John Cowan won. Get what John Cowan says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
John Cowan (Republican) and Chris Harden (Democrat) are the nominees for Georgia's 11th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, John Cowan's campaign had raised $2.8 million (through October 14, 2026) and Chris Harden's campaign $139,000 (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $783,000 for John Cowan and $40,000 against.
John Cowan (REP), Chris Harden (DEM).
11 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Fri, Oct 23 (application must be received 11 days before the election); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (received by the county registrar by close of polls (7 p.m.) Election Day) (passed)Source: sos.ga.gov ↗Source: sos.ga.gov ↗Source: sos.ga.gov ↗
Government-issued photo ID required (driver's license even if expired, free state ID, passport, military ID, public college student ID, government employee ID)Source: sos.ga.gov ↗
Checked October 6, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
John Cowan (REP)
Raised
$2.8M through 2026-10-14individuals $619K · PACs $332K · candidate's own money, incl. loans $1.8M · from the candidate's other committees $124K · cash on hand $146K
DEFENDING OUR VALUES PAC— $759K supporting CowanLargest donors:
PUBLIC FIRST ACTION, INC $4.9M (59%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); PUBLIC FIRST ACTION $3.0M (36%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); PUBLIC FIRST $300K (4%); Jan Leike $100K (1%), Anthropic, ResearcherTEA PARTY PATRIOTS CITIZENS FUND— $23K opposing CowanLargest donors:
RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC $509K (61%); RESTORATION PAC $273K (32%)GEORGIANS FOR COMMON SENSE— $18K opposing CowanHEALTHCARE FREEDOM SUPER PAC— $15K supporting CowanAMERICAN VALUES FIRST— $9,138 supporting CowanLargest donors:
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION $1.3M (84%); THE REVITALIZATION PROJECT $200K (12%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)
Bundled through PACs
$7,000 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC— $7,000 from 2 gifts
24 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
ACSPA-SURGEONSPAC-AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC (SKINPAC) $5,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS PAC (FAMMEDPAC) $5,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY BRAINPAC $2,500
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY ENT PAC $1,500
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS PAC (NEUROSURGERYPAC) $15K
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC $10K
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PAC $10K
AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC INFORMATION ASSOCIATION - OSTEOPATHIC PAC $2,500
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION PAC $2,500
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS PAC (ASA PAC) $10K
ANDY HARRIS FOR CONGRESS $2,000
ASCO ASSOCIATION PAC (ASCO ASSOCIATION PAC) $2,500
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION PAC (BSC PAC) $500
CHUCK HUFSTETLER FOR STATE SENATE $1,000
COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS PAC $1,000
GEORGIA OILMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC PAC (GOAPAC) $1,000
HEALTHCARE FREEDOM FUND $10K
NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE PAC / AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS $10K
OLD BREED PAC $3,500
PAC OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS--PAC OF AAOS $7,500
PATRIOT FUND $3,500
PROJECTHEALTHSOLUTIONS PAC - PHSPAC $5,000
SPINE PAC OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPINE SPECIALISTS $3,500
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in GA; or it ran mostly in GA and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.