Ohio Senate

Sherrod Brown is for the people not the powerful. Sherrod Brown is for the people not the powerful.

Glittering Generalities: The phrase uses vague, emotionally positive framing to position Brown as a champion of ordinary people without providing any specific policy substance — for example: 'for the people not the powerful'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies a binary opposition between 'the people' and 'the powerful', leaving no room for nuance or middle ground — for example: 'for the people not the powerful'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sherrod Brown has an important message for you >> Sherrod Brown has an important message for you >> Sherrod Brown has an important message for you >>

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Forcing sex change surgery for young Ohio kids? That's what Sherrod Brown supports with his radical agenda. Permanent surgical decisions with devastating consequences. After 50 years in politics, Sherrod Brown has gone too far.

Appeal to Fear: The sentence frames gender-affirming care as forced surgery on children to provoke fear and outrage — for example: 'Forcing sex change surgery for young Ohio kids'

Loaded Language: The word 'Forcing' is emotionally charged and implies coercion and harm to children to trigger a visceral reaction — for example: Forcing sex change surgery and radical agenda.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim grossly overstates the nature of gender-affirming care policies, misrepresenting them as forced surgical procedures on children — for example: 'Forcing sex change surgery for young Ohio kids'

Name Calling: The label 'radical agenda' is used to discredit Sherrod Brown without engaging with his actual policy positions — for example: 'his radical agenda'

Card Stacking: The sentence presents an extreme and unverified characterization of Brown's position as established fact, omitting any nuance or accurate description of the actual policy — for example: 'That's what Sherrod Brown supports'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

ALERT: The GOP is catching up in Ohio. We need your support to FLIP this seat BLUE. We’re fighting to fend off Republican incumbents and Flip the Senate in November – and that starts with Ohio. Republican incumbent Jon Husted is one of Trump’s most loyal allies, backed by his enthusiastic endorsement and millions of dollars from the GOP war chest. We’re backed by you. Every dollar you give today helps us maintain our lead in Ohio and secure a Democratic Senate Majority.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

OHIO: How extreme is Sherrod Brown? He's embraced the extremist Democrat agenda and supports SEX CHANGE surgeries for Ohio kids. After 50 years in politics, Sherrod Brown and his extremism cannot be trusted.

Loaded Language: The word 'extreme' is used as an emotionally charged label to frame Sherrod Brown negatively before any evidence is presented — for example: 'How extreme is Sherrod Brown?'

Name Calling: The phrase 'extremist Democrat agenda' uses a derogatory label to discredit the political opponent rather than engage with their actual policy positions — for example: 'extremist Democrat agenda'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies a threat to children by associating the political opponent with medical procedures performed on minors, designed to provoke parental anxiety and fear — for example: 'supports SEX CHANGE surgeries for Ohio kids'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🛑 Please don't scroll away! 🛑 Crypto is dumping $30 million into defeating Sherrod Brown, and we need your help to fight back. Ohio is the ONLY state they are targeting, and it’s with an historic amount in the final stretch of our race. These attacks just started, and we need to beef up our resources to respond. Please rush a contribution to help us fend off the onslaught. >> 🛑 Please don't scroll away! 🛑 Crypto is dumping $30 million into defeating Sherrod Brown, and we need your help to fight back. Ohio is the ONLY state they are targeting, and it’s with an historic amount in the final stretch of our race. These attacks just started, and we need to beef up our resources to respond. Please rush a contribution to help us fend off the onslaught. >>

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

It starts with Drag Queen Story Hour. It ends with kids going under the knife. Sherrod Brown supports it. Vote NO on Brown. It starts with Drag Queen Story Hour. It ends with kids going under the knife. Sherrod Brown supports it. Vote NO on Brown. It starts with Drag Queen Story Hour. It ends with kids going under the knife. Sherrod Brown supports it. Vote NO on Brown.

Appeal to Fear: The sentence frames Drag Queen Story Hour as the beginning of a dangerous progression, implying it is a gateway to harm — for example: It starts with Drag Queen Story Hour, It ends with kids going under the knife and Vote NO on Brown.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'Drag Queen Story Hour' is deployed as an emotionally charged trigger term designed to provoke a negative reaction in a target audience — for example: Drag Queen Story Hour and kids going under the knife.

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents a false linear inevitability — that one thing necessarily leads to another extreme outcome — collapsing a complex policy debate into a binary slippery slope — for example: 'It starts... It ends...'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that story hour inevitably leads to surgical procedures on children is an extreme overstatement unsupported by evidence — for example: 'It ends with kids going under the knife.'

Card Stacking: By placing Brown's name immediately after the fear-laden claim without context or nuance, the sentence implies he endorses child harm, omitting any actual policy position — for example: 'Sherrod Brown supports it.'

Name Calling: The sentence functions as a derogatory label by association, linking Brown to the previously constructed image of child harm without substantive argument — for example: 'Sherrod Brown supports it.'

False Urgency: The imperative 'Vote NO' is a direct call to action designed to channel the manufactured fear into an immediate electoral response — for example: 'Vote NO on Brown.'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Government-run health care. Sex changes for kids. Men in women's locker rooms. Ohio: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3. Government-run health care. Sex changes for kids. Men in women's locker rooms. Ohio: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'Government-run health care' uses negatively charged framing to evoke distrust of government control — for example: Government-run health care, Sex changes for kids and Men in women's locker rooms.

Appeal to Fear: The phrase implies a threatening scenario of government takeover of personal health decisions to provoke anxiety — for example: Government-run health care, Sex changes for kids and Men in women's locker rooms. Ohio: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3.

False Urgency: The specific date 'November 3' combined with 'VOTE NO' creates artificial time pressure to act before careful deliberation can occur — for example: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3

Card Stacking: The passage presents only alarming, one-sided claims associated with the candidate without any balancing information, selectively stacking negative associations — for example: Government-run health care. Sex changes for kids. Men in women's locker rooms

Scapegoating: The phrase implicitly blames Sherrod Brown for a threatening policy affecting children, attributing a complex social issue to a single political figure — for example: 'Sex changes for kids'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Government-run health care. Sex changes for kids. Men in women's locker rooms. Ohio: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3. Government-run health care. Sex changes for kids. Men in women's locker rooms. Ohio: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3. Government-run health care. Sex changes for kids. Men in women's locker rooms. Ohio: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'Government-run health care' uses negatively charged framing to evoke distrust of government control — for example: Government-run health care, Sex changes for kids and Men in women's locker rooms.

Appeal to Fear: The phrase implies a threatening scenario of government overreach in healthcare to provoke anxiety — for example: Government-run health care, Sex changes for kids and Men in women's locker rooms. Ohio: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3.

Black-and-White Fallacy: The message implies that voting against Sherrod Brown is the only way to prevent these feared outcomes, presenting no middle ground or nuanced policy alternatives — for example: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown

False Urgency: The specific date 'November 3' combined with the imperative 'VOTE NO' creates artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation — for example: VOTE NO on Sherrod Brown November 3

Card Stacking: The message selectively lists only alarming and negatively framed policy positions attributed to Sherrod Brown without presenting any counterbalancing information or context — for example: Government-run health care. Sex changes for kids. Men in women's locker rooms

Scapegoating: The phrase implicitly blames Sherrod Brown for a feared policy outcome affecting children, attributing complex social issues to a single political figure — for example: Sex changes for kids.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

It starts with Drag Queen Story Hour. It ends with kids going under the knife. Sherrod Brown supports it. Vote NO on Brown. It starts with Drag Queen Story Hour. It ends with kids going under the knife. Sherrod Brown supports it. Vote NO on Brown.

Appeal to Fear: Frames Drag Queen Story Hour as the beginning of a dangerous escalating sequence, designed to trigger anxiety — for example: It starts with Drag Queen Story Hour and It ends with kids going under the knife.

Loaded Language: The phrase is used as an emotionally charged trigger word intended to provoke a visceral negative reaction in a target audience — for example: Drag Queen Story Hour and kids going under the knife.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Presents an extreme and unverified causal endpoint as an inevitable conclusion with no supporting evidence — for example: 'It ends with kids going under the knife'

Black-and-White Fallacy: Implies a direct, inevitable progression from one event to a worst-case outcome, eliminating any middle ground or nuance — for example: 'It starts with... It ends with'

Card Stacking: Associates Sherrod Brown with the previously constructed fear narrative without evidence or context, implying he endorses harm to children — for example: 'Sherrod Brown supports it'

False Urgency: Issues a direct imperative call to action based on the fear narrative constructed in prior sentences, pressuring the audience to act without deliberation — for example: 'Vote NO on Brown'

Name Calling: Reduces Sherrod Brown to a target label associated with harm to children, discrediting him without addressing policy substance — for example: 'Vote NO on Brown'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

For 50 years, Sherrod Brown has voted in lock-step with Washington Democrats. Now radical extremists are taking over, and we know that Brown will once again fall in line. He always does. Sherrod Brown votes with Washington Democrats, not Ohioans.

Name Calling: The phrase 'radical extremists' is a derogatory label used to discredit a group without addressing their actual positions or arguments — for example: 'radical extremists are taking over'

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words like 'radical extremists' and 'taking over' are chosen to trigger alarm and fear rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'radical extremists are taking over'

Appeal to Fear: The claim that 'radical extremists are taking over' is designed to create anxiety about a threatening group seizing control, pressuring the audience toward a specific reaction — for example: 'radical extremists are taking over'

Repetition: The short declarative 'He always does' reinforces the prior claim about Brown's compliance through emphatic repetition of the same accusation, hammering the point for rhetorical effect — for example: 'He always does'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two options — voting with 'Washington Democrats' or voting with 'Ohioans' — implying these are mutually exclusive and that no overlap or nuance is possible — for example: framing a senator's votes as either for a distant political class or for his constituents, with no middle ground

Appeal to Prejudice: The framing exploits in-group/out-group identity by contrasting 'Washington Democrats' as an alien outside force against 'Ohioans' as the authentic local in-group, implying Brown betrays his own people — for example: positioning a senator as loyal to distant elites rather than 'real' constituents

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

50 years in politics, and what does Sherrod Brown have to show for it? A record of voting exactly as he's told by Washington Democrats, no matter the cost to Ohioans. Now extremists are taking over his party, and Brown will do what he's always done: fall in line. Every time.

Loaded Language: The rhetorical question implies a long career has produced nothing of value, using dismissive framing to color the audience's perception — for example: 50 years in politics, and what does Sherrod Brown have to show for it? and voting exactly as he's told by Washington Democrats, no matter the cost to Ohioans.

Appeal to Prejudice: 'Washington Democrats' is used as an out-group label to imply that Brown serves distant elites rather than local Ohioans, exploiting regional in-group/out-group identity — for example: 'Washington Democrats' vs. 'Ohioans'

Card Stacking: The sentence presents only a negative characterization of Brown's voting record without acknowledging any instances where his votes may have benefited Ohioans, selectively omitting counterevidence — for example: 'A record of voting exactly as he's told'

Name Calling: The word 'extremists' is used as a derogatory label to discredit members of Brown's party without substantiating the claim — for example: 'extremists are taking over his party'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

After 50 years in politics, Sherrod Brown is more extreme than ever. Sherrod Brown supports SEX CHANGE surgeries for children. Permanent decisions. Devastating consequences. When extremists demand it, Brown complies. Every time.

Loaded Language: The word 'extreme' is an emotionally charged label used to trigger a negative reaction toward Sherrod Brown rather than convey a specific factual claim about his positions — for example: 'more extreme than ever'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The superlative framing 'more extreme than ever' makes an absolute claim without evidence, overstating a characterization beyond what the facts presented could support — for example: 'more extreme than ever'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence is framed to provoke parental anxiety by associating a political figure with surgical procedures on children, implying a threat to child safety — for example: SEX CHANGE surgeries for children

Name Calling: The label 'extremists' is used as a derogatory term to discredit those making demands without addressing the substance of those demands — for example: 'When extremists demand it'

Repetition: The passage uses short, punchy declarative fragments repeated in rhythm ('Permanent decisions. Devastating consequences. Every time.') to hammer a message through familiarity and cadence — for example: 'Every time.'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ohioans set the record straight.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sounding the Alarm: A new revelation exposes Sherrod Brown’s extreme record supporting permanent sex change surgeries for Ohio children. Read more on the story.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words are used to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts — for example: 'extreme record' and 'permanent sex change surgeries'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence invokes anxiety about children being harmed to provoke an emotional response rather than rational deliberation — for example: 'permanent sex change surgeries for Ohio children'

False Urgency: The phrase 'Sounding the Alarm' creates artificial urgency implying an immediate crisis requiring action — for example: 'Sounding the Alarm'

Name Calling: The label 'extreme record' is used to discredit Sherrod Brown rather than address his actual policy positions — for example: 'extreme record'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

⚠️ Ohio: Sherrod Brown has gone too far with his radical agenda. When Democrat extremists demanded PERMANENT sex change surgeries for kids, Sherrod Brown complied. Just like he does every time. Ohio can’t trust Sherrod Brown and his extremist agenda.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'radical agenda' uses emotionally charged language designed to trigger a negative reaction rather than convey factual information about Brown's policies — for example: 'radical agenda'

Name Calling: Labeling Brown's positions as 'radical' is a derogatory characterization used to discredit him without addressing the substance of his actual policy positions — for example: 'radical agenda'

Appeal to Fear: The framing of permanent medical procedures being performed on children is designed to provoke parental anxiety and fear to drive a negative reaction toward the named politician — for example: PERMANENT sex change surgeries for kids

Repetition: The phrase reinforces the accusation of blind compliance as a habitual pattern, rhetorically hammering the idea that Brown always capitulates to extremists — for example: Just like he does every time

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The absolute claim 'every time' overstates Brown's compliance as universal and without exception, going beyond what evidence could support — for example: every time

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sherrod Brown supports sex change surgeries for kids. Sherrod Brown puts Democrat extremists first. Our children pay the price. After 50 years in politics, Sherrod Brown is too extreme for Ohio. REJECT radical Sherrod Brown.

Name Calling: The phrase 'Democrat extremists' is a derogatory label used to discredit political opponents rather than address their actual positions — for example: 'Democrat extremists'

Appeal to Fear: The claim that 'our children pay the price' invokes anxiety about harm to children to trigger an emotional response rather than present factual argument — for example: 'Our children pay the price'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our children' invokes in-group identity to create an us-versus-them framing, implying Brown is harming the reader's own community — for example: 'Our children pay the price'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies Brown must choose between 'Democrat extremists' and 'our children,' presenting a false binary with no middle ground or nuance — for example: 'puts Democrat extremists first. Our children pay the price'

Loaded Language: The term 'radical' is an emotionally charged word chosen to trigger a negative reaction toward the named individual rather than convey factual information — for example: radical Sherrod Brown

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

NEW: Sherrod Brown’s position on sex change surgery for kids is raising alarm bells for Ohio parents. Brown’s record supporting permanent sex change surgery for children is drawing renewed attention. Read more.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'sex change surgery for kids' uses emotionally charged framing to provoke a strong reaction, while 'raising alarm bells' amplifies anxiety — for example: 'raising alarm bells for Ohio parents'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence is constructed to trigger parental fear by implying children are at risk due to a politician's position — for example: 'raising alarm bells for Ohio parents'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'Ohio parents' invokes an in-group identity to frame the issue as a community under threat from a political figure — for example: 'Ohio parents'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Senator Jon Husted testified in the trial related to the largest public corruption scheme in Ohio history. As Lt. Governor, Husted worked closely with the company to pass the bailout after it helped fund his campaign, tried to distance himself from FirstEnergy executives. Prosecutors said that there are inconsistencies between Husted’s testimony and the evidence presented at court. News5 Cleveland Paid for by NRDC Action Votes

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ohioans set the record straight. Ohioans set the record straight.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted is at the heart of Ohio’s largest-ever corruption scandal. He led the charge to approve a $1 billion dollar bailout for FirstEnergy – after the utility supported his campaign with a million dollars. Today, Ohio families are paying $663 more a year for electricity, and bills are still climbing. Tiffin Ohio Paid for by NRDC Action Votes

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Asking urgently: Will you make a gift to help hit my $2M goal before our next end-of-month deadline – if, and only if, you can?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Husted testifies in FirstEnergy trial Sen. Jon Husted testified as defense witness in FirstEnergy bribery trial

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’ll be radically transparent with you: We need to do something different today. Over the last 48 hours, our grassroots fundraising has taken a nosedive. Folks just aren’t chipping in as much as we thought they would – even though the latest poll of Ohio shows this race statistically tied and we urgently need more resources to surge ahead. So I’m going to try something out of the ordinary. I’m going to lower my ask to $1 in the hopes that every person reading this message donates to help us close the gap. If you can give $1, thank you. If you can give more, that’s great. The most important thing is that we see thousands of donations come through the door today. It adds up fast when we’re all working together – so please, chip in at the link below.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

SCANDAL: A secret $1 million payment to help Jon Husted’s campaign, and Husted got FirstEnergy a massive, billion-dollar bailout. We weren’t supposed to know... they just want us to pay the price. Find out how Ohio is getting screwed at HustedHike.com.

Loaded Language: The word 'SCANDAL' in all caps and 'massive, billion-dollar bailout' use emotionally charged language to trigger outrage — for example: SCANDAL, massive, billion-dollar bailout and Ohio is getting screwed.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Describing the bailout as 'massive' and 'billion-dollar' stacks superlatives to amplify the perceived scale of wrongdoing — for example: massive, billion-dollar bailout

Conspiracy Appeal: Implies a hidden plot to keep information from the public, suggesting shadowy actors deliberately concealed the truth — for example: We weren't supposed to know

Appeal to Prejudice: Uses 'us' vs 'they' framing to create an in-group/out-group dynamic, implying ordinary people are being victimized by powerful elites — for example: they just want us to pay the price

Appeal to Fear: Implies that the audience will suffer financial consequences as a result of the alleged corruption, creating anxiety to drive action — for example: pay the price

False Urgency: The imperative 'Find out' combined with the emotionally loaded framing pressures the audience to act immediately without deliberation — for example: Find out how Ohio is getting screwed

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

SHERROD BROWN IS MORE EXTREME THAN EVER

Abused [music] and exploited by an extremist agenda forcing childhood sex change surgery, but Sherrod Brown stands with [music] these extremists. Brown supports sex change surgery for kids, permanent surgical decisions with devastating consequences. The extremists demand it, Sherrod Brown complies, and Ohio's children pay the price. Sherrod Brown, after 50 years in politics, the extreme egos are just too [music] much. SLF PAC is responsible for the content of this advertising.

Loaded Language: Words like 'abused', 'exploited', and 'extremist agenda' are emotionally charged to trigger fear and disgust rather than convey facts — for example: extremist agenda, abused and exploited.

Name Calling: Sherrod Brown is labeled as standing with 'extremists' to discredit him without addressing policy substance — for example: these extremists, The extremists and extreme egos.

Appeal to Fear: The sentence invokes the image of children being abused and exploited to generate fear and anxiety about the consequences of Brown's positions — for example: Abused and exploited, forcing childhood sex change surgery and permanent surgical decisions.

Repetition: The word 'extremist/extremists' is used repeatedly across the passage (sentences 1, 3, 4) to make the association feel true through familiarity — for example: 'extremist agenda', 'these extremists', 'The extremists demand it'

Scapegoating: Brown is portrayed as solely responsible for harm to Ohio's children by complying with extremist demands, oversimplifying complex policy debates — for example: 'Sherrod Brown complies, and Ohio's children pay the price'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Senator Jon Husted is fighting for clean, cutting edge energy. This midterm back Jon Husted so he can continue that fight by backing clean, practical energy.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Stop Sherrod Brown Stop Sherrod Brown Stop Sherrod Brown Stop Sherrod Brown

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

OHIO: Sherrod Brown has spent 50 years in politics. Now he wants ANOTHER term? Sherrod Brown voted with Joe Biden 97% of the time. He supports higher taxes, open borders, and sex changes for kids. After 50 years, we’ve seen enough.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: open borders and sex changes for kids.

Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments.

Conspiracy Appeal: Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence.

Appeal to Fear: The sentence lists policies framed to provoke anxiety — higher taxes, uncontrolled immigration, and gender procedures for children — designed to frighten voters rather than inform them — for example: 'sex changes for kids'

Card Stacking: The sentence selectively presents a one-sided characterisation of the subject's positions using loaded framing, omitting nuance or context about the actual policy positions — for example: 'open borders'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

97% of the time... That's how often Sherrod Brown voted with Joe Biden, even when it meant higher taxes, supporting sex changes for kids, and open borders opposed by Ohioans. Brown always fell in line. Sherrod Brown has never stood up to Democrat extremists. He won’t start now.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged phrases are used to trigger negative reactions rather than convey neutral policy positions — for example: sex changes for kids, open borders and Brown always fell in line.

Card Stacking: Selectively pairs a verifiable voting statistic with inflammatory and contested characterizations of policy positions, presenting them as equivalent facts without qualification — for example: placing 'higher taxes, supporting sex changes for kids, and open borders' alongside the 97% figure

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes in-group identity by framing these policies as opposed by Ohioans, implying Brown betrayed his own constituents — for example: 'open borders opposed by Ohioans'

Name Calling: The phrase 'Democrat extremists' uses a derogatory label to discredit members of the Democratic Party rather than addressing any specific policy or argument — for example: Democrat extremists

False Urgency: The declarative 'He won't start now' implies a definitive, unchangeable future to foreclose deliberation and discourage voters from considering the possibility of change — for example: He won't start now

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

The billionaires don’t want you to watch this. Peter Thiel. You know that name? Peter Thiel is a Silicon Valley billionaire who's worked for some of the biggest corporations and surveillance systems. He spent $15 million to elect JD Vance in 2022. And now he’s spending millions of dollars, and likely will spend tens of millions of dollars, against me. He’s trying to buy the Ohio Senate seat and install someone who he likes who will give him favors. We know more spending is coming, so will you chip in even just a few dollars to help me fight back and prove that Ohio is not for sale?

Conspiracy Appeal: Implies a shadowy group of powerful elites are secretly working to suppress information from the public — a classic conspiracy framing device — for example: 'they don't want you to know'

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety that powerful actors are actively working against the viewer's interests and access to information, pressuring them to act before it is too late — for example: implied suppression of truth by the powerful

Appeal to Prejudice: Exploits an in-group/out-group dynamic by positioning 'billionaires' as a hostile out-group conspiring against ordinary viewers, flattering the audience as truth-seekers being targeted — for example: 'they don't want you to know'

Loaded Language: The words 'buy' and 'install' are emotionally charged, implying corruption and puppet-mastery rather than neutral political support — for example: 'buy the Ohio Senate seat'

False Urgency: The phrase 'more spending is coming' creates a sense of imminent threat requiring immediate financial action, pressuring the reader to donate now before it is too late — for example: 'we know more spending is coming'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I can’t believe I’m saying this already. The first Ohioans are already voting. Everyone always jokes about how time flies, but I guess it’s true. This race is happening now. Time is running out to persuade voters before they cast their ballots. Please, chip in today so I can reach folks in every corner of Ohio. Thank you, and I urge people to vote early. I can’t believe I’m saying this already. The first Ohioans are already voting. Everyone always jokes about how time flies, but I guess it’s true. This race is happening now. Time is running out to persuade voters before they cast their ballots. Please, chip in today so I can reach folks in every corner of Ohio. Thank you, and I urge people to vote early.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Fifty years... 50 years of Sherrod Brown giving Washington Democrats every vote they needed. Now extremists are taking over, and Brown will fall in line again. Higher taxes. Open borders. Sex changes for kids. Times have changed. Sherrod Brown’s vote hasn’t.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim of '50 years' is an extreme overstatement used to paint Brown as a career loyalist without factual grounding — for example: implying decades of blind obedience

Name Calling: The word 'extremists' is used as a derogatory label to discredit the political group taking power without addressing their actual positions — for example: 'extremists are taking over'

Appeal to Fear: The phrase 'extremists are taking over' creates anxiety about a threatening political takeover to provoke alarm in the reader — for example: 'extremists are taking over'

Loaded Language: 'Extremists are taking over' uses emotionally charged language designed to trigger fear and revulsion rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'extremists are taking over'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’ll cut to the chase. This is our last end-of-quarter deadline before Election Day. My opponent, Jon Husted, has a vast network of billionaires and special interests writing him checks. Now Peter Thiel is pouring in millions of dollars against us, too. I don’t have that, but look, I don’t want it, either. I have you. I’m proud that our team is made up of grassroots supporters. Today, I need you to chip in. We’re almost at the end of this race. We need to keep our foot on the gas all the way across the finish line. Can you rush a donation to us? I’ll cut to the chase. This is our last end-of-quarter deadline before Election Day. My opponent, Jon Husted, has a vast network of billionaires and special interests writing him checks. Now Peter Thiel is pouring in millions of dollars against us, too. I don’t have that, but look, I don’t want it, either. I have you. I’m proud that our team is made up of grassroots supporters. Today, I need you to chip in. We’re almost at the end of this race. We need to keep our foot on the gas all the way across the finish line. Can you rush a donation to us?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

OHIO: Sherrod Brown has spent 50 years in politics. Fifty years of doing what he's told by Washington Democrats. Sherrod Brown voted for: higher taxes and open borders, and even supported sex changes for kids. With extremists taking over, Ohio can't afford a Senator who always falls in line.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts.

Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments. — for example: doing what he's told by Washington Democrats.

Conspiracy Appeal: Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence.

Repetition: The phrase 'Fifty years' repeats the time frame from the previous sentence to rhetorically hammer home the implication of subservience — for example: 'Fifty years of doing what he's told'

Appeal to Prejudice: The framing implies Brown is beholden to distant Washington elites rather than Ohio constituents, exploiting in-group/out-group identity between ordinary Ohioans and the Washington establishment — for example: 'doing what he's told by Washington Democrats'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence lists policies framed as threats — higher taxes, open borders, and gender-related medical care for minors — designed to provoke anxiety and alarm in the reader rather than inform — for example: 'supported sex changes for kids'

Card Stacking: The sentence selectively lists only negatively framed policy positions attributed to Brown without any context, counterarguments, or nuance about what he actually voted for — for example: 'Sherrod Brown voted for: higher taxes and open borders'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The framing implies only two options: a Senator who 'falls in line' with extremists or the implied alternative candidate, leaving no room for nuance or other possibilities — for example: 'can't afford a Senator who always falls in line'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

We fired Sherrod Brown once for putting the trans agenda ahead of Ohio's values. Get ready to fire him AGAIN! We fired Sherrod Brown once for putting the trans agenda ahead of Ohio's values. Get ready to fire him AGAIN! Sherrod Brown put the trans agenda ahead of Ohio values. Let’s defeat him and his radical agenda again.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'trans agenda' is emotionally charged and pejorative, designed to trigger a negative reaction rather than describe policy neutrally — for example: 'trans agenda'

Appeal to Prejudice: The framing of 'Ohio's values' implies an in-group identity that Brown has betrayed, positioning him as an outsider to the community — for example: 'Ohio's values'

Glittering Generalities: The vague appeal to 'Ohio's values' uses emotionally positive but undefined language to imply moral superiority without specifying what those values are — for example: 'Ohio's values'

False Urgency: The imperative 'Get ready to fire him AGAIN!' creates artificial urgency and pressure to act, discouraging deliberation — for example: 'Get ready to fire him AGAIN!'

Bandwagon Appeal: The use of 'We fired' and 'fire him AGAIN' implies collective prior action and pressures the audience to join in repeating it, leveraging crowd conformity — for example: 'We fired... fire him AGAIN'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence frames Brown's record as a binary choice: either you support 'Ohio's values' or you support the 'trans agenda,' leaving no room for nuance — for example: 'putting the trans agenda ahead of Ohio's values'

Name Calling: Labeling Brown's positions as a 'radical agenda' is a derogatory characterization meant to discredit him rather than address specific policies — for example: 'his radical agenda'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sherrod Brown puts the radical trans agenda over Ohio values. We MUST fire him again this November. Sherrod Brown puts the radical trans agenda over Ohio values. We MUST fire him again this November. Sherrod Brown puts the radical trans agenda over Ohio values. We MUST fire him again this November.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'radical trans agenda' uses emotionally charged, derogatory language designed to trigger fear and hostility rather than describe policy — for example: 'radical trans agenda'

Name Calling: The term 'radical' is used as a derogatory label to discredit Sherrod Brown without engaging with his actual policy positions — for example: 'radical trans agenda'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'Ohio values' invokes in-group identity to imply Brown is betraying his constituents and is not one of 'us' — for example: 'Ohio values'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence frames the situation as a binary: Brown is either for 'Ohio values' or for a 'radical trans agenda,' leaving no room for nuance or middle ground — for example: 'puts the radical trans agenda over Ohio values'

False Urgency: The capitalized 'MUST' and the time-bound phrase 'this November' create artificial urgency to pressure action without deliberation — for example: 'We MUST fire him again this November'

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'Ohio values' is a vague, emotionally positive appeal with no specific meaning used to contrast against the perceived threat — for example: 'Ohio values'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sherrod Brown supported biological men in women's locker rooms and bathrooms. Too radical for Ohio. Fire him again. Sherrod Brown supported biological men in women's locker rooms and bathrooms. Too radical for Ohio. Fire him again. Sherrod Brown supported biological men in women's locker rooms and bathrooms. Too radical for Ohio. Fire him again.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'biological men in women's locker rooms and bathrooms' is emotionally charged framing designed to trigger fear and disgust rather than describe policy accurately — for example: 'biological men in women's locker rooms'

Name Calling: The label 'Too radical for Ohio' is a derogatory political label used to discredit Brown rather than engage with his actual policy positions — for example: 'Too radical for Ohio'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'Too radical for Ohio' invokes regional in-group identity, implying that 'real Ohioans' would reject Brown's positions — for example: 'Too radical for Ohio'

Appeal to Fear: The framing of men in women's private spaces is designed to provoke fear and anxiety about safety and privacy to override rational policy evaluation — for example: 'biological men in women's locker rooms and bathrooms'

False Urgency: The imperative 'Fire him again' is a direct call to action framed as an obvious necessity, creating pressure to act without deliberation — for example: 'Fire him again'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

We fired Sherrod Brown once for putting the trans agenda ahead of Ohio's values. Get ready to fire him AGAIN! Sherrod Brown put the trans agenda ahead of Ohio values. Let’s defeat him and his radical agenda again.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'trans agenda' is emotionally charged and designed to trigger a negative reaction rather than describe policy positions neutrally — for example: 'trans agenda'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'Ohio's values' invokes in-group identity to imply Brown is an outsider betraying the community's shared beliefs — for example: 'Ohio's values'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence frames Brown's position as a binary betrayal — either you support 'Ohio's values' or you support the 'trans agenda' — leaving no room for nuance — for example: 'putting the trans agenda ahead of Ohio's values'

False Urgency: The imperative 'Get ready to fire him AGAIN!' creates artificial urgency and pressure to act, discouraging deliberation — for example: 'Get ready to fire him AGAIN!'

Bandwagon Appeal: The use of 'We fired' and 'fire him AGAIN' implies a collective movement that the reader is expected to join and repeat — for example: 'We fired Sherrod Brown once'

Glittering Generalities: 'Ohio values' is a vague, emotionally positive phrase used as rhetorical flourish without specifying what those values actually are — for example: 'Ohio values'

Name Calling: Labeling Brown's positions as a 'radical agenda' is a derogatory characterization meant to discredit him rather than engage with his actual policy positions — for example: 'his radical agenda'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

We were blessed to have Senator Jon Husted with us today. 🇺🇸

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

We were blessed to have Senator Jon Husted with us today 🇺🇸

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted has stood up to deliver tax relief for Ohio veterans.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

BREAKING: Trump’s super PAC just dumped $11.1M into Ohio to attack me. I have to respond ASAP. Can you help me fight back?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted will stop Washington’s progressive takeover to deliver real results for Ohio families.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'progressive takeover' uses emotionally charged language to frame political opposition as a hostile seizure of power rather than a policy disagreement — for example: 'progressive takeover'

Appeal to Prejudice: The contrast between 'Washington' as an outside threat and 'Ohio families' as the in-group exploits regional identity to create an us-versus-them dynamic — for example: 'Ohio families'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies only two options exist: Husted stops the takeover, or Ohio families suffer, leaving no room for nuanced policy alternatives — for example: 'will stop Washington's progressive takeover to deliver real results'

Glittering Generalities: 'Real results for Ohio families' is a vague, emotionally positive phrase that sounds meaningful but contains no specific policy substance — for example: 'real results for Ohio families'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Working families are already feeling the squeeze. Senator Jon Husted is helping stop a potential 12% increase in grocery prices by supporting one national ingredient standard. Thank him for standing up for families. Working families are already feeling the squeeze. Senator Jon Husted is helping stop a potential 12% increase in grocery prices by supporting one national ingredient standard. Thank him for standing up for families. Working families are already feeling the squeeze. Senator Jon Husted is helping stop a potential 12% increase in grocery prices by supporting one national ingredient standard. Thank him for standing up for families. Working families are already feeling the squeeze. Senator Jon Husted is helping stop a potential 12% increase in grocery prices by supporting one national ingredient standard. Thank him for standing up for families. Working families are already feeling the squeeze. Senator Jon Husted is helping stop a potential 12% increase in grocery prices by supporting one national ingredient standard. Thank him for standing up for families. Working families are already feeling the squeeze. Senator Jon Husted is helping stop a potential 12% increase in grocery prices by supporting one national ingredient standard. Thank him for standing up for families. Working families are already feeling the squeeze. Senator Jon Husted is helping stop a potential 12% increase in grocery prices by supporting one national ingredient standard. Thank him for standing up for families.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'feeling the squeeze' is emotionally charged, evoking hardship and economic pain to prime the reader emotionally — for example: 'feeling the squeeze'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence establishes anxiety about economic hardship for working families to set up a fear-based appeal for the subsequent political message — for example: 'Working families are already feeling the squeeze'

Card Stacking: The '12% increase in grocery prices' is presented as a factual threat without noting it is a projected or contested figure, lending unverified specificity to a political claim — for example: 'a potential 12% increase in grocery prices'

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'standing up for families' uses a vague, emotionally positive framing to associate the senator with noble values without substantive detail — for example: 'standing up for families'

Bandwagon Appeal: The directive 'Thank him' implicitly pressures the reader to conform to a positive collective response toward the senator, manufacturing social consensus — for example: 'Thank him for standing up for families'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

NEW: The registered Republican arrested after forcing his way toward Amy Acton while carrying two pistols and a Taser is the brother of Andrew Havas — the former Jon Husted campaign chair who resigned after scrutiny of a 2009 guilty plea in a case involving a 15-year-old and later gave more than $10,000 to Vivek Ramaswamy. Read more: https://s.tiffinohio.net/qXAGFr7

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

FIFTY YEARS OF SHERROD BROWN

For 50 years, Sherrod Brown voted how he was told. Higher taxes, open borders, sex changes [music] for kids. When Washington Democrats needed Brown's vote, he gave it [music] every time. Now, extremists are taking over and Brown will fall in line. He always does. Sherrod Brown, >> [music] >> times changed, his vote never does. SLF PAC is responsible [music] for the content of this advertising.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'voted how he was told' implies Brown is a puppet with no independent judgment — emotionally charged framing rather than factual description. — for example: voted how he was told, open borders and sex changes for kids.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Claiming 50 years of total compliance with instructions is an extreme overstatement that ignores any independent votes Brown may have cast. — for example: For 50 years, Sherrod Brown voted how he was told and his vote never does.

Appeal to Fear: The list of policy positions is framed as threats — higher taxes, open borders, and gender-related procedures for children — designed to provoke anxiety about Brown's record. — for example: Higher taxes, open borders, sex changes for kids and Now, extremists are taking over and Brown will fall in line.

Card Stacking: Selectively lists only the most inflammatory characterizations of Brown's positions without context, counterarguments, or nuance, presenting a one-sided picture.

Repetition: The idea that Brown blindly follows orders is repeated here ('gave it every time'), reinforcing the puppet framing established in sentence 1. — for example: gave it every time, He always does and times changed, his vote never does.

Name Calling: 'Washington Democrats' is used as a derogatory label implying a distant, out-of-touch political machine that controls Brown.

Black-and-White Fallacy: Implies Brown has no choice but to 'fall in line' with extremists, presenting no possibility of independent action or moderation.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

SCANDAL: A secret $1 million payment to help Jon Husted’s campaign, and Husted got FirstEnergy a massive, billion-dollar bailout. We weren’t supposed to know... they just want us to pay the price. Find out how Ohio is getting screwed at HustedHike.com.

Loaded Language: The word 'SCANDAL' in all caps and 'massive, billion-dollar bailout' use emotionally charged language to trigger outrage — for example: SCANDAL, massive, billion-dollar bailout and Ohio is getting screwed.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Describing the bailout as 'massive' and 'billion-dollar' stacks superlatives to amplify the perceived scale of wrongdoing — for example: massive, billion-dollar bailout

Conspiracy Appeal: Implies a hidden plot to keep information from the public, suggesting shadowy actors deliberately concealed the truth — for example: We weren't supposed to know

Appeal to Prejudice: Uses 'us' vs 'they' framing to create an in-group/out-group dynamic, positioning ordinary Ohioans against powerful elites — for example: they just want us to pay the price

Appeal to Fear: Implies ordinary citizens will suffer financial harm as a result of the alleged conspiracy, creating anxiety to drive action — for example: pay the price

False Urgency: The imperative 'Find out' combined with the emotionally loaded framing pressures the audience to act immediately without deliberation — for example: Find out how Ohio is getting screwed

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Senator Jon Husted testified in the trial related to the largest public corruption scheme in Ohio history. As Lt. Governor, Husted worked closely with the company to pass the bailout after it helped fund his campaign, tried to distance himself from FirstEnergy executives. Prosecutors said that there are inconsistencies between Husted’s testimony and the evidence presented at court. News5 Cleveland Paid for by WinSenate

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted is at the heart of Ohio’s largest-ever corruption scandal. He led the charge to approve a $1 billion dollar bailout for FirstEnergy – after the utility supported his campaign with a million dollars. Today, Ohio families are paying $663 more a year for electricity, and bills are still climbing. Tiffin Ohio Paid for by WinSenate

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted is at the center of the FirstEnergy corruption scandal that’s raising Ohio utility bills. Jon Husted is at the center of the FirstEnergy corruption scandal that’s raising Ohio utility bills.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted is at the center of the FirstEnergy corruption scandal that’s raising Ohio utility bills.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Please watch and consider making a donation to Sherrod’s campaign today >> Please watch and consider making a donation to Sherrod’s campaign today >>

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted constantly speaks as if he knows nothing of the subject he is speaking on. So let me get this straight. If we want to get rid of data centers we need to use bunny ears for our televisions? Like what the crap are you talking about. Husted doesn't understand or care about lives of rural Ohioans. Whose smart phone use has a miniscule role in the development of rural data centers. #ruralpathpartner #jonhusted

Name Calling: The sentence dismisses Husted as ignorant without engaging with his actual arguments — for example: constantly speaks as if he knows nothing of the subject he is speaking on and Husted doesn't understand or care about lives of rural Ohioans.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The rhetorical question exaggerates or distorts Husted's position to make it sound absurd — for example: reducing a policy argument to 'bunny ears for televisions'.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts.

Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence invokes rural identity as an in-group whose interests are being ignored by an out-group politician — for example: 'lives of rural Ohioans'.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Folks, we just got some news that could turn this race on its head: According to The New York Times, Elon Musk is planning to pour more than $100 million into buying the Senate – and Ohio is one of his first targets. And he’s not doing this alone. His operation is coordinating with the Koch network and other dark-money groups to flood the airwaves and drown us out. This is the same Elon Musk who gutted programs that Ohio families rely on and became the world’s first trillionaire while everyday people struggled with rising costs. Now, he wants to buy Ohio's Senate seat too. We can’t let Elon Musk and other billionaire backers decide who represents Ohio. That’s why my team just launched an urgent $200,000 rapid-response goal, and I need your help RIGHT NOW to hit it. This kind of money could make or break our campaign. And Musk has virtually unlimited resources to use to try and buy access, power, and control. This race is already shaping up to be the most expensive Senate race in U.S. history, and now Musk is about to hit us with a tsunami of tens of millions more. We have no room for error. If we don’t respond NOW, Musk’s money will tip this race before we can fight back. That’s why our $200,000 rapid-response goal matters so much. We need to prove that our grassroots team won’t let a billionaire buy this Senate seat. Your $5 might not seem like much against $100 million, but believe me, everything adds up when thousands of folks chip in a few dollars at a time. Please chip in today if you can. It has never been more important. Your support is crucial in these moments. Folks, we just got some news that could turn this race on its head: According to The New York Times, Elon Musk is planning to pour more than $100 million into buying the Senate – and Ohio is one of his first targets. And he’s not doing this alone. His operation is coordinating with the Koch network and other dark-money groups to flood the airwaves and drown us out. This is the same Elon Musk who gutted programs that Ohio families rely on and became the world’s first trillionaire while everyday people struggled with rising costs. Now, he wants to buy Ohio's Senate seat too. We can’t let Elon Musk and other billionaire backers decide who represents Ohio. That’s why my team just launched an urgent $200,000 rapid-response goal, and I need your help RIGHT NOW to hit it. This kind of money could make or break our campaign. And Musk has virtually unlimited resources to use to try and buy access, power, and control. This race is already shaping up to be the most expensive Senate race in U.S. history, and now Musk is about to hit us with a tsunami of tens of millions more. We have no room for error. If we don’t respond NOW, Musk’s money will tip this race before we can fight back. That’s why our $200,000 rapid-response goal matters so much. We need to prove that our grassroots team won’t let a billionaire buy this Senate seat. Your $5 might not seem like much against $100 million, but believe me, everything adds up when thousands of folks chip in a few dollars at a time. Please chip in today if you can. It has never been more important. Your support is crucial in these moments.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'buying the Senate' uses emotionally charged language to imply corruption and illegitimacy rather than neutrally describing political spending — for example: buying the Senate and dark-money groups to flood the airwaves and drown us out.

Conspiracy Appeal: Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence. — for example: coordinating with the Koch network and other dark-money groups.

Appeal to Fear: The imagery of being 'drowned out' by overwhelming outside forces creates anxiety about losing voice and power, pushing the reader toward a defensive response — for example: 'flood the airwaves and drown us out'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'Ohio families' and 'everyday people' invokes in-group identity to contrast ordinary citizens against a wealthy elite figure, fostering us-vs-them sentiment — for example: Ohio families rely on and everyday people struggled

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Framing Musk as 'the world's first trillionaire' alongside suffering families is used to amplify the contrast to an extreme degree, overstating the moral disparity — for example: became the world's first trillionaire while everyday people struggled with rising costs

Scapegoating: Musk is blamed as the singular cause of hardship for Ohio families and everyday people struggling with costs, oversimplifying complex economic and policy realities — for example: gutted programs that Ohio families rely on

Name Calling: Uses the label 'billionaire backers' as a derogatory descriptor to discredit Elon Musk and others without addressing their specific actions or arguments — for example: 'billionaire backers'

False Urgency: Uses artificial time pressure with capitalized 'RIGHT NOW' and the word 'urgent' to prevent deliberation and force an immediate financial response — for example: 'urgent $200,000 rapid-response goal' and 'RIGHT NOW'

Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents only two outcomes — respond immediately or lose — ignoring any other possible strategies or timelines — for example: 'If we don't respond NOW...before we can fight back.'

Bandwagon Appeal: Implies that thousands of people are already contributing, pressuring the reader to join the crowd — for example: thousands of folks chip in

Card Stacking: The sentence juxtaposes Musk's wealth accumulation directly against struggling families without context or counterargument, selectively framing the relationship as causal or morally equivalent — for example: became the world's first trillionaire while everyday people struggled

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Folks, we just got some news that could turn this race on its head: According to The New York Times, Elon Musk is planning to pour more than $100 million into buying the Senate – and Ohio is one of his first targets. And he’s not doing this alone. His operation is coordinating with the Koch network and other dark-money groups to flood the airwaves and drown us out. This is the same Elon Musk who gutted programs that Ohio families rely on and became the world’s first trillionaire while everyday people struggled with rising costs. Now, he wants to buy Ohio's Senate seat too. We can’t let Elon Musk and other billionaire backers decide who represents Ohio. That’s why my team just launched an urgent $200,000 rapid-response goal, and I need your help RIGHT NOW to hit it. This kind of money could make or break our campaign. And Musk has virtually unlimited resources to use to try and buy access, power, and control. This race is already shaping up to be the most expensive Senate race in U.S. history, and now Musk is about to hit us with a tsunami of tens of millions more. We have no room for error. If we don’t respond NOW, Musk’s money will tip this race before we can fight back. That’s why our $200,000 rapid-response goal matters so much. We need to prove that our grassroots team won’t let a billionaire buy this Senate seat. Your $5 might not seem like much against $100 million, but believe me, everything adds up when thousands of folks chip in a few dollars at a time. Please chip in today if you can. It has never been more important. Your support is crucial in these moments.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'buying the Senate' uses emotionally charged language to imply corruption and illegitimacy rather than neutrally describing political spending — for example: buying the Senate and dark-money groups to flood the airwaves and drown us out.

Conspiracy Appeal: Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence. — for example: coordinating with the Koch network and other dark-money groups.

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'drown us out' invokes an in-group identity of ordinary people being silenced by powerful outsiders, exploiting us-vs-them sentiment — for example: 'drown us out'

Card Stacking: The sentence juxtaposes Musk becoming a trillionaire with 'everyday people struggling' without providing context about whether these two facts are causally related, implying a direct connection that may not exist — for example: became the world's first trillionaire while everyday people struggled with rising costs

Name Calling: Uses the label 'billionaire backers' as a derogatory descriptor to discredit opponents rather than address their arguments — for example: billionaire backers

False Urgency: Uses artificial time pressure with capitalized 'RIGHT NOW' and the word 'urgent' to prevent deliberation and force an immediate financial response — for example: RIGHT NOW

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety by implying any mistake will lead to catastrophic failure, priming the reader for an urgent call to action — for example: We have no room for error and Musk's money will tip this race before we can fight back.

Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents only two options — respond immediately or lose — ignoring any other possible strategies or outcomes — for example: 'If we don't respond NOW... before we can fight back.'

Bandwagon Appeal: Implies that because thousands of people are chipping in, the reader should too, using crowd size to pressure conformity — for example: everything adds up when thousands of folks chip in a few dollars at a time

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Claiming this is the most important moment ever is an extreme overstatement unsupported by evidence — for example: It has never been more important

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted helped President Trump pass the Working Families Tax Cuts... over $3,100 back for the average Ohio taxpayer. Get the facts at MyOhio.Vote!

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sherrod Brown has an important message for you >> Please join Julia Louis-Dreyfus in supporting Sherrod Brown >>

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I just took a huge risk. Help me make sure it pays off. I’m no stranger to tough fights. Heck, I’m the only Democrat in Ohio who’s won statewide over the past two decades. But with election analysts projecting that spending could reach $749 million in this race – breaking the record for most expensive U.S. Senate race in history – and a recent poll showing me 3 points down, I had to do something I don’t usually do to fight back immediately. I made the decision to go up with new campaign ads, knowing full well that we didn’t have the money in the budget for them yet. The GOP is hammering me with false attack ads, and we have to reach voters with the truth before it’s too late. That’s what these new ads will do – but now, I need your help to keep them running all across Ohio. Will you chip in before the midnight deadline so we can spread our message far and wide, respond to the GOP’s attacks, and flip this crucial seat? I just took a huge risk. Help me make sure it pays off. I’m no stranger to tough fights. Heck, I’m the only Democrat in Ohio who’s won statewide over the past two decades. But with election analysts projecting that spending could reach $749 million in this race – breaking the record for most expensive U.S. Senate race in history – and a recent poll showing me 3 points down, I had to do something I don’t usually do to fight back immediately. I made the decision to go up with new campaign ads, knowing full well that we didn’t have the money in the budget for them yet. The GOP is hammering me with false attack ads, and we have to reach voters with the truth before it’s too late. That’s what these new ads will do – but now, I need your help to keep them running all across Ohio. Will you chip in before the midnight deadline so we can spread our message far and wide, respond to the GOP’s attacks, and flip this crucial seat?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Friend, this is a five-alarm fire. NYT reports Elon Musk is planning to funnel $100M+ to buy the Senate for Republicans, and Ohio is his top target. He’s teaming up with Koch network's dark money to bury us in ads. This is the guy who gutted programs that Ohio families rely on while becoming a trillionaire. We're fighting back. Help us reach our $200K emergency goal by rushing $25 to prove the ultra wealthy can't buy Ohio's Senate seat. Hey, it's Mark Kelly. I've spent my life around leaders – in the Navy, NASA, and the Senate. And I can tell you: Sherrod Brown is a true leader and one of the toughest fighters for working families I've ever met. I watched him up close in the Senate. When a vote was hard, he asked one thing: Is this good for the people who make this country work? And he never sold out. Not once. That's rare in Washington. Now he's in a battleground race in Ohio. It’s a toss-up race that could decide which party controls the Senate. The GOP is pummeling him with $100M in attack ads because they know they might lose this seat. Will you chip in to help him fight back? Look, I've been the candidate buried in attacks, wondering if support would come through. It did, because good people stepped up. Sherrod has spent his whole career having working people's backs. Let's have his now. Thank you, Mark Kelly

Appeal to Fear: The phrase 'five-alarm fire' creates extreme urgency and anxiety to override rational thinking — for example: 'five-alarm fire'

False Urgency: The dramatic framing implies an immediate crisis requiring instant action without deliberation — for example: 'this is a five-alarm fire'

Loaded Language: The phrase 'buy the Senate' uses emotionally charged language implying corruption and illegitimacy rather than neutral political spending — for example: buy the Senate and bury us in ads.

Conspiracy Appeal: References to 'dark money' and shadowy coordination between powerful actors implies a hidden sinister plot against the reader — for example: 'Koch network's dark money'

Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'us' constructs a clear in-group identity under threat from powerful out-group actors — for example: 'bury us in ads'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: 'Trillionaire' is a wildly exaggerated claim as no individual has ever achieved trillionaire status, making this an extreme overstatement beyond what evidence supports — for example: becoming a trillionaire

Transfer: The speaker borrows authority and legitimacy from respected institutions (Navy, NASA, Senate) to establish credibility before making a political endorsement — for example: invoking military and space agency credentials to validate a political claim

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive labels like 'true leader' and 'toughest fighters for working families' sound noble but carry no specific substantive meaning — for example: 'true leader' as rhetorical flourish without concrete evidence

Bandwagon Appeal: The inclusive 'Let's' implies a collective movement and social pressure to join in supporting Sherrod, nudging the audience toward conformity through implied group action — for example: 'Let's have his now'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Nobody in Ohio voted for Jon Husted. Politicians handed him the seat. Then he voted against bringing down grocery, utility, and energy costs.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

NEW: Vivek Ramaswamy put Linda Caudill on TV to blame Amy Acton for her mother’s death. What the ad leaves out: Her mother lived in Kentucky, died in a Kentucky hospice, and passed away six weeks after Acton left office. Caudill is also the GOP activist once dropped from Jim Renacci’s campaign after posting a “silencer” meme about Jon Husted. Read more: https://s.tiffinohio.net/WEQqec4

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Nine times, Jon Husted voted against lowering health premiums for Ohio families. Then Ohio insurers raised rates by as much as 37 percent.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted is at the center of the FirstEnergy corruption scandal that’s raising Ohio utility bills. Jon Husted is at the center of the FirstEnergy corruption scandal that’s raising Ohio utility bills.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A woman with dementia and a walker, dumped at a shelter that already had 100 people on its waiting list. Seven Ohio nursing homes did this, federal inspectors found — and Jon Husted co-wrote the 2002 law that made those facilities harder to sue, cutting the window to file suit and blocking inspection findings from court. He's since taken more than $1 million from the nursing home industry, and NBC4 found nursing home PACs and lobbyists have given at least $34,000 more to his Senate campaign this year alone. Read more: https://s.tiffinohio.net/EVUNe7k

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

📰 JUST IN: For decades, Washington liberals like Bernie Sanders and Ohio’s former Senator Sherrod Brown voted to rain down taxpayer benefits like Social Security and Medicaid on illegal immigrants. Click to read the full story. 📰 JUST IN: For decades, Washington liberals like Bernie Sanders and Ohio’s former Senator Sherrod Brown voted to rain down taxpayer benefits like Social Security and Medicaid on illegal immigrants. Click to read the full story.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words and phrases are used to trigger a negative reaction — for example: 'rain down taxpayer benefits' and 'illegal immigrants'

Name Calling: The label 'Washington liberals' is used as a derogatory tag to discredit the named politicians rather than engage with their actual policy positions — for example: 'Washington liberals like Bernie Sanders'

Scapegoating: Named politicians are blamed for directing taxpayer resources toward a disfavored out-group, implying they are responsible for harm to ordinary citizens — for example: 'voted to rain down taxpayer benefits...on illegal immigrants'

False Urgency: The 'JUST IN' framing creates an artificial sense of breaking urgency around what is described as a decades-long pattern, pressuring the reader to react immediately — for example: '📰 JUST IN'

Card Stacking: The sentence presents an unverified and misleading claim — that Sanders and Brown voted to give Social Security and Medicaid to illegal immigrants — as if it were straightforward fact, omitting that these programs are legally restricted from undocumented immigrants — for example: 'voted to rain down taxpayer benefits like Social Security and Medicaid on illegal immigrants'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A great meeting in Columbus with Senator Jon Husted

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Husted took more money from Epstein’s co-conspirator than anyone in Congress — then voted to block the Epstein Files. Husted took more money from Epstein’s co-conspirator than anyone in Congress — then voted to block the Epstein Files.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

The Senate adjourned for its August recess after passing a government funding bill, confirming Todd Blanche as attorney general, and advancing a Russia sanctions package, but the SAVE America Act was not brought to a vote. Sen. Jon Husted pushed to bring the election security bill to the Senate floor, arguing it would strengthen voter integrity through measures such as photo ID requirements, but Democrats blocked the effort and Republicans lacked the support needed to advance it. GOP leaders now plan to revisit elements of the legislation through a budget reconciliation package when Congress returns in September, which would allow Republicans to bypass a Senate filibuster.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sen. Jon Husted said the Senate's top priority before the August recess is passing a continuing resolution to keep the government funded and avoid a shutdown, calling it "job one." He also said Republicans are working to confirm President Donald Trump's nominees, including attorney general nominee Todd Blanche, while advancing legislation on election security, Russia sanctions, and cryptocurrency regulation. Husted reiterated his support for the SAVE America Act and voter ID requirements, saying, "We're also trying to get done to make sure President Trump has the team that he needs to govern and run America."

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sen. Jon Husted honored World War II veteran Sgt. Wayne Franklin Phillips on the Senate floor ahead of his 100th birthday, recognizing his military service during the Battle of the Bulge and his role in helping secure freedom during World War II. Husted also praised Phillips' decades of public service after returning home, noting his work as a Henry County commissioner, community leader, and founder of the family-owned Phillips Oil Company, where he still works nearly every day. Husted said Phillips embodies the values of the "Greatest Generation" and urged Americans to honor the service and sacrifices of World War II veterans so their stories are never forgotten.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Please don’t look away from this post. First, polling had me trailing my opponent, Republican Jon Husted, by 1 point. Then, the GOP started spending $133 million in Ohio to stop our grassroots campaign (the most they’re spending in any battleground state), and dark-money groups followed suit by launching ad buys of their own. Now, the latest poll has me slipping behind, this time trailing Husted by 3 points. The GOP’s attacks are working, and with analysts predicting this will be the most expensive Senate race in history, they’re just getting started. Will you rush a donation right now to help me fight back and win? Please don’t look away from this post. First, polling had me trailing my opponent, Republican Jon Husted, by 1 point. Then, the GOP started spending $133 million in Ohio to stop our grassroots campaign (the most they’re spending in any battleground state), and dark-money groups followed suit by launching ad buys of their own. Now, the latest poll has me slipping behind, this time trailing Husted by 3 points. The GOP’s attacks are working, and with analysts predicting this will be the most expensive Senate race in history, they’re just getting started. Will you rush a donation right now to help me fight back and win?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Please don’t look away from this post. First, polling had me trailing my opponent, Republican Jon Husted, by 1 point. Then, the GOP started spending $133 million in Ohio to stop our grassroots campaign (the most they’re spending in any battleground state), and dark-money groups followed suit by launching ad buys of their own. Now, the latest poll has me slipping behind, this time trailing Husted by 3 points. The GOP’s attacks are working, and with analysts predicting this will be the most expensive Senate race in history, they’re just getting started. Will you rush a donation right now to help me fight back and win?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

The billionaires don’t want you to read this. The billionaires don’t want you to read this.

Conspiracy Appeal: Implies a shadowy group of powerful actors (billionaires) are secretly working to suppress information from the public — a classic hidden-agenda framing designed to make the reader feel they are accessing forbidden truth — for example: 'they don't want you to know'

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety that powerful elites are actively working against the reader's interests and access to information, pressuring the reader into a defensive, reactive mindset — for example: implying suppression of truth by powerful forces

Appeal to Prejudice: Exploits in-group/out-group identity by positioning 'you' (the ordinary reader) against 'the billionaires' (a powerful out-group), fostering class-based resentment to prime the reader before any argument is made — for example: 'they' vs 'you' framing

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I need to thank you. You’ve chipped in to my campaign before, and your generosity hasn’t gone unnoticed. Today, I’m asking you to do something a bit different – but just as impactful: Will you add your name to personally endorse me in Ohio’s Senate race? I need to thank you. You’ve chipped in to my campaign before, and your generosity hasn’t gone unnoticed. Today, I’m asking you to do something a bit different – but just as impactful: Will you add your name to personally endorse me in Ohio’s Senate race?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’m not asking for money, so please keep reading. Polling showed me trailing my opponent, Republican Jon Husted, by just 1 point. But then, a dark-money group launched an eight-figure ad buy against me – bringing total GOP ad spending in this race to $133 million – changing the game overnight. Now, a new poll has me slipping behind – this time, by 3 points. Their attacks are working, and I’m defenseless without people like you. Will you add your name today to endorse my campaign and show the GOP exactly what they’re up against?

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety by claiming attacks are succeeding and the speaker is vulnerable, pressuring the reader to act to prevent a bad outcome — for example: 'Their attacks are working, and I'm defenseless without people like you.'

False Urgency: Implies an immediate crisis requiring the reader's intervention right now to prevent defeat — for example: I'm defenseless without people like you and add your name today.

Appeal to Prejudice: Frames the appeal around in-group solidarity against an out-group (the GOP), encouraging the reader to identify as part of a team opposing a named adversary — for example: 'show the GOP exactly what they're up against.'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted will continue working to cut taxes and deliver real results for Ohio veterans, their families, and communities across the state.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted is focused on cutting taxes and delivering real results that lower costs for Ohio families.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Nobody in Ohio voted for Jon Husted. He was appointed when JD Vance moved on. Then he voted nine times to raise your health care costs. November 3rd, Ohio gets a say.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Bipartisan bills to bring down grocery, utility, and energy costs came to the Senate floor. Jon Husted voted no on all of them.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted will lower costs and expand opportunity so more Ohio families can achieve their American Dream.

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'American Dream' is a vague, emotionally positive concept used as rhetorical flourish without any specific policy detail — for example: 'achieve their American Dream'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 U.S. Sen. Jon Husted (R-OH) took to the Senate floor to defend Ohio's photo voter ID law, arguing the measure boosted — rather than suppressed — electoral participation, and calling for similar requirements to be adopted nationwide. Sen. Husted pointed to Ohio's 71.71% turnout in the 2024 presidential election, claiming the state recorded its second-highest voter turnout across the last four presidential elections since the photo ID law took effect. Husted, who served as Ohio Secretary of State from 2011 to 2019 before being appointed to the Senate in January 2025, framed the data as proof that voter ID laws do not disenfranchise voters. His remarks came during Senate debate over the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act — legislation that would require proof of citizenship at voter registration and photo ID at the polls. The bill, sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and championed by President Trump, passed the House in February 2026 and was also folded into the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Ohio's own photo ID law, House Bill 458, was signed by Gov. Mike DeWine (R) on January 6, 2023. Ohio Secretary of State data shows the number of ballots rejected due to missing ID rose from 698 in November 2022 to 3,820 in November 2023 after the law took effect. Do voter ID laws strengthen election integrity, or do rising ballot rejections signal a barrier to access? 👇 #Ohio #VoterID #SAVEAct #ElectionIntegrity #SenHusted #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨NEW AD ALERT: Liberal Senator Sherrod Brown spent 32 years putting illegal immigrants ahead of Ohio families - and sticking Ohio taxpayers with the bill. Jon Husted will always fight for the people who elected him, not those who broke our laws.

Name Calling: The label 'Liberal' is used as a derogatory political tag to discredit Senator Brown rather than address his policy record — for example: Liberal Senator

Scapegoating: The sentence implies that illegal immigrants are the cause of harm to Ohio families and taxpayers, framing a complex policy issue as a simple blame narrative — for example: putting illegal immigrants ahead of Ohio families

Appeal to Prejudice: The framing of 'Ohio families' and 'Ohio taxpayers' as an in-group being harmed by an out-group exploits local identity and loyalty to generate resentment — for example: Ohio families

Loaded Language: The phrase 'sticking Ohio taxpayers with the bill' uses emotionally charged language to imply financial betrayal and exploitation — for example: sticking Ohio taxpayers with the bill

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that Brown spent 32 years consistently prioritizing illegal immigrants over Ohio families is an extreme overstatement of a complex legislative record — for example: spent 32 years putting illegal immigrants ahead of Ohio families

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two groups — law-abiding voters and lawbreakers — implying there is no middle ground or complexity, forcing a binary framing — for example: 'the people who elected him' vs 'those who broke our laws'

Glittering Generalities: The word 'fight' is used as a vague, emotionally positive term implying strength and dedication without specifying any concrete action or policy — for example: 'will always fight for the people'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sherrod Brown has an important message for you >> Sherrod Brown has an important message for you >>

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

re: my decision. I’m no stranger to tough fights or razor-thin margins. But shortly after Republican Jon Husted and the GOP started pouring a combined $81 million into this race to defeat me, I had to do something out of the ordinary. I made the risky decision to approve new digital ads – knowing full well that we don’t have the money for them yet. With experts predicting that this race could be the closest in the country, and with polls showing us neck and neck, failing to respond in this moment could put our chances of flipping Ohio in jeopardy. But now, I need your help to close this critical budget gap. Will you chip in before the midnight deadline so we can reach more voters with our ads and win in Ohio? I’m getting drowned out by $133 million in attack ad spending. We need today to be one of our biggest fundraising days so we can fight back. I know most folks aren’t able to chip in right now, but I’m hoping you’ll be the exception. If you want to flip Ohio and take back the Senate this November, will you please donate?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

"Folks, this isn’t good. The GOP and dark-money PACs are pouring millions into Ohio to defeat me, and it looks like their attacks are working: New polling shows me 3 points down to Republican Jon Husted in this Senate race. Without your immediate grassroots support, I’ll have no chance to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in whatever you can today?" "Folks, this isn’t good. The GOP and dark-money PACs are pouring millions into Ohio to defeat me, and it looks like their attacks are working: New polling shows me 3 points down to Republican Jon Husted in this Senate race. Without your immediate grassroots support, I’ll have no chance to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in whatever you can today?"

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted recruited data centers to Ohio. Now, utility bills are through the roof. Jon Husted recruited data centers to Ohio. Now, utility bills are through the roof.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I just made a tough call to launch new digital ads earlier than planned. I couldn’t sit back and let the GOP spread lies about me. Please chip in to ensure millions of Ohioans hear my message.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’m getting drowned out by $133 million in attack ad spending. We need today to be one of our biggest fundraising days so we can fight back. I know most folks aren’t able to chip in right now, but I’m hoping you’ll be the exception. If you want to flip Ohio and take back the Senate this November, will you please donate?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Folks, this isn’t good. The GOP and dark-money PACs are pouring millions into Ohio to defeat me, and it looks like their attacks are working: New polling shows me 3 points down to Republican Jon Husted in this Senate race. Without your immediate grassroots support, I’ll have no chance to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in whatever you can today?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Do you want to flip Ohio? Please read: ‎

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

ALERT: SCOTUS hands Donald Trump a HUGE win The Supreme Court just issued the worst ruling for campaign finances since Citizens United. This is a Republican power grab, plain and simple. And the truth is, it will be a disaster for our chances of flipping Ohio and the Senate if we don’t act immediately. Can you rush an emergency donation ASAP to help us fight back? Do you want to flip Ohio? Please read:

Loaded Language: The phrase 'power grab' is emotionally charged, implying illegitimate seizure of control rather than describing a neutral political action — for example: 'power grab'

Name Calling: Labeling the action as a 'Republican power grab' frames the opposing party as acting in bad faith without addressing the substance of the action — for example: 'Republican power grab'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence warns of a 'disaster' for electoral chances to create anxiety and pressure the reader into action — for example: 'it will be a disaster'

False Urgency: The phrase 'if we don't act immediately' imposes artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation — for example: if we don't act immediately, rush and emergency.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Please read: Please read:

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Please watch and consider making a donation to Sherrod’s campaign today >> Please watch and consider making a donation to Sherrod’s campaign today >> Do you want to flip Ohio? Please read:

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Sen. Jon Husted takes to the Senate floor to honor Rittman Police Sgt. Scott Ries, a 31-year law enforcement veteran killed in the line of duty on July 5, 2026. Sgt. Ries, 54, was shot and killed while responding to a disturbance call near 90 Chippewa Trail in Rittman, Ohio. Upon arrival, officers came under immediate gunfire. Four other officers and a Wayne County Sheriff's Office K-9 were also shot. Sgt. Ries had served the Rittman Police Department for 10 years and was promoted to sergeant in 2023 — a badge his wife, Michelle, proudly pinned on him herself. Sen. Husted honored Sgt. Ries as a devoted husband, father, and community member, keeping Michelle, their children, and his fellow officers in his prayers. Gov. Mike DeWine ordered flags flown at half-staff across Wayne County and at the Ohio Statehouse in his memory. Sgt. Ries served Ohio for 31 years — a true public servant who made the ultimate sacrifice protecting others. #SgtScottRies #RittmanPolice #OhioLawEnforcement #LineDuty #NeverForget #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I have some tough news: New polling reported by The New York Times shows me 1 point down to Jon Husted in Ohio's battleground race. Ohio is the most competitive and important race of the midterm elections, and poll after poll confirms that it will be a dead heat. Will you chip in right now to help us surge ahead and win in Ohio?

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Claiming Ohio is 'the most competitive and important race' is an absolute superlative that overstates its significance beyond what evidence supports — for example: 'the most competitive and important race of the midterm elections'

Bandwagon Appeal: Citing 'poll after poll' implies overwhelming consensus to pressure the reader into accepting the framing as settled truth — for example: 'poll after poll confirms'

False Urgency: The phrase 'right now' creates artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation and prompt an immediate financial response — for example: 'chip in right now'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

You wake up the day after Election Day ... We want you to imagine what it will feel like waking up the morning after Election Day. Really imagine. You wake up, roll over to look at your phone, and see the headline: “Sherrod Brown Flips Ohio. Democrats Take Senate Majority.” You feel proud knowing you chipped in to help push us over the finish line. Your morning coffee has never tasted better. But there’s another scenario that’s just as possible: Wake up. Roll over. Headlines. Your stomach drops. Republican Jon Husted wins by a razor-thin margin. You didn’t get involved because you thought others would – or that your donation wouldn’t make much of a difference. The truth is, this race will come down to a handful of votes. That means a handful of grassroots donations could be the tipping point. Including your donation. And right now, you have the power to help decide which scenario we’ll all be waking up to on Nov. 4. That’s why we’re asking you to chip in today to help make the first scenario come true. Sherrod needs your support to win in Ohio and bring our fight for working people to the Senate. Can he count on you today? Thank you, Team Sherrod You wake up the day after Election Day ... We want you to imagine what it will feel like waking up the morning after Election Day. Really imagine. You wake up, roll over to look at your phone, and see the headline: “Sherrod Brown Flips Ohio. Democrats Take Senate Majority.” You feel proud knowing you chipped in to help push us over the finish line. Your morning coffee has never tasted better. But there’s another scenario that’s just as possible: Wake up. Roll over. Headlines. Your stomach drops. Republican Jon Husted wins by a razor-thin margin. You didn’t get involved because you thought others would – or that your donation wouldn’t make much of a difference. The truth is, this race will come down to a handful of votes. That means a handful of grassroots donations could be the tipping point. Including your donation. And right now, you have the power to help decide which scenario we’ll all be waking up to on Nov. 4. That’s why we’re asking you to chip in today to help make the first scenario come true. Sherrod needs your support to win in Ohio and bring our fight for working people to the Senate. Can he count on you today? Thank you, Team Sherrod

False Urgency: The phrase 'right now' combined with a specific deadline date creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action rather than careful deliberation — for example: 'right now' and 'Nov. 4'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

If everyone reading this chipped in $25 to our campaign right now, we would be able to reach our midnight fundraising goal in minutes. But we know that $25 is a lot, so not everyone can or will make that donation. That’s why we’re doing something different today. We’re lowering our ask to just $1. Yes, just $1. That’s not a typo. We figure that if everyone gives just $1, we can still continue closing our budget gap in a meaningful way – and it will show the GOP dark-money PACs spending big against me that I’ve got a massive grassroots team by my side that’s not giving up without a fight. So please, will you chip in $1 today to fuel our movement, flip Ohio, and take back the Senate? Do you want to flip Ohio? Please read:

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

You wake up the day after Election Day ... We want you to imagine what it will feel like waking up the morning after Election Day. Really imagine. You wake up, roll over to look at your phone, and see the headline: “Sherrod Brown Flips Ohio. Democrats Take Senate Majority.” You feel proud knowing you chipped in to help push us over the finish line. Your morning coffee has never tasted better. But there’s another scenario that’s just as possible: Wake up. Roll over. Headlines. Your stomach drops. Republican Jon Husted wins by a razor-thin margin. You didn’t get involved because you thought others would – or that your donation wouldn’t make much of a difference. The truth is, this race will come down to a handful of votes. That means a handful of grassroots donations could be the tipping point. Including your donation. And right now, you have the power to help decide which scenario we’ll all be waking up to on Nov. 4. That’s why we’re asking you to chip in today to help make the first scenario come true. Sherrod needs your support to win in Ohio and bring our fight for working people to the Senate. Can he count on you today? Thank you, Team Sherrod

False Urgency: The phrase 'right now' combined with the specific deadline of Nov. 4 creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action rather than careful deliberation — for example: right now

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’ll be transparent: We’re running very short of our fundraising goals this month. So today, I’m trying something new. I’m lowering my ask to just $1 in the hopes that every person reading this pitches in to help us catch up. If flipping Ohio and taking back the Senate are worth $1 to you, will you chip in? I’ll be transparent: We’re running very short of our fundraising goals this month. So today, I’m trying something new. I’m lowering my ask to just $1 in the hopes that every person reading this pitches in to help us catch up. If flipping Ohio and taking back the Senate are worth $1 to you, will you chip in?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Big corporations are draining Ohio’s grid and spiking electric bills. I’ll make them pay for the electricity they use. Big corporations are draining Ohio’s grid and spiking electric bills. I’ll make them pay for the electricity they use.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Husted will keep working to deliver real solutions for Ohio and stand up for our communities.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Husted cut data centers “sweetheart tax deals” while our electricity bills exploded. Husted cut data centers “sweetheart tax deals” while our electricity bills exploded.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Don't look away. First, polling showed me trailing my corrupt opponent, Jon Husted, by 1 point. Then, National Republicans announced they're pouring $81 million into Ohio to stop our campaign – the most they're spending in any battleground state. And now, a brand new poll has me slipping behind, this time trailing Husted by 3 points. Their attacks are working. And they’re just getting started. Millions of dollars of ads targeting me are hitting the airwaves soon. The only way we can win this toss up race and flip Ohio and the Senate is with a massive outpouring of grassroots support today. We haven’t hit our $200,000 emergency goal yet, so I'm asking you personally: Will you rush a donation now to help us respond to the GOP's attacks before it's too late? Don't look away. First, polling showed me trailing my corrupt opponent, Jon Husted, by 1 point. Then, National Republicans announced they're pouring $81 million into Ohio to stop our campaign – the most they're spending in any battleground state. And now, a brand new poll has me slipping behind, this time trailing Husted by 3 points. Their attacks are working. And they’re just getting started. Millions of dollars of ads targeting me are hitting the airwaves soon. The only way we can win this toss up race and flip Ohio and the Senate is with a massive outpouring of grassroots support today. We haven’t hit our $200,000 emergency goal yet, so I'm asking you personally: Will you rush a donation now to help us respond to the GOP's attacks before it's too late?

Name Calling: The word 'corrupt' is used as a derogatory label to discredit Jon Husted rather than presenting any evidence of wrongdoing — for example: 'my corrupt opponent'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

If you care about flipping the Senate, please don't skip this video. If you care about flipping the Senate, please don't skip this video.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Please read and consider making a donation to Sherrod’s campaign today >> (1) New Message: Sherrod Brown

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Here’s what happened: First, we launched this campaign, and on DAY ONE, people from all 88 counties in Ohio stepped up to support us. Then, regular working folks signed on to endorse our campaign. Then, thousands more followed. Then, dozens of unions. Then, even more people added their names. The numbers keep climbing. Now, our momentum is real. We’re leading in two new polls, and analysts at the New York Times have named Ohio a key Senate race to watch. I know we can win this race. But we’re up against dark money groups and billionaires who have already launched attack ads. That’s why I need you with me. Help me fight back and win – will you add your name now to personally endorse my pro-worker, pro-union campaign for Senate?

Appeal to Prejudice: Creates an in-group identity by implying the reader belongs with the speaker, fostering a sense of shared identity and loyalty — for example: 'I need you with me'

False Urgency: The phrase 'add your name now' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'add your name now'

Glittering Generalities: Vague but emotionally positive labels like 'pro-worker' and 'pro-union' are used as rhetorical flourishes that sound noble without conveying specific policy substance — for example: 'pro-worker, pro-union campaign'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Sherrod Brown here. I’m running to unseat Republican Jon Husted in Ohio, and multiple election experts have shifted this race further in our direction. The Cook Political Report is now officially calling it a “Toss Up.” But listen, Ohio is the most competitive and important race this November – which means national Republicans are coming after me as their top target to beat. Husted and the GOP are spending a combined $83 million on baseless attack ads smearing my name. I need to build the largest grassroots movement Ohio has ever seen to fight back and win. Will you add your name today to personally endorse my campaign? Sherrod Brown here. I’m running to unseat Republican Jon Husted in Ohio, and multiple election experts have shifted this race further in our direction. The Cook Political Report is now officially calling it a “Toss Up.” But listen, Ohio is the most competitive and important race this November – which means national Republicans are coming after me as their top target to beat. Husted and the GOP are spending a combined $83 million on baseless attack ads smearing my name. I need to build the largest grassroots movement Ohio has ever seen to fight back and win. Will you add your name today to personally endorse my campaign? Sherrod Brown here. I’m running to unseat Republican Jon Husted in Ohio, and multiple election experts have shifted this race further in our direction. The Cook Political Report is now officially calling it a “Toss Up.” But listen, Ohio is the most competitive and important race this November – which means national Republicans are coming after me as their top target to beat. Husted and the GOP are spending a combined $83 million on baseless attack ads smearing my name. I need to build the largest grassroots movement Ohio has ever seen to fight back and win. Will you add your name today to personally endorse my campaign?

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Claiming Ohio is 'the most competitive and important race' is an overstatement used to elevate the stakes beyond what evidence supports — for example: 'the most competitive and important race this November'

Appeal to Fear: Framing national Republicans as 'coming after me as their top target' creates a sense of threat and urgency designed to provoke a defensive emotional response in supporters — for example: 'national Republicans are coming after me as their top target to beat'

Loaded Language: The words 'baseless' and 'smearing' are emotionally charged terms designed to discredit the opposition's campaign spending without engaging with the substance of the ads — for example: 'baseless attack ads smearing my name'

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive framing around 'fight back and win' that sounds energizing but carries no specific policy substance — for example: 'fight back and win'

False Urgency: The phrase 'today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'add your name today'

Bandwagon Appeal: Invites the reader to join a growing movement by personally endorsing the campaign, implying collective momentum that one should not miss — for example: 'personally endorse my campaign'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Here’s what happened: First, we launched this campaign, and on DAY ONE, people from all 88 counties in Ohio stepped up to support us. Then, regular working folks signed on to endorse our campaign. Then, thousands more followed. Then, dozens of unions. Then, even more people added their names. The numbers keep climbing. Now, our momentum is real. We’re leading in two new polls, and analysts at the New York Times have named Ohio a key Senate race to watch. I know we can win this race. But we’re up against dark money groups and billionaires who have already launched attack ads. That’s why I need you with me. Help me fight back and win – will you add your name now to personally endorse my pro-worker, pro-union campaign for Senate? Here’s what happened: First, we launched this campaign, and on DAY ONE, people from all 88 counties in Ohio stepped up to support us. Then, regular working folks signed on to endorse our campaign. Then, thousands more followed. Then, dozens of unions. Then, even more people added their names. The numbers keep climbing. Now, our momentum is real. We’re leading in two new polls, and analysts at the New York Times have named Ohio a key Senate race to watch. I know we can win this race. But we’re up against dark money groups and billionaires who have already launched attack ads. That’s why I need you with me. Help me fight back and win – will you add your name now to personally endorse my pro-worker, pro-union campaign for Senate?

Appeal to Prejudice: Creates an in-group identity by implying the reader is part of the speaker's side and should stand with them — for example: 'I need you with me'

False Urgency: The phrase 'add your name now' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'add your name now'

Glittering Generalities: Vague but emotionally positive labels like 'pro-worker' and 'pro-union' are used as rhetorical flourishes without substantive policy detail — for example: 'pro-worker, pro-union campaign'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

If you’re upset with what’s happening in our country and you want to flip the Senate this November, I’m asking for your donation today. Here’s why: 💪I’m in this fight for working people. 📊Polling shows this race statistically tied. 💰The GOP is spending $81 million to defeat me. The truth is, we’re facing an uphill battle in Ohio. But if folks like you chip in a little here, a little there, we’ll have the best shot in years at flipping this seat. Can I count on your support? If you’re upset with what’s happening in our country and you want to flip the Senate this November, I’m asking for your donation today. Here’s why: 💪I’m in this fight for working people. 📊Polling shows this race statistically tied. 💰The GOP is spending $81 million to defeat me. The truth is, we’re facing an uphill battle in Ohio. But if folks like you chip in a little here, a little there, we’ll have the best shot in years at flipping this seat. Can I count on your support?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

3 points, folks. That’s the polling gap between Republican Jon Husted and me in Ohio’s Senate race right now. I’m falling behind – just as GOP super PACs are pouring in millions of dollars to defeat me, and Husted is launching attack ads smearing my name. I need your immediate grassroots support to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in and help me reach my midnight fundraising goal? 3 points, folks. That’s the polling gap between Republican Jon Husted and me in Ohio’s Senate race right now. I’m falling behind – just as GOP super PACs are pouring in millions of dollars to defeat me, and Husted is launching attack ads smearing my name. I need your immediate grassroots support to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in and help me reach my midnight fundraising goal? 3 points, folks. That’s the polling gap between Republican Jon Husted and me in Ohio’s Senate race right now. I’m falling behind – just as GOP super PACs are pouring in millions of dollars to defeat me, and Husted is launching attack ads smearing my name. I need your immediate grassroots support to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in and help me reach my midnight fundraising goal?

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety about being overwhelmed by powerful outside forces (super PACs pouring in millions) to trigger an emotional response and implied call to action — for example: framing the situation as a dire threat requiring urgent support.

Loaded Language: Uses emotionally charged words to frame the opponent's actions as malicious and dishonest rather than simply competitive — for example: 'smearing my name'.

False Urgency: The phrase 'I'm falling behind' combined with the description of mounting opposition creates artificial time pressure implying immediate action is needed — for example: 'I'm falling behind' signals a crisis moment demanding response.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

If you’re upset with what’s happening in our country and you want to flip the Senate this November, I’m asking for your donation today. Here’s why: 💪I’m in this fight for working people. 📊Polling shows this race statistically tied. 💰The GOP is spending $81 million to defeat me. The truth is, we’re facing an uphill battle in Ohio. But if folks like you chip in a little here, a little there, we’ll have the best shot in years at flipping this seat. Can I count on your support? If you’re upset with what’s happening in our country and you want to flip the Senate this November, I’m asking for your donation today. Here’s why: 💪I’m in this fight for working people. 📊Polling shows this race statistically tied. 💰The GOP is spending $81 million to defeat me. The truth is, we’re facing an uphill battle in Ohio. But if folks like you chip in a little here, a little there, we’ll have the best shot in years at flipping this seat. Can I count on your support? If you’re upset with what’s happening in our country and you want to flip the Senate this November, I’m asking for your donation today. Here’s why: 💪I’m in this fight for working people. 📊Polling shows this race statistically tied. 💰The GOP is spending $81 million to defeat me. The truth is, we’re facing an uphill battle in Ohio. But if folks like you chip in a little here, a little there, we’ll have the best shot in years at flipping this seat. Can I count on your support?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Please read: (1) New Message: Sherrod Brown

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

(1) New Message: Sherrod Brown (1) New Message: Sherrod Brown

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Is there anything I can say to convince you to chip in to my Senate campaign today? What if I told you that experts at The Cook Political Report just upgraded our chances of winning, now officially ranking this race a Toss Up? What if I told you that the GOP is set to pour almost $80 million into Ohio to defeat me – more than in any other battleground in the country? What if I told you that they’re spending that much because the path to retaking Senate control runs straight through Ohio – and new polling shows this race neck and neck? So please, will you chip in what you can to help me flip Ohio AND the Senate? Folks, this isn’t good. The GOP and dark-money PACs are pouring millions into Ohio to defeat me, and it looks like their attacks are working: New polling shows me 3 points down to Republican Jon Husted in this Senate race. Without your immediate grassroots support, I’ll have no chance to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in whatever you can today?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Folks, this isn’t good: New polling shows me 3 points down to Republican Jon Husted in Ohio’s Senate race. Even worse, I’m falling short of my midnight fundraising goal – right as the GOP and dark-money PACs are pouring millions into Ohio to defeat me. I need your immediate grassroots support to fight back and win. Can I count on you? Folks, this isn’t good. The GOP and dark-money PACs are pouring millions into Ohio to defeat me, and it looks like their attacks are working: New polling shows me 3 points down to Republican Jon Husted in this Senate race. Without your immediate grassroots support, I’ll have no chance to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in whatever you can today?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Folks, this isn’t good. The GOP and dark-money PACs are pouring millions into Ohio to defeat me, and it looks like their attacks are working: New polling shows me 3 points down to Republican Jon Husted in this Senate race. Without your immediate grassroots support, I’ll have no chance to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in whatever you can today? Folks, this isn’t good. The GOP and dark-money PACs are pouring millions into Ohio to defeat me, and it looks like their attacks are working: New polling shows me 3 points down to Republican Jon Husted in this Senate race. Without your immediate grassroots support, I’ll have no chance to fight back and win. So please, will you chip in whatever you can today?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗