsos.gov ↗
Checked October 8, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Eli Crane (REP, incumbent)
Raised
$11.9M through 2026-10-14individuals $10.9M · PACs $126K · party $1,000 · from the candidate's other committees $849K · cash on hand $1.3M
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.— $2.4M supporting CraneHMP— $1.4M opposing CraneLargest donors:
HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD $93.7M (39%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Reid G Hoffman $8.5M (4%), Greylock Partners, Partner; ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FUND $5.0M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Fred Eychaner $5.0M (2%), Retired; UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ISSUES FUND $4.8M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)FREEDOM CAUCUS FUND— $895K supporting CraneLargest donors:
Michael T Rydin $8.8M (76%), Retired, Retired; HOUSE FREEDOM ACTION $350K (3%); KOMADA, ANNA $253K (2%); Steven Cowles $205K (2%), Retired, Retired; Steven W Corbett $200K (2%)CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC.— $535K supporting CraneLCV VICTORY FUND— $502K opposing CraneLargest donors:
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS, INC. $18.0M (81%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Amos Hostetter $600K (3%), Pilot House Associates LLC, Chairman; DEMOCRACY PAC $500K (2%); Giovanna Randall $375K (2%), Randall Apparel, Designer; Eric Laufer $375K (2%), Laufer Wind Group, Film Producerand 15 more
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.— $2.4M opposing NezCLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION— $818K opposing NezLargest donors:
Jeff Yass $16.5M (34%), SIG, Managing Director; RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC $15.0M (30%); MARSHA FOR SENATE $4.8M (10%); RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC $2.5M (5%); RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC $2.5M (5%) (its largest donors: Richard E Uihlein $57.7M, Uline; RESTORATION OF AMERICA $1.7M, an organization; AMERICAN LEADERSHIP PAC $1.0M)SOMOS PAC— $413K supporting NezLargest donors:
ELEVATE AMERICA $3.0M (52%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); ADVOCACY ACTION FUND INC. $2.0M (35%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); FORWARD ACTION FUND $468K (8%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); WELLNESS ADVOCACY FUND $250K (4%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)FREEDOM CAUCUS FUND— $297K opposing NezLargest donors:
Michael T Rydin $8.8M (76%), Retired, Retired; HOUSE FREEDOM ACTION $350K (3%); KOMADA, ANNA $253K (2%); Steven Cowles $205K (2%), Retired, Retired; Steven W Corbett $200K (2%)PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT— $290K supporting NezLargest donors:
STOP REPUBLICANS $6.1M (22%) (its largest donors: FAHEY, EILEEN $2.7M; PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $2.5M); LAWALL, JOY $6.0M (22%); PROGRESSIVE TAKEOVER $3.5M (13%) (its largest donors: EVEY, JULIE $1.4M); STOP THESE OPPRESSIVE PEOPLE: TYRANTS RACISTS UNQUALIFIEDS MISOGYNISTS PROPAGANDISTS (STOP TRUMP) $3.0M (11%) (its largest donors: JOHNSTON, ERIC $1.3M); DEM TURNOUT 2024 $2.1M (8%) (its largest donors: KITCHEN, CAROL $1.2M)and 13 more
Bundled through PACs
$18K through 2 PACs · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01ZINC COLLECTIVE PAC— $11K from 4 giftsJSTREETPAC— $7,500 from 6 giftsLobbyist/registrant PAC
62 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
AHORA PAC $2,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC) $2,500
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E $5,000
AMERICAN MOSAIC PAC $1,000
AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $5,000
BEEPAC (BUILDING ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT PAC) $2,000
BLUE MOMENTUM PAC $2,000
BRIDGE THE GAP PAC $2,000
CA LUV PAC (CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP UNITED FOR VICTORY PAC) $10K
COMMITTEE FOR A DEMOCRATIC FUTURE $1,000
DE COLORES PAC $1,000
DEFEAT EXTREMISTS $1,000
DEFEND THE VOTE $2,500
DEMOCRACY SUMMER LEADERSHIP PAC $1,000
DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY FUND $7,500
DEMOCRATS RESHAPING AMERICA (DREAMPAC) $1,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND PAC (EDAF PAC) $1,000
FAIR SHOT PAC $10K
FIGHT FOR PROGRESS PAC $1,000
FIGHTING BACK PAC $1,500
FLIP THE CONGRESS PAC $5,000
GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS PAC $1,000
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in AZ; or it ran mostly in AZ and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.