Louisiana House District 3 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them
Follow Captain Higgins in office
Captain Higgins won. Get what Captain Higgins says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Captain Higgins (REP, incumbent), John David Day (DEM), Tia Marie Lebrun (NPA).
0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Also on every Louisiana ballot: 10 statewide ballot measures → The ballot wording and the official arguments, read for rhetorical techniques.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Captain Higgins (REP, incumbent)
- Raised
- $904K through 2026-10-14
individuals $235K · PACs $170K · from the candidate's other committees $498K · cash on hand $566K
- Outside spending
- $809 supporting Higgins · latest reported 2026-09-30
- Largest outside spenders
- FREEDOM CAUCUS FUND
— $809 supporting Higgins
Largest donors:
Michael T Rydin $8.8M (76%), Retired, Retired; HOUSE FREEDOM ACTION $350K (3%); KOMADA, ANNA $253K (2%); Steven Cowles $205K (2%), Retired, Retired; Steven W Corbett $200K (2%)
- Bundled through PACs
- $7,500 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01
FREEDOM CAUCUS FUND
— $7,500 from 3 gifts
46 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
- AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY PAC $1,000
- AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (CRNA-PAC) $1,000
- AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC) $8,500
- AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
- AMERICAN SUGAR CANE LEAGUE OF USA INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10K
- ARKANSAS RICE PRODUCERS GROUP INC PAC - AKA ARKANSAS RICE PAC $1,000
- ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. PAC (ABC PAC) $5,000
- BUILD POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS (BUILDPAC) $3,500
- CALIFORNIA RICE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION FUND (CALIFORNIA RICE FUND) $1,000
- CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. PAC $10K
- CITIZENS UNITED POLITICAL VICTORY FUND $1,000
- FARMERS' RICE COOPERATIVE FUND $1,000
- FLORIDA SUGAR CANE LEAGUE PAC $1,000
- FRIENDS OF DAVID SCHWEIKERT $2,000
- HOUSE FREEDOM FUND $5,000
- LAND OF OPPORTUNITY PAC $2,500
- LEAN FORWARD AMERICA $3,500
- LETS GET TO WORK PAC $7,000
- LOUISIANA RICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, INC. $5,000
- MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION EMPLOYEES PAC (MPAC) $1,000
- MARK GARBER FOR SHERIFF $1,000
- MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY GROWERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
- MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE SUGAR PAC (MDSPAC) $1,000
- MOTORCYCLE RIDERS FOUNDATION-POLITICAL ACTIVE CYCLISTS (MRF PAC) $1,000
- NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
- NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
- NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NSSF PAC) $2,500
- PAN-AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAC (PALIC PAC) $1,000
- PHILLIPS 66 PAC $5,000
- PRODUCERS RICE MILL INC PAC $1,000
- RALPH NORMAN FOR CONGRESS $2,000
- RAPTOR PAC $1,000
- REPUBLICANS UNITED TO DEFEND YOU PAC $1,000
- RICELAND FOODS, INC. PAC $1,000
- ROAD TO VICTORY PAC $1,000
- RUDY FOR INDIANA $4,000
- SARONIC TECHNOLOGIES INC. PAC $2,500
- SEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PAC $1,000
- SECURING EVERY AMERICAN'S LIBERTY PAC (SEAL PAC) $1,000
- SOUTHERN MINNESOTA BEET SUGAR COOPERATIVE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,000
- SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA (PAC) $500
- TEXAS RICE PRODUCERS' LEGISLATIVE GROUP POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
- THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
- USA RICE FEDERATION PAC $5,000
- VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION PAC $5,000
- WESTERN SUGAR COOPERATIVE PAC $1,000
All filings at the FEC ↗
John David Day (DEM)
- Raised
- $223K through 2026-10-14
individuals $208K · PACs $5,000 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $7,575 · cash on hand $125K
- Outside spending
- none reported
- Bundled through PACs
- none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01
All filings at the FEC ↗
Tia Marie Lebrun (NPA)
- Raised
- $7,383 through 2026-09-30
individuals $5,033 · PACs $0 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $2,350 · cash on hand $3,880
- Outside spending
- none reported
- Bundled through PACs
- none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01
All filings at the FEC ↗
No campaign ads analyzed for this race yet.
What this page is
- An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in LA; or it ran mostly in LA and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
- Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
- A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
- Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
- Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
- Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.