Political ads · 2026 · FL

Florida House District 2 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them

Austin Rogers won · 52.1% to 47.9% · Called by AP on Nov 3

Follow Austin Rogers in office

Austin Rogers won. Get what Austin Rogers says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.

Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.

Amanda Green (Democrat) and Austin Rogers (Republican) are the nominees for Florida's 2nd congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, Amanda Green's campaign had raised $658,000 (through October 14, 2026) and Austin Rogers's campaign $1.4 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $1.9 million for Austin Rogers and $91,000 against.

Amanda Green (DEM), Austin Rogers (REP). 11 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy. Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.

Also on every Florida ballot: 3 statewide ballot measures → The ballot wording and the official arguments, read for rhetorical techniques.

How to vote in Florida

From Florida's official election office. Each line links to the official page it came from.

Registration	Register by Mon, Oct 5 (29 days before the election) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
Early voting in person	Sat, Oct 24 to Sat, Oct 31 (Mandatory start date (10th day before). Counties may start as early as Oct 19 (15th day before).) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
By mail	Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Thu, Oct 22 (5 pm on the 12th day before the election. This is the deadline for a ballot to be mailed.); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (Received by 7 pm local time on Election Day; the postmark does not count) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
Election Day	Tue, Nov 3. Polls: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. local time (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
ID at the polls	Current, valid photo ID with signatureSource: dos.fl.gov ↗

Check your registration and polling place ↗ Florida's official election site ↗

Checked October 6, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.

Something wrong or out of date? Tell us

A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.

Got a political text?

Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.

Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.

Money in this race

From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.

Amanda Green (DEM)

Raised: $658K through 2026-10-14 individuals $631K · PACs $24K · candidate's own money, incl. loans $2,577 · cash on hand $28K
Outside spending: none reported

Bundled through PACs: none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01

2 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election

ELECT EVERY DEMOCRAT PAC $1,000
HARVEST PAC $5,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

Austin Rogers (REP)

Raised: $1.4M through 2026-10-14 individuals $800K · PACs $184K · candidate's own money, incl. loans $375K · cash on hand $98K
Outside spending: $91K opposing Rogers · $1.9M supporting Rogers · latest reported 2026-10-30
Largest outside spenders: PANHANDLE PATRIOTS PAC — $1.8M supporting Rogers Largest donors: Joseph Daou $1.6M (80%), Savis Inc., Self Employed; Clark Thomas Rogers $400K (20%), US Airforce, Civilian Simulator Instructor Pilot FREEDOM AGAINST FEDERAL OVERREACH — $91K opposing Rogers Largest donors: CYTOGENESIS, INC $300K (95%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) AMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION PAC (ACC PAC) — $55K supporting Rogers Largest donors: AMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION ACTION INC. $783K (94%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) SAVE AMERICAN FREEDOM — $34K supporting Rogers Largest donors: COMMONSENSE POLICY IN ACTION $790K (81%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Konstantin Sokolov $100K (10%), US Investments LLC, Executive AMERICAN LIBERTY FOUNDATION — $30K supporting Rogers Largest donors: AMERICAN LIBERTY ACTION FUND $355K (26%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); VOICE OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL $250K (18%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); THE GEO GROUP, INC. PAC $250K (18%); THE 2026 VICTORY COMMITTEE $148K (11%) (its largest donors: ANDREWS, GEORGE $409K); Phillip Frost $100K (7%), Opko Health INC, CEO and 1 more

Bundled through PACs: none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01

3 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election

ADEIA INC PAC (ADEIA PAC) $500
FUND FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE $1,000
THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS PAC $5,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

No campaign ads analyzed for this race yet.

What this page is

An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in FL; or it ran mostly in FL and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.