Political ads · 2026 · GA

Georgia Senate

Jon Ossoff (DEM, incumbent), Buddy Carter (REP), John King (REP), Jonathan Mccolumn (REP), Mike Collins (REP). 64 ads analyzed, 32 with at least one technique in the copy. Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.

Findings

As of 2026-09-23. Counts are of distinct ads; the same text run many times is one ad.

Ads analyzed
64 (Meta 57, YouTube 7) · started running between 2025-12-24 and 2026-09-22
With at least one technique
32 of 64 (50%)
Most common techniques
Loaded Language · 23 adsName Calling · 20 adsFalse Urgency · 16 ads
Meta
28 of 57 (49%) flagged · Loaded Language (19), False Urgency (16), Name Calling (16)
YouTube
4 of 7 flagged · Card Stacking (4), Loaded Language (4), Name Calling (4)
Reported Meta spend
$344,600–438,336 on all ads, $207,100–255,427 on flagged ads · Meta reports ranges; these are the sums of their ends
Example
“MAGA extremist opponent” — Loaded Language, paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATE · the flagged ad with the highest reported spend that shows the most common technique

Money in this race

From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money groups spent on their own for or against a candidate, reported within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named.

Jon Ossoff (DEM, incumbent)

Raised
$77.3M through 2026-06-30 individuals $67.8M · PACs $920K · party $11K · from the candidate's other committees $7.9M · cash on hand $42.6M
Outside spending
$209K for · $8.3M against · latest reported 2026-09-15
Largest outside spenders
SLF PAC — $5.9M against · 2 ads on this pageLargest donors: ONE NATION $70.7M (28%); ADELSON, MIRIAM $30.0M (12%); SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN A. $17.0M (7%); SINGER, PAUL ELLIOTT $14.5M (6%); MUSK, ELON $10.0M (4%) NO GOING BACK PAC INC. — $2.0M against NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND — $136K against AMERICA ONE — $88K against Largest donors: AMERICA ONE POLICIES $850K (30%); COTTON MAJORITY COMMITTEE $303K (11%); ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC $300K (11%); KARP, ALEXANDER C. DR.. $125K (4%); MILLSTONE, DAVID $120K (4%) FORWARD BLUE — $61K for Largest donors: SCHOFF, KEN $420K (30%); FIDELITY INVESTMENTS $210K (15%) and 15 more
Bundled through PACs
$283K through 10 PACs · FEC bulk data of 2026-09-20 JSTREETPAC — $228K from 356 gifts Lobbyist/registrant PAC JDCA PAC — $19K from 7 gifts ADVANCING DEMOCRACY AND MOBILIZATION PAC — $10K from 3 gifts SERVE AMERICA PAC — $7,000 from 2 gifts PAC FOR GOOD — $5,000 from 3 gifts and 5 more
162 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • A NEW DIRECTION PAC $10K
  • ACADEMY OF RAIL LABOR ATTORNEYS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • ADVANCING DEMOCRACY & MOBILIZATION PAC $10K
  • AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTL. PAC $10K
  • ALABAMA PEANUT PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, PEANUTPAC OF ALABAMA $2,500
  • ALL FOR OUR COUNTRY LEADERSHIP PAC $10K
  • ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS POLITICAL ACTION FUND $6,500
  • ALSOPAC $10K
  • AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION-COPE $10K
  • AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. $5,000
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC) $10K
  • AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY $1,000
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OB-GYNS PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY (RHEUMPAC) $2,500
  • AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVT EMPL PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES $10K
  • AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION $10K
  • AMERICAN FRUIT & VEGETABLE PAC AKA FAV-PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC $6,000
  • AMERICAN HOTEL AND LODGING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE ('HOTELPAC') $7,500
  • AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • AMERICAN MOBILIZATION PAC $10K
  • AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC INFORMATION ASSOCIATION PAC $1,500
  • AMERICAN PEANUT SHELLERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL ACTION $10K
  • AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
  • AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,500
  • AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
  • AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $5,000
  • ASCO ASSOCIATION PAC (ASCO ASSOCIATION PAC) $3,000
  • BEAT THE ODDS PAC $10K
  • BEEPAC (BUILDING ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT PAC) $1,000
  • BLUE AMP ACTION PAC $1,000
  • BLUE HEN FEDERAL PAC $10K
  • BLUE SENATE PAC $10K
  • BUILDING BLUE $10K
  • CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS $5,000
  • CLEAN ENERGY FOR AMERICA ACTION PAC $500
  • COMMITTEE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COTTON $5,000
  • COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE PAC $1,000
  • COMMON GROUND PAC $10K
  • COMMON SENSE COLORADO $10K
  • COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA - COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEE $5,000
  • COURAGE TO CHANGE $5,000
  • CTIA THE WIRELESS PAC $3,500
  • D.R.I.V.E. - DEM, REP, IND VOTER ED (THE PAC OF THE INT'L BRHD OF TEAMSTERS) $10K
  • DEFEND THE DREAM PAC $7,500
  • DEFEND THE DREAM PAC $2,500
  • DEMOCRACY ACTION NOW PAC $2,000
  • DEMOCRATIC CONSERVATION ALLIANCE PAC $1,000
  • EDUCATE AND INNOVATE PAC $5,000
  • ELECT DEMS NOW PAC $1,500
  • END CITIZENS UNITED $5,000
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND PAC (EDAF PAC) $2,000
  • EVERY VOTE PAC $5,000
  • FAYETTE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $500
  • FIGHT FOR PROGRESS PAC $2,000
  • FOLLOW THE NORTH STAR FUND $10K
  • FORWARD TOGETHER PAC $10K
  • FRIENDS OF DICK DURBIN COMMITTEE $2,000
  • FRIENDS OF TOM BYRNE $2,000
  • GEORGIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, INC. FEDERAL IMPACT FUND $3,300
  • GIDDY UP PAC $10K
  • GIFFORDS PAC $2,500
  • GRANITE VALUES PAC $10K
  • GREAT LAKES PAC $10K
  • HAWAII PAC $10K
  • HOOPS PAC $10K
  • HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN PAC $1,118
  • HUMANE WORLD ACTION FUND PAC $2,000
  • I GOT YOUR BACK PAC $10K
  • IBEW PAC VOLUNTARY FUND $5,000
  • IMPACT $10K
  • IN OUR HANDS PAC $10K
  • INT'L. ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL & REINFORCING IRON WORKERS (IPAL) $1,000
  • INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC $7,500
  • INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION $10K
  • INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS $10K
  • JUNTOS PAC $5,000
  • KEYSTONE AMERICA PAC $10K
  • KIDSPAC $5,000
  • LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PAC $5,000
  • LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS ACTION FUND $2,615
  • LIFTOFF PAC $10K
  • LOBO PAC $10K
  • M-PAC $10K
  • MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS $10K
  • MAKE IT WORK PAC $5,000
  • MAPLE PAC $5,000
  • MARK KELLY FOR SENATE $4,000
  • MASTERS, MATES & PILOTS POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION FUND $2,500
  • MITTEN PAC $10K
  • MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (MORPAC) $10K
  • MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (MPAAMERICA PAC) $1,000
  • MOTOR CITY PAC $10K
  • MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION $5,000
  • NARRAGANSETT BAY PAC $10K
  • NATIONAL ACTIVE AND RETIRED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES (NARFE) $2,500
  • NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION PAC $7,500
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BENEFITS AND INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS PAC (NABIP PAC) $2,500
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS OF THE USA POLITICAL FUND $5,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION FOR CANDIDATE ELECTION (PACE) $2,000
  • NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION $5,000
  • NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION PAC (CORNPAC) $2,500
  • NATIONAL ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL NURSES UNITED PAC $2,000
  • NATIONAL PEANUT BUYING POINTS ASSOCIATION PEANUT BUYING POINT PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL PECAN FEDERATION INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PECAN PAC) $5,000
  • NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL PORK PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION - DIVISION OF LABORERS' INT'L UNION OF NORTH AMERICA $5,000
  • NATIONAL RURAL LETTER CARRIERS ASSOCIATION PAC $7,500
  • NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
  • NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATION $5,000
  • NICK ALEX FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • NO SURRENDER FUND $5,000
  • NORTH AMERICA'S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS POLITICAL EDUCATIONAL FUND $3,000
  • NRDC ACTION FUND PAC $1,000
  • NUTMEG PAC $10K
  • OCEANS PAC $10K
  • PAC OF THE INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES $5,000
  • PAC TO THE FUTURE $5,000
  • PEOPLE'S VOICES PAC $10K
  • PERIMETER PAC $10K
  • PINEAPPLE PAC $10K
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND, INC. PAC $782
  • PRAIRIE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • PROFESSIONAL AVIATION SAFETY SPECIALISTS PAC $5,000
  • PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $5,000
  • PURPOSE PAC $10K
  • REV UP PAC $10K
  • RISING DEMS $3,500
  • SAVE DEMOCRACY PAC $10K
  • SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION PAC $1,000
  • SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION) $5,000
  • SERVING OUR COUNTRY PAC $2,000
  • SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUE $5,000
  • SMALL BUSINESS COUNCIL OF AMERICA-PAC $1,000
  • SMART SOLUTIONS PAC $10K
  • SOUTHEAST COTTON COMMITTEE (SECC) SOUTHERN COTTON GROWERS INC/SE COTTON GINNERS ASSN $5,000
  • SPEAK UP PAC $8,500
  • STAND UP FOR WORKERS PAC $5,000
  • STANTON FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • TECHNOLOGY NETWORK (TECHNET) FEDERAL PAC $2,500
  • TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION $2,500
  • TRUEDEM LEADERSHIP FUND $5,000
  • TURQUOISE PAC $10K
  • UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION $1,500
  • UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA - COAL MINERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • UNITED POSTMASTERS AND MANAGERS OF AMERICA POLITICAL FUND $1,000
  • UNITED STATES PEANUT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (US PEANUT PAC) $5,000
  • US TRAVEL ASSOCIATION PAC $2,500
  • USA RICE FEDERATION PAC $1,000
  • VELVET HAMMER PAC $5,000
  • VICTORY NOW PAC $10K
  • VOTER PROTECTION PROJECT $10K
  • YOUTH SAVE DEMOCRACY $5,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

Buddy Carter (REP)

Raised
$7.3M through 2026-06-30 individuals $1.9M · PACs $1.1M · candidate's own money, incl. loans $3.5M · from the candidate's other committees $635K · cash on hand $60K
Outside spending
$0 for · $489K against · latest reported 2026-05-13
Largest outside spenders
WIN IT BACK PAC — $489K against Largest donors: CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION $4.5M (40%); YASS, JEFF MR. $4.5M (39%); SCHOOL FREEDOM FUND $1.9M (17%); ROJ, WILLIAM H. MR. $300K (3%); SANDLER, RICKY $100K (1%)
Bundled through PACs
$2,000 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-09-20 AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE — $2,000 from 2 gifts Lobbyist/registrant PAC
305 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • ABBOTT LABORATORIES EMPLOYEE PAC $2,500
  • ABBVIE PAC $10K
  • ABRAHAM LINCOLN PAC $2,500
  • ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS PAC $2,500
  • ADVANCED MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
  • AGRICULTUTAL RETAILERS ASSOCIAION PAC $2,500
  • AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP CIVIC ACTION COMMITTEE (AKA AKIN GUMP PAC) $1,875
  • ALLEGIANT TRAVEL COMPANY PAC $2,500
  • ALLIANCE FOR PHARMACY COMPOUNDING PAC (COMP PAC) $10K
  • ALLIANCE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE PAC ARM PAC $5,000
  • ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. PAC (ALNYLAM PAC) $2,500
  • ALSTON & BIRD PAC $2,000
  • ALTICOR, INC. PAC ALTIPAC $2,500
  • ALTRIA GROUP, INC. PAC $2,500
  • ALZHEIMERS IMPACT MOVEMENT PAC $1,000
  • AMERICA RELOADED $10K
  • AMERICA'S FIRST PAC $5,000
  • AMERICA'S MOUNTAIN PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC (SKINPAC) $2,500
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS PAC $3,500
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY BRAINPAC $3,500
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC POLITICAL COMMITTEE (OPHTHPAC) $3,500
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY ENT PAC $1,000
  • AMERICAN AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION FEDERAL PAC (AKA AMBU-PAC) $1,000
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY PAC (AACAP-PAC) $1,000
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS PAC (NEUROSURGERYPAC) $1,000
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $4,000
  • AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC) $2,500
  • AMERICAN BEVERAGE ASSOCIATION PAC (AKA AMERICAN BEVERAGE PAC) $1,000
  • AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION INC PAC (ACA PAC) $2,000
  • AMERICAN CAR RENTAL ASSOCIATION PAC $2,000
  • AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION PAC $3,000
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY PAC $1,000
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC PAC; AKA ACP SERVICES PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC $2,000
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY (RHEUMPAC) $5,000
  • AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION PAC $3,500
  • AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMPANIES $2,000
  • AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC. PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOC.-PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN HOTEL AND LODGING ASSOCIATION PAC ('HOTELPAC') $5,000
  • AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PAC $3,000
  • AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $15K
  • AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC INFORMATION ASSOCIATION - OSTEOPATHIC PAC $1,000
  • AMERICAN PHARMACIES, INC. FEDERAL PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10K
  • AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION PHYSICAL THERAPY PAC (PT-PAC) $10K
  • AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION PAC $2,000
  • AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY PAC (''ASTRO-PAC'') $1,000
  • AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS PAC $1,500
  • AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH SYSTEM PHARMACIST - PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN STAFFING ASSOCIATION STAFFING PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. PAC (AUAPAC) $3,500
  • AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN WATERWAYS OPERATORS-PAC $1,000
  • AMGEN INC. PAC $10K
  • AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS INC. PAC $1,000
  • ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION PAC $4,500
  • ARDELYX, INC. PAC (ARDX PAC) $5,500
  • ARGENTUM'S SILVER PAC $2,000
  • ARNOLD & PORTER LLP PARTNERS PAC $2,500
  • ASCO ASSOCIATION PAC (ASCO ASSOCIATION PAC) $1,000
  • ASTELLAS US LLC PAC (ASTELLAS PAC) $3,000
  • AT&T INC. FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AT&T FEDERAL PAC) $3,000
  • ATA ACTION PAC $1,000
  • AVANGRID PAC $3,000
  • BADLANDS PAC $5,000
  • BAKER & HOSTETLER PAC $1,000
  • BALCH & BINGHAM LLP PAC $5,000
  • BASF CORPORATION EMPLOYEES PAC $2,500
  • BAYER CORPORATION PAC $1,000
  • BENTLEY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED FEDERAL PAC $3,000
  • BIG IDEAS CREATE EXCELLENCE PAC $1,000
  • BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. PAC AKA BIOMARIN PAC $7,500
  • BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION PAC (BIO PAC) $1,000
  • BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION PAC $5,000
  • BOOTS PAC $5,000
  • BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION PAC ('BSC PAC') $2,500
  • BRINGING REPUBLICAN EXCELLENCE TO TOWN PAC $10K
  • BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY PAC (BMS PAC) $3,000
  • BRUCE POLIQUIN FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • BUDDY PAC $5,000
  • BUILDING AMERICA'S REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATION PAC $10K
  • BUILDING AMERICAN CONSERVATISM PAC $2,000
  • BUILDING LEADERSHIP AND INSPIRING NEW ENTERPRISE PAC $5,000
  • BULLDOG PAC $4,000
  • BURCHETT FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • CALL TO SERVICE PAC $2,500
  • CARDINAL HEALTH INC. PAC AKA CARDINAL HEALTH COMPANIES PAC $10K
  • CAREY FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • CAROL FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • CARRY ON PAC $5,000
  • CATALENT, INC. PAC $2,500
  • CATERPILLAR INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CATPAC) $5,000
  • CELANESE CORPORATION PAC $5,000
  • CENCORA, INC. PAC $10K
  • CGCN PAC $2,500
  • CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PAC (US CHAMBER PAC) $2,500
  • CHEMOURS COMPANY PAC 'CHEMOURS PAC'; THE $1,000
  • CHEVRON EMPLOYEES PAC - CHEVRON CORPORATION $5,000
  • CITIZENS ORGANIZED PAC $5,000
  • CMR POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,500
  • COHERUS BIOSCIENCES PAC $15K
  • COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,000
  • COMMITTEE TO ELECT RON STEPHENS $500
  • CONCORDIA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, INC. $5,000
  • CONSERVATIVE CLIMATE ACTION PAC $1,000
  • CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP IN ELECTIONS PAC $3,500
  • CONTINUING AMERICA'S STRENGTH AND SECURITY PAC $15K
  • CSX CORPORATION GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND $2,500
  • DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (DAPAC) $3,000
  • DEFEND & UPHOLD OUR NATION NOW PAC $2,000
  • DEFENDING THE AMERICAN DREAM PAC $5,000
  • DELIVERS PAC $10K
  • DELOITTE PAC $2,000
  • DELTA AIR LINES PAC $10K
  • DENHAM FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • DENTONS US PAC $1,000
  • DO RIGHT BAYOU PAC $3,000
  • DON BACON FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • DOUBLE L PAC $1,000
  • DOW INC. PAC (DOWPAC) $2,500
  • EASTMANPAC OF EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY $1,500
  • EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES PAC (EWPAC) $2,000
  • ELI LILLY AND COMPANY PAC $2,500
  • EMD SERONO, INC. PAC $2,500
  • EMPOWER CLINIC SERVICES, L.L.C./EMPOWER PHARMACY LLC PAC $1,000
  • ENERGY MARKETERS OF AMERICA SMALL BUSINESS COMMITTEE PAC (EMA SBC PAC) $2,000
  • ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC. PAC $2,500
  • EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION PAC (EXXONMOBIL PAC) $2,500
  • EYEPAC PAC FOR AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY $2,500
  • FAEGRE DRINKER PAC (FAEGRE DRINKER PAC) $2,500
  • FIRST CAPITAL PAC $3,500
  • FITZGERALD FOR SENATE $1,000
  • FOLEY & LARDNER POLITICAL FUND, INC. $2,000
  • FOREVER YOUTH ORGANIZATION UTILIZING A NEW GENERATION PAC $10K
  • FRIENDS OF COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY PAC $13K
  • FRIENDS OF DAVE JOYCE $2,000
  • FRIENDS OF SUSAN BROOKS $1,000
  • FROGMAN PAC $2,000
  • FULL HOUSE PAC $2,000
  • GAINWELL HOLDING CORP. PAC (GAINWELL PAC) $5,000
  • GARRET GRAVES FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • GENENTECH INC. PAC $5,000
  • GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GDC PAC) $5,000
  • GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY PAC (GM PAC) $3,000
  • GEORGIA POWER COMPANY FEDERAL PAC $5,000
  • GIVING US SECURITY PAC $2,000
  • GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC PAC (GSK PAC) $1,000
  • HEALTH & FITNESS ASSOCIATION PAC (FITPAC) $1,000
  • HEALTH AGENTS OF AMERICA PAC $1,000
  • HEALTH INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION PAC $6,000
  • HEALTHCARE DISTRIBUTION ALLIANCE PAC $2,500
  • HEALTHCARE FREEDOM FUND $5,000
  • HEARTDOCPAC $2,500
  • HELP ELECT REPUBLICANS NOW $2,500
  • HIMS & HERS HEALTH, INC. PAC $1,000
  • HOLDEN INDUSTRIES, INC. PAC (HOLDEN PAC) $4,000
  • HOLLAND & KNIGHT COMMITTEE FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT $4,500
  • HY-VEE EMPLOYEES PAC $5,000
  • IN THE ARENA PAC $5,000
  • INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE PAC (IPC PAC) $3,700
  • INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE PAC $2,500
  • INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION FRANCHISING PAC INC $4,500
  • INTERNATIONAL PAPER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (IP-PAC) $5,000
  • INVEST IN A STRONG AND SECURE AMERICA $5,000
  • ITG HOLDINGS U.S.A. INC. PAC (AKA ITG PAC) $2,500
  • JAM PAC $3,000
  • JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. PAC $2,500
  • JOE WILSON FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • JOHNSON & JOHNSON PAC $10K
  • KEEP TEXAS TEXAS PAC $2,500
  • KING & SPALDING NONPARTISAN COMMITTEE FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT $5,000
  • LAND OF OPPORTUNITY PAC $5,000
  • LANTHEUS HOLDINGS INC PAC (LANTHEUS PAC) $1,000
  • LEAN FORWARD AMERICA FUND $3,500
  • LIFEPOINT HEALTH PAC - THE PAC OF LIFEPOINT CORPORATE SERVICES, GENERAL PARTNERSHIP (LCSGP) AND F... $2,500
  • LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC., PAC (LIVE NATION PAC) $2,500
  • LKQ CORPORATION EMPLOYEE GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND $3,000
  • LUNDBECK LLC EMPLOYEE PAC $1,000
  • MAINTAINING ALL REPUBLICANS IN OFFICE PAC $1,000
  • MAJORITY COMMITTEE PAC--MC PAC $10K
  • MAXIMUS INC PAC (MAXPAC) $6,000
  • MCGUIREWOODS FEDERAL PAC $2,500
  • MCKESSON CORPORATION EMPLOYEES POLITICAL FUND $5,000
  • MERCK & CO., INC., EMPLOYEES PAC (MERCK PAC) $5,000
  • MEUSER FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • MISSOURI TRUTH PAC $4,000
  • MR. SOUTHERN MISSOURIAN IN THE HOUSE PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE PAC (NABH CHAMPIONS PAC) $2,500
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BENEFITS AND INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS PAC (NABIP PAC) $2,500
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $4,500
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS RESPONSIBLE DISTRIBUTION POLITICAL ACTION CO $5,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS PAC (NAM-PAC) $2,500
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS PAC $3,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SPECIALTY PHARMACY PAC $4,500
  • NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • NATIONAL CHICKEN COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION - PAC $10K
  • NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA COMMITTEE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COTTON $5,000
  • NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE PAC (NEMPAC) $1,500
  • NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS FEDERAL PAC $2,500
  • NATIONAL FISHERIES INSTITUTE (FISHPAC) $5,000
  • NATIONAL INDEPENDENT AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION PAC FUND $2,500
  • NATIONAL MARINE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION AND MARINE RETAILERS ASSOCIATION BOAT POLITICAL ACTION ... $2,500
  • NATIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING COUNCIL PAC $1,000
  • NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC. PAC (NSSF PAC) $1,000
  • NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS INC NSPS PAC $1,000
  • NATIONAL STONE, SAND & GRAVEL ASSOCIATION ROCKPAC $2,500
  • NATIONAL VICTORY ACTION FUND $3,500
  • NEBRASKA SANDHILLS PAC $5,000
  • NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. PAC $5,000
  • NOOGA PAC $1,000
  • NORCAL WATER JOBS LIBERTY PAC $5,000
  • NOVARTIS CORPORATION PAC $3,000
  • NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE FEDERAL PAC $1,000
  • ONE COUNTRY, ONE DESTINY PAC $3,500
  • OPTION CARE HEALTH, INC. PAC $1,000
  • OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC. PAC (OTSUKA US PAC) $2,500
  • OWENS & MINOR, INC. PAC (OWENS & MINOR PAC) $5,000
  • PA-FIRST PAC $2,500
  • PAC OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS--PAC OF AAOS $4,500
  • PAIN FREE AMERICA, THE PAC OF ATHLETICO HOLDINGS, LLC $1,000
  • PATRIOT FUND $2,000
  • PATRIOTS IN ACTION $5,000
  • PFIZER INC. PAC $1,500
  • PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC PAC $1,000
  • PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION PAC $5,000
  • POET PAC $5,000
  • POLSINELLI PAC $5,000
  • PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS PAC I $7,500
  • PRIME POLICY GROUP LLC/BURSON COHN & WOLFE PAC $1,000
  • PRIMERICA INC PAC (PRIMERICA PAC) $5,000
  • PRIZEPICKS PAC $2,000
  • QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED PAC $2,500
  • RAYONIER ADVANCED MATERIALS INC GOOD GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE $5,000
  • REJOICE PAC $5,000
  • RELX INC. PAC $1,000
  • REPUBLICAN GOVERNANCE GROUP/TUESDAY GROUP PAC $8,000
  • REPUBLICAN MAINSTREET PARTNERSHIP PAC $5,000
  • RESCARE, INC. DBA BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES LEGACY FUND (BRIGHTSPRING LEGACY FUND) $2,700
  • RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC. PAC AKA DOMTAR PAC $1,000
  • RESTORING OUR NATION PAC $2,000
  • REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. PAC; RAI PAC $2,500
  • ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION PAC $2,500
  • SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL PAC (SCI-PAC) $5,000
  • SANOFI US SERVICES INC. EMPLOYEES' PAC $3,500
  • SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC. PAC (SAREPTA PAC) $1,000
  • SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION PAC, SECURITYPAC $1,000
  • SENIOR CARE PHARMACY COALITION PAC $5,000
  • SIX PAC $10K
  • SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY PAC $1,000
  • SOCK IT TO 'EM PAC $5,000
  • SOUTHEASTERN LUMBER MANUFACTURERS ASSOC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,750
  • STRENGTHENING THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC (STAR) PAC $2,000
  • SWEDISH MATCH NORTH AMERICA LLC PAC $5,000
  • SWISHER INTERNATIONAL INC PAC FUND $2,500
  • SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP. FUND FOR EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP $2,500
  • T-MOBILE USA, INC. PAC (T-PAC) $3,000
  • TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA INC. PAC $5,000
  • TELADOC HEALTH, INC. PAC $2,500
  • TENNESSEE TOUGH PAC $1,000
  • TEXTILE RENTAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA PAC (TRSA PAC) $5,000
  • THE AMERICAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION, INC. PAC (AOTPAC) $1,000
  • THE AMERICAN PILOTS' ASSOCIATION PAC $6,000
  • THE COCA-COLA COMPANY NONPARTISAN COMMITTEE FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT $5,000
  • THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS PAC $5,000
  • THE HOME DEPOT INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • THE KROGER CO. PAC $4,500
  • THE NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION ACTION COMMITTEE FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION (A... $5,000
  • THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. PAC $1,500
  • THOMPSON FOR MAYOR $250
  • THOROUGHBRED PAC $2,500
  • TKJ PAC $1,000
  • TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC PAC (TOYOTA/LEXUS PAC) $5,000
  • TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP PAC, INC. $5,000
  • U.S. ANESTHESIA PARTNERS, INC. PAC D/B/A/ USAP PAC $2,500
  • U.S. TRAVEL ASSOCIATION PAC $2,000
  • ULTRAGENYX PHARMACEUTICAL INC. PAC (AKA ULTRAGENYX PAC) $5,000
  • UNITED EGG ASSOCIATION EGGPAC $2,500
  • UNITED HEALTH SERVICES PAC, INC. $2,500
  • UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC PAC $5,000
  • UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION EMPLOYEE PAC - USAA EMPLOYEE PAC $2,500
  • UNITED STATES PEANUT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (US PEANUT PAC) $5,000
  • US ONCOLOGY INC. NETWORK PAC $5,000
  • VEN-PAC $1,000
  • VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. GOOD GOVERNMENT CLUB (VERIZON PAC) $1,000
  • VERN BUCHANAN FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • VIATRIS INC. PAC (VIAPAC) $7,500
  • VICTORY EAST $5,000
  • VILLAGEMD PAC $5,000
  • VITORIA PAC $10K
  • VOTE TO ELECT REPUBLICANS NOW PAC $2,000
  • WALDEN FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • WALGREEN CO PAC $5,000
  • WALMART INC. PAC FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT $1,000
  • WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS OF AMERICA, INC. PAC $2,000
  • WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION PAC $1,000
  • YOUR OHIO REPUBLICAN TEAM $2,500
  • ZENECA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

John King (REP)

Raised
$563K through 2026-01-31 individuals $551K · PACs $12K · cash on hand $0
Outside spending
none reported
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-09-20
3 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY PAC $5,000
  • ELECT - THE PAC OF THE ALABAMA FARMERS FEDERATION $5,000
  • FRIENDS OF MIKE $1,500

All filings at the FEC ↗

Jonathan Mccolumn (REP)

Raised
$36K through 2026-03-31 individuals $6,144 · PACs $0 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $30K · cash on hand $12K
Outside spending
none reported
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-09-20

All filings at the FEC ↗

Mike Collins (REP)

Raised
$7.4M through 2026-06-30 individuals $4.4M · PACs $496K · candidate's own money, incl. loans $65K · from the candidate's other committees $2.4M · cash on hand $2.1M
Outside spending
$821K for · $4.7M against · latest reported 2026-09-15
Largest outside spenders
THE GEORGIA WAY — $3.3M against GEORGIA VALUES — $845K against Largest donors: GEORGIANS FIRST LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE $800K (100%) NEW ENGAGEMENT PAC — $493K against Largest donors: WORKING FOR WORKING AMERICANS - FEDERAL $300K (15%); PAJCIC, STEPHEN III $263K (13%); SIMON, DEBORAH J. $250K (12%); LOCAL JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND $250K (12%); CHAMBERS, JAMES COX $150K (7%) FELLOWSHIP PAC — $350K for Largest donors: CANTOR FITZGERALD $10.0M (91%); ANCHOR LABS INC $1.0M (9%) NO GOING BACK PAC INC. — $334K for and 8 more
Bundled through PACs
$77K through 4 PACs · FEC bulk data of 2026-09-20 SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND — $33K from 43 gifts CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC — $30K from 22 gifts AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE — $14K from 8 gifts Lobbyist/registrant PAC CLUB FOR GROWTH — $250 from 1 gift
138 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • AECOM PAC $1,000
  • AIRCRAFT OWNERS AND PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC $2,500
  • AIRLINES FOR AMERICA (A4A) PAC $1,000
  • ALASKA AIR GROUP INC. PAC $1,000
  • ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
  • AMERICA'S BOLD ERA PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN BUS ASSOCIATION PAC - BUSPAC $1,500
  • AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE ASSOCIATION PAC $1,000
  • AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMPANIES (ACEC/PAC) $4,500
  • AMERICAN FUELS AND PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION PAC (AFPMPAC) $1,000
  • AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN MARITIME OFFICERS VOLUNTARY POLITICAL ACTION FUND $5,500
  • AMERICAN PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN PRINCIPLES $500
  • AMERICAN SPORTFISHING ASSOCIATION PAC $1,000
  • AMERICAN WATERWAYS OPERATORS-PAC $4,500
  • AUSTIN SCOTT FOR CONGRESS INC $2,000
  • BE AN AMERICAN PAC $1,500
  • BETH CAMP FOR STATE HOUSE $500
  • BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY RAILPAC (BNSF RAILPAC) $2,000
  • BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION PAC $2,000
  • BRIAN JACK FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • BUILDING A REPUBLIC AMERICA DESERVES $1,000
  • BUILDING UP DEMOCRACY'S DREAM $5,000
  • CALPORTLAND COMPANY PAC (CALPORTLANDPAC) $2,500
  • CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PAC (US CHAMBER PAC) $1,000
  • CHAS CANNON FOR STATE HOUSE, INC $1,000
  • COALPAC, A PAC OF THE NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION $1,000
  • COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED, INC. COMMITTEE FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT $6,500
  • COLLINS VICTORY FUND $7,032
  • COMMITTEE TO ELECT DUNAHOO FOR STATE HOUSE $1,000
  • COMMITTEE TO ELECT HOUSTON GAINES $1,000
  • COMMITTEE TO ELECT RICHARD WEATHERSBY $100
  • CONSERVATIVES HARVESTING SUCCESS PAC $10K
  • COX ENTERPRISES PAC (COXPAC) INC. $3,500
  • CPAC ACTION PAC $5,000
  • CSX CORPORATION GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND $1,000
  • CULAC THE PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION $10K
  • DALE STRONG FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • DAVE TAYLOR FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • DAVID VITTER FOR US SENATE $2,000
  • DEFENDING THE AMERICAN DREAM PAC $5,000
  • DELTA AIR LINES PAC $5,000
  • DIRIGO PAC $10K
  • EL SUENO AMERICANO $3,500
  • ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC. / ENTERPRISE MOBILITY PAC $2,500
  • FAA MANAGERS ASSOCIATION INC. PAC $1,500
  • FEDEX CORPORATION PAC $2,000
  • FIGHTIN' RIGHT Y'ALL $2,500
  • FIRST IN FREEDOM PAC $5,000
  • FREEDOM FUND $5,000
  • FRIENDS OF JOHN CORBETT $500
  • FROGMAN PAC $2,500
  • FRY FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • GENERAL AVIATION MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION PAC $1,000
  • GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION PAC (GENERAL DYNAMICS EMPLOYEE PAC) $5,000
  • GEORGIA BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC $1,000
  • GEORGIA OILMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC PAC (GOAPAC) $2,000
  • GEORGIA POWER COMPANY FEDERAL PAC $2,500
  • GOD, FAMILY, & COUNTRY PAC $2,500
  • GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK COMPANY PAC $1,500
  • GROWING OUR OWN DYNAMIC ECONOMY NOW $10K
  • HEARTLAND VALUES PAC $5,000
  • HELP ELECT REPUBLICANS NOW $2,500
  • HERMEUS CORPORATION PAC $3,000
  • HIGGINBOTHAM INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. PAC $2,500
  • INGRAM BARGE COMPANY PAC $3,500
  • JAMES BURCHETT FOR HOUSE $500
  • JASON SMITH FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • JM FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC PAC $5,000
  • JOBS, FREEDOM, AND SECURITY PAC $5,000
  • KIRBY CORPORATION PAC $2,500
  • KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC. PAC (KOCHPAC) $5,000
  • LAND OF OPPORTUNITY PAC $5,000
  • LEADERSHIP AND ACCOUNTABILITY ARE NATIONAL KEYS PAC $10K
  • LETS GET TO WORK PAC $5,000
  • LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' PAC $1,000
  • MCGUIRE FOR VIRGINIA $2,000
  • NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION PAC (NAPA-PAC) $5,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES PAC $1,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS PAC $1,000
  • NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL CHICKEN COUNCIL PAC (FKA) NATIONAL BROILER COUNCIL PAC $3,500
  • NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEXTILE ORGANIZATIONS INC PAC $1,000
  • NATIONAL MARINE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION AND MARINE RETAILERS ASSOCIATION BOAT PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL READY MIXED CONCRETE ASSN. PAC (CONCRETEPAC) $15K
  • NATIONAL STONE, SAND & GRAVEL ASSOCIATION ROCKPAC $1,000
  • NETJETS ASSOCIATION OF SHARED AIRCRAFT PILOTS PAC; NJASAP PAC $3,500
  • NETJETS INC. PAC $1,000
  • NEW SHERIFF PAC $5,000
  • NO FAIL MISSION PAC $3,500
  • OHIO VALLEY LEADERSHIP PAC $1,000
  • OORAH! PAC $10K
  • OVERHAUL PAC $10K
  • OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSN INC PAC (AKA OOIDA-PAC) $5,000
  • PEACH STATE PAC $8,500
  • PENNSYLVANIA HONOR $5,000
  • PEOPLE PAC (PACCAR INC EMPLOYEES ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATION PAC) $5,000
  • PLAIN STATE PAC $1,000
  • PRIMERICA INC PAC (PRIMERICA PAC) $5,000
  • PROJECTHEALTHSOLUTIONS PAC - PHSPAC $1,000
  • RAPTOR PAC $2,000
  • REPUBLICAN MAJORITY FUND: STATE AND LOCAL $5,000
  • RESPONSIBILITY AND FREEDOM WORK PAC (RFWPAC) $10K
  • ROCKET LAB USA, INC. PAC (ROCKET LAB PAC) $1,000
  • RVFPAC $2,000
  • SCALISE FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND $15K
  • SOUTHERN COMPANY GAS EMPLOYEES PAC $2,500
  • SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. FREEDOM FUND $1,000
  • SOUTHWEST AIRLINES PILOTS' ASSOCIATION PAC (SWAPA PAC) $2,500
  • SPACE COAST LEADERSHIP PAC $1,000
  • SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. PAC $10K
  • SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS PAC (SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS PAC) $1,000
  • STEER PAC $5,000
  • SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP. FUND FOR EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP $2,500
  • TENACIOUS PAC $5,000
  • TEXANS FOR JODEY ARRINGTON $2,000
  • TEXANS FOR MORGAN LUTTRELL $4,000
  • TEXAS VALUES PAC $5,000
  • THE BOEING COMPANY PAC $2,000
  • THE COCA-COLA COMPANY NONPARTISAN COMMITTEE FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT $5,000
  • THE EYE OF THE TIGER PAC $10K
  • THE HAWKEYE PAC $2,500
  • THE HOME DEPOT INC. PAC $5,000
  • THE NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION ACTION COMMITTEE FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION (A... $2,500
  • TRALAPAC (TRUCK RENTING AND LEASING ASSOCIATION PAC) $2,500
  • TRUCKING PAC OF THE AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS INC. $2,500
  • TRUE NORTH PAC $10K
  • UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. PAC $2,500
  • VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PAC (VERIZON PAC) $1,000
  • VICTORY AND FREEDOM PAC (VAF PAC) $1,000
  • VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY PAC $1,000
  • WAYNE FARMS LLC PAC $1,000
  • WELLS PAC $3,500
  • WOOLPERT, INC. PAC $5,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-22spend $0–992,000–2,999 impressions
Earn $1,000 for being a Community Mobilizer with Jon Ossoff! Earn extra cash while helping turn out the vote! Apply today: Earn $1,000 for being a Community Mobilizer with Jon Ossoff! Earn extra cash while helping turn out the vote! Apply today:
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-223 variantsspend $4,000–5,097115,000–139,997 impressions
Earn $1,000 for being a Community Mobilizer with Jon Ossoff! Earn extra cash while helping turn out the vote! Apply today:
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-22 to 2026-09-22spend $200–29930,000–34,999 impressions
GEORGIA: It’s YOUR paycheck, but Sen. Jon Ossoff wants to take even more money from it in taxes. Sen. Ossoff even voted for you to pay HIGHER taxes on those exhausting overtime hours. Sen. Ossoff doesn't care about Georgia families. Call and tell Senator Ossoff: Stop voting for higher taxes: 202-224-3521 GEORGIA: It’s YOUR paycheck, but Sen. Jon Ossoff wants to take even more money from it in taxes. Sen. Ossoff even voted for you to pay HIGHER taxes on those exhausting overtime hours. Sen. Ossoff doesn't care about Georgia families. Call and tell Senator Ossoff: Stop voting for higher taxes: 202-224-3521
Appeal to PrejudiceLoaded LanguageCard StackingName CallingAppeal to Fear75.0% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Prejudice: The opening 'GEORGIA' and 'YOUR paycheck' frames this as an in-group appeal, positioning Georgia residents as a unified group whose personal finances are under threat from Ossoff — for example: YOUR paycheck

Loaded Language: The phrase 'take even more money' frames taxation as theft or seizure rather than policy, using emotionally charged language to provoke resentment — for example: take even more money from it and exhausting overtime hours.

Card Stacking: The sentence presents a selective characterization of Ossoff's vote without context about what legislation was actually voted on or what other provisions it contained, implying a straightforward vote to raise taxes on overtime — for example: voted for you to pay HIGHER taxes

Name Calling: A derogatory, dismissive label is applied to Sen. Ossoff without evidence or argument, intended to discredit him rather than address any specific policy — for example: dismissing a politician as uncaring to undermine their credibility

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety about losing personal income to taxes to provoke a defensive emotional reaction — for example: wants to take even more money from it in taxes and pay HIGHER taxes on those exhausting overtime hours.

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-213 variantsspend $3,300–4,39778,000–93,997 impressions
Not the news we were hoping to share, but we’re pacing behind our fundraising goal ahead of our final end-of-quarter FEC deadline on September 30th. Jon is up against a MAGA loyalist, and the GOP and their Super PACs are already pouring MILLIONS into Georgia’s Senate race to defeat him. We can’t afford to fall behind now. Can you chip in $10, $25, or $50 to Jon Ossoff’s reelection campaign to help close this gap?
Name CallingLoaded LanguageFalse UrgencyAppeal to Fear50.0% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: The label 'MAGA loyalist' is used as a derogatory political tag to discredit the opponent rather than address their positions — for example: MAGA loyalist

Loaded Language: The word 'MILLIONS' in all caps is emotionally charged to trigger alarm and urgency about the scale of opposition funding — for example: pouring MILLIONS

False Urgency: The phrase 'can't afford to fall behind now' creates artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation and push immediate action — for example: We can't afford to fall behind now

Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies dire consequences if action is not taken immediately, leveraging anxiety about being outspent to compel a response — for example: We can't afford to fall behind now

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-212 variantsspend $200–39810,000–11,998 impressions
📣 JUST IN: A major tax vote cast by Sen. Jon Ossoff sparks outrage and concern among Georgia families. Sen. Ossoff voted for higher taxes on pay for overtime hours, which would force workers going above and beyond to give up more of their hard-earned paycheck.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by SMPfrom 2026-09-21spend $0–99100–999 impressions
ALERT: Democrats’ lead in GA is faltering. We need your support. We’re fighting to protect Democratic incumbents and Flip the Senate in November – and that starts with Georgia. The Trump-endorsed challenger, Mike Collins, has mountains of GOP funding, but we have you. Every dollar you give today helps us maintain our lead in state and across the county and secure a Democratic Senate Majority.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-20 to 2026-09-21spend $700–79920,000–24,999 impressions
Here are the facts: I’m the only Democratic Senator up for reelection in a state Trump won, and one of the most powerful Super PACs announced they’ll spend $44 million to try to defeat me. I’m MAGA’s #1 target for defeat in midterms this year. If you’re ready to fight back and take back the Senate majority, please chip in to my reelection campaign today.
Appeal to FearName CallingExaggeration/HyperboleFalse UrgencyBlack-and-White FallacyLoaded Language66.7% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Fear: Frames the speaker as under direct threat from a named political enemy to create anxiety and urgency in the reader — for example: being labeled the top target implies danger and high stakes

Name Calling: Uses 'MAGA' as a derogatory label to identify and discredit the opposing political group rather than engaging with their arguments — for example: MAGA's #1 target

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim of being the single '#1 target' is an absolute superlative that is unverifiable and likely overstated to dramatize the threat — for example: #1 target for defeat

False Urgency: Uses an immediate call to action with the word 'today' to pressure the reader into donating without deliberation — for example: please chip in to my reelection campaign today

Black-and-White Fallacy: Frames the situation as a binary choice — either you are 'ready to fight back' and donate, or you are not, leaving no room for other responses or positions — for example: If you're ready to fight back and take back the Senate majority

Loaded Language: Uses emotionally charged combat language like 'fight back' and 'take back' to trigger a reactive emotional response rather than rational deliberation — for example: fight back and take back the Senate majority

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-164 variantsspend $10,500–12,196625,200–701,996 impressions
GEORGIA NEWS: Sen. Jon Ossoff voted to increase taxes on hardworking Georgia families by $2,000 and reduce the Child Tax Credit. Learn what it means for you ⬇️
Loaded LanguageCard Stacking50.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: The phrase 'hardworking Georgia families' is emotionally charged language designed to evoke sympathy and frame the tax increase as an attack on virtuous, deserving people — for example: hardworking Georgia families

Card Stacking: The sentence presents a specific dollar figure and policy claim without context about what bill was voted on, what the full policy entailed, or any offsetting benefits, selectively framing the vote to support only a negative conclusion — for example: voted to increase taxes on hardworking Georgia families by $2,000

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18spend $0–991,000–1,999 impressions
Please don't scroll past this! We're reaching out because Jon Ossoff is MAGA's #1 target in the midterms. This race will be one of the toughest in the nation. Most people who read this will look the other way, but we're counting on you. If regaining Congressional power and reversing our country’s ongoing descent toward one-man rule is worth a $10 or $20 donation to you, then please rush a donation before our critical FEC deadline on September 30th. Your donation will help secure the future of this campaign.
Loaded LanguageAppeal to FearFalse UrgencyGlittering Generalities40.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged phrases are used to frame the political situation as dire and authoritarian — for example: 'ongoing descent toward one-man rule'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence invokes fear of authoritarian rule to pressure the reader into donating, implying catastrophic consequences if action is not taken — for example: 'reversing our country's ongoing descent toward one-man rule'

False Urgency: An artificial deadline is imposed to prevent deliberation and pressure immediate action — for example: 'please rush a donation before our critical FEC deadline on September 30th'

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive language is used to make the donation seem noble and consequential without specific substance — for example: 'secure the future of this campaign'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-166 variantsspend $6,200–7,994371,100–447,994 impressions
LATEST: Senator Jon Ossoff’s vote to raise taxes by $2,000 and for higher taxes on overtime work is drawing concern among Georgia families begging for lower costs. Read More:
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-212 variantsspend $700–89817,000–22,998 impressions
🌤️ Please don't click away from this important message. 🇺🇸 If everyone reading this donated just $10 before our FEC deadline, we would be able to show the strength of this campaign to the media and to our opponent with a MASSIVE number of donations. Unfortunately, not everyone gives. So Jon is counting on people who understand how important these donations are to chip in to his campaign today. If reelecting Jon Ossoff and keeping this seat out of MAGA hands is worth $10 or $20 to you, please donate before our FEC deadline. 🌤️ Please don't click away from this important message. 🇺🇸 If everyone reading this donated just $10 before our FEC deadline, we would be able to show the strength of this campaign to the media and to our opponent with a MASSIVE number of donations. Unfortunately, not everyone gives. So Jon is counting on people who understand how important these donations are to chip in to his campaign today. If reelecting Jon Ossoff and keeping this seat out of MAGA hands is worth $10 or $20 to you, please donate before our FEC deadline.
Name CallingFalse UrgencyAppeal to Fear20.0% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: The term 'MAGA' is used as a derogatory label to frame the opposition negatively rather than addressing their policy positions — for example: 'MAGA hands'

False Urgency: The FEC deadline is invoked as artificial time pressure to prompt immediate donation without deliberation — for example: 'donate before our FEC deadline'

Appeal to Fear: The framing implies a threatening outcome if the seat falls into 'MAGA hands,' creating anxiety to drive action — for example: 'keeping this seat out of MAGA hands'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-163 variantsspend $15,400–20,597408,100–459,997 impressions
🌤️ Please don't click away from this important message. 🇺🇸 If everyone reading this donated just $10 before our FEC deadline, we would be able to show the strength of this campaign to the media and to our opponent with a MASSIVE number of donations. Unfortunately, not everyone gives. So Jon is counting on people who understand how important these donations are to chip in to his campaign today. If reelecting Jon Ossoff and keeping this seat out of MAGA hands is worth $10 or $20 to you, please donate before our FEC deadline.
Name CallingFalse UrgencyAppeal to Fear20.0% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: The term 'MAGA' is used as a derogatory label to frame the opposition negatively rather than addressing their policy positions — for example: MAGA hands

False Urgency: The reference to an FEC deadline creates artificial time pressure to compel immediate donation without deliberation — for example: donate before our FEC deadline

Appeal to Fear: The framing of 'keeping this seat out of MAGA hands' implies a threatening consequence if action is not taken, designed to provoke anxiety and drive donations — for example: keeping this seat out of MAGA hands

Claims checked

No checkable factual claims in this ad.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

JON OSSOFF HAS AN UGLY RECORD

Paid for by Senate Leadership Fundvideo · 0:30from 2026-09-15
Do I still have it? Absolutely. Does it cost more every year? Yep. But it doesn't hold a candle to Jon Ossoff. Turns out [music] that boy spends more on hair and makeup than any DC politician, including women. >> [music] >> I know what I'm trying to cover up. Ossoff, he's hiding something else. Like voting to raise taxes on retirees making under 75,000. >> [music] >> Jon Ossoff talks pretty. His actions, ugly. >> SLF PAC is responsible [music] for the content of this advertising.
Loaded LanguageName CallingExaggeration/HyperboleConspiracy AppealAppeal to FearCard StackingBlack-and-White Fallacy70.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: talks pretty and ugly.

Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments. — for example: that boy.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that Ossoff spends more on hair and makeup than any DC politician, including women, is an extreme superlative presented without evidence — for example: 'more on hair and makeup than any DC politician, including women'

Conspiracy Appeal: Suggests secret plots or hidden information to create distrust in institutions — for example: cover up and he's hiding something else.

Appeal to Fear: Invoking the threat of raised taxes on retirees with modest incomes is designed to trigger anxiety among a vulnerable demographic — for example: 'voting to raise taxes on retirees making under 75,000'

Card Stacking: This presents a single vote selectively as evidence of Ossoff 'hiding something,' omitting any context about the broader legislation or Ossoff's overall record — for example: 'voting to raise taxes on retirees making under 75,000'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The stark binary contrast between 'talks pretty' and 'actions, ugly' presents Ossoff as entirely deceptive with no nuance or middle ground — for example: 'Jon Ossoff talks pretty. His actions, ugly.'

Claims checked

“voting to raise taxes on retirees making under 75,000”
Checked as: Someone voted to raise taxes on retirees making under $75,000 No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“that boy spends more on hair and makeup than any DC politician, including women”
Checked as: Jon Ossoff spends more on hair and makeup than any DC politician, including women. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Coverup

Paid for by Mike Collins for Senatevideo · 0:56from 2026-09-15
I'm Mike Collins and I approve this message. >> Senator John Oaf spends more money than any Washington politician on hair and makeup. >> I know what you're thinking. Yes, even more than the ladies. Thousands on hair and makeup. What a phone. >> What's that? >> The dude voted to raise taxes. >> No, no, no, no. Absolutely not. >> Have you seen this? We need this taken down. >> Senator, it's an ad. We can't just >> It's not true. All I've had done is color, nails, daily makeup. Obviously the perm and root work. >> Don't forget the undereye treatment. >> Sarah, that was an emergency. >> I'll see what I can do. >> This is character assassination. Oh my god. Stephanie. Stephanie. >> What? >> Look at this. It's chipped. Call the nail girl now. I cannot go on television like
Loaded LanguageName CallingExaggeration/HyperboleAppeal to PrejudiceCard Stacking33.3% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: Thousands on hair and makeup and This is character assassination.

Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments. — for example: Senator John Oaf.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that the senator spends more than any Washington politician on hair and makeup is an absolute superlative used to mock and discredit — for example: 'more than any Washington politician'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase exploits gender stereotypes to mock the senator by implying that spending on grooming is unmasculine and shameful, appealing to in-group biases — for example: 'even more than the ladies'

Card Stacking: The tax-raising vote is presented as a damning standalone fact without context, selectively stacking negative information to build a one-sided portrait of the senator — for example: 'The dude voted to raise taxes'

Claims checked

“The dude voted to raise taxes.”
Checked as: Voting against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act constituted a vote to raise taxes. True, but missing context: The "tax raise" refers to the expiration of existing tax cuts that the bill extended, not a new affirmative legislative vote to increase tax rates. source ↗Confidence: high“everybody who voted against our bill voted to raise taxes on the American people in the amount of $4.3 trillion. That's just a fact.” Verdict right?

“Senator John Oaf spends more money than any Washington politician on hair and makeup.”
No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“Thousands on hair and makeup.”
No authoritative evidence found no_evidence Verdict right?

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-153 variantsspend $20,300–25,4971,052,000–62,998 impressions
Georgia families are working overtime just to keep up. Meanwhile, Sen. Jon Ossoff is voting to take more money in taxes. He voted to keep higher taxes on working families’ overtime pay and voted to RAISE TAXES for Georgia families by $2,000. Sen Ossoff: Stop voting for higher taxes: 202-224-3521
Appeal to PrejudiceLoaded LanguageBlack-and-White Fallacy50.0% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes the identity of 'Georgia families' as a sympathetic in-group struggling to survive, setting up an us-vs-them contrast with the politician — for example: Georgia families working overtime

Loaded Language: The phrase 'take more money in taxes' frames taxation as an act of taking or theft rather than neutral policy, using emotionally charged language to trigger resentment — for example: take more money in taxes

Black-and-White Fallacy: Juxtaposed with sentence 1, the framing implies Ossoff is working against struggling Georgia families with no nuance or context about the tax policy — for example: families working overtime vs. Ossoff taking more money

Claims checked

“Sen. Jon Ossoff is voting to take more money in taxes.”
Checked as: Sen. Jon Ossoff voted in favor of raising taxes. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“voted to RAISE TAXES for Georgia families by $2,000.”
Checked as: A person (implied: Jon Ossoff or another Georgia politician) voted to raise taxes for Georgia families by $2,000. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“He voted to keep higher taxes on working families’ overtime pay”
Checked as: A named person voted to keep higher taxes on working families' overtime pay No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-156 variantsspend $2,300–3,294297,000–354,994 impressions
💸A $2,000 tax increase on Georgia families? That’s what Sen. Jon Ossoff voted for. He even voted to gut the Child Tax Credit and to keep taxing overtime work. It’s clear: Sen. Jon Ossoff doesn’t care about us, he’s all about himself. Sen. Ossoff: Stop voting for higher taxes: 202-224-3521
Appeal to FearLoaded LanguageCard StackingAppeal to PrejudiceName CallingBlack-and-White Fallacy80.0% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Fear: The framing of a $2,000 tax increase on 'Georgia families' is designed to provoke anxiety and alarm among voters — for example: implying a direct financial threat to ordinary households

Loaded Language: The word 'families' is used emotionally to maximize the perceived harm and trigger a protective instinct in the audience — for example: Georgia families and voted to gut the Child Tax Credit.

Card Stacking: The sentence presents a simplified and one-sided characterization of Ossoff's voting record without context about what bill was voted on or what it actually contained — for example: That's what Sen. Jon Ossoff voted for and voted to gut the Child Tax Credit and to keep taxing overtime work.

Appeal to Prejudice: Invoking 'overtime work' appeals to working-class identity and implies Ossoff is against ordinary hardworking people — for example: 'keep taxing overtime work' frames Ossoff as hostile to blue-collar workers

Name Calling: The sentence uses a dismissive, derogatory characterization of Senator Ossoff as self-serving rather than addressing any specific policy or action — for example: 'he's all about himself'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents a binary framing — either Ossoff cares about 'us' or he only cares about himself, leaving no room for nuance or partial positions — for example: 'doesn't care about us, he's all about himself'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-159 variantsspend $13,600–16,191302,100–374,191 impressions
Apply to be an Ossoff Community Mobilizer! You can earn $100 for attending one hour-long onboarding and you will also play an important role in helping Jon Ossoff win this Senate race. Sign up today! Apply to be an Ossoff Community Mobilizer! You can earn $100 for attending one hour-long onboarding and you will also play an important role in helping Jon Ossoff win this Senate race. Sign up today!
no techniques found

Claims checked

“You can earn $100 for attending one hour-long onboarding”
Checked as: Attending one hour-long onboarding pays $100 No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-152 variantsspend $13,500–18,998360,000–419,998 impressions
Apply to be an Ossoff Community Mobilizer! You can earn $100 for attending one hour-long onboarding and you will also play an important role in helping Jon Ossoff win this Senate race. Sign up today!
no techniques found

Claims checked

“You can earn $100 for attending one hour-long onboarding”
Checked as: Attending one hour-long onboarding pays $100 No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-153 variantsspend $1,900–2,597238,000–293,997 impressions
Instead of cutting costs for GA families, Sen. Ossoff voted for: ✖️A $2,000 tax increase ✖️Higher taxes on overtime pay ✖️Gutting the Child Tax Credit Sen. Jon Ossoff only cares about himself, not Georgia families. Sen. Ossoff: Stop voting for higher taxes: 202-224-3521
Name CallingAppeal to Prejudice25.0% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: The sentence uses a derogatory characterization to discredit Ossoff without addressing any specific policy or argument — for example: dismissing him as purely self-interested rather than engaging with his record

Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence invokes in-group identity by contrasting Ossoff against 'Georgia families,' implying he is not one of 'us' and does not represent the community — for example: framing him as an outsider to Georgia families

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-156 variantsspend $9,500–11,3941,476,000–1,687,994 impressions
While hardworking Georgians put in the extra hours to make ends meet, Sen. Jon Ossoff voted for HIGHER taxes on overtime pay. Sen. Jon Ossoff doesn’t care about us, he’s all about himself. Sen Ossoff: Stop voting for higher taxes: 202-224-3521
Appeal to PrejudiceLoaded LanguageCard StackingName Calling66.7% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'hardworking Georgians' invokes in-group identity to contrast ordinary working people with the senator, implying he is out of touch with or working against his own constituents — for example: hardworking Georgians

Loaded Language: The capitalization of 'HIGHER' is a rhetorical device to emotionally amplify the word beyond its factual meaning, triggering a stronger negative reaction — for example: HIGHER taxes

Card Stacking: The sentence presents only one side — that Ossoff voted for higher taxes on overtime — without any context about what bill was voted on, what other provisions it contained, or what the actual tax impact would be, selectively framing the vote to appear maximally damaging — for example: voted for HIGHER taxes on overtime pay

Name Calling: The sentence uses a dismissive, derogatory characterization of Sen. Ossoff as selfish and indifferent, attacking his character rather than addressing any specific policy or argument — for example: 'he's all about himself'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by One Nationfrom 2026-09-153 variantsspend $7,800–9,3971,020,000–1,174,997 impressions
Providing lower costs for Georgia families is not on Sen. Jon Ossoff's agenda. But, you know what is? ✔️Increasing our taxes by $2,000 ✔️Gutting the Child Tax Credit ✔️Higher taxes on overtime Call and tell Sen. Ossoff to stop voting for higher taxes: 202-224-3521
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-142 variantsspend $0–1981,100–2,998 impressions
Right now, this Georgia Senate race is in an absolute dead heat. Neck-and-neck. A complete dogfight. The Senate majority depends on what we do right here in Georgia over the next 2 months. Will you chip in $5 today to help us power Mike Collins across the finish line?
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-143 variantsspend $600–89717,100–23,997 impressions
$5. That’s all I’m asking for to help flip Georgia’s Senate seat red. If we come up short on September 17th, Jon Ossoff is going to retain his Senate seat and springboard into his 2028 Presidential run. Will you help me crush his dream? $5. That’s all I’m asking for to help flip Georgia’s Senate seat red. If we come up short on September 17th, Jon Ossoff is going to retain his Senate seat and springboard into his 2028 Presidential run. Will you help me crush his dream?
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-143 variantsspend $1,100–1,39728,100–34,997 impressions
Jon Ossoff is bleeding support, and Mike Collins is HOURS away from taking the lead in the polls. To flip Georgia red, we need grassroots support to flood in before September 17th. Will you help Mike Collins flip Georgia red by donating $5 RIGHT NOW? Jon Ossoff is bleeding support, and Mike Collins is HOURS away from taking the lead in the polls. To flip Georgia red, we need grassroots support to flood in before September 17th. Will you help Mike Collins flip Georgia red by donating $5 RIGHT NOW?
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-19spend $0–991,000–1,999 impressions
If Chuck Schumer and the Left seize control of the Senate, it won’t just hurt Georgia, it will ruin the entire country. Mike Collins has this race within the margin of error. Will you help him take the lead with a donation of $5?
Appeal to FearLoaded LanguageExaggeration/HyperboleName Calling33.3% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Fear: The sentence warns of catastrophic national consequences if the opposing political faction gains power, designed to trigger fear and override rational deliberation — for example: 'it will ruin the entire country'

Loaded Language: The word 'seize' implies an illegitimate or aggressive takeover rather than a democratic electoral outcome, and 'ruin' is an emotionally charged term suggesting total destruction — for example: 'seize control'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Claiming that one party winning a Senate majority will 'ruin the entire country' is an extreme overstatement unsupported by evidence — for example: 'ruin the entire country'

Name Calling: 'The Left' is used as a broad derogatory label to frame the opposing side as an ideological threat rather than engaging with specific policy positions — for example: 'Chuck Schumer and the Left'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-143 variantsspend $200–4974,100–6,997 impressions
BREAKING: The Georgia Senate race has just turned into a TOSS-UP. Mike Collins can defeat Jon Ossoff on November 3rd. But he needs YOUR help. Will you chip in just $5 to deliver a MAGA majority?
Appeal to PrejudiceFalse UrgencyBandwagon AppealGlittering Generalities50.0% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Prejudice: The capitalized 'YOUR' singles out the reader as part of an in-group with a special responsibility to act — for example: YOUR help

False Urgency: The framing implies immediate action is needed to secure a political outcome, creating pressure to donate without deliberation — for example: chip in just $5

Bandwagon Appeal: The appeal to delivering a 'majority' implies joining a large collective movement and not being left out of a winning side — for example: deliver a MAGA majority

Glittering Generalities: The term 'MAGA majority' invokes a vague but emotionally resonant political identity without specifying concrete policy goals — for example: MAGA majority

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-143 variantsspend $0–2971,200–3,997 impressions
GOOD NEWS: Georgia Senate race is now a TOSS-UP. BAD NEWS: We might be losing momentum. Will you chip in $5 to help Mike Collins finish the job?
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-14spend $60,000–69,9991,000,000+ impressions
Bad news... with MAGA Super PACs prepared to pour millions into Georgia, Jon is expected to be outspent. To make things worse, our MAGA extremist opponent just launched TV ads attacking Jon. Can you rush a donation and help us fight back? This U.S. Senate race in Georgia isn’t just another election. It’s the one race MAGA is banking on to oust Jon and lock in their majority for the long term. Jon is counting on people like you who understand the stakes of this moment to defend this seat and chip in $20 or whatever they can afford to his reelection campaign today. Thank you.
Appeal to FearName CallingLoaded LanguageFalse Urgency50.0% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety about being financially overwhelmed by outside money to pressure the reader into donating — for example: the threat of millions in opposition spending implies inevitable defeat without action

Name Calling: Uses 'MAGA' as a derogatory label to discredit the opposition rather than address their positions — for example: MAGA Super PACs prepared to pour millions into Georgia and our MAGA extremist opponent just launched TV ads attacking Jon.

Loaded Language: The word 'extremist' is emotionally charged and chosen to trigger a negative reaction rather than convey factual information — for example: 'MAGA extremist opponent'

False Urgency: The word 'rush' creates artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation and compel an immediate donation — for example: 'rush a donation' implies there is no time to think carefully

Claims checked

“our MAGA extremist opponent just launched TV ads attacking Jon”
Checked as: A MAGA extremist opponent launched TV ads attacking Jon Ossoff. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-09-12 to 2026-09-15spend $15,000–19,999350,000–399,999 impressions
I’m humbly asking you to contribute to my reelection campaign today. I'm being bombarded with attacks, and the truth is, we're expecting to be outspent by MAGA's war chest. So I urgently need your help to fight back and defend Georgia from a MAGA takeover. Can you rush a donation today?
Loaded LanguageAppeal to FearFalse UrgencyName Calling100.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: MAGA's war chest and defend Georgia from a MAGA takeover.

Appeal to Fear: The sentence creates anxiety about being overwhelmed and losing Georgia to a hostile force, implying dire consequences if the reader does not act — for example: 'defend Georgia from a MAGA takeover'

False Urgency: The word 'urgently' is used to pressure the reader into acting immediately without deliberation — for example: I urgently need your help to fight back and Can you rush a donation today?.

Name Calling: The label 'MAGA' is used as a derogatory shorthand to discredit the opposition rather than address specific policy arguments — for example: 'MAGA takeover'

Claims checked

No checkable factual claims in this ad.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Jon Ossoff: Spending Thousands on Hair & Makeup While Raising Taxes on Georgia

Paid for by Senate Leadership Fundvideo · 0:30from 2026-09-04
Get this. Senator Jon Ossoff spends more money than any Washington politician on hair and makeup. I know what [music] you're thinking. Yes, even more than the ladies. Thousands on hair and makeup. What a phony. The dude voted to raise taxes by two grand and to tax overtime, too. Ossoff needs to put down the mascara and join the real world. >> [music] >> Pretty boy has an ugly record. SLF PAC is responsible for the content of this advertising.
Exaggeration/HyperboleCard StackingAppeal to PrejudiceRepetitionLoaded LanguageName Calling75.0% of sentences flagged

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that Ossoff spends more than 'any Washington politician' on hair and makeup is an extreme superlative that is almost certainly unverified — for example: 'more money than any Washington politician on hair and makeup'

Card Stacking: An extraordinary unverified claim about personal grooming spending is presented as fact without sourcing, framing Ossoff negatively through selective and unsubstantiated information — for example: spends more money than any Washington politician on hair and makeup and voted to raise taxes by two grand and to tax overtime, too.

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase implies that spending on grooming is unmasculine and inappropriate for a male politician by comparing him unfavorably to women, exploiting gender-based in-group/out-group bias — for example: even more than the ladies and join the real world.

Repetition: The phrase 'hair and makeup' is repeated from sentence 1 to reinforce the negative image of Ossoff through familiarity — for example: 'Thousands on hair and makeup'

Loaded Language: The casual dismissive term 'dude' is used to demean and belittle a sitting senator rather than engage with his record substantively — for example: The dude and ugly record.

Name Calling: Telling Ossoff to 'put down the mascara' is a derogatory label implying he is effeminate and out of touch, used to discredit rather than address his policies — for example: put down the mascara and Pretty boy.

Claims checked

“The dude voted to raise taxes by two grand”
Checked as: A specific person voted to raise taxes by $2,000. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“Senator Jon Ossoff spends more money than any Washington politician on hair and makeup.”
No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“to tax overtime, too”
Checked as: A plan or proposal exists to tax overtime pay No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-102 variantsspend $0–1983,000–4,998 impressions
🚨 Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA), the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Georgia, is out with a new campaign video sharply attacking Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) over his political positioning ahead of their 2026 general election matchup. In the video, Collins says Ossoff "running around as a moderate is one of the biggest con games in political history," arguing the senator's voting record does not match his public image. Collins, who describes himself as "a blue collar, small businessman" and is the founder and CEO of a trucking company, also calls Ossoff "nothing but a trust fund kid who has never had a real job in his life." Those characterizations are Collins' opinion, expressed in a campaign attack video, and do not reflect the documented record: before his election to the Senate in 2021, Ossoff worked as a national security aide for Georgia Rep. Hank Johnson and served as CEO of Insight TWI, a media production company producing internationally broadcast investigations of corruption and war crimes. The Georgia Senate race is widely considered one of the most competitive in the country. Ossoff entered the general election cycle with a commanding financial lead, having raised more than $77 million as of March 2026, while two major super PACs have pledged a combined $64 million for the race. Collins secured the GOP nomination after a primary runoff victory aided by a last-minute endorsement from President Donald Trump, who carried Georgia 50.7% to 48.5% in 2024. What do you make of Collins' argument about Ossoff's record vs. his moderate image? 👇 #GASen #GeorgiaPolitics #MikeCollins #JonOssoff #Georgia2026 #Breaking
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Deliver

Paid for by Mike Collins for Senatevideo · 0:30from 2026-08-25
As a trucker, I couldn't talk all day and never deliver. But that's what Jon Ossoff does. Ossoff talks healthcare, but voted to gut rural hospitals. He voted for higher taxes on tips, [music] overtime, even social security. Ossoff talks a good game, but all he's delivered is higher prices [music] and unaffordable healthcare. I'm Mike Collins. I approve this message because I'm [music] a trucker, not a talker, and my 18-wheeler is ready to deliver.
Name CallingLoaded LanguageCard StackingAppeal to PrejudiceRepetitionFlag-WavingSlogansGlittering Generalities85.7% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: Implicitly labels Ossoff as all talk and no action, a derogatory characterization used to discredit rather than address policy — for example: 'that's what Jon Ossoff does'

Loaded Language: The phrase 'gut rural hospitals' uses emotionally charged language to provoke fear and outrage rather than neutrally describe a policy vote — for example: voted to gut rural hospitals, higher prices and unaffordable healthcare.

Card Stacking: Presents a one-sided characterization of Ossoff's record by asserting he 'talks healthcare' but 'voted to gut rural hospitals' without providing context, nuance, or counterbalancing information about his actual healthcare positions — for example: Ossoff talks healthcare, but voted to gut rural hospitals, higher taxes on tips, overtime, even social security and all he's delivered is higher prices and unaffordable healthcare.

Appeal to Prejudice: Targeting tips, overtime, and social security invokes in-group identity of working-class and elderly voters to stoke resentment against Ossoff — for example: higher taxes on tips, overtime, even social security and I'm a trucker, not a talker.

Repetition: The word 'talks' is repeated across multiple sentences (sentences 3 and 5) as a deliberate rhetorical device to reinforce the label of Ossoff as all talk — for example: 'Ossoff talks a good game'

Flag-Waving: Patriotic, religious, or in-group identity invoked to validate a position.

Slogans: Catchy phrase used to compress a complex position into an emotionally loaded shorthand.

Glittering Generalities: The metaphor of the 18-wheeler being 'ready to deliver' is vague and emotionally positive, implying action and results without specifying any concrete policy — for example: 'my 18-wheeler is ready to deliver'

Claims checked

“voted to gut rural hospitals”
Checked as: Jon Ossoff voted to gut rural hospitals No authoritative evidence found passages_do_not_deny Verdict right?

“He voted for higher taxes on tips, overtime, even social security.”
Checked as: Jon Ossoff voted for higher taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Mike Collins: Will you testify?

Paid for by Jon Ossoff for Senatevideo · 0:46from 2026-08-25
Congressman Mike Collins >> Collins >> Collins >> Mike Collins responding to claims he hired his chief of staff's girlfriend as a paid intern. >> And paid her thousands of dollars. >> When she didn't actually work in his office. >> A 37-page report found quote substantial reason to believe Collins abused congressional resources. >> Misusing taxpayer dollars. >> If taxpayers can't trust you to properly steward their money, how can they trust you to be a US Senator? >> Why did you not cooperate with the investigation for over 4 months? And how can hard-working Georgians trust you going forward? >> Mike Collins is so scandal-plagued and and ethics-challenged, it's just the baggage. >> Mike >> If you're our candidate, we lose. You're under federal investigation.
no techniques found

Claims checked

“You're under federal investigation.”
Checked as: Mike Collins is under federal investigation. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“she didn't actually work in his office.”
Checked as: The girlfriend hired by Brandon Phillips (chief of staff to Rep. Mike Collins) did not actually work in Collins' office. No authoritative evidence found insufficient_tier Verdict right?

“paid her thousands of dollars.”
Checked as: Someone paid a woman thousands of dollars. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-25 to 2026-09-142 variantsspend $1,100–1,29824,000–29,998 impressions
Jon Ossoff is calling in Soros and Hillary Clinton to help him in Georgia. He saw the recent polling, and now he’s sweating. With your support today, we can send the Radical Left’s golden boy home for good.
Appeal to PrejudiceConspiracy AppealFalse UrgencyName CallingLoaded Language66.7% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Prejudice: Invoking George Soros and Hillary Clinton by name is a dog whistle targeting right-wing in-group resentment, implying outside liberal elites are interfering in Georgia — for example: framing outside support as sinister based on who is providing it

Conspiracy Appeal: The phrase 'calling in' implies a secretive or transactional arrangement rather than normal political campaigning, suggesting hidden coordination — for example: 'calling in' as if summoning shadowy backers

False Urgency: The phrase 'today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'With your support today'

Name Calling: 'Radical Left' and 'golden boy' are derogatory labels used to discredit a political opponent rather than engage with their positions — for example: 'the Radical Left's golden boy'

Loaded Language: 'Radical Left' is an emotionally charged phrase designed to trigger a negative reaction toward the political opponent — for example: 'Radical Left's golden boy'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-25 to 2026-09-012 variantsspend $0–1984,000–5,998 impressions
🚨 The publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times is calling out Sen. Jon Ossoff, saying the Georgia Democrat's record on Israel is "abysmal" and that he has misled the state's Jewish community about his positions. Michael A. Morris penned an open letter to Ossoff on August 12, 2026, citing specific votes he says run counter to Israel's interests. Morris wrote that Ossoff "backed some of Senator Sanders' resolutions to cut off Israel's weapons in late 2024, again in July 2025, and on April 15, 2026, you went furthest yet, voting to block every sale on the floor." One specific vote cited is S.J.Res.41, Roll Call Vote 454, from July 30, 2025, in which Ossoff voted to block the transfer of thousands of assault rifles to Israel as a protest against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's policies. Morris, speaking about his letter, says Ossoff has failed to support Israel and has misrepresented his positions to Jewish constituents. Republican U.S. Senate candidate Rep. Mike Collins also released a statement slamming Ossoff over his Israel voting record following the publication of the letter. Ossoff has not released a direct statement addressing the specific points raised in Morris's open letter. Multiple political handicappers describe Ossoff as the Democrats' most vulnerable senator heading into 2026. Do you think a senator's voting record on foreign military aid should be a defining issue in a Senate race? 👇 #JonOssoff #Georgia #Israel #GeorgiaSenate #AtlantaJewishTimes #Breaking
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-25 to 2026-09-012 variantsspend $0–1984,000–5,998 impressions
🚨 Georgia Republican Senate nominee Rep. Mike Collins is calling Sen. Jon Ossoff "the poster child" for the Democratic Socialists of America movement, citing Ossoff's public endorsement of Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed following El-Sayed's narrow primary victory. Collins argued that Ossoff's support for El-Sayed reveals where the Georgia incumbent stands ideologically, also claiming Ossoff voted with Sen. Bernie Sanders 92% of the time. El-Sayed, an epidemiologist and former Wayne County health director, overcame roughly $65 million in outside opposition spending, including more than $30 million from AIPAC, to win the Michigan Democratic primary by approximately one point. El-Sayed has stated he is "not technically or practically DSA" and has not received a formal DSA endorsement, though democratic socialist figures including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Sanders campaigned on his behalf. El-Sayed advances to the November general election against Republican Mike Rogers. Ossoff, who won his Senate seat in January 2021 by just over one point, is considered by Republicans to be one of the most vulnerable Democratic incumbents on the ballot in 2026. Two major super PACs have already pledged a combined $64 million to the Georgia Senate race. What do you think: will Ossoff's endorsement of El-Sayed become a defining issue in the Georgia Senate race? 👇 #GASen #GeorgiaPolitics #MikeCollins #JonOssoff #AbdulElSayed #Breaking
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-25 to 2026-09-012 variantsspend $0–1984,000–5,998 impressions
🚨 Sen. Jon Ossoff has publicly criticized "vast sums of corporate and billionaire money" in politics, but a review of FEC filings shows he has received nearly half a million dollars from billionaires, including George Soros and his son Alex Soros. Ossoff is slated to headline a fundraiser at the Water Mill estate of Alex Soros and Huma Abedin in the Hamptons, with Hillary Clinton also listed as a co-host. The trip includes at least three fundraising stops on the same weekend. A Newsweek analysis of itemized contributions found that California donors, at roughly $7.35 million, outpaced Georgia donors, at roughly $6.86 million, out of more than $81 million raised for reelection. That puts in-state contributions at approximately 18 percent of his total haul. Rep. Mike Collins, Ossoff's Republican general election opponent, posted about the contradiction, highlighting the senator's stump speech criticizing outside money in elections while referencing Georgia communities like Garden City, Albany, and College Park. Collins raised about $2.1 million in Q2 2026. The Ossoff campaign, for its part, says the average Q2 contribution was $42, with nearly 90 percent of more than 474,000 donations from April through June coming in at $100 or less. Ossoff holds the only Democratic Senate seat up for reelection in a state carried by President Trump in 2024, making it a top national Republican target. Reports indicate the Hamptons swing is also giving the Wall Street donor class a chance to evaluate Ossoff as a potential 2028 presidential candidate. What do you think: does a candidate's donor list contradict their campaign message? 👇 #JonOssoff #GeorgiaSenate #AlexSoros #HamptonsRaiser #GeorgiaPolitics #Breaking
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-25 to 2026-09-142 variantsspend $600–79814,000–19,998 impressions
I’ve driven enough miles to know that you don’t ease up when you’re making good time. Our end-of-month deadline is coming up. Will you give us the fuel we need to finish this off?
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-254 variantsspend $6,000–7,196121,100–137,996 impressions
Today, I write you with news that is truly shifting this race. We are in a better spot today to send Jon Ossoff hitchhiking than ever before. But I need your support before our CRITICAL end-of-month deadline hits.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-25 to 2026-09-012 variantsspend $0–1984,000–5,998 impressions
🚨 Georgia Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff has voted against the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act three separate times, yet is now publicly questioning why banning biological males from women's sports is a legislative priority. Ossoff voted against related amendments in March 2021 and March 2024, then voted against S. 9, the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act, in March 2025. The NRSC confirmed a third vote against the ban in March 2026. In a statement to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Ossoff called the bill "overreach," arguing that "school districts and athletic associations can ensure fair, safe competition without subjecting the bodies of adolescent student athletes to intrusive investigation by the federal government." In footage from a separate appearance, Ossoff appeared to frame the transgender sports debate as a distraction from issues like artificial intelligence and economic threats. The votes put Ossoff at odds with Georgia voters. A poll found that 73% of Georgia general election voters support a ban on biological men competing in women's sports. A 2025 New York Times/Ipsos poll put national support at 79%. Following Ossoff's federal votes against the measure, Georgia lawmakers passed the Riley Gaines Act, banning biological males from competing in female athletics at all academic levels in the state. Ossoff has also co-sponsored the federal Equality Act in 2021 and 2023, which would redefine sex to include gender identity across federal civil rights law, with no carveout for sports. Ossoff is up for re-election in November 2026, facing Republican challengers including Rep. Mike Collins and Rep. Buddy Carter in what is considered one of the key Senate races of the midterm cycle. Do you think Sen. Ossoff's votes on women's sports reflect the values of Georgia voters? 👇 #JonOssoff #WomensSports #GeorgiaSenate #ProtectionOfWomenAndGirlsInSportsAct #Georgia2026 #Breaking
Loaded LanguageCard Stacking7.7% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: The term 'biological males' is a politically charged phrase used to frame transgender women in a derogatory and delegitimizing way, triggering an emotional reaction rather than conveying neutral facts — for example: 'biological males from women's sports'

Card Stacking: The sentence selectively presents Ossoff's voting record to imply hypocrisy while omitting any context for why he voted against the bill or what his stated reasoning is, presenting only the framing that supports the criticism — for example: 'voted against the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act three separate times, yet is now publicly questioning'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-25 to 2026-08-31spend $500–59910,000–14,999 impressions
BREAKING: Jon Ossoff is losing ground in GA! Mike Collins is closing fast, and we have a real shot of flipping this seat. Your support today could send Jon Ossoff hitchhiking for good.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-23 to 2026-08-25spend $1,500–1,99945,000–49,999 impressions
We’ll make this quick: We need everyone who is able to give $5 today to make sure Jon Ossoff has the resources he needs to win. Jon is being challenged by MAGA extremist, bigot and antisemite Mike Collins. MAGA has already made Jon their #1 target, spending millions to defeat him, and a major dark money group just committed to spending another $15 million. Can you rush $5 today to help us meet this moment? We’ll make this quick: We need everyone who is able to give $5 today to make sure Jon Ossoff has the resources he needs to win. Jon is being challenged by MAGA extremist, bigot and antisemite Mike Collins. MAGA has already made Jon their #1 target, spending millions to defeat him, and a major dark money group just committed to spending another $15 million. Can you rush $5 today to help us meet this moment?
Name CallingLoaded Language25.0% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: The sentence uses multiple derogatory labels — 'MAGA extremist', 'bigot', and 'antisemite' — to discredit Mike Collins rather than address his policy positions or arguments — for example: labeling a political opponent with stacked pejorative terms to delegitimize them without substantive critique.

Loaded Language: The terms 'extremist', 'bigot', and 'antisemite' are emotionally charged words designed to trigger a strong negative reaction toward the named individual rather than convey neutral factual information — for example: stacking inflammatory labels to provoke an emotional response.

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-19 to 2026-08-25spend $0–991,000–1,999 impressions
TRUMP'S ENDORSED SENATE NOMINEE NEEDS YOU! TRUMP'S PICK TO FLIP GEORGIA RED: MIKE COLLINS!
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-19 to 2026-09-223 variantsspend $6,200–7,797134,000–164,997 impressions
The polls show a dead heat. Help this Georgia trucker finish the fight and send Jon Ossoff hitchhiking. Just $5 today makes a difference!
Appeal to PrejudiceLoaded LanguageName Calling33.3% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'Georgia trucker' invokes working-class regional identity as a badge of authenticity and legitimacy, implying that supporting this candidate is the 'real' choice for ordinary Georgians — for example: Georgia trucker

Loaded Language: The phrase 'finish the fight' uses militaristic, emotionally charged language to frame a political campaign as a battle requiring urgent action — for example: finish the fight

Name Calling: 'Send Jon Ossoff hitchhiking' is a derogatory dismissal of the opponent, reducing him to a figure to be discarded rather than engaging with his positions — for example: send Jon Ossoff hitchhiking

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-19 to 2026-08-25spend $0–991,000–1,999 impressions
PRESIDENT TRUMP BACKS MIKE COLLINS TO DEFEAT JON OSSOFF! He's got the President's Complete and Total Endorsement. Now he needs yours.
Bandwagon AppealLoaded LanguageFalse Urgency66.7% of sentences flagged

Bandwagon Appeal: Invoking the President's endorsement implies that a high-status authority figure has already committed, creating social pressure to follow — for example: He's got the President's Complete and Total Endorsement and Now he needs yours.

Loaded Language: The capitalized superlatives 'Complete and Total' are emotionally amplified to make the endorsement sound absolute and overwhelming rather than simply factual — for example: 'Complete and Total Endorsement'

False Urgency: The word 'Now' creates artificial time pressure implying immediate action is required, discouraging deliberation — for example: 'Now he needs yours'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-19 to 2026-09-142 variantsspend $2,400–2,99855,000–64,998 impressions
We're in a dead heat with the most vulnerable Democrat in America. Help me put him away for good. Just $5 today can save the Senate majority!
False UrgencyExaggeration/HyperboleAppeal to Fear33.3% of sentences flagged

False Urgency: The word 'today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'Just $5 today'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that a single $5 donation can 'save' an entire Senate majority is a dramatic overstatement that inflates the impact of one small action — for example: 'can save the Senate majority'

Appeal to Fear: The framing implies the Senate majority is in imminent danger and will be lost without immediate action, creating anxiety to override rational deliberation — for example: 'save the Senate majority'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-17 to 2026-08-222 variantsspend $4,000–4,998100,000–114,998 impressions
🚨Calling all Democrats🚨Can you take one minute to watch this important message and consider donating to Jon Ossoff’s reelection campaign? Thanks for your support.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-14 to 2026-09-114 variantsspend $2,700–3,496150,200–177,096 impressions
BREAKING: The polls just showed something that has Jon Ossoff SWEATING. Senator Rick Scott is personally asking you to chip in $5, $50, or $500 and put him away for good.
False UrgencyBandwagon Appeal50.0% of sentences flagged

False Urgency: The phrasing 'put him away for good' implies a decisive, final action that must be taken now, creating artificial pressure to donate immediately — for example: 'put him away for good'

Bandwagon Appeal: The framing of a named senator 'personally asking you' to contribute alongside tiered donation amounts implies a mass movement where participation is expected and normalized — for example: 'chip in $5, $50, or $500'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-14 to 2026-08-202 variantsspend $0–1985,000–6,998 impressions
🚨 Rep. Mike Collins, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Georgia, is touting two laws he authored as proof he can deliver results in Washington, while drawing a sharp contrast with Democratic incumbent Sen. Jon Ossoff ahead of one of the most competitive Senate races in the country. Collins points to the TRANQ Research Act, H.R. 1734, which passed the House 425-0 and was signed into law by President Biden. The bill directs the National Institute of Standards and Technology to strengthen its ability to detect and identify synthetic opioids like tranq. He also co-authored the Laken Riley Act, the first bill signed by President Trump in his new term, named after 22-year-old nursing student Laken Riley, who was murdered by an undocumented Venezuelan immigrant. Collins says the law has led to the deportation of over 20,000 people, though a sourced report found more than 17,500 illegal immigrants in 2025 had been arrested under its mandatory detention provisions. In a campaign video, Collins describes himself as a capitalist with a small-business background, saying a capitalist in Washington means common sense and results. He labels Sen. Ossoff a socialist, arguing that means higher taxes and bigger government. Collins won the Republican Senate runoff with an endorsement from President Trump, setting up a general election race that both the Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball have rated as a Toss-up. What do you think matters most to Georgia voters heading into this Senate race? 👇 #GeorgiaSenate #MikeCollins #JonOssoff #LakenRileyAct #TRANQAct #Breaking
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-14 to 2026-08-193 variantsspend $0–29711,000–13,997 impressions
🚨 Republican Rep. Mike Collins is drawing a sharp contrast with Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia's 2026 U.S. Senate race, highlighting his background as the founder and CEO of a Georgia trucking company against Ossoff's pre-Senate career as CEO of a London-based investigative television production company. Collins, who secured the GOP nomination after defeating former Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley by more than 10 points in a primary runoff — with a last-minute endorsement from President Trump — is positioning himself as a homegrown Georgia businessman and staunch Trump ally ahead of what is shaping up as one of the most closely watched Senate contests of the midterm cycle. The contrast, amplified by Team Trump's official social media account, also zeroes in on Ossoff's donor base — a line of attack Republicans have used against the incumbent senator since at least 2020, when opponents labeled him a "trust fund" candidate. Ossoff, who became the youngest sitting U.S. senator when he was sworn in January 2021, is seeking re-election amid polls showing him holding a lead in early matchups against Collins. Georgia voted for Trump in 2024, but political analysts note the national environment could favor Democrats given the president's current approval ratings — making the Ossoff-Collins matchup a critical battleground for control of the Senate. What do you think matters most to Georgia voters in this race — a candidate's background or their policy positions? 👇 #GeorgiaSenate #MikeCollins #JonOssoff #Georgia2026 #Senate2026 #Breaking
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-14 to 2026-08-202 variantsspend $0–1982,000–3,998 impressions
The Georgia Chamber of Commerce 2026 Congressional Luncheon will be held on Wednesday, August 5, 2026, at The Classic Center in Athens, Georgia. Gubernatorial, Senate, and congressional candidates are set to gather for the first time since their primary wins, including U.S. Senate contender Rep. Mike Collins and gubernatorial contenders Rick Jackson and Keisha Lance Bottoms.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-14 to 2026-08-193 variantsspend $0–29710,000–12,997 impressions
🚨 Rep. Mike Collins is previewing his upcoming Oct. 8 Senate debate against incumbent Sen. Jon Ossoff, saying voters will finally get to compare both candidates' records side by side. In a post on his campaign's social media account, Collins said Ossoff "made people's lives less safe, more expensive" — framing the debate as a direct referendum on Ossoff's Senate record since his 2020 runoff election victory. The one-hour debate is set for Thursday, Oct. 8, 2026, at Assembly Atlanta, airing live at 7 p.m. across Georgia markets. It will be moderated by a panel of professional journalists. The race is rated a Toss-up by both The Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball, making it one of the most closely watched Senate contests of the 2026 cycle. Ossoff holds a significant fundraising edge — $31.7 million cash on hand vs. Collins's $1.7 million — though two major super PACs have pledged a combined $64 million to the race. Collins, a trucking company co-owner and Georgia's 10th Congressional District representative, won the Republican Senate runoff on June 16, 2026, following an endorsement from President Trump. Ossoff had previously challenged Collins to three total televised debates. What's the one issue you want both candidates pressed on in the October debate? 👇 #GASen #MikeCollins #JonOssoff #GeorgiaPolitics #GASenate2026 #Breaking
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by The Georgia Democratfrom 2026-08-14 to 2026-08-192 variantsspend $0–1986,000–7,998 impressions
🚨 Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA) says states that issue commercial drivers licenses to people who cannot speak or read English should be held financially liable — citing the highway-safety risk of unqualified drivers operating 80,000-pound trucks. Collins, a trucking company co-owner and Republican Senate nominee challenging Sen. Jon Ossoff in 2026, is a co-sponsor of Connor's Law — legislation that would codify English proficiency requirements for CDL holders and include an out-of-service provision revoking licenses from those who fail to meet the standard. The FMCSA finalized a rule in March 2026 limiting non-domiciled CDLs to drivers holding H-2A, H-2B, or E-2 visas, and placed 28 states and jurisdictions under special orders to pause non-domiciled CDL issuance. States like California and New York posted non-compliance rates of 25% and over 53%, respectively. Collins estimates roughly 700,000 illegal non-domiciled drivers are currently operating on U.S. roads — a figure he did not source. The FMCSA has cited 17 fatal crashes in 2025 resulting in 30 deaths involving non-domiciled CDL holders who would be ineligible under the new rule. However, the administration's own initial analysis acknowledged there is not sufficient evidence "to reliably demonstrate a measurable empirical relationship" between a trucker's citizenship status and safety outcomes. Should states face financial penalties for issuing CDLs outside federal eligibility requirements? 👇 #MikeCollins #ConnorsLaw #CDL #TruckingSafety #Immigration #Breaking
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Listen

Paid for by Jon Ossoff for Senatevideo · 0:51from 2026-08-13
[music] >> He's got really good constituent services. So, if somebody has a problem with a passport, [music] you know, he does good things like that. >> I've seen nothing from Senator Jon Ossoff that requires me to say you're fired from the job. So, [music] you've got my support. >> Their constituent services are second to none. I think he really picked up the mantle [music] laid down by the late Senator Johnny Isakson, who had a tremendous [music] constituent services staff, and you've carried on that tradition. >> You talk to farmers in South Georgia, they can get him on the phone, they can get his staff on [music] the phone, they can get help. You talk to Republicans in Houston County, they know they can reach out to to Ossoff, and he doesn't care that they're Republican. If they [music] need something, he's going to get it done.
no techniques found

Claims checked

“he really picked up the mantle laid down by the late Senator Johnny Isakson, who had a tremendous constituent services staff, and you've carried on that tradition.”
Checked as: Senator Jon Ossoff picked up the mantle of the late Senator Johnny Isakson, who had a tremendous constituent services staff, and Ossoff carried on that tradition. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-13 to 2026-08-204 variantsspend $0–396400–3,996 impressions
BREAKING: Mike Collins is within the margin of error with the Radical Left’s golden boy, Jon Ossoff! Will you accept Senator Tim Scott’s personal plea to donate $5, $50, or even $500 to defeat Jon Ossoff?
Name CallingLoaded LanguageFalse Urgency50.0% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: The phrase 'Radical Left' is a derogatory political label used to discredit Ossoff and his supporters rather than engage with their positions — for example: Radical Left

Loaded Language: 'Radical Left' is an emotionally charged term designed to trigger a negative reaction toward Ossoff and his political affiliation — for example: Radical Left

False Urgency: The 'BREAKING' label creates artificial urgency and excitement around a poll result to provoke an immediate emotional response — for example: BREAKING

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-13 to 2026-09-104 variantsspend $200–59611,100–18,096 impressions
Senator Tim Scott: Georgia loves Mike. We need your support; $5, $50, or even $500 might be the difference in taking this state and making it red to the roots. Will you join the convoy and take down Jon Ossoff?
Bandwagon AppealFalse Urgency66.7% of sentences flagged

Bandwagon Appeal: The claim that 'Georgia loves Mike' implies widespread popular support to pressure conformity and suggest the candidate is universally embraced — for example: Georgia loves Mike

False Urgency: The framing that even a small donation 'might be the difference' creates artificial pressure implying immediate action is critical to the outcome — for example: might be the difference in taking this state

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-13 to 2026-09-104 variantsspend $300–69615,100–21,196 impressions
Senator Tim Scott: We need your support! Mike Collins is only behind by 4% in the latest polls; your support today will be the reason the next poll has us winning. Will you join the convoy today?
False UrgencyBandwagon Appeal33.3% of sentences flagged

False Urgency: The phrase 'your support today' creates artificial time pressure implying that immediate action is required to shift the polling outcome — for example: 'your support today will be the reason the next poll has us winning'

Bandwagon Appeal: The framing implies that joining the support effort now will tip the scales, pressuring the reader to conform to a winning movement rather than deliberate carefully — for example: 'the next poll has us winning'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-124 variantsspend $1,900–2,29654,000–69,996 impressions
Do you believe MAGA extremist Mike Collins should be a United States Senator? If the answer is no — and the answer is definitely no — then can you add your name to personally endorse Jon Ossoff’s reelection campaign today?
Name CallingLoaded Language50.0% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: The label 'MAGA extremist' is a derogatory political label used to discredit Mike Collins rather than address his policy positions or qualifications — for example: 'MAGA extremist Mike Collins'

Loaded Language: The word 'extremist' is emotionally charged and designed to trigger a negative reaction toward the subject rather than convey factual information — for example: 'MAGA extremist'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-08-102 variantsspend $50,000–59,9982,000,000–0 impressions
🚨🚨Mike Collins voted to gut Social Security. He wants Social Security beneficiaries to go back to work.🚨🚨
Loaded LanguageAppeal to FearExaggeration/Hyperbole100.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: The word 'gut' is emotionally charged, implying severe and destructive damage rather than using neutral language like 'reduce' or 'reform' — for example: 'voted to gut Social Security'

Appeal to Fear: The use of alarm emojis and the claim about gutting Social Security is designed to trigger fear among beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries about losing their benefits — for example: 🚨🚨Mike Collins voted to gut Social Security and wants Social Security beneficiaries to go back to work.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The framing implies an extreme and absolute intent on Collins's part without nuance or qualification, overstating the policy position — for example: 'He wants Social Security beneficiaries to go back to work'

Claims checked

“Mike Collins voted to gut Social Security.”
True, but missing context: The "voted to gut Social Security" claim comes from an Ossoff ad that fact-checkers describe as misleadingly using a partial quote; Collins' actual statement was about tax cuts incentivizing people to leave Social Security and return to work, not a direct vote to cut benefits. source ↗Fact-checker citedConfidence: medium“Two ads from Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., misleadingly used a partial quote from a radio interview in which U.” Verdict right?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

No Answers

Paid for by Jon Ossoff for Senatevideo · 1:04from 2026-08-03
Republican Senate candidate Mike Collins dogged by news reports of his campaign ties to white nationalism >> [music] >> refused to answer reporter questions about the controversy. >> You know, we fully addressed [music] that. >> Did you address his comments completely, sir? >> yes, ma'am. I'll I'll give that young lady right there. She has a [music] question, one last question. Listen, thank you. I appreciate y'all's time. I appreciate you coming. >> want to talk about your son's line at all? You want to Do you embrace [music] him in the family? Share his views? >> He soon left after reporters asked Collins [music] to condemn widespread claims of his ties to anti-Semitism and white nationalism. [music] Not addressing the question, Collins redirected instead. >> We saw a candidate for the United States Senate, a sitting [music] member of Congress, Mike Collins, run away from a press conference >> [music] >> because he was asked some important and straightforward questions. And Congressman Collins is not going to get away with refusing [music] to answer these questions.
no techniques found

Claims checked

“Republican Senate candidate Mike Collins dogged by news reports of his campaign ties to white nationalism”
Checked as: News reports exist about Mike Collins's campaign ties to white nationalism. Supported by c-span.org source ↗Primary sourceConfidence: high Verdict right?

“He soon left after reporters asked Collins to condemn widespread claims of his ties to anti-Semitism and white nationalism.”
Checked as: Collins left soon after reporters asked him to condemn widespread claims of his ties to anti-Semitism and white nationalism. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“refused to answer reporter questions about the controversy.”
Checked as: A person refused to answer reporter questions about a controversy. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

“Not addressing the question, Collins redirected instead.”
Checked as: Collins redirected instead of addressing a question. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-07-14 to 2026-09-034 variantsspend $55,000–74,9964,000,000–0 impressions
Mike Collins voted to cover up the Epstein Files AFTER he knew 14-year-old girls were raped.
no techniques found

Claims checked

“Mike Collins voted to cover up the Epstein Files AFTER he knew 14-year-old girls were raped.”
Checked as: Mike Collins voted against releasing the Epstein files after knowing that 14-year-old girls were raped. No authoritative evidence found Verdict right?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by JON OSSOFF FOR SENATEfrom 2026-07-14 to 2026-09-034 variantsspend $13,500–15,9962,050,000–1,199,997 impressions
Records show Mike Collins voted to cover up the Epstein Files AFTER he knew 14-year-old girls were raped.
no techniques found

Claims checked

No checkable factual claims in this ad.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2026-04-13spend $800–899350,000–399,999 impressions
Father, Husband, Trucker, Pilot. Conservative Workhorse for Senate. Text MAGA to 70622
Appeal to PrejudiceGlittering GeneralitiesFalse UrgencyBandwagon Appeal100.0% of sentences flagged

Appeal to Prejudice: The identity labels 'Father, Husband, Trucker, Pilot' are curated to signal working-class, family-values in-group identity to a specific conservative audience — for example: invoking 'real American' archetypes

Glittering Generalities: The term 'Conservative Workhorse' uses vague but emotionally positive framing to imply virtue and diligence without substantive policy content — for example: 'values that made this country great'

False Urgency: The call-to-action 'Text MAGA to 70622' functions as an immediate mobilization prompt designed to bypass deliberation and prompt instant action — for example: 'act now'

Bandwagon Appeal: The use of 'MAGA' as a rallying keyword implicitly invokes a large movement to pressure conformity and belonging — for example: 'join the movement'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MIKE COLLINS FOR SENATEfrom 2025-12-2415 variantsspend $10,900–15,185820,000–939,985 impressions
Hit the follow button in the bottom right if you still support President Trump & VP Vance! 🇺🇸
no techniques found

Claims checked

No checkable factual claims in this ad.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

What this page is

  • An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in GA; or it ran mostly in GA and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
  • Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
  • A technique is a specific manipulative move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
  • Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. The check runs once and its result is shown to everyone afterwards. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
  • Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
  • Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.

Get notified as this improves — new detection models, the browser extension, and outlet scorecards. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time