Jon Husted (REP, incumbent), Faris Write In (IND), Frederick Ode (DEM), Greg Levy (IND), Ron Kincaid (DEM), Sherrod Brown (DEM), William Redpath (LIB).
117 ads analyzed, 47 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing. 5 official office videos shown separately below.
Findings
As of 2026-09-23. Counts are of distinct ads; the same text run many times is one ad.
Ads analyzed
117 (Meta 115, YouTube 2) · started running between 2026-05-01 and 2026-09-22
With at least one technique
47 of 117 (40%)
Most common techniques
Loaded Language · 37 adsAppeal to Fear · 30 adsName Calling · 27 ads
Meta
45 of 115 (39%) flagged · Loaded Language (35), Appeal to Fear (28), False Urgency (26)
YouTube
2 of 2 flagged · Appeal to Fear (2), Loaded Language (2), Name Calling (2)
Reported Meta spend
$1,345,100–1,723,072 on all ads, $538,000–703,359 on flagged ads · Meta reports ranges; these are the sums of their ends
Example
“SCANDAL” — Loaded Language, paid for by WINSENATE
· the flagged ad with the highest reported spend that shows the most common technique
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named.
Jon Husted (REP, incumbent)
Raised
$14.4M through 2026-06-30individuals $6.3M · PACs $2.3M · party $62K · from the candidate's other committees $5.7M · cash on hand $9.4M
WINSENATE— $11.3M opposing Husted
· 3 ads on this pageLargest donors: SMP $4.1M (100%)AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION— $6.0M supporting Husted
· 6 ads on this pageLargest donors: KOCH INC $30.0M (33%); STAND TOGETHER INC. $20.0M (22%); WALTON, JIM C. $7.0M (8%); WALTON, S ROBSON $7.0M (8%); STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC $6.5M (7%)NRDC ACTION VOTES— $3.0M opposing Husted
· 3 ads on this pageLargest donors: NRDC ACTION FUND $3.1M (100%)EDF ACTION VOTES— $2.5M opposing HustedLargest donors: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND $8.7M (73%); MANDEL, SUSAN Z. $2.5M (21%); SALL, JOHN $100K (1%); SALL, VIRGINIA $100K (1%); HOSTETTER, BARBARA $100K (1%)LCV VICTORY FUND— $1.5M opposing HustedLargest donors: LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS, INC. $18.0M (84%); DEMOCRACY PAC $500K (2%); RANDALL, GIOVANNA $375K (2%); LAUFER, ERIC $375K (2%); GREEN ADVOCACY PROJECT $300K (1%)and 13 more
$38.6M through 2026-06-30individuals $31.1M · PACs $861K · party $200 · from the candidate's other committees $6.3M · cash on hand $16.2M
Outside spending
$45.7M opposing Brown · $1.5M supporting Brown· latest reported 2026-09-21
Largest outside spenders
SLF PAC— $21.3M opposing Brown
· 14 ads on this pageLargest donors: ONE NATION $70.7M (28%); ADELSON, MIRIAM $30.0M (12%); SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN A. $17.0M (7%); SINGER, PAUL ELLIOTT $14.5M (6%); MUSK, ELON $10.0M (4%)NO GOING BACK PAC INC.— $12.5M opposing BrownAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION— $4.2M opposing Brown
· 6 ads on this pageLargest donors: KOCH INC $30.0M (33%); STAND TOGETHER INC. $20.0M (22%); WALTON, JIM C. $7.0M (8%); WALTON, S ROBSON $7.0M (8%); STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC $6.5M (7%)OHIO FLYER PAC— $3.1M opposing BrownLargest donors: A PUBLIC VOCIE, INC. $1.0M (35%); TEAM HUSTED $513K (18%); CONNOR, LAWRENCE S $250K (9%); COLLERAN, BRIAN $250K (9%); CHEVRON CORPORATION $200K (7%)AMERICA PAC— $2.2M opposing Brown
· 8 ads on this pageLargest donors: MUSK, ELON $20.1M (>99%)and 19 more
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-212 variantsspend $600–79828,000–33,998 impressions
Forcing sex change surgery for young Ohio kids? That's what Sherrod Brown supports with his radical agenda.
Permanent surgical decisions with devastating consequences.
After 50 years in politics, Sherrod Brown has gone too far.
Appeal to FearLoaded LanguageExaggeration/HyperboleName CallingCard Stacking50.0% of sentences flagged
Appeal to Fear: The sentence frames gender-affirming care as forced surgery on children to provoke fear and outrage — for example: 'Forcing sex change surgery for young Ohio kids'
Loaded Language: The word 'Forcing' is emotionally charged and implies coercion and harm to children to trigger a visceral reaction — for example: Forcing sex change surgery and radical agenda.
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim grossly overstates the nature of gender-affirming care policies, misrepresenting them as forced surgical procedures on children — for example: 'Forcing sex change surgery for young Ohio kids'
Name Calling: The label 'radical agenda' is used to discredit Sherrod Brown without engaging with his actual policy positions — for example: 'his radical agenda'
Card Stacking: The sentence presents an extreme and unverified characterization of Brown's position as established fact, omitting any nuance or accurate description of the actual policy — for example: 'That's what Sherrod Brown supports'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-213 variantsspend $2,000–2,69780,100–95,997 impressions
OHIO: How extreme is Sherrod Brown?
He's embraced the extremist Democrat agenda and supports SEX CHANGE surgeries for Ohio kids.
After 50 years in politics, Sherrod Brown and his extremism cannot be trusted.
Loaded LanguageName CallingAppeal to Fear100.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: The word 'extreme' is used as an emotionally charged label to frame Sherrod Brown negatively before any evidence is presented — for example: 'How extreme is Sherrod Brown?'
Name Calling: The phrase 'extremist Democrat agenda' uses a derogatory label to discredit the political opponent rather than engage with their actual policy positions — for example: 'extremist Democrat agenda'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies a threat to children by associating the political opponent with medical procedures performed on minors, designed to provoke parental anxiety and fear — for example: 'supports SEX CHANGE surgeries for Ohio kids'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-19spend $400–49920,000–24,999 impressions
For 50 years, Sherrod Brown has voted in lock-step with Washington Democrats.
Now radical extremists are taking over, and we know that Brown will once again fall in line. He always does.
Sherrod Brown votes with Washington Democrats, not Ohioans.
Name CallingLoaded LanguageAppeal to FearRepetitionBlack-and-White FallacyAppeal to Prejudice75.0% of sentences flagged
Name Calling: The phrase 'radical extremists' is a derogatory label used to discredit a group without addressing their actual positions or arguments — for example: 'radical extremists are taking over'
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words like 'radical extremists' and 'taking over' are chosen to trigger alarm and fear rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'radical extremists are taking over'
Appeal to Fear: The claim that 'radical extremists are taking over' is designed to create anxiety about a threatening group seizing control, pressuring the audience toward a specific reaction — for example: 'radical extremists are taking over'
Repetition: The short declarative 'He always does' reinforces the prior claim about Brown's compliance through emphatic repetition of the same accusation, hammering the point for rhetorical effect — for example: 'He always does'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two options — voting with 'Washington Democrats' or voting with 'Ohioans' — implying these are mutually exclusive and that no overlap or nuance is possible — for example: framing a senator's votes as either for a distant political class or for his constituents, with no middle ground
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing exploits in-group/out-group identity by contrasting 'Washington Democrats' as an alien outside force against 'Ohioans' as the authentic local in-group, implying Brown betrays his own people — for example: positioning a senator as loyal to distant elites rather than 'real' constituents
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-192 variantsspend $4,000–4,598175,100–200,998 impressions
50 years in politics, and what does Sherrod Brown have to show for it? A record of voting exactly as he's told by Washington Democrats, no matter the cost to Ohioans.
Now extremists are taking over his party, and Brown will do what he's always done: fall in line. Every time.
Loaded LanguageAppeal to PrejudiceCard StackingName Calling100.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: The rhetorical question implies a long career has produced nothing of value, using dismissive framing to color the audience's perception — for example: 50 years in politics, and what does Sherrod Brown have to show for it? and voting exactly as he's told by Washington Democrats, no matter the cost to Ohioans.
Appeal to Prejudice: 'Washington Democrats' is used as an out-group label to imply that Brown serves distant elites rather than local Ohioans, exploiting regional in-group/out-group identity — for example: 'Washington Democrats' vs. 'Ohioans'
Card Stacking: The sentence presents only a negative characterization of Brown's voting record without acknowledging any instances where his votes may have benefited Ohioans, selectively omitting counterevidence — for example: 'A record of voting exactly as he's told'
Name Calling: The word 'extremists' is used as a derogatory label to discredit members of Brown's party without substantiating the claim — for example: 'extremists are taking over his party'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-182 variantsspend $200–39820,000–29,998 impressions
After 50 years in politics, Sherrod Brown is more extreme than ever.
Sherrod Brown supports SEX CHANGE surgeries for children.
Permanent decisions. Devastating consequences. When extremists demand it, Brown complies. Every time.
Loaded LanguageExaggeration/HyperboleAppeal to FearName CallingRepetition100.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: The word 'extreme' is an emotionally charged label used to trigger a negative reaction toward Sherrod Brown rather than convey a specific factual claim about his positions — for example: 'more extreme than ever'
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The superlative framing 'more extreme than ever' makes an absolute claim without evidence, overstating a characterization beyond what the facts presented could support — for example: 'more extreme than ever'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence is framed to provoke parental anxiety by associating a political figure with surgical procedures on children, implying a threat to child safety — for example: SEX CHANGE surgeries for children
Name Calling: The label 'extremists' is used as a derogatory term to discredit those making demands without addressing the substance of those demands — for example: 'When extremists demand it'
Repetition: The passage uses short, punchy declarative fragments repeated in rhythm ('Permanent decisions. Devastating consequences. Every time.') to hammer a message through familiarity and cadence — for example: 'Every time.'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-186 variantsspend $33,400–40,5941,610,000–734,995 impressions
Sounding the Alarm: A new revelation exposes Sherrod Brown’s extreme record supporting permanent sex change surgeries for Ohio children.
Read more on the story.
Loaded LanguageAppeal to FearFalse UrgencyName Calling50.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words are used to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts — for example: 'extreme record' and 'permanent sex change surgeries'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence invokes anxiety about children being harmed to provoke an emotional response rather than rational deliberation — for example: 'permanent sex change surgeries for Ohio children'
False Urgency: The phrase 'Sounding the Alarm' creates artificial urgency implying an immediate crisis requiring action — for example: 'Sounding the Alarm'
Name Calling: The label 'extreme record' is used to discredit Sherrod Brown rather than address his actual policy positions — for example: 'extreme record'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-183 variantsspend $8,000–9,497630,000–714,997 impressions
⚠️ Ohio: Sherrod Brown has gone too far with his radical agenda.
When Democrat extremists demanded PERMANENT sex change surgeries for kids, Sherrod Brown complied. Just like he does every time.
Ohio can’t trust Sherrod Brown and his extremist agenda.
Loaded LanguageName CallingAppeal to FearRepetitionExaggeration/Hyperbole100.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: The phrase 'radical agenda' uses emotionally charged language designed to trigger a negative reaction rather than convey factual information about Brown's policies — for example: 'radical agenda'
Name Calling: Labeling Brown's positions as 'radical' is a derogatory characterization used to discredit him without addressing the substance of his actual policy positions — for example: 'radical agenda'
Appeal to Fear: The framing of permanent medical procedures being performed on children is designed to provoke parental anxiety and fear to drive a negative reaction toward the named politician — for example: PERMANENT sex change surgeries for kids
Repetition: The phrase reinforces the accusation of blind compliance as a habitual pattern, rhetorically hammering the idea that Brown always capitulates to extremists — for example: Just like he does every time
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The absolute claim 'every time' overstates Brown's compliance as universal and without exception, going beyond what evidence could support — for example: every time
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-184 variantsspend $5,100–6,696435,000–509,996 impressions
Sherrod Brown supports sex change surgeries for kids.
Sherrod Brown puts Democrat extremists first. Our children pay the price.
After 50 years in politics, Sherrod Brown is too extreme for Ohio.
REJECT radical Sherrod Brown.
Name CallingAppeal to FearAppeal to PrejudiceBlack-and-White FallacyLoaded Language75.0% of sentences flagged
Name Calling: The phrase 'Democrat extremists' is a derogatory label used to discredit political opponents rather than address their actual positions — for example: 'Democrat extremists'
Appeal to Fear: The claim that 'our children pay the price' invokes anxiety about harm to children to trigger an emotional response rather than present factual argument — for example: 'Our children pay the price'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our children' invokes in-group identity to create an us-versus-them framing, implying Brown is harming the reader's own community — for example: 'Our children pay the price'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies Brown must choose between 'Democrat extremists' and 'our children,' presenting a false binary with no middle ground or nuance — for example: 'puts Democrat extremists first. Our children pay the price'
Loaded Language: The term 'radical' is an emotionally charged word chosen to trigger a negative reaction toward the named individual rather than convey factual information — for example: radical Sherrod Brown
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-188 variantsspend $13,100–15,592570,000–659,992 impressions
NEW: Sherrod Brown’s position on sex change surgery for kids is raising alarm bells for Ohio parents.
Brown’s record supporting permanent sex change surgery for children is drawing renewed attention. Read more.
Loaded LanguageAppeal to FearAppeal to Prejudice50.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: The phrase 'sex change surgery for kids' uses emotionally charged framing to provoke a strong reaction, while 'raising alarm bells' amplifies anxiety — for example: 'raising alarm bells for Ohio parents'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence is constructed to trigger parental fear by implying children are at risk due to a politician's position — for example: 'raising alarm bells for Ohio parents'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'Ohio parents' invokes an in-group identity to frame the issue as a community under threat from a political figure — for example: 'Ohio parents'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-195 variantsspend $1,600–2,495173,100–199,995 impressions
OHIO: Sherrod Brown has spent 50 years in politics. Now he wants ANOTHER term?
Sherrod Brown voted with Joe Biden 97% of the time. He supports higher taxes, open borders, and sex changes for kids.
After 50 years, we’ve seen enough.
Loaded LanguageName CallingConspiracy AppealAppeal to FearCard Stacking40.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: open borders and sex changes for kids.
Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments.
Conspiracy Appeal: Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence.
Appeal to Fear: The sentence lists policies framed to provoke anxiety — higher taxes, uncontrolled immigration, and gender procedures for children — designed to frighten voters rather than inform them — for example: 'sex changes for kids'
Card Stacking: The sentence selectively presents a one-sided characterisation of the subject's positions using loaded framing, omitting nuance or context about the actual policy positions — for example: 'open borders'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-199 variantsspend $2,600–4,291320,100–386,991 impressions
97% of the time... That's how often Sherrod Brown voted with Joe Biden, even when it meant higher taxes, supporting sex changes for kids, and open borders opposed by Ohioans. Brown always fell in line.
Sherrod Brown has never stood up to Democrat extremists. He won’t start now.
Loaded LanguageCard StackingAppeal to PrejudiceName CallingFalse Urgency80.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged phrases are used to trigger negative reactions rather than convey neutral policy positions — for example: sex changes for kids, open borders and Brown always fell in line.
Card Stacking: Selectively pairs a verifiable voting statistic with inflammatory and contested characterizations of policy positions, presenting them as equivalent facts without qualification — for example: placing 'higher taxes, supporting sex changes for kids, and open borders' alongside the 97% figure
Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes in-group identity by framing these policies as opposed by Ohioans, implying Brown betrayed his own constituents — for example: 'open borders opposed by Ohioans'
Name Calling: The phrase 'Democrat extremists' uses a derogatory label to discredit members of the Democratic Party rather than addressing any specific policy or argument — for example: Democrat extremists
False Urgency: The declarative 'He won't start now' implies a definitive, unchangeable future to foreclose deliberation and discourage voters from considering the possibility of change — for example: He won't start now
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-159 variantsspend $3,300–4,591238,000–284,991 impressions
Fifty years...
50 years of Sherrod Brown giving Washington Democrats every vote they needed. Now extremists are taking over, and Brown will fall in line again.
Higher taxes. Open borders. Sex changes for kids.
Times have changed. Sherrod Brown’s vote hasn’t.
Exaggeration/HyperboleName CallingAppeal to FearLoaded Language60.0% of sentences flagged
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim of '50 years' is an extreme overstatement used to paint Brown as a career loyalist without factual grounding — for example: implying decades of blind obedience
Name Calling: The word 'extremists' is used as a derogatory label to discredit the political group taking power without addressing their actual positions — for example: 'extremists are taking over'
Appeal to Fear: The phrase 'extremists are taking over' creates anxiety about a threatening political takeover to provoke alarm in the reader — for example: 'extremists are taking over'
Loaded Language: 'Extremists are taking over' uses emotionally charged language designed to trigger fear and revulsion rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'extremists are taking over'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by SLF PACfrom 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-1910 variantsspend $1,900–3,290188,200–222,990 impressions
OHIO: Sherrod Brown has spent 50 years in politics. Fifty years of doing what he's told by Washington Democrats.
Sherrod Brown voted for: higher taxes and open borders, and even supported sex changes for kids.
With extremists taking over, Ohio can't afford a Senator who always falls in line.
Loaded LanguageName CallingConspiracy AppealRepetitionAppeal to PrejudiceAppeal to FearCard StackingBlack-and-White Fallacy100.0% of sentences flagged
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts.
Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments. — for example: doing what he's told by Washington Democrats.
Conspiracy Appeal: Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence.
Repetition: The phrase 'Fifty years' repeats the time frame from the previous sentence to rhetorically hammer home the implication of subservience — for example: 'Fifty years of doing what he's told'
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing implies Brown is beholden to distant Washington elites rather than Ohio constituents, exploiting in-group/out-group identity between ordinary Ohioans and the Washington establishment — for example: 'doing what he's told by Washington Democrats'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence lists policies framed as threats — higher taxes, open borders, and gender-related medical care for minors — designed to provoke anxiety and alarm in the reader rather than inform — for example: 'supported sex changes for kids'
Card Stacking: The sentence selectively lists only negatively framed policy positions attributed to Brown without any context, counterarguments, or nuance about what he actually voted for — for example: 'Sherrod Brown voted for: higher taxes and open borders'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The framing implies only two options: a Senator who 'falls in line' with extremists or the implied alternative candidate, leaving no room for nuance or other possibilities — for example: 'can't afford a Senator who always falls in line'
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Not paid ads. These come from an officeholder's official channel: they are publicly funded and may not contain campaign content, so they are a different kind of speech from the ads above and are not counted with them. We show the same technique analysis; their claims are not checked, because an office's figures are mostly documented by its own press releases.
Husted: We make them right here in Ohio 08 31 26
Official office video · Senator Jon Hustedvideo · 0:40from 2026-08-31
I'm here outside the Lima Tank Plant. I was just in there watching the workers build uh the tanks that keep America's war fighters safe. And we're going to get more funding for this facility, a new generation of investment to upgrade this place to make the the next uh generation of weapon systems, which will provide secure jobs for the people that work at the Lima Tank Plant, and the 227 companies around the state of Ohio that are part of the supply chain for this. So, very, very important facility. It's important that we uh continue to support uh the best weapon system for America's military, and we make them right here in Ohio.
no techniques found
Watch on YouTube ↗Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.
Husted: Celebrating National Shooting Sports Month
Official office video · Senator Jon Hustedvideo · 1:09from 2026-08-31
Pull. >> We're here at Blackwing. They have a great shooting sports center here. We've been here for 24 years, family-owned business, and [music] specialize really in in all the shooting sports. So, we have indoor rifle and pistol ranges, outdoor shotgun ranges, gunsmiths, do large events, corporate events, really anything that you need we can provide. >> And what I've learned today is about how you have so many youth sports. A lot of schools are now doing shooting sports as part of their extracurriculars. >> We do. In fact, the shotgun sports is the fastest growing sport in high school right now, and we are seeing a boom with the with the high school kids here [music] at Blackwing. >> Yeah, it's really cool. Well, it's national shooting sports month. We're celebrating it. >> [music] >> Uh I made some progress on my target shooting today. DID OKAY. OH, BUT WE GOT A LOT OF room to improve on that. But, hey, I love being out here. I love hunting, I love fishing, I love all the outdoor sports that I can participate in, and we're we're grateful to have Blackwing hosting us today.
no techniques found
Watch on YouTube ↗Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.
My team helped Katherine regain her coverage, and they can help you, too.
Official office video · Senator Jon Hustedvideo · 1:31from 2026-08-25
Cathy Will, Lancaster, Ohio. I am a lifelong Ohio citizen. I uh was in the process of registering for Medicare and had worked with the local office. I was told that I wouldn't be able to register because the time had lapsed. So, I reached out to the senator's office and um I I was amazed, absolutely amazed at the contact. I do believe I received a response from an email within a day or two. Oh, the team at Senator Husted's office is wonderful with a capital W. The response was so timely. The team was able to approach their contacts in the Medicare office and explain the situation. I think it was approximately 1 month it was handled and I had my part B coverage. I received it in a timely fashion and I was able to make my appointments to take care of my medical concerns. If you have an issue that you're having trouble with resolution, I highly recommend it calling Senator Husted's office and talking to someone there. There's also an online um possibility and they are wonderful communication and also wonderful productivity and resolution.
no techniques found
Watch on YouTube ↗Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.
Husted: It's time to empower first-time homebuyers
Official office video · Senator Jon Hustedvideo · 1:07from 2026-08-20
When I got appointed to the US Senate, I committed myself to focusing on issues that matter to working families in Ohio. One of those things is making life more affordable for them. Home ownership is one of those issues. Home ownership has long been considered part of achieving your version of the American dream. But it's become difficult for many working families to afford housing and particularly for young people to have the hope that they can buy a home. That's why I'm leading a bipartisan firsttime home buyer empowerment act. This bill would allow people to use unused 529 college savings, of which 40% of Ohioans with children have these accounts. It would allow them tax-free to use these accounts towards a down payment for first-time home purchase. By freeing up existing resources, we're helping Ohioans get closer to buying that first home so they can achieve their version of the American dream. It's so important that we help young people off to a good start. Giving them flexibility on how they use 529 accounts is one of those things.
no techniques found
Watch on YouTube ↗Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.
Husted: It's time for a national voter ID law 08 08 26
Official office video · Senator Jon Hustedvideo · 1:22from 2026-08-08
Madam President, >> the gentleman from Ohio is recognized. >> Madame President, using a photo ID to vote is common sense. It's an issue Americans broadly support. So tonight, this early morning, I'm offering a clean, simple, straightforward bill to require a photo ID to vote in America. Voters can use a driver's license, a stateisssued ID, passport, military or veterans ID, or tribal ID. No additional restrictions, no tricks, no games, no prohibitions on absentee voting. 36 states require some form of voter ID. Photo ID laws have been tested in elections across this country and they work. So, so tonight I'm asking my colleagues to answer one simple question. Should you have to prove who you are when you vote? Americans think we should, and tonight we'll find out if their senators agree. I urge my colleagues to vote yes on this bill to establish a nationwide photo ID standards and give Americans better run, honest, and fair elections. Madame President, I yield the floor.
no techniques found
Watch on YouTube ↗Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.
What this page is
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in OH; or it ran mostly in OH and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific manipulative move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. The check runs once and its result is shown to everyone afterwards. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.
Get notified as this improves — new detection models, the browser
extension, and outlet scorecards. Occasional email, no spam.
Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time