California House District 14 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them
Aisha Wahab won · 57.5% to 42.5%, with an estimated 67% of the vote counted · Called by AP on Nov 6
Follow Aisha Wahab in office
Aisha Wahab won. Get what Aisha Wahab says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Melissa Hernandez (Democrat) and Aisha Wahab (Democrat) are the nominees for California's 14th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, Melissa Hernandez's campaign had raised $2.1 million (through October 14, 2026) and Aisha Wahab's campaign $1.2 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $4.3 million for Melissa Hernandez and $410,000 against; $1.7 million for Aisha Wahab and $2.8 million against.
Melissa Hernandez (DEM), Aisha Wahab (DEM).
7 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Also on every California ballot: 14 statewide ballot measures →The ballot wording and the official arguments, read for rhetorical techniques.
How to vote in California
From California's official election office. Each line links to the official page it came from.
Registration
Register by Mon, Oct 19 (Conditional (same-day) registration Oct 20 - Nov 3). Same-day registration: Conditional registration, provisional ballot, Oct 20 - Nov 3 (passed)Source: sos.ca.gov ↗Source: sos.ca.gov ↗
Early voting in person
Mon, Oct 5 to (Varies by county; VCA vote centers open Oct 24)Source: sos.ca.gov ↗
Checked October 8, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Melissa Hernandez (DEM)
Raised
$2.1M through 2026-10-14individuals $2.0M · PACs $118K · cash on hand $108K
BOLD AMERICA— $1.8M supporting HernandezLargest donors:
PROXIMO ACTION $2.9M (31%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP') $2.8M (30%); DEMOCRATS 2026 $1.2M (12%) (its largest donors: KOLBECK, PETER $290K); OPPORTUNITY FORWARD ALLIANCE $775K (8%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); CHC BOLD PAC $600K (6%)UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP')— $825K supporting HernandezLargest donors:
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $30.0M (28%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Paul Singer $2.6M (2%), Elliott Investment Management, Founder; Haim Saban $2.0M (2%), Saban Capital Group, CEO; MANZANITA ACTION FUND $1.6M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Marc Rowan $1.5M (1%), Apollo Management, InvestmentsPROJECT 218— $500K supporting HernandezLargest donors:
DEMOCRACY MATTERS $5.9M (50%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Keith Behner $250K (2%), Retired; Amos Hostetter $250K (2%), Retired; James Millstein $250K (2%), Millstein & CO., Consultant; Samuel Walton $250K (2%), Restoration Works, ExecutiveSD 2026— $449K supporting HernandezLargest donors:
SD PAC $2.7M (70%); MORRISS, FRANCES $884K (23%); HOUSE MAJORITY PAC $233K (6%)ALAMEDA COME TOGETHER PAC— $314K supporting Hernandezand 6 more
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01
25 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $5,000
ANDREA SALINAS FOR OREGON $1,000
BRIDGE THE GAP PAC $1,000
CA LUV PAC (CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP UNITED FOR VICTORY PAC) $10K
CEMEX INC EMPLOYEES PAC $2,500
CHC BOLD PAC $15K
DEMOCRATS RESHAPING AMERICA (DREAMPAC) $1,500
DMFI PAC $5,000
DRIVE - DEM, REP, IND VOTER ED (THE PAC OF THE INT'L BRHD OF TEAMSTERS) $2,500
UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP')— $1.6M opposing WahabLargest donors:
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $30.0M (28%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Paul Singer $2.6M (2%), Elliott Investment Management, Founder; Haim Saban $2.0M (2%), Saban Capital Group, CEO; MANZANITA ACTION FUND $1.6M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Marc Rowan $1.5M (1%), Apollo Management, InvestmentsCOMMITTEE FOR WORKING FAMILIES, SPONSORED BY LABOR ORGANIZATIONS— $684K supporting WahabLargest donors:
HEALTH CARE SAVES LIVES $162K (15%); SEIU CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL FOR WORKING PEOPLE $150K (13%); PACE OF CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION - LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL CANDIDATES $120K (11%); STATE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL PAC $105K (9%); OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION 3 STATEWIDE PAC $100K (9%)BOLD AMERICA— $611K opposing WahabLargest donors:
PROXIMO ACTION $2.9M (31%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP') $2.8M (30%); DEMOCRATS 2026 $1.2M (12%) (its largest donors: KOLBECK, PETER $290K); OPPORTUNITY FORWARD ALLIANCE $775K (8%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); CHC BOLD PAC $600K (6%)PROTECT PROGRESS— $535K supporting WahabLargest donors:
FAIRSHAKE $33.0M (>99%) (its largest donors: RIPPLE LABS INC. $48.0M, an organization; COINBASE $25.0M, an organization; COINBASE COMMERCE (EXCHANGE) $8.2M, an organization); RIPPLE LABS INC. $250K (1%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)SAFER ALAMEDA COUNTY PAC— $387K opposing Wahaband 7 more
Bundled through PACs
$20K through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01JSTREETPAC— $20K from 30 giftsLobbyist/registrant PAC
47 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
AFSCME CA PEOPLE $15K
AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION $2,500
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS PAC (ASA PAC) $5,000
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in CA; or it ran mostly in CA and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.