Adelita Grijalva won. Get what Adelita Grijalva says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Daniel Butierez (Republican) and Adelita Grijalva (Democrat) are the nominees for Arizona's 7th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. Adelita Grijalva is the incumbent. By their latest FEC reports, Daniel Butierez's campaign had raised $234,000 (through October 14, 2026) and Adelita Grijalva's campaign $2.6 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $663,000 for Adelita Grijalva and $196,000 against.
Daniel Butierez (REP), Adelita Grijalva (DEM, incumbent).
0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Fri, Oct 23 (Request ballot-by-mail by this date (11 days before Election Day)) (passed)Source: azsos.gov ↗Source: azsos.gov ↗
Election Day
Tue, Nov 3 (passed)
ID at the polls
One photo ID with name and address, or two non-photo documents (List #2 or 3)Source: azsos.gov ↗
Checked October 8, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Daniel Butierez (REP)
Raised
$234K through 2026-10-14individuals $49K · PACs $2,000 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $175K · cash on hand $11K
Outside spending
none reported
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01
2 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC— $231K supporting GrijalvaLargest donors:
DEMOCRACY PAC $6.5M (32%); MOVEMENT VOTER PAC $2.2M (11%); ACCOUNTABLE JUSTICE ACTION FUND $2.0M (10%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Patty Ann Quillin $650K (3%), NOT Employed, NOT Employed; JORDAN/DELANEY FAMILY TRUST $450K (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)PROGRESSIVE PROMISE— $221K supporting GrijalvaLargest donors:
MEADOW FUND $250K (17%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC $225K (15%); MEDICARE FOR ALL PAC $225K (15%); SEIU CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL $100K (7%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE FOR GRIJALVA $100K (7%)TUCSON FAMILIES FED UP PAC— $196K opposing GrijalvaCONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC— $80K supporting GrijalvaLargest donors:
BATTLEGROUND BLUE PAC $300K (11%)LCV VICTORY FUND— $60K supporting GrijalvaLargest donors:
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS, INC. $18.0M (81%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Amos Hostetter $600K (3%), Pilot House Associates LLC, Chairman; DEMOCRACY PAC $500K (2%); Giovanna Randall $375K (2%), Randall Apparel, Designer; Eric Laufer $375K (2%), Laufer Wind Group, Film Producerand 6 more
Bundled through PACs
$6,550 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01EMILYS LIST— $6,550 from 8 gifts
104 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE FOR GRIJALVA CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE $4,000
AHORA PAC $1,000
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC $2,500
ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE ACTION FUND $500
ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS POLITICAL ACTION FUND $4,000
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE $2,500
AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. $12K
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC) $2,500
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVT. EMPL. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E $5,000
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION $5,000
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL ACTION $2,500
AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $5,000
AQUI ESTAMOS PAC $3,500
BARNES & THORNBURG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
BLUE MOMENTUM PAC $2,500
BUFFALO RIVER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS $5,000
CATHERINE MIRANDA FOR STATE SENATE $1,000
CHC BOLD PAC $10K
CHRISTOPHER STREET PROJECT PAC (CSP PAC) $5,000
CHUY GARCIA FOR CONGRESS $1,000
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA - COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEE $5,000
CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC $5,000
CRUSH MAGA PAC $2,500
D.R.I.V.E. - DEM, REP, IND VOTER ED (THE PAC OF THE INT'L BRHD OF TEAMSTERS) $1,500
DC STATEHOOD PAC $501
DEMOCRATS WIN FUND $12K
DOGGETT FOR CONGRESS $2,000
DOING RIGHT - RESULTS ACTION UNITY LEADERSHIP PAC $2,500
ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN $5,500
EMILYS LIST $5,000
END CITIZENS UNITED $9,500
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND, INC. PAC (EVERYTOWN PAC) $1,000
FAIR SHOT PAC $5,000
FIG AND OLIVE ACTION PAC $1,255
GENERATION GO LEADERSHIP PAC $1,000
GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS PAC $4,000
GIFFORDS PAC $2,500
HOPE PAC $2,000
HUMANE WORLD ACTION FUND POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
INT'L ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS (IPAL) $5,000
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC $12K
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUE $5,000
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $15K
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 12 FEDERAL PAC $10K
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in AZ; or it ran mostly in AZ and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.