Anna Paulina Luna won. Get what Anna Paulina Luna says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Tony D'Arrigo (independent), Leela Gray (Democrat) and Anna Paulina Luna (Republican) are the nominees for Florida's 13th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. Anna Paulina Luna is the incumbent. By their latest FEC reports, Tony D'Arrigo's campaign had raised $28,000 (through June 30, 2026), Leela Gray's campaign $2.9 million (through October 14, 2026) and Anna Paulina Luna's campaign $4.4 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $324,000 for Leela Gray and $3.5 million against; $678,000 for Anna Paulina Luna and $6.2 million against.
Tony D'Arrigo (IND), Leela Gray (DEM), Anna Paulina Luna (REP, incumbent).
5 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Sat, Oct 24 to Sat, Oct 31 (Mandatory start date (10th day before). Counties may start as early as Oct 19 (15th day before).) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
By mail
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Thu, Oct 22 (5 pm on the 12th day before the election. This is the deadline for a ballot to be mailed.); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (Received by 7 pm local time on Election Day; the postmark does not count) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
Checked October 6, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Tony D'Arrigo (IND)
Raised
$28K through 2026-06-30individuals $21K · PACs $0 · cash on hand $26K
$2.9M through 2026-10-14individuals $2.5M · PACs $308K · party $322 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $7,115 · from the candidate's other committees $127K · cash on hand $656K
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.— $1.9M opposing GrayWIN IT BACK PAC— $849K opposing GrayLargest donors:
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION $4.5M (40%); Jeff Yass $4.5M (39%), SIG, Managing Director; SCHOOL FREEDOM FUND $1.9M (17%); William H Roj $300K (3%), Retired; Ricky Sandler $100K (1%), Eminence CapitalADVANCING PRINCIPLED LEADERSHIP— $394K opposing GrayLargest donors:
Joseph White $100K (39%), Retired, RetiredVOTEVETS— $210K opposing Gray, $10K supporting GrayLargest donors:
GOVERNMENT THAT WORKS PAC $6.9M (20%); GLOBAL IMPACT SOCIAL WELFARE FUND $3.0M (9%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); BETTER WORLD CIVIC TRUST $1.6M (5%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); DEMOCRACY MATTERS $1.4M (4%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Joshua Bekenstein $1.2M (3%), Bain Capital, InvestorPROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT— $176K supporting GrayLargest donors:
STOP REPUBLICANS $6.1M (22%) (its largest donors: FAHEY, EILEEN $2.7M; PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $2.5M); LAWALL, JOY $6.0M (22%); PROGRESSIVE TAKEOVER $3.5M (13%) (its largest donors: EVEY, JULIE $1.4M); STOP THESE OPPRESSIVE PEOPLE: TYRANTS RACISTS UNQUALIFIEDS MISOGYNISTS PROPAGANDISTS (STOP TRUMP) $3.0M (11%) (its largest donors: JOHNSTON, ERIC $1.3M); DEM TURNOUT 2024 $2.1M (8%) (its largest donors: KITCHEN, CAROL $1.2M)and 6 more
Bundled through PACs
$34K through 2 PACs · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01EMILYS LIST— $29K from 36 giftsFAIR SHOT PAC— $4,500 from 2 gifts
21 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS PLASTYPAC $500
AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $5,000
ATHENA PAC $1,000
CALL TO SERVE $1,000
CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS $5,000
CHRISSY HOULAHAN FOR CONGRESS $2,000
CROSSPARTISAN PAC I $10K
ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN $5,000
ELECT EVERY DEMOCRAT PAC $1,000
EMILYS LIST $5,000
FRATERNITY & SORORITY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
$4.4M through 2026-10-14individuals $2.7M · PACs $220K · candidate's own money, incl. loans $97 · from the candidate's other committees $1.4M · cash on hand $747K
Outside spending
$6.2M opposing Luna · $678K supporting Luna· latest reported 2026-10-29
Largest outside spenders
HMP— $4.5M opposing LunaLargest donors:
HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD $93.7M (39%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Reid G Hoffman $8.5M (4%), Greylock Partners, Partner; ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FUND $5.0M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Fred Eychaner $5.0M (2%), Retired; UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ISSUES FUND $4.8M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)GIFFORDS PAC— $857K opposing LunaLargest donors:
GIFFORDS $4.5M (57%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); JAMES L. GUTHRIE TRUST $571K (7%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); WARFEL, EDWARD $497K (6%); HOUSE MAJORITY PAC $100K (1%)NO GOING BACK PAC INC.— $405K supporting LunaNRDC ACTION VOTES— $300K opposing LunaLargest donors:
NRDC ACTION FUND $3.1M (100%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)EDW ACTION FUND— $299K opposing LunaLargest donors:
UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP') $2.4M (28%); EDW FOUNDATION $1.8M (21%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN $880K (10%); THE BENCH $596K (7%); BATTLEGROUND DEMOCRATS $560K (7%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)and 12 more
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in FL; or it ran mostly in FL and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.