Dan Koh won. Get what Dan Koh says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Micah Jones (Republican) and Dan Koh (Democrat) are the nominees for Massachusetts's 6th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, Micah Jones's campaign had raised $620,000 (through October 14, 2026) and Dan Koh's campaign $5.4 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $2.4 million for Dan Koh and $82,000 against.
Micah Jones (REP), Dan Koh (DEM).
6 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Sat, Oct 17 to Fri, Oct 30 (Sites and hours set by each city or town.) (passed)Source: sec.state.ma.us ↗
By mail
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Tue, Oct 27 (Application must be received by 5 p.m.; postmark does not count.); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (Received by close of polls (8 p.m.); by mail, postmarked by Election Day and received within 3 days.) (passed)Source: sec.state.ma.us ↗Source: sec.state.ma.us ↗
Checked October 8, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Micah Jones (REP)
Raised
$620K through 2026-10-14individuals $603K · PACs $17K · cash on hand $170K
Outside spending
none reported
Bundled through PACs
$1,000 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01PRO-ISRAEL AMERICA INC— $1,000 from 1 gift
4 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
$5.4M through 2026-10-14individuals $4.9M · PACs $180K · party $300 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $260K · from the candidate's other committees $68K · cash on hand $1.1M
THINK BIG— $1.3M supporting KohLargest donors:
LEADING THE FUTURE $22.5M (98%); Ronald Conway $500K (2%), SV Angel, FounderNEW LEADERSHIP PAC— $1.1M supporting KohLargest donors:
NEW ENGAGEMENT PAC $3.0M (62%); DK CROWN HOLDINGS INC. $250K (5%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); D.R.I.V.E. - DEM, REP, IND VOTER ED (THE PAC OF THE INT'L BRHD OF TEAMSTERS) $100K (2%); Robert Hale $100K (2%), Granite Telecom, CEO; James Pinto $100K (2%), Self Employed, AttorneyUNITED FUTURE PAC— $47K opposing KohGUARDRAILS ALLIANCE— $35K opposing KohLargest donors:
Juan Felipe Ceron Uribe $200K (27%), Openai, Research Engineer; Dylan Mavrides $100K (14%), Jane Street Capital, Quantitative Trader; Jacob Eliosoff $100K (14%), Calibrated Markets LLC, Investment Manager
Bundled through PACs
$7,000 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01END CITIZENS UNITED— $7,000 from 2 gifts
37 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E $5,000
BLUE HEN FEDERAL PAC $5,000
CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS $5,000
CAVALIER FOR MILWAUKEE $500
COMMITTEE TO ELECT JULIE DAIGLE $100
COMMITTEE TO ELECT TOM GOULD $100
D.R.I.V.E. - DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, INDEPENDENT VOTER EDUCATION (THE PAC OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS) $5,000
ENGINEERS POLITICAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE (EPEC)/INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS $5,000
EVAN LOW FOR CONGRESS $1,000
FERREIRA COMMITTEE $100
FRIENDS OF CHERI BUSTOS $1,000
FRIENDS OF ELIZABETH ESTY $1,000
FRIENDS OF GINA RAIMONDO $1,000
HUMANITY ABOVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PAC $250
IN OUR HANDS $1,000
INT'L ASSOC. OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL & REINFORCING IRON WORKERS (IPAL) $2,500
INT'L UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS $5,000
INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF SHEET METAL, AIR RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS $5,000
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC $5,000
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS AND ALLIED WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS CAMPAIGN ASSISTANCE FUND $3,500
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS (IBEW PAC) $5,000
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS & ALLIED TRADES POLITICAL ACTION TOGETHER POLITICAL COMMIT $5,000
JUSTICE LEAGUE PAC $1,000
KOREAN AMERICANS FOR ORGANIZING FUND $2,500
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PAC $5,000
NATIONAL ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS PAC $5,000
NICK MELVOIN FOR CONGRESS $1,000
NORTH AMERICA'S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS POLITICAL EDUCATIONAL FUND $2,500
PATRIOT PAC $2,500
SMART TD PAC $5,000
UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING & PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA) $5,000
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in MA; or it ran mostly in MA and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.