New Hampshire Senate

Bleep

Oh, the things you'll hear about me in this campaign. They'll say I'm a that when I was in Congress I And when I'm elected, oh, more. Just know one thing. As senator, I'll have one job, stand up for New Hampshire every single day. >> If you believe anything bad about John, you a fool. >> I'm John Sununu and I approve this message. She kills me.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Whenever I talk to Granite Staters, I always hear the same thing: The cost of everything is out of control. I’m fighting back. When Donald Trump’s tariffs started driving up prices, I wrote the bill to block them. When his war with Iran sent gas prices soaring, I said “enough.” And when Big Pharma raised your bills, I took them on. I’ll never stop fighting to lower costs for New Hampshire.

Bandwagon Appeal: Claims universal agreement among a regional group to imply the speaker's position is widely shared — for example: 'I always hear the same thing'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Absolute claim that the cost of 'everything' is out of control overstates the situation beyond what evidence supports — for example: 'The cost of everything is out of control'

Loaded Language: The phrase 'fighting back' frames the speaker as a heroic combatant against unnamed forces, triggering an emotional response — for example: I'm fighting back and his war with Iran sent gas prices soaring.

Card Stacking: Presents the claim that Trump's tariffs drove up prices as established fact without qualification, while crediting the speaker's bill as the solution, omitting any counterarguments or complexity — for example: When Donald Trump's tariffs started driving up prices, I wrote the bill to block them and his war with Iran sent gas prices soaring.

Name Calling: 'Big Pharma' is a derogatory label used to discredit the pharmaceutical industry rather than engage with specific policy arguments — for example: 'Big Pharma raised your bills'

Glittering Generalities: Vague pledge to 'never stop fighting' invokes noble-sounding commitment without specifying any concrete policy — for example: 'I'll never stop fighting to lower costs for New Hampshire'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Granite Staters are tired of corporate special interests rigging the system and raising prices. I’m taking on Trump’s tariffs, standing up to Big Pharma to lower prescription drug costs, and fighting to cut taxes for working families. And I’ve never taken a dime of corporate PAC money. I only work for you.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'rigging the system' uses emotionally charged language to imply deliberate corruption and manipulation — for example: 'rigging the system'

Bandwagon Appeal: Claiming that 'Granite Staters' broadly are tired implies widespread consensus to pressure agreement — for example: 'Granite Staters are tired'

Scapegoating: Corporate special interests are blamed as the singular cause of high prices and a rigged system, oversimplifying complex economic issues — for example: 'corporate special interests rigging the system and raising prices'

Name Calling: The label 'Big Pharma' is a derogatory shorthand used to discredit the pharmaceutical industry rather than engage with specific policy arguments — for example: 'Big Pharma'

Appeal to Prejudice: Invoking 'working families' as the in-group beneficiary implies the speaker is on the side of ordinary people against powerful elites — for example: 'working families'

Card Stacking: The claim selectively highlights the absence of corporate PAC money without providing broader context about other funding sources, presenting a partial picture of financial independence — for example: 'never taken a dime of corporate PAC money'

Glittering Generalities: The vague pledge 'I only work for you' sounds noble and selfless but carries no specific meaning or verifiable commitment — for example: 'I only work for you'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

The cost of everything is out of control. Working families deserve a break. That’s why I fought to lower taxes and took on Big Pharma to lower prescription drug costs. I’ll never stop fighting for Granite Staters.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that 'everything' is out of control is an overstatement that generalizes beyond what evidence supports — for example: 'The cost of everything is out of control'

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes 'working families' as an in-group identity to generate emotional solidarity and imply the speaker is on their side — for example: 'Working families deserve a break'

Name Calling: The label 'Big Pharma' is a derogatory shorthand used to cast the pharmaceutical industry as a villainous monolith rather than engaging with specific policy arguments — for example: 'took on Big Pharma'

Card Stacking: The sentence presents the speaker's actions as unambiguous victories without acknowledging complexity, counterarguments, or the degree of actual impact — for example: 'I fought to lower taxes and took on Big Pharma to lower prescription drug costs'

Glittering Generalities: The vague pledge to 'never stop fighting' for a regional identity group is emotionally resonant but substantively empty, functioning as rhetorical flourish — for example: 'I'll never stop fighting for Granite Staters'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’m fighting to lower costs for New Hampshire families, take on Big Pharma, push back against Trump’s tariffs, and cut taxes for hard working Granite Staters. I’ll always stand up for New Hampshire.

Name Calling: 'Big Pharma' is a derogatory label used to discredit the pharmaceutical industry rather than engage with specific policy arguments — for example: Big Pharma

Appeal to Prejudice: 'Granite Staters' and 'New Hampshire families' invoke in-group identity to signal the speaker is one of 'us' and fighting for 'our people' — for example: hard working Granite Staters

Glittering Generalities: 'Always stand up for New Hampshire' is a vague, emotionally positive pledge with no specific meaning or policy substance — for example: I'll always stand up for New Hampshire

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’ve had enough of big drug companies making record profits, while working people struggle to afford their life-saving medication. I’m taking on Big Pharma to stop them from rigging the system and lower costs for New Hampshire families.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged contrast between 'record profits' and 'working people struggle' with 'life-saving medication' to trigger resentment — for example: working people struggle to afford their life-saving medication and stop them from rigging the system.

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes an in-group identity of 'working people' against the out-group of 'big drug companies' to foster class-based solidarity — for example: big drug companies making record profits, while working people struggle and lower costs for New Hampshire families.

Name Calling: The term 'Big Pharma' is a derogatory label used to discredit the pharmaceutical industry as a monolithic corrupt entity rather than addressing specific companies or policies — for example: 'I'm taking on Big Pharma'.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

CHRIS URGENTLY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT. ❌ Back-to-back polls show our campaign falling behind our GOP opponent. ❌ Multiple pundits have shifted our race to a Toss Up. ❌ We’re being outspent 3:1 on the airwaves. ❌ Our opponent has the full backing of Donald Trump and the Republican establishment. It’s crucial that we fight back now. Our end-of-quarter fundraising deadline on September 30th is one of the last chances we have to take back the lead. We need to raise $1,000,000 from grassroots donors like you. We’re on the way there, but we need your help. Rush a $15 donation right now →

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

CHRIS PAPPAS URGENTLY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT. Rush a $15 donation right now →

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

RUSH A DONATION TO CHRIS PAPPAS → Republicans are outspending us 3-to-1 on the airwaves — and it’s working. Trump-endorsed John Sununu now has a real shot at winning the seat that could decide the Senate majority, and this Toss Up race rating will bring even more GOP money and attention to New Hampshire. We need to turn this around right now. Rush a donation before our end-of-quarter deadline on September 30th to help Chris Pappas fight back against their attacks, reach the voters who will decide this Toss Up race, and keep Democrats’ path to the Senate majority alive.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Chris Pappas is not honest with you because he doesn’t believe you’ll vote. Prove him wrong, check your voter registration now. Chris Pappas is not honest with you because he doesn’t believe you’ll vote. Prove him wrong, check your voter registration now.

Name Calling: Pappas is labeled as dishonest without evidence or argument to support the claim — for example: asserting someone is 'not honest' as a character attack rather than addressing specific actions

Appeal to Prejudice: The message frames Pappas as dismissive of the reader specifically, creating an in-group/out-group dynamic where the politician looks down on ordinary voters — for example: 'he doesn't believe you'll vote'

False Urgency: The imperative 'now' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'check your voter registration now'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

WHOSE POCKET IS PAPPAS IN?

In Washington, [music] you can find Chris Pappas here, in the pocket of DC lobbyists, in the pocket of the Amazon lobbyist he dated while voting on their bills. You can also find him here, in the pocket of his liberal donors in exchange for big tax breaks for their [music] mansions in New York and Massachusetts. Chris Pappas, he really fits in in Washington. >> [music] >> SLF PAC is responsible for the content of this message.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'in the pocket of' is emotionally charged, implying corruption and subservience without presenting verified evidence — for example: in the pocket of DC lobbyists, in the pocket of the Amazon lobbyist and his liberal donors.

Name Calling: Pappas is implicitly labeled as corrupt and compromised through repeated association with lobbyists and personal relationships framed as conflicts of interest — for example: 'in the pocket of the Amazon lobbyist he dated while voting on their bills'

Repetition: The phrase 'in the pocket of' is repeated three times within a single sentence to hammer home the corruption framing through sheer repetition — for example: in the pocket of DC lobbyists, in the pocket of the Amazon lobbyist and in the pocket of his liberal donors.

Appeal to Prejudice: Invoking 'New York and Massachusetts' as out-group elite locations implies Pappas serves wealthy coastal elites rather than his constituents — for example: 'mansions in New York and Massachusetts'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

$50 million. That’s how much Trump allies and dark money groups have funneled into New Hampshire to prop up my opponent, John Sununu. They’re running attack ads 24/7, spreading misinformation to New Hampshire voters. That kind of spending doesn’t happen unless national Republicans think this seat is theirs to buy. And it's paying off. The Cook Political Report just moved this race to its Toss Up category. Inside Elections did the same. We need all hands on deck right now. This race could decide whether Democrats take back the Senate majority — and whether we can finally put a check on Trump’s extreme agenda. Rush a donation to our grassroots campaign today, and help us close the gap before it’s too late.

False Urgency: The phrase 'all hands on deck right now' creates artificial time pressure to mobilize action without deliberation — for example: 'right now'

Loaded Language: The word 'extreme' is used as an emotionally charged label to characterize Trump's agenda negatively rather than describe it factually — for example: 'extreme agenda'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies dire consequences if Democrats do not win the Senate, framing the race as the last line of defense against an unchecked threat — for example: 'whether we can finally put a check on Trump's extreme agenda'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 URGENT MESSAGE: From Chris Pappas 🚨

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

You’re paying more because of John Sununu.

Scapegoating: The sentence directly and solely attributes a financial burden ('paying more') to a single named individual, implying he alone is responsible for a complex economic outcome — for example: blaming one person for rising costs

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

It’s Maggie Hassan. I won my first Senate race by just 1,017 votes. So trust me: Every vote matters in New Hampshire. Chris Pappas is officially our Democratic nominee, and Republicans are spending big to defeat him. Recent polls show Trump-backed John Sununu gaining on Chris, and the Cook Political Report just moved New Hampshire’s rating from “Lean Democrat” to “Toss Up.” I know Chris. I know this state. And I know he can win – but he needs us right now. Chip in $5 today to help Chris win this Senate seat and secure a majority for Democrats.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Liberal Chris Pappas says he works for New Hampshire. But his record says otherwise: 🤯 Cash payments to illegal immigrants 🤯 Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals Pappas is good for criminal illegals. Bad for New Hampshire. Liberal Chris Pappas says he works for New Hampshire. But his record says otherwise: 🤯 Cash payments to illegal immigrants 🤯 Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals Pappas is good for criminal illegals. Bad for New Hampshire. Liberal Chris Pappas says he works for New Hampshire. But his record says otherwise: 🤯 Cash payments to illegal immigrants 🤯 Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals Pappas is good for criminal illegals. Bad for New Hampshire.

Name Calling: The label 'Liberal' is used as a derogatory political tag to prime the audience negatively before any substantive claim is made — for example: 'Liberal Chris Pappas'

Loaded Language: The phrase 'illegal immigrants' uses emotionally charged terminology to trigger a negative reaction, and 'amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals' is designed to provoke fear and outrage — for example: 'illegal immigrants', 'convicted criminals'

Card Stacking: Selectively presents two inflammatory policy positions without context, counterarguments, or verification, framing them as damning evidence of betrayal — for example: 'Cash payments to illegal immigrants', 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals'

Appeal to Fear: The mention of 'convicted criminals' receiving amnesty is designed to create anxiety about public safety and override rational evaluation of the policy — for example: 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals'

Scapegoating: Illegal immigrants are implicitly framed as a drain on resources and a threat, with Pappas blamed for enabling them — for example: 'Cash payments to illegal immigrants'

Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents a binary opposition: being good for one group is automatically bad for New Hampshire, allowing no nuance or middle ground — for example: 'Bad for New Hampshire'

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes in-group identity of New Hampshire residents to imply Pappas is working against 'our people' — for example: 'Bad for New Hampshire'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim of 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals' uses extreme framing to overstate the scope and danger of the policy — for example: 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A Message From End Citizens United President 🔽: New Hampshire’s Senate race is officially a Toss-Up – and Chris Pappas needs your help to stand up to Trump, fight back against big money, and put working people before corporate greed. If Republicans flip this seat, they keep a Senate majority that answers to corporate money – not working people. He can't out-raise the special interests backing Sununu. He can only out-organize them with grassroots donors like you. End Citizens United is proud to stand with Chris in this critical Senate race. Chip in $5 to help Chris win.

False Urgency: The framing of the race as 'officially a Toss-Up' combined with 'needs your help' creates artificial urgency to pressure immediate action — for example: needs your help

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged phrases are used to trigger a reaction against opponents rather than convey neutral facts — for example: corporate greed

Appeal to Prejudice: Frames the contest as 'working people' versus corporate interests to invoke in-group identity and loyalty — for example: working people before corporate greed

Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents only two sides — working people versus corporate greed — with no acknowledgment of complexity or middle ground — for example: working people before corporate greed

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

The race for New Hampshire's Senate seat is closer than ever — a new poll shows the race tied, and experts are calling this the most competitive Senate race in the country. Republicans are backing John Sununu – the guy I defeated in 2008. If elected he would be a rubber stamp for Trump's reckless agenda. Please join me in supporting Chris Pappas and donate whatever you can to his campaign today. – Senator Jeanne Shaheen

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: rubber stamp for Trump's reckless agenda.

Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments.

Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies a dire consequence if Sununu is elected — that he would blindly follow a 'reckless agenda' — designed to create anxiety and deter voters — for example: 'If elected he would be a rubber stamp for Trump's reckless agenda'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Liberal Chris Pappas says he works for New Hampshire. But his record says otherwise: 🤯 Cash payments to illegal immigrants 🤯 Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals Pappas is good for criminal illegals. Bad for New Hampshire.

Name Calling: The label 'Liberal' is used as a derogatory political tag to prime the audience negatively before any substantive claim is made — for example: 'Liberal Chris Pappas'

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged phrases like 'illegal immigrants' and 'convicted criminals' are used to trigger fear and outrage rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'illegal immigrants' and 'convicted criminals'

Appeal to Fear: The bullet points invoke fear by associating the politician with cash payments to illegal immigrants and amnesty for criminals, implying dangerous consequences for the public — for example: 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals'

Card Stacking: The record is presented selectively through two inflammatory bullet points with no context, counterbalancing information, or nuance about the actual policy positions — for example: 'his record says otherwise' followed only by negative cherry-picked items

Scapegoating: Illegal immigrants and criminals are implicitly framed as threats that the politician is enabling, deflecting complex policy debate into blame of an out-group — for example: 'Cash payments to illegal immigrants'

Appeal to Prejudice: 'Bad for New Hampshire' invokes in-group identity of New Hampshire residents to imply Pappas is an enemy of the local community — for example: Bad for New Hampshire

Black-and-White Fallacy: The two sentences together present a binary framing: Pappas helps criminals and harms New Hampshire, leaving no room for nuance or alternative interpretation — for example: good for criminal illegals / Bad for New Hampshire

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Liberal Chris Pappas says he works for New Hampshire. But his record says otherwise: 🤯 Cash payments to illegal immigrants 🤯 Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals Pappas is good for criminal illegals. Bad for New Hampshire. Liberal Chris Pappas says he works for New Hampshire. But his record says otherwise: 🤯 Cash payments to illegal immigrants 🤯 Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals Pappas is good for criminal illegals. Bad for New Hampshire.

Name Calling: The label 'Liberal' is used as a derogatory political tag to prime the audience negatively before any substantive criticism is made — for example: 'Liberal Chris Pappas'

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged phrases like 'illegal immigrants' and 'convicted criminals' are used to trigger negative reactions rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'Cash payments to illegal immigrants' and 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals'

Scapegoating: The framing implies Pappas is enabling harm by directing resources to out-group members ('illegal immigrants', 'convicted criminals'), blaming a political figure for enabling threats to the community — for example: 'Cash payments to illegal immigrants'

Card Stacking: The bullet points selectively present characterizations of policy positions in the most alarming framing possible, omitting context, nuance, or counterarguments about the actual legislation — for example: 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The phrase 'Amnesty for millions' uses an extreme scale claim to amplify alarm beyond what a specific policy proposal would typically entail — for example: 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals'

Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents a binary outcome — what is good for one group is automatically bad for New Hampshire — leaving no room for nuance or alternative interpretations — for example: 'Bad for New Hampshire'

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes New Hampshire residents as an in-group implicitly harmed by Pappas's positions, exploiting local identity to generate opposition — for example: 'Bad for New Hampshire'

Appeal to Fear: The bullet points invoke fear by implying taxpayer money goes to illegal immigrants and that dangerous criminals would receive amnesty, designed to provoke anxiety about public safety and resources — for example: 'Amnesty for millions—even convicted criminals'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Hey, it’s Tiffany Muller, President of End Citizens United. Here are the facts: John Sununu left the Senate and made millions from corporate special interests that hurt Granite Staters. Chris Pappas is different. He's been cleaning up corruption since day one – fighting to ban members of Congress from trading stocks and holding politicians accountable to the people they serve. This race is a Toss-Up, and the Senate majority runs through it. Chris can't compete with Sununu’s corporate PACs – but he can win this seat if he has help from people like you. Chris needs our help. Can you chip in $5 or $10 to help Chris win this critical seat so we can secure a Democratic Senate majority? Thank you.

Flag-Waving: Patriotic, religious, or in-group identity invoked to validate a position.

Slogans: Catchy phrase used to compress a complex position into an emotionally loaded shorthand.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'cleaning up corruption' uses emotionally charged language to frame the subject heroically while implying widespread wrongdoing by others — for example: 'cleaning up corruption'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

EXPOSED: Americans have been demanding Congressional ethics reform. New Hampshire citizens became alarmed after Rep. Chris Pappas attempted to pass massive tax breaks for millionaires in New York and Massachusetts. Read more.

Loaded Language: The word 'massive' is emotionally charged to exaggerate the scale of the tax breaks and provoke a negative reaction — for example: massive tax breaks for millionaires

Appeal to Prejudice: The framing implies New Hampshire citizens should be outraged that their representative is helping out-of-state wealthy people in New York and Massachusetts, exploiting in-group/out-group identity — for example: New Hampshire citizens became alarmed

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

New Hampshire wants transparency from Congress. New Hampshire Rep. Chris Pappas voted to give millionaires and billionaires in New York and Massachusetts a TAX BREAK, and gave Granite Staters nothing. 📞Tell Rep. Pappas: Strengthen transparency rules for Congress. 202-225-5456

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A message from Chris Pappas 🔽

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨🚨🚨 The Cook Political Report just moved the New Hampshire Senate race into their Toss Up category. Pundits were calling our race Lean Democrat just a few weeks ago, but since Republicans began flooding the airwaves with attack ads, we’ve lost a lot of ground. We need to turn this around right now if we want to win this seat for Democrats and stop Republicans from holding a majority in the Senate. If you’re with us, chip in $10 to Chris’s campaign today.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 This race keeps shifting in MAGA’s favor. FIRST: National Republicans gained a 3-to-1 spending advantage over us on the airwaves. THEN: Back-to-back polls dropped, showing John Sununu taking the lead over Chris for the first time in this campaign. NOW: Inside Elections and the Cook Political Report have shifted their rating of this race to a Toss Up. Their attacks are working, and this Senate seat is more within their reach than ever before. With just weeks left until Election Day, we need to fight back and turn this around NOW – and the only way we can do that is with your help. Rush a donation to our campaign today to help us defend this open seat. 🚨 This race keeps shifting in MAGA’s favor. FIRST: National Republicans gained a 3-to-1 spending advantage over us on the airwaves. THEN: Back-to-back polls dropped, showing John Sununu taking the lead over Chris for the first time in this campaign. NOW: Inside Elections and the Cook Political Report have shifted their rating of this race to a Toss Up. Their attacks are working, and this Senate seat is more within their reach than ever before. With just weeks left until Election Day, we need to fight back and turn this around NOW – and the only way we can do that is with your help. Rush a donation to our campaign today to help us defend this open seat.

False Urgency: The phrase 'just weeks left' and 'NOW' in capitals creates artificial time pressure to prevent careful deliberation and force an immediate response — for example: 'act now before it's too late'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only one possible path to success, eliminating any alternative options or strategies — for example: 'the only way we can do that is with your help'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

💭 ɴᴇᴡ ʜᴀᴍᴘꜱʜɪʀᴇ ᴅᴇᴍᴀɴᴅꜱ ᴛʀᴀɴꜱᴘᴀʀᴇɴᴄʏ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ᴄᴏɴɢʀᴇꜱꜱ. NH’s own Rep. Chris Pappas dated an Amazon lobbyist while voting on multiple bills that Jeff Bezos' Amazon lobbied on. 📞Tell Rep. Chris Pappas: Strengthen ethics & transparency rules for Congress. 202-225-5456

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A message from Chris Pappas 🔽 A message from Chris Pappas 🔽

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Chris Pappas voted for billions in new energy taxes and higher fuel costs during a period of record inflation. John Sununu believes families should keep more of their hard-earned paycheck instead of sending it to Washington.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'record inflation' is emotionally charged, designed to amplify anxiety about the policy vote — for example: record inflation and hard-earned paycheck.

Card Stacking: The sentence selectively frames the vote as causing 'higher fuel costs' and 'new energy taxes' without acknowledging any other aspects or intended benefits of the legislation — for example: 'voted for billions in new energy taxes and higher fuel costs'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies only two options: families keep their money or send it to Washington, ignoring the complexity of tax policy and public spending — for example: 'keep more of their hard-earned paycheck instead of sending it to Washington'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

While New Hampshire families faced record inflation, Chris Pappas voted to make life even more expensive. Pappas supported higher gas taxes, an increased death tax, and over 100 billion dollars in new energy taxes right as local households struggled with surging heating bills.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'record inflation' and 'make life even more expensive' use emotionally charged framing to cast Pappas's votes in the most damaging light possible — for example: make life even more expensive and death tax.

Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence invokes 'New Hampshire families' as an in-group identity to contrast with Pappas, implying he is acting against his own constituents — for example: 'New Hampshire families'

Card Stacking: The sentence selectively lists only tax increases attributed to Pappas without any context about what those policies fund or any counterbalancing benefits, presenting a one-sided picture — for example: listing 'higher gas taxes, an increased death tax, and over 100 billion dollars in new energy taxes' with no offsetting context

Appeal to Fear: The juxtaposition of massive tax figures with households 'struggling with surging heating bills' is designed to create anxiety about economic harm — for example: 'local households struggled with surging heating bills'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

BREAKING: The Cook Political Report just moved our Senate race from Lean Democratic to Toss Up. We always knew this race would be tough. And we know we can turn the tide, but here’s what we’re up against: → Republicans are on pace to have a $20 million spending advantage over Democrats. → Polling has our race within the margin of error. → Republicans see this seat as a way to stop Democrats from taking the Senate majority. We need you with us if we’re going to overcome the GOP’s advantage and help Chris take the lead. Pitch in $10 or whatever you can to our campaign today.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Chris Pappas consistently votes to raise taxes on New Hampshire families. He supported higher gas taxes, raised the death tax on family farms and businesses, and approved 100 billion dollars in new energy taxes during peak winter heating season. John Sununu is standing up for taxpayers to stop these rate hikes, lower everyday costs, and protect working families.

Loaded Language: The word 'consistently' is used to paint Pappas as a habitual tax raiser, framing him negatively without nuance — for example: consistently votes to raise taxes on New Hampshire families and death tax on family farms and businesses.

Card Stacking: The sentence presents a one-sided characterization of Pappas's voting record without acknowledging any context, counterarguments, or offsetting votes — for example: consistently votes to raise taxes on New Hampshire families and approved 100 billion dollars in new energy taxes during peak winter heating season.

Appeal to Fear: The mention of energy taxes 'during peak winter heating season' is designed to evoke anxiety about families being unable to heat their homes — for example: 'new energy taxes during peak winter heating season'

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive phrases like 'standing up for taxpayers,' 'lower everyday costs,' and 'protect working families' are used to make Sununu sound noble without providing specific policy substance — for example: 'standing up for taxpayers to stop these rate hikes, lower everyday costs, and protect working families'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implicitly frames the choice as binary: Pappas raises taxes and harms families, while Sununu protects them, leaving no room for nuance or alternative positions — for example: 'John Sununu is standing up for taxpayers to stop these rate hikes'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

BEST BUDS?: As Americans demand Congressional ethics reform, New Hampshire Rep. Chris Pappas is in the hot seat for lying about dating an Amazon lobbyist, while VOTING on several bills Amazon lobbied on. Read more:

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 BREAKING: Cook Political Report just moved New Hampshire’s Senate race from Lean Democratic to Toss Up. Republicans are outspending us 3-to-1 on the airwaves — and it’s working. Trump-endorsed John Sununu now has a real shot at winning the seat that could decide the Senate majority, and this new race rating will bring even more GOP money and attention to New Hampshire. We need to fight back now. Rush a donation to help Chris Pappas withstand their attacks, reach the voters who will decide this toss-up, and keep Democrats’ path to the Senate majority alive. 🚨 BREAKING: Cook Political Report just moved New Hampshire’s Senate race from Lean Democratic to Toss Up. Republicans are outspending us 3-to-1 on the airwaves — and it’s working. Trump-endorsed John Sununu now has a real shot at winning the seat that could decide the Senate majority, and this new race rating will bring even more GOP money and attention to New Hampshire. We need to fight back now. Rush a donation to help Chris Pappas withstand their attacks, reach the voters who will decide this toss-up, and keep Democrats’ path to the Senate majority alive.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

What are our Congressmen hiding? Rep. Chris Pappas lied about dating an Amazon lobbyist, all while voting on several bills that Jeff Bezos' Amazon lobbied on. 📞Tell Rep. Chris Pappas: Strengthen Congress transparency rules. 202-225-5456

Conspiracy Appeal: The rhetorical question implies that Congressmen are concealing something sinister, suggesting a hidden agenda without providing evidence — for example: 'What are our Congressmen hiding?'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Sununu and national Republicans just spent tens of millions of dollars to drown our campaign out — and it worked. This race is now a true Toss Up. That’s exactly why the next couple of months matter so much. This race will decide who controls the Senate, and we can’t let Republican outside spending be the reason we lose. Chip in today and help us reach as many voters as we can before Election Day.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Sununu and national Republicans just spent tens of millions of dollars to drown our campaign out — and it worked. This race is now a true Toss Up. That’s exactly why the next couple of months matter so much. This race will decide who controls the Senate, and we can’t let Republican outside spending be the reason we lose. Chip in today and help us reach as many voters as we can before Election Day. 🚨 Sununu and national Republicans just spent tens of millions of dollars to drown our campaign out — and it worked. This race is now a true Toss Up. That’s exactly why the next couple of months matter so much. This race will decide who controls the Senate, and we can’t let Republican outside spending be the reason we lose. Chip in today and help us reach as many voters as we can before Election Day.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

⚠️ Republicans have made it clear: New Hampshire is their top pickup opportunity this November. Analysts are calling this race a “dead heat.” Republicans are predicting that Chris will be “swamped” with the outside money backing Sununu. And everyone agrees that this race has the power to determine whether Democrats take back the Senate majority. That’s why we can’t lose momentum now. This is exactly the kind of election where grassroots supporters who are able to step up nationwide make all the difference — and right now our people-powered campaign is counting on people like you. Help us prove to Trump and national Republicans that New Hampshire can’t be bought. Rush a donation to Chris’s campaign today.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

New Hampshire is one of the most competitive Senate races in the country — and Trump knows it. That’s why a shady super PAC tied to Trump’s MAGA Inc. just reserved $10 million in ads to help Sununu, more than almost any other race in the country. This kind of spending means one thing: The GOP thinks this seat is theirs to buy. This race could be the difference between Democrats taking back control of the Senate or Trump and national Republicans’ power going unchecked for another two years. The latest polls have us in a dead heat. Reaching undecided voters before Election Day is how we take back the lead. Donate to Chris’s grassroots campaign today, and show Republicans New Hampshire isn’t for sale.

Loaded Language: The word 'shady' is an emotionally charged pejorative used to cast suspicion on the super PAC without providing evidence of wrongdoing — for example: 'shady super PAC'

Name Calling: The label 'MAGA Inc.' is used as a derogatory identifier to discredit the political organization by association rather than addressing its actions on their merits — for example: 'Trump's MAGA Inc.'

False Urgency: The word 'today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate donation without deliberation — for example: 'Donate today'

Appeal to Prejudice: Frames the appeal around state identity and pride, implying that true New Hampshire residents stand against outside Republican money — for example: 'New Hampshire isn't for sale'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Republicans aren’t hiding it — they’ve called New Hampshire a “must-win” and are pouring millions of outside money into this race to take this seat. The news coverage says it all: This race could determine who holds the Senate majority and whether Trump’s power goes unchecked for another two years. They’re not treating this race like it’s a long shot — they’re expecting to win by drowning us out with their outside spending. But Chris isn’t backing down. He’s never taken a dime from corporate PACs — this is a people-powered campaign. With your support, we can fight back. So chip in today to help us elect Chris and keep New Hampshire blue.

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'people-powered campaign' creates an in-group identity of ordinary people versus corporate interests, implying Chris represents 'real' people while opponents represent corrupt elites — for example: people-powered campaign

Card Stacking: Selectively highlights the absence of corporate PAC money as a defining virtue while omitting any other relevant information about funding sources or campaign finances — for example: never taken a dime from corporate PACs

False Urgency: The call to action 'with your support, we can fight back' implies an immediate need to act and contribute, creating pressure to respond without deliberation — for example: With your support, we can fight back

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

MAGA and national Republicans just made a $10 million bet on New Hampshire. Donald Trump’s newly formed super PAC is dropping millions into New Hampshire to run ads supporting John Sununu — more money than they’re giving to any other race in the country. The latest polling shows why: Sununu already holds a slight advantage, and they know that a flood of outside spending now could push that lead even further. New Hampshire is a top target because flipping this seat brings national Republicans one step closer to keeping control of the Senate and rubber-stamping Trump’s agenda for two more years. We can’t let money decide who wins this race. Chip in today and help Chris fight back.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Senator Elizabeth Warren: We’ve got to get Chris elected to the United States Senate.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Hi, it’s Senator Elizabeth Warren. In order for Democrats to take back the Senate majority and put an end to Trump’s unchecked power, winning in New Hampshire is absolutely critical. That’s why I’m in this fight with everything I’ve got. And that’s why I’m asking you to please pitch in $5 right now to help Chris Pappas stand up to big-money Republicans, compete against John Sununu, and keep this seat blue.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

↓ Elizabeth Warren has an urgent message:

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

It is time to turn the page in America to a better day.

[cheering] >> Today, the voters of New Hampshire have sent a clear message. They're fed up with what's happening in our politics, [music] and they're ready for change. >> [cheering] >> And I am so grateful to stand [music] before you as your nominee for United States Senate. It was a year and a half ago in this very room that we launched our campaign to make life better for families and small businesses. To challenge extreme politicians and corporate [music] special interests and the billionaire class. And to confront the costs, the chaos, and the corruption of Donald Trump's Washington. While Donald Trump and the DC special interests [music] have hand-picked John Sununu to be their candidate in this race, we know that Granite Staters deserve someone who works for New Hampshire. Folks, it is time to turn the page in America to a better day. And so tonight, we all celebrate this victory together. But tomorrow, we get back to work. So, let's go out, [music] folks, and let's win this for New Hampshire. Thank you all so much. Thank [cheering] you. >> Maggie! >> Maggie! >> Maggie! >> Maggie! >> Maggie! >> Maggie!

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Instead of helping real people, Chris Pappas supported a healthcare agenda that made coverage more complicated and far more expensive for New Hampshire families. John Sununu is running for Senate to lower costs and put patients back in control.

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'real people' implies Pappas's constituents or supporters are not real or authentic people, creating an in-group/out-group distinction — for example: 'real people' vs. those Pappas supposedly serves.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'far more expensive' uses emotionally charged framing to amplify the negative impact of Pappas's policy positions beyond neutral factual description — for example: 'far more expensive for New Hampshire families'.

Card Stacking: The sentence presents only the negative framing of Pappas's healthcare record without acknowledging any potential benefits or counterarguments, selectively presenting one side — for example: 'made coverage more complicated and far more expensive'.

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'put patients back in control' is a vague, emotionally positive promise with no specific policy substance, functioning as rhetorical flourish — for example: 'put patients back in control'.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

While New Hampshire households struggle with cost-of-living increases, Chris Pappas backed a healthcare system that empowers insurance corporations while costs skyrocket. John Sununu believes it is time to take power away from Washington bureaucrats and put patients first.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words are used to frame Pappas negatively and evoke resentment — for example: empowers insurance corporations, costs skyrocket and Washington bureaucrats.

Name Calling: Chris Pappas is implicitly labeled as a tool of corporate interests without substantive argument — for example: 'Chris Pappas backed a healthcare system that empowers insurance corporations'

Card Stacking: The sentence selectively frames Pappas's healthcare position as purely benefiting corporations while omitting any other aspects or intentions of the policy — for example: 'backed a healthcare system that empowers insurance corporations while costs skyrocket'

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive language is used without specific policy detail to make Sununu's position sound noble — for example: 'take power away from Washington bureaucrats and put patients first'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Chris Pappas and Washington politicians promised lower healthcare costs and more choices, but local families got rising premiums and fewer options instead. John Sununu is fighting to restore affordable, common-sense healthcare.

Card Stacking: The sentence presents only the negative outcome (rising premiums, fewer options) while omitting any context or counterevidence about healthcare policy results — for example: attributing all premium increases solely to Pappas without acknowledging broader market forces

Appeal to Prejudice: Contrasts 'Washington politicians' as an out-group with 'local families' as the in-group to stoke resentment toward political elites — for example: framing Pappas as aligned with distant Washington insiders against ordinary local people

Glittering Generalities: Uses vague, emotionally positive terms like 'affordable' and 'common-sense' without specifying any concrete policy — for example: 'common-sense healthcare' implies virtue without defining what it means

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

WATCH: Why dark money is flooding New Hampshire

Donald Trump, Elon Musk, the corporate special interests, they're coming in heavy for John Sununu because they know he's going to be another vote for their agenda. He was before when he was our US Senator back in the early 2000s where he voted for forever wars, voted for big oil and the insurance companies, voted against a woman's right to choose, was the architect of the plan to privatize social security. So, he was out of step with New Hampshire then, he is today. The last thing New Hampshire needs is another rubber stamp for an agenda that's raising costs and making life more expensive and it's hurting our small business community here in New Hampshire.

Conspiracy Appeal: Implies a coordinated effort by powerful actors with a hidden shared agenda — for example: Trump, Musk, and 'corporate special interests' are portrayed as conspiring together to install a puppet politician.

Name Calling: Groups Sununu with 'corporate special interests' as a derogatory label to discredit him by association rather than addressing his policy positions — for example: lumping him with 'corporate special interests'.

Loaded Language: Uses emotionally charged phrases designed to trigger negative reactions rather than neutrally describe voting records — for example: forever wars, big oil and rubber stamp.

Card Stacking: Selectively lists only negative votes and positions without acknowledging any counterbalancing record, presenting a one-sided portrait — for example: listing four negative items with no mitigating context.

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes New Hampshire identity to frame Sununu as an outsider to the community's values, exploiting in-group loyalty — for example: 'out of step with New Hampshire'.

Appeal to Fear: Warns of concrete economic harm to ordinary people and small businesses to provoke anxiety and opposition — for example: 'raising costs and making life more expensive and it's hurting our small business community'.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

CHRIS PAPPAS LIED TO VOTERS

Chris Pappas looked voters in the eye and lied. >> You've been dating a corporate lobbyist who actually was lobbying on behalf of Amazon at time when you then went on to cast votes on Amazon's behalf on bills they lobbied you on. Yes, it is, Congressman. Absolutely is. >> That's not true. >> It was true. Pappas dated an Amazon lobbyist, voted on bills that Amazon lobbied on, then lied about it. [music] Chris Pappas, lying, corrupt, out for himself, not you. SLF PAC is responsible for the content of this message.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'looked voters in the eye and lied' uses emotionally charged framing to imply deliberate, personal betrayal — for example: looked voters in the eye and lied and lying, corrupt.

Card Stacking: The question presents a chain of events as established fact — dating, lobbying, voting — without acknowledging that correlation between dating and voting does not establish quid pro quo — for example: cast votes on Amazon's behalf on bills they lobbied you on, It was true and voted on bills that Amazon lobbied on, then lied about it.

Repetition: The accusation of lying is repeated across multiple sentences to reinforce the label through familiarity — for example: lied about it and lying.

Name Calling: Derogatory labels are applied directly to Pappas to discredit him rather than address policy arguments — for example: lying, corrupt, out for himself, not you.

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'out for himself, not you' creates an in-group/out-group contrast positioning voters as victims of Pappas's self-interest — for example: 'out for himself, not you'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

When John Sununu started selling access in Washington, he sold us out in New Hampshire.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'selling access' implies corrupt pay-to-play behavior, and 'sold us out' is an emotionally charged accusation of betrayal designed to trigger outrage rather than convey verified facts — for example: 'sold us out'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'us out in New Hampshire' invokes in-group identity, framing Sununu as betraying the local community and positioning the audience as the wronged in-group — for example: 'sold us out in New Hampshire'

Name Calling: Characterizing Sununu as someone who 'sells access' is a derogatory label used to discredit him rather than address specific policy arguments — for example: 'started selling access'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

The general election is officially underway, and New Hampshire is one of the most consequential Senate races in the country. Control of the Senate could come down to whether Chris Pappas has the resources to out-organize his MAGA opponent, John Sununu. But back-to-back polls show this race in a dead heat, and election experts just moved us to a Toss-up. Right now we need to raise $100,000 for the fight ahead of us. Sununu and national Republicans are watching this race closely and waiting for any signs that show that we’re not ready. The longer we take to meet our fundraising goal, the more Sununu’s outside money overwhelms the airwaves and ad space. Please chip in today and help fuel our grassroots campaign.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

John Sununu will deliver real solutions that lower costs and put more money back in Granite Staters’ pockets.

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'real solutions' is vague and emotionally positive without specifying any concrete policy — for example: 'real solutions'

Appeal to Prejudice: The term 'Granite Staters' invokes in-group identity to create a sense that Sununu is specifically for 'our people' — for example: 'Granite Staters' pockets'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

John Sununu will bring real solutions to lower the cost of living for Granite Staters.

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'real solutions' is vague and emotionally positive without specifying any concrete policy or mechanism — for example: 'real solutions'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

It’s official: Chris will go up against Trump’s hand-picked Republican candidate, John Sununu, this November. Sununu is backed by national Republicans and a flood of outside money. Why? Because he answers to corporate PACs and special interests — not Granite Staters. Chris is different. He’s spent his career fighting for working people. And with control of the Senate on the line, this race could be the difference between two more years of Trump’s unchecked agenda or real accountability in Washington. With election experts rating this race a Toss-up, we need to raise $100,000 right now to start the general election in the best position possible. Every dollar Sununu and his MAGA allies spend makes this race harder to win. We can’t afford to let outside money decide this race and buy New Hampshire. Chip in right now to our general election fund and help us reach our $100,000 goal.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'flood of outside money' uses emotionally charged language to imply an overwhelming, corrupting influx of funds rather than neutrally describing campaign contributions — for example: a flood of outside money and corporate PACs and special interests.

Appeal to Prejudice: The contrast between 'corporate PACs and special interests' and 'Granite Staters' invokes in-group/out-group identity, implying Sununu serves outsiders rather than the local community — for example: not Granite Staters

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two options: either Sununu answers to corporate PACs or to Granite Staters, ignoring any more nuanced reality — for example: he answers to corporate PACs and special interests — not Granite Staters

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive framing of fighting for 'working people' without any specific policy substance — for example: fighting for working people

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety about dire consequences of an unchecked agenda to pressure voters toward a specific choice — for example: two more years of Trump's unchecked agenda

False Urgency: Frames the race as a pivotal, high-stakes moment implying the outcome is imminent and critical — for example: with control of the Senate on the line

Name Calling: The label 'MAGA allies' is used as a derogatory political tag to discredit Sununu and his supporters rather than address their arguments — for example: his MAGA allies

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

It’s official: John Sununu just became the Republican nominee in the race for New Hampshire’s open Senate seat. Sununu is personally endorsed by Donald Trump. His name is in the Epstein files. And he has a record of selling out Granite Staters to line his own pockets. Sununu’s Senate bid is being propped up by dark money and corporate interest-backed super PACs. We’re being outspent 3:1 on the airwaves, and the attacks are starting to work. New polling shows us behind for the first time since we launched this campaign. If Sununu wins, Republicans will keep control of the Senate, and New Hampshire will send a Trump-endorsed Republican to Washington for the first time ever. The stakes are too high to sit this one out. Chip in today and help Chris fight back. It’s official: John Sununu just became the Republican nominee in the race for New Hampshire’s open Senate seat. Sununu is personally endorsed by Donald Trump. His name is in the Epstein files. And he has a record of selling out Granite Staters to line his own pockets. Sununu’s Senate bid is being propped up by dark money and corporate interest-backed super PACs. We’re being outspent 3:1 on the airwaves, and the attacks are starting to work. New polling shows us behind for the first time since we launched this campaign. If Sununu wins, Republicans will keep control of the Senate, and New Hampshire will send a Trump-endorsed Republican to Washington for the first time ever. The stakes are too high to sit this one out. Chip in today and help Chris fight back.

Loaded Language: Referencing the 'Epstein files' carries extreme negative connotations implying criminal or scandalous association without providing specifics — for example: Epstein files, selling out and line his own pockets.

Appeal to Fear: The vague claim that his name appears in the Epstein files is designed to trigger anxiety and suspicion about the subject's character without substantiation — for example: His name is in the Epstein files

Appeal to Prejudice: The term 'Granite Staters' invokes in-group identity to frame the subject as a betrayer of the local community — for example: selling out Granite Staters

Card Stacking: The claim that his name appears in the Epstein files is presented as a damning fact without context about what that appearance means or entails, selectively omitting information that would clarify the nature of the association — for example: implying guilt by association without evidence

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

!!️ John Sununu is officially the Republican nominee in the New Hampshire Senate race. Donald Trump personally endorsed John Sununu because MAGA needs to flip this seat in order to hold on to their Senate majority and keep their harmful agenda moving — which is exactly why they’re doing everything they can to stop Chris. Chris has spent his career fighting for Granite Staters, not corporate PACs. He’s fought to lower costs for working families and keep New Hampshire jobs protected. While Sununu looks out for Trump’s agenda, Chris shows up for the people. Donate what you can today, and help our grassroots campaign fight back. !!️ John Sununu is officially the Republican nominee in the New Hampshire Senate race. Donald Trump personally endorsed John Sununu because MAGA needs to flip this seat in order to hold on to their Senate majority and keep their harmful agenda moving — which is exactly why they’re doing everything they can to stop Chris. Chris has spent his career fighting for Granite Staters, not corporate PACs. He’s fought to lower costs for working families and keep New Hampshire jobs protected. While Sununu looks out for Trump’s agenda, Chris shows up for the people. Donate what you can today, and help our grassroots campaign fight back.

Loaded Language: The word 'harmful' is an emotionally charged descriptor applied to the opposing agenda without factual substantiation, designed to trigger a negative reaction — for example: 'harmful agenda moving'

Appeal to Fear: The framing implies that if MAGA flips the seat and keeps their agenda moving, harmful consequences will follow, creating anxiety to motivate opposition — for example: 'keep their harmful agenda moving'

Name Calling: The label 'MAGA' is used as a derogatory political identifier to discredit the opposing side rather than engage with their arguments — for example: 'MAGA needs to flip this seat'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two options — fighting for ordinary citizens or serving corporate PACs — ignoring the complexity of political motivations and alliances — for example: 'fighting for Granite Staters, not corporate PACs'

Appeal to Prejudice: The term 'Granite Staters' invokes a regional in-group identity to create an us-versus-them dynamic between local people and outside corporate interests — for example: 'Granite Staters'

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive claims about lowering costs and protecting jobs carry no specific policy substance and function as rhetorical flourish — for example: 'lower costs for working families and keep New Hampshire jobs protected'

False Urgency: The word 'today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'Donate what you can today'.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A freer, fairer future is on the horizon. Let’s do this, New Hampshire.

What's that song that kind of goes like >> [music] >> I'm here with my friend Chris Pappas. >> [music]

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

John Sununu: A Sequel New Hampshire Can't Afford

30 years ago, John Sununu went to Washington with one mission: [music] to sell out New Hampshire and make a ton of money. Granite [music] Staters paid the price. He offered up our retirement benefits to Wall Street to gamble. >> It's the effort to privatize Social Security, another one of your major initiatives. >> Slashed our health care while giving tax breaks for pharmaceutical companies. >> We also paired back uh Medicare and Medicaid. >> And then he got up to $35 million richer from the same corporate [music] special interests he helped. >> John E. Sununu, who used to hold this Senate seat, [music] has seen a surge in his personal wealth since he left office. >> Now, he wants to [music] go back to DC to do it all over again. Sununu supports Trump's plan to cut Medicaid and double health insurance premiums. >> And the president's support is welcome. >> Backs Trump's Iran war that's raising gas prices while he cashes in. >> This is important to President Trump's agenda. >> And champions Trump's tariffs that are costing Granite Staters. >> Protect those gains [music] that the president and this Congress has made. >> John Sununu, a sequel [music] New Hampshire can't afford.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

New Hampshire Primary Elections are this Tuesday, Sept. 8th. Make a plan now to vote! #nhpolitics #nh #nhtok

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Well said, Governor Pritzker! 👏 👏 👏 Recent polling reveals that Chris is neck-and-neck—in a statistical tie—with his opponent, John Sununu. New Hampshire is the Republicans' best chance to flip a Senate seat and maintain their grip on the Senate. We can’t let that happen. Republicans have endless dark money for campaign funding, while Chris is relying on grassroots support from folks like you. We need to start earlier and work harder if we’re going to out-work Sununu and win in 2026. This race is way too close for comfort. Chip in $5 or whatever you can afford to help get Chris elected and keep this seat safe for the Democrats.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

This isn’t about Democrats vs. Republicans. This is about right vs. wrong. It’s about democracy vs. fascism. Justice vs. corruption. It’s about NH vs. the billionaires.

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence reduces a complex issue to a simple binary moral choice between right and wrong, leaving no room for nuance or middle ground — for example: This is about right vs. wrong. and It's about democracy vs. fascism..

Loaded Language: The word 'fascism' is an emotionally charged term designed to trigger a strong negative reaction and delegitimize the opposing side — for example: 'fascism.'

Glittering Generalities: The word 'democracy' is used as a vague, emotionally positive term to lend moral authority to one side without substantive elaboration — for example: 'democracy.'

Appeal to Prejudice: Frames the conflict as 'us' (NH residents) versus an out-group ('the billionaires'), exploiting in-group identity to create an us-vs-them dynamic — for example: NH vs. the billionaires

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

NH is ready for hope. NH is ready for change. Vote for Karishma on Tuesday, September 8.

Glittering Generalities: Uses the vague, emotionally positive word 'hope' without any substantive meaning or policy detail — for example: NH is ready for hope and NH is ready for change.

Repetition: The phrase 'NH is ready for' is repeated across sentences 1 and 2 to create a rhythmic, emotionally reinforcing effect — for example: 'NH is ready for hope. NH is ready for change.'

False Urgency: Specifies a concrete deadline date to create time pressure and prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'Vote for Karishma on Tuesday, September 8'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

NH wants hope NH wants change NH wants Karishma #karishmaforsenate

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Watch Karishma’s full interview with Prem Thekker on Zeteo: https://zeteo.com/p/meet-the-progressive-outsider-new-hampshire

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Politics as usual has had its turn. It’s time to choose progress. On Tuesday, September 8, vote for Karishma Manzur. #nhpolitics

Loaded Language: The phrase 'politics as usual' carries a negative emotional charge implying corruption or stagnation without specifying any concrete problem — for example: 'Politics as usual'

Glittering Generalities: The word 'progress' is used as a vague, emotionally positive term with no specific meaning or policy attached, designed to generate approval — for example: 'choose progress'

False Urgency: The phrase 'It's time' creates a sense of immediacy and pressure to act without deliberation — for example: 'It's time to choose progress'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Hi, it’s Senator Sheldon Whitehouse. Dark money is driving up costs for everyday Americans — and Washington listens to whoever has the deepest pockets. My friend Chris Pappas is leading the fight to change that. He’s championing the DISCLOSE Act to get dark money out of politics. But his Trump-backed opponent, John Sununu, is funded by special corporate interests and outside super PACs. This race could decide who holds the majority in the Senate — and whether Washington finally starts listening to people instead of MAGA mega-donors. Chip in today, and help send Chris to the Senate. Hi, it’s Senator Sheldon Whitehouse. Dark money is driving up costs for everyday Americans — and Washington listens to whoever has the deepest pockets. My friend Chris Pappas is leading the fight to change that. He’s championing the DISCLOSE Act to get dark money out of politics. But his Trump-backed opponent, John Sununu, is funded by special corporate interests and outside super PACs. This race could decide who holds the majority in the Senate — and whether Washington finally starts listening to people instead of MAGA mega-donors. Chip in today, and help send Chris to the Senate.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'dark money' is an emotionally charged term designed to evoke suspicion and corruption rather than neutrally describe political spending — for example: dark money

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'everyday Americans' invokes an in-group identity of ordinary people being victimized, implying a contrast with corrupt elites — for example: everyday Americans

Conspiracy Appeal: The claim that Washington 'listens to whoever has the deepest pockets' implies a hidden, corrupt arrangement where money secretly controls government decisions — for example: Washington listens to whoever has the deepest pockets

Scapegoating: Complex economic cost increases are attributed solely to 'dark money' influence, blaming a single shadowy cause for broad economic hardship — for example: Dark money is driving up costs for everyday Americans

Name Calling: The term 'MAGA mega-donors' is used as a derogatory label to discredit a group rather than engage with their arguments — for example: MAGA mega-donors

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence frames the outcome as a binary choice between Washington listening to 'people' or serving 'MAGA mega-donors', ignoring the complexity of political representation — for example: listening to people instead of MAGA mega-donors

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

The people are rising up to say no to the same old corrupt politicians. Let’s do this, NH. On Sept. 8th vote Karishma Manzur for U.S. Senate. #nhpolitics

Loaded Language: The word 'corrupt' is emotionally charged and used to discredit political opponents without specific evidence — for example: 'corrupt politicians'

Bandwagon Appeal: The phrase 'the people are rising up' implies a mass movement to pressure conformity and suggest widespread support — for example: 'The people are rising up'

False Urgency: The rallying call 'Let's do this' creates a sense of immediate momentum and urgency to act without deliberation — for example: 'Let's do this, NH'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’m running for the U.S. Senate because the people of New Hampshire deserve an honest people’s candidate to represent them. Make a plan to vote on Tuesday, Sept. 8th! Link to full interview ⬇️

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Join Karishma at the People’s Rally on Monday Sept. 7th from 12:30-3:00PM outside the State House. Hear from special guest speakers Salaam Odeh, Salah Mustafa, Faisal Khan, Jesse Gillis, Rebecca Beaulieu, Karishma, and Track AIPAC’s Cory Archibald

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Join us for today’s Progressive Town Hall featuring PDA-endorsed candidates Patrick Roath for Congress (MA-08) and Karishma Manzur for Senate (NH). 4pm ET/ 3pm CT/ 2pm MT/1pm PT on Zoom. Join us for today’s Progressive Town Hall featuring PDA-endorsed candidates Patrick Roath for Congress (MA-08) and Karishma Manzur for Senate (NH). 4pm ET/ 3pm CT/ 2pm MT/1pm PT on Zoom.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

You deserve a senator who will fight for your health care, your housing, and your family. That’s why I’m asking for your vote in the primary on September 8. Together, we can build a future where every American has a fair shot. Thank you for your support! You deserve a senator who will fight for your health care, your housing, and your family. That’s why I’m asking for your vote in the primary on September 8. Together, we can build a future where every American has a fair shot. Thank you for your support! You deserve a senator who will fight for your health care, your housing, and your family. That’s why I’m asking for your vote in the primary on September 8. Together, we can build a future where every American has a fair shot. Thank you for your support! You deserve a senator who will fight for your health care, your housing, and your family. That’s why I’m asking for your vote in the primary on September 8. Together, we can build a future where every American has a fair shot. Thank you for your support!

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive promises about fighting for health care, housing, and family without any specific policy substance — for example: fight for your health care, your housing, and your family and build a future where every American has a fair shot.

Flag-Waving: Patriotic, religious, or in-group identity invoked to validate a position.

Slogans: Catchy phrase used to compress a complex position into an emotionally loaded shorthand.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I have a question for John Sununu... ✋ Why aren't you debating me? The people of New Hampshire deserve a debate. Period. #nhpolitics #NewHampshire #scottbrown #newhampshireliving #NewHampshireLife

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

You deserve a senator who will fight for your health care, your housing, and your family. That’s why I’m asking for your vote in the primary on September 8. Together, we can build a future where every American has a fair shot. Thank you for your support! You deserve a senator who will fight for your health care, your housing, and your family. That’s why I’m asking for your vote in the primary on September 8. Together, we can build a future where every American has a fair shot. Thank you for your support! You deserve a senator who will fight for your health care, your housing, and your family. That’s why I’m asking for your vote in the primary on September 8. Together, we can build a future where every American has a fair shot. Thank you for your support!

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive promises about fighting for health care, housing, and family without any specific policy substance — for example: fight for your health care, your housing, and your family and build a future where every American has a fair shot.

Flag-Waving: Patriotic, religious, or in-group identity invoked to validate a position.

Slogans: Catchy phrase used to compress a complex position into an emotionally loaded shorthand.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

1996

1996, everyone was doing the Macarena, the dot com boom began, John Sununu became a politician, and I was busting tables at my family's restaurant. In Congress, Sununu gave huge [music] tax breaks to pharma companies and sided with the insurance industry. And then he went to work for them and made 35 million dollars. In Washington, I'm taking [music] on this kind of corruption, refusing corporate PAC money, and fighting to lower costs. I'm Chris Pappas and [music] I approve this message because I'll never sell out New Hampshire.

Appeal to Prejudice: Contrasting the candidate's humble working-class origins (busing tables at a family restaurant) with Sununu becoming a politician invokes in-group identity and relatability to ordinary voters — for example: I was busting tables at my family's restaurant and I'll never sell out New Hampshire.

Card Stacking: Selectively presents Sununu's legislative record to paint him negatively, omitting any context or counterarguments about the tax breaks or industry relationships — for example: gave huge [music] tax breaks to pharma companies and sided with the insurance industry and went to work for them and made 35 million dollars.

Loaded Language: The word 'sided' implies betrayal and favoritism rather than neutral policy description — for example: sided with the insurance industry, went to work for them and made 35 million dollars and this kind of corruption.

Glittering Generalities: Vague positive framing around 'fighting to lower costs' and 'refusing corporate PAC money' sounds noble but lacks specific policy substance — for example: 'fighting to lower costs'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

NEW HAMPSHIRE FIRST RALLY Join Brian Cole, Scott Brown, and special guests for an exciting day celebrating New Hampshire values at the New Hampshire First Rally. Bring the whole family and enjoy an afternoon filled with great food, fun activities, and the opportunity to meet fellow Granite Staters who care about the future of our state and our country. Event Highlights: Meet Brian Cole and Scott Brown Lunch provided Machine gun shoot Cornhole and family games Meet local candidates and community leaders Connect with neighbors from across New Hampshire Date: Saturday, August 22 Time: 10:00 AM – 3:00 PM Location: Londonderry Fish & Game 5 Lund Street Litchfield, NH 03052 Together, we'll celebrate the principles that make New Hampshire strong: freedom, opportunity, public safety, and economic growth. Whether you're a longtime supporter or simply want to learn more, everyone is welcome. Live Free or Die. Let's Keep New Hampshire First!

Glittering Generalities: The sentence lists vague, emotionally positive concepts — freedom, opportunity, public safety, economic growth — that sound noble but carry no specific policy meaning, used as rhetorical flourish — for example: 'freedom, opportunity, public safety, and economic growth'

Bandwagon Appeal: Implies that an idea is correct because many people believe it, pressuring conformity — for example: everyone is.

Black-and-White Fallacy: The slogan presents only two extreme options — absolute freedom or death — leaving no room for nuance or middle ground — for example: 'Live Free or Die'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase appeals to in-group identity by framing New Hampshire residents as a special group whose primacy must be preserved — for example: 'Keep New Hampshire First'

False Urgency: The word 'Keep' implies that New Hampshire's status is under threat and must be actively maintained, creating a sense of urgency — for example: 'Let's Keep New Hampshire First'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Join our people-powered campaign! We’ll eat, drink, build community. And get ready to knock doors and talk with our neighbors. Together, let’s bring people together, and win this race for the people!! Join our people-powered campaign! We’ll eat, drink, build community. And get ready to knock doors and talk with our neighbors. Together, let’s bring people together, and win this race for the people!!

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our people' invokes in-group identity to create a sense of belonging and exclusivity — for example: 'people-powered'

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive language about unity and collective action without specific substance — for example: 'bring people together'

Repetition: The word 'people' is repeated three times within a single sentence to create an emotionally resonant, populist feel — for example: 'people-powered', 'bring people together', 'for the people'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

In less than 90 days, New Hampshire will send a new Senator to Washington. The question is who — and who they’ll fight for when they get there. On one side: former Senator John Sununu. He’s Trump’s hand-picked candidate, backed by millions from Koch-backed outside groups — who want to keep the Senate under MAGA control. On the other: Chris Pappas. He’s running a grassroots campaign funded by people like you — fighting to lower costs, stand up to special interests, and bring real change to a broken Washington. This race is down to one point. National Republicans are spending millions because they know exactly what’s at stake — but so do we. There’s still time to win. But only if we keep up our momentum. Chip in today and help us make sure New Hampshire sends the right person to Washington. In less than 90 days, New Hampshire will send a new Senator to Washington. The question is who — and who they’ll fight for when they get there. On one side: former Senator John Sununu. He’s Trump’s hand-picked candidate, backed by millions from Koch-backed outside groups — who want to keep the Senate under MAGA control. On the other: Chris Pappas. He’s running a grassroots campaign funded by people like you — fighting to lower costs, stand up to special interests, and bring real change to a broken Washington. This race is down to one point. National Republicans are spending millions because they know exactly what’s at stake — but so do we. There’s still time to win. But only if we keep up our momentum. Chip in today and help us make sure New Hampshire sends the right person to Washington.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Chris Pappas Discusses Social Security with Seniors

Committee and covers now and Chris Pappas met with seniors today to discuss fixing Social Security. The Democratic front-runner for the US Senate says he will 100% oppose any efforts to privatize Social Security or introduce more risk into the system. He also met today with the head of the National Committee to preserve Social Security and Medicare who says seniors cannot afford to see their benefits cut. >> I don't know about you, but this is not the time that I think most Granite Staters want to have their benefits cut. In fact, we need to be doing more to address this cost of living crisis and make sure that people can live on the benefits that they're receiving. >> Pappas says he supports a new congressional commission to work on a bipartisan solution that will be able to extend Social Security beyond 2032 when it faces depletion of its reserves.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

The New Hampshire way needs to be the American way. Washington needs less noise and more focus on what actually matters: jobs, the debt, and economic stability. John Sununu is ready to bring real leadership back to the U.S. Senate.

Appeal to Prejudice: Elevates a regional identity ('the New Hampshire way') as the model for the entire nation, implying that one group's values should define everyone — a classic in-group appeal.

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'the American way' is a vague, emotionally positive expression used as rhetorical flourish without specifying any concrete meaning — for example: the American way and real leadership.

Card Stacking: Selectively frames Washington's problems as reducible to 'noise' versus a narrow list of priorities, omitting other legitimate policy concerns and implying only these issues matter — for example: 'what actually matters: jobs, the debt, and economic stability'.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

"As Senator, I’ll have just one job: stand up for the people of New Hampshire every single day." In a Washington full of noise and dysfunction, John Sununu offers a commonsense approach focused on lower living costs, economic growth, and fiscal responsibility.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'noise and dysfunction' uses emotionally charged negative language to characterize Washington, setting up a contrast that makes the subject look favorable — for example: 'noise and dysfunction'

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive terms like 'commonsense approach', 'lower living costs', 'economic growth', and 'fiscal responsibility' sound noble and appealing but carry no specific policy substance — for example: 'commonsense approach focused on lower living costs, economic growth, and fiscal responsibility'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implicitly frames Washington as dysfunctional chaos on one side and Sununu's 'commonsense approach' as the only rational alternative, leaving no room for other perspectives or candidates — for example: 'In a Washington full of noise and dysfunction, John Sununu offers a commonsense approach'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

John Sununu is laser-focused on strengthening our economy, creating jobs, tackling our national debt, and making life affordable again for Granite Staters. Watch to see how John always puts New Hampshire first.

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive phrases about economic strength, jobs, and affordability are used as rhetorical flourishes without any specific policy substance — for example: 'strengthening our economy, creating jobs, tackling our national debt'

Appeal to Prejudice: Invoking in-group identity by framing Sununu as uniquely devoted to 'New Hampshire first', implying a special loyalty to local constituents over outsiders — for example: 'puts New Hampshire first'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

We have some bad news: A recent poll shows Chris Pappas and John Sununu are in a statistical tie. Governor Pritzker is right—Chris needs your support right now. Republicans and their dark money allies are making it clear that they’re preparing to spend big to flip this seat. If we don’t fight for New Hampshire, Democrats have little to no chance of winning back the majority. Will you step up now and chip in $5, or whatever you can afford, to help us get Chris elected and secure a huge win for Democrats?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗