Richard Neal won. Get what Richard Neal says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Nadia Milleron (NPA) and Richard Neal (Democrat) are the nominees for Massachusetts's 1st congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. Richard Neal is the incumbent. By their latest FEC reports, Nadia Milleron's campaign had raised $1.6 million (through October 14, 2026) and Richard Neal's campaign $3.1 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $0 for Nadia Milleron and $915,000 against; $61,000 for Richard Neal and $0 against.
Nadia Milleron (NPA), Richard Neal (DEM, incumbent).
1 other filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Sat, Oct 17 to Fri, Oct 30 (Sites and hours set by each city or town.) (passed)Source: sec.state.ma.us ↗
By mail
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Tue, Oct 27 (Application must be received by 5 p.m.; postmark does not count.); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (Received by close of polls (8 p.m.); by mail, postmarked by Election Day and received within 3 days.) (passed)Source: sec.state.ma.us ↗Source: sec.state.ma.us ↗
Checked October 8, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Nadia Milleron (NPA)
Raised
$1.6M through 2026-10-14individuals $62K · PACs $0 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $1.5M · cash on hand $310K
$3.1M through 2026-10-14individuals $709K · PACs $2.1M · from the candidate's other committees $62K · cash on hand $1.9M
Outside spending
$61K supporting Neal· latest reported 2026-10-15
Largest outside spenders
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE— $61K supporting NealLargest donors:
CREPAC FEDERAL $2.5M (26%) (its largest donors: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1.3M); TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS FEDERAL PAC $1.4M (15%)
TENASKA INC EMPLOYEES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,500
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (TI PAC) $1,000
THE AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
THE AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT $10K
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PENSION PROFESSIONALS AND ACTUARIES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ASPPA-NAPA PAC) A/K/A AMERICAN RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ARA PAC) $10K
THE BOEING COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $4,500
THE CARLYLE GROUP INC. PAC (AKA 'CARLYLE PAC') $5,000
THE CIGNA GROUP EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $7,500
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY NONPARTISAN COMMITTEE FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT $5,000
THE ESOP ASSOCIATION PAC $2,500
THE FARM CREDIT COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $4,000
THE GRANT THORNTON LLP POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE LLC $2,500
THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE - FEDERAL (GUARD $10K
THE HOME DEPOT INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10K
THE J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY PAC (SMUCKER PAC) $3,500
THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FEDERAL PAC $5,000
THE OPTIONS CLEARING CORPORATION PAC $10K
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND $5,000
THE SCHWAN FOOD COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,000
THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (T-PAC) $5,000
THE VANGUARD GROUP COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT $7,500
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. PAC $6,000
THREE RIVERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
THRIVENT FINANCIAL FOR LUTHERANS - EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
TORCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,000
TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (TOYOTA/LEXUS PAC) $2,500
TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION PAC $3,000
TRINET GROUP INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
TYSON FOODS INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (TYPAC) $1,000
U.S. BANCORP POLITICAL PARTICIPATION PROGRAM $10K
UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING & PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA) $5,000
UBS AMERICAS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (UBS PAC) $7,500
UNITED AIRLINES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (UAPAC) $2,000
UNITED HEALTH PAC $2,500
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA - COAL MINERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,000
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED PAC (UNITEDHEALTH GROUP PAC) $5,000
UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES EMPLOYEES' GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND $2,500
US ONCOLOGY INC. NETWORK POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
USACS PAC $5,000
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (VERIZON PAC) $5,000
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
VISA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $4,000
WALMART INC. PAC FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT $7,500
WAWA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY EMPLOYEES GOOD GOVERNMENT FEDERAL FUND II $1,000
WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (WABPAC) $10K
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
WILLIAMS AND JENSEN, PLLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $500
WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS OF AMERICA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
WSP USA PAC $2,500
XCEL ENERGY EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (XPAC) $2,500
ZENECA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
ZOETIS INC. PAC AKA ZOETIS PAC $2,500
ZURICH HOLDING COMPANY OF AMERICA COMMITTEE FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT (Z-PAC) $2,500
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in MA; or it ran mostly in MA and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.