Texas Senate

Ken Paxton's China-Linked Donations EXPOSED

Ken Paxton loves making false claims like [music] this. >> James Telerico sold Texas out to China. >> But guess which one of these candidates took a secretive all expenses paid luxury trip to China to meet with Communist Party officials. >> Not James Telerico. >> Ken Paxton's own staffers advised him against the trip, but he went anyway. He visited Beijing, Hao, Shanghai, and Macau. >> Literally all over the place. >> The trip included lavish [music] accommodations and meetings with Communist Party leaders. He then took tens of thousands of dollars from China linked real estate developers. In other words, Ken Paxton >> Salt South China >> vote [music] for James Terico. He's never been to China.

Name Calling: Labeling Paxton as someone who 'loves making false claims' is a derogatory characterization used to discredit him rather than address specific arguments — for example: loves making false claims and Ken Paxton >> Salt South China.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'sold Texas out to China' uses emotionally charged betrayal language to trigger a strong negative reaction — for example: sold Texas out to China, secretive all expenses paid luxury trip and Ken Paxton's own staffers advised him against the trip, but he went anyway.

Scapegoating: Blames Telerico for a complex geopolitical relationship by reducing it to a single act of betrayal — for example: 'sold Texas out to China'

Conspiracy Appeal: The framing of a 'secretive' trip to meet with 'Communist Party officials' implies hidden sinister coordination — for example: secretive all expenses paid luxury trip to China to meet with Communist Party officials and China linked real estate developers.

Black-and-White Fallacy: The rhetorical structure sets up a binary: one candidate is guilty of the secretive trip, the other is not, leaving no room for nuance — for example: 'Not James Telerico'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The phrase 'literally all over the place' overstates the extent of the travel to amplify the impression of suspicious activity — for example: 'Literally all over the place'

Card Stacking: Presents the financial connection to 'China linked real estate developers' as damning without providing context, counterarguments, or verification of the implication of wrongdoing — for example: 'took tens of thousands of dollars from China linked real estate developers'

Appeal to Prejudice: Implicitly frames never having been to China as a virtue, exploiting anti-China sentiment to favor Terico — for example: 'He's never been to China'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

MUST WATCH: James Talarico's Favorite Drag Queen

Who was your favorite drag queen in Texas? >> Oh my god, probably Alyssa Edwards. >> Alyssa Edwards? >> I want you to stop, look, listen, [music] and learn. >> My name is Alyssa Edwards. >> [music] >> My name is Alyssa Edwards, and this [screaming] is Alyssa's Secret. >> [bell] >> Much better. >> JJ's got it all. Oh, I cannot wait to see what his future holds for him. >> Although I see my mini me. >> I'm a teacher, I'm a leader, I'm a mentor. >> I get it. >> Let's talk about s e >> [music] >> x sex. >> Who was your favorite drag queen in Texas? >> Oh my god, probably Alyssa Edwards. >> Alyssa Edwards?

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

I disagree with James Talarico and Democrats. We should not put down a "welcome mat" at our southern border. Don't be fooled by tough talk this election. Democrats are for open borders and will immediately reverse all the work we have done to secure our border if given the chance. We need to strengthen our southern border, give border personnel the resources they need, crush human and drug trafficking networks, and fully control who we are letting in — not open it back up to let thugs and cartel members back in freely.

Appeal to Fear: Implies the audience is being deceived and must be on guard, creating anxiety about being misled — for example: 'Don't be fooled'

Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents Democrats as entirely and uniformly for open borders with no nuance or middle ground — for example: 'Democrats are for open borders'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Claims Democrats will 'immediately reverse all the work' — an absolute, sweeping overstatement — for example: 'immediately reverse all the work we have done'

Loaded Language: The phrase 'open borders' is an emotionally charged term used to trigger fear and opposition rather than describe actual policy — for example: 'open borders'

Name Calling: Attaches the label 'open borders' to Democrats as a derogatory characterization to discredit them rather than engage with their actual positions — for example: 'Democrats are for open borders'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Hey, it’s James, and I want to call a few of our supporters to personally say thank you. Our movement wouldn't be where it is today without grassroots supporters like you. The polls are leaning in our favor, but with dark money groups ramping up their spending against us, we need the resources to fight back. Chip in whatever you can to this ad, and I might give you a call!

Bandwagon Appeal: The sentence implies a large collective movement that the reader is part of, subtly pressuring conformity and belonging through crowd identity — for example: 'Our movement'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

THE SYMPOSIUM | OCTOBER 5 Join us for the Central Texas African American Civic Engagement Symposium — “The Symposium” featuring Texas State Representative James Talarico, candidate for the United States Senate, for an evening of meaningful dialogue about civic engagement and the future of our communities. October 5 | 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM King-Seabrook Chapel Huston-Tillotson University 900 Chicon Street Austin, Texas 78702 The program begins promptly at 6:00 PM, so please arrive early and be seated before the conversation begins. Come informed. Come engaged. Come ready for the conversation. James Talarico teamtalaricohq #TheSymposium #CentralTexas #CivicEngagement #THK45 #45BeeHive #TexasPrinceHallFreemasonry THE SYMPOSIUM | OCTOBER 5 Join us for the Central Texas African American Civic Engagement Symposium — “The Symposium” featuring Texas State Representative James Talarico, candidate for the United States Senate, for an evening of meaningful dialogue about civic engagement and the future of our communities. October 5 | 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM King-Seabrook Chapel Huston-Tillotson University 900 Chicon Street Austin, Texas 78702 The program begins promptly at 6:00 PM, so please arrive early and be seated before the conversation begins. Come informed. Come engaged. Come ready for the conversation. James Talarico teamtalaricohq #TheSymposium #CentralTexas #CivicEngagement #THK45 #45BeeHive #TexasPrinceHallFreemasonry THE SYMPOSIUM | OCTOBER 5 Join us for the Central Texas African American Civic Engagement Symposium — “The Symposium” featuring Texas State Representative James Talarico, candidate for the United States Senate, for an evening of meaningful dialogue about civic engagement and the future of our communities. October 5 | 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM King-Seabrook Chapel Huston-Tillotson University 900 Chicon Street Austin, Texas 78702 The program begins promptly at 6:00 PM, so please arrive early and be seated before the conversation begins. Come informed. Come engaged. Come ready for the conversation. James Talarico teamtalaricohq #TheSymposium #CentralTexas #CivicEngagement #THK45 #45BeeHive #TexasPrinceHallFreemasonry

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

James Talarico is for the people not the powerful. James Talarico is for the people not the powerful.

Glittering Generalities: The phrase uses a vague populist framing that sounds noble but carries no specific policy meaning, positioning Talarico as a champion of 'the people' against 'the powerful' without substantive detail — for example: 'for the people not the powerful'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Because of Ken Paxton’s abortion ban, Tierra Walker died. The abortion ban cut off life-saving options and created a culture of fear among health care providers.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A 14-year-old girl was being sold out of a motel off I-35. Ken Paxton’s unit put her traffickers in prison. Because Ken Paxton put them there. Ken Paxton is fighting to keep our children safe.

Appeal to Fear: The framing implies children are under threat and require active protection, invoking parental anxiety to generate support for Paxton — for example: 'keep our children safe'

Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'our children' creates an in-group identity, implying shared ownership and community belonging to rally support — for example: 'our children'

Glittering Generalities: 'Keep our children safe' is a vague, emotionally positive phrase that sounds noble but provides no specific policy or factual content — for example: 'keep our children safe'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Democratic U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico met with volunteers for a statewide food drive in Dallas as Republicans prepare to gather for a midterm convention nearby. “While we’re here serving our neighbors, billionaire mega donors and their puppet politicians are clinking their champagne glasses,” Talarico said. Volunteers distributed donations from the campaign’s “Love Thy Neighbor” food drive at the Frederick Douglass Human Services and Justice Center in Dallas on Wednesday. The food drive is intended to draw a contrast with the GOP convention in Dallas this week and highlight rising grocery prices, a key focus of Talarico’s campaign against Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton. The campaign collected more than twenty thousand pounds of groceries at sites in Dallas, Plano, Glenn Heights, Fort Worth and Denton earlier this week. Read the full story at link in bio. Story by Caroline Love Photos by Yfat Yossifor, Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged terms are used to vilify wealthy donors and politicians, contrasting them with ordinary people 'serving neighbors' — for example: 'billionaire mega donors' and 'puppet politicians'

Name Calling: Derogatory labels are applied to politicians to discredit them without addressing their arguments — for example: 'puppet politicians'

Appeal to Prejudice: An in-group/out-group contrast is drawn between ordinary people serving neighbors and wealthy elites celebrating, exploiting class identity — for example: 'While we're here serving our neighbors' versus 'clinking their champagne glasses'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Democrat James Talarico is consistently leading in the polls over Ken Paxton, which is unheard of in recent decades. National forecasters are calling Texas a tie, or else giving the advantage to the Democrat.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Republican U.S. Senate candidate and Texas AG Ken Paxton may owe overdue property taxes and fees on one of his properties in Hawaii according to Maui county records.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

What do you really know about radical James Talarico? He voted no on banning sex-change surgeries for kids.

Name Calling: The word 'radical' is used as a derogatory label to discredit James Talarico before any argument is made — for example: 'radical James Talarico'

Loaded Language: The phrase 'sex-change surgeries for kids' uses emotionally charged framing designed to trigger a visceral reaction rather than neutrally describe the policy position — for example: 'sex-change surgeries for kids'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

What do you really know about radical James Talarico? He voted no on banning sex-change surgeries for kids. What do you really know about radical James Talarico? He voted no on banning sex-change surgeries for kids.

Name Calling: The word 'radical' is used as a derogatory label to discredit James Talarico before any argument is made — for example: 'radical James Talarico'

Loaded Language: The term 'radical' is an emotionally charged word designed to trigger a negative reaction toward the subject rather than convey factual information — for example: radical James Talarico and sex-change surgeries for kids.

Conspiracy Appeal: The phrase 'What do you really know' implies hidden or suppressed information about the subject, suggesting the audience is unaware of something sinister — for example: 'What do you really know about radical James Talarico?'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies that Talarico's vote endangers children, invoking parental fear to discredit him without providing broader context — for example: 'voted no on banning sex-change surgeries for kids'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

James Talarico says God is nonbinary and thinks there are six genders. We must DEFEAT him. Check your registration HERE! James Talarico says God is nonbinary and thinks there are six genders. We must DEFEAT him. Check your registration HERE! God made two genders. Talarico thinks there are six. Don't sit this election out. Check your voter registration NOW!

Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence frames Talarico's theological and scientific views as implicitly offensive to religious and traditional in-group values, exploiting identity-based resentment — for example: presenting his views on God and gender as self-evidently disqualifying

False Urgency: The capitalized 'DEFEAT' creates an imperative call to action framed as an urgent moral necessity rather than a considered political choice — for example: We must DEFEAT him and Check your registration HERE!.

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies the only acceptable response to Talarico's views is total defeat, leaving no room for nuance, debate, or alternative responses — for example: 'We must DEFEAT him'

Card Stacking: The sentence selectively presents Talarico's statements on religion and gender to frame him negatively, omitting any context or broader policy positions — for example: presenting only the most provocative quotes to define him entirely

Loaded Language: The word 'DEFEAT' is capitalized for emotional emphasis, framing political opposition as a battle requiring urgent aggressive action — for example: 'We must DEFEAT him'

Appeal to Fear: The imperative framing implies dire consequences if this individual is not defeated, creating urgency and anxiety to motivate action — for example: 'We must DEFEAT him'

Transfer: Invokes divine authority to validate a political/social position on gender, borrowing legitimacy from religion — for example: using God's name to settle a contested empirical and social debate.

Name Calling: Uses Talarico's name to attach a discrediting label by implication, framing their position as absurd or extreme without engaging the argument — for example: singling out a named individual to mock their stated belief.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

It's the two-minute warning and James Talarico is in the red zone. You're the last line of defense. STOP him! It's the two-minute warning and James Talarico is in the red zone. You're the last line of defense. STOP him! James Talarico thinks there are six genders and wants to use your tax dollars on sex changes for kids. DEFEAT him!

Loaded Language: The phrase 'sex changes for kids' is emotionally charged and deliberately inflammatory framing designed to provoke outrage rather than describe policy accurately — for example: 'sex changes for kids'

Appeal to Fear: The claim that tax dollars will be used for 'sex changes for kids' is designed to create anxiety and alarm in the reader about a threat to their finances and children — for example: 'use your tax dollars on sex changes for kids'

False Urgency: The imperative 'DEFEAT him!' in all caps creates artificial urgency pressuring the reader to act immediately without deliberation — for example: 'DEFEAT him!'

Name Calling: The sentence frames Talarico with a derogatory characterization intended to discredit him rather than engage with his actual policy positions — for example: 'thinks there are six genders'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

James Talarico thinks there are six genders. Texas can't let him win. Make your plan to VOTE and defeat him! It's time to shine the lights on Talarico. He thinks God is nonbinary and that there are 6 genders. We must DEFEAT HIM.

Card Stacking: Presents a single isolated belief of the opponent to frame him negatively, omitting any broader context about his positions or record — for example: reducing a candidate to one controversial statement

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes Texas identity and in-group loyalty to frame the candidate as incompatible with 'Texas values', pressuring readers through regional identity — for example: implying real Texans must oppose him

Black-and-White Fallacy: Frames the situation as a binary — either Texas stops him or he wins — leaving no room for nuance or alternative outcomes — for example: 'Texas can't let him win'

False Urgency: Uses imperative language and emphasis ('VOTE') to create artificial urgency and pressure immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'Make your plan to VOTE and defeat him!'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

It's the two-minute warning and James Talarico is in the red zone. You're the last line of defense. STOP him! James Talarico thinks there are six genders and wants to use your tax dollars on sex changes for kids. DEFEAT him!

Loaded Language: The phrase 'sex changes for kids' is emotionally charged and deliberately inflammatory, designed to trigger a visceral reaction rather than describe policy accurately — for example: 'sex changes for kids'

Appeal to Fear: The claim that tax dollars will be used for 'sex changes for kids' is framed to provoke anxiety and outrage in the reader about their money being used for something they may find alarming — for example: 'use your tax dollars on sex changes for kids'

Name Calling: Attributing the belief that 'there are six genders' is used as a derogatory label to discredit Talarico rather than engage with his actual policy positions — for example: 'thinks there are six genders'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

"That is what disrespects Jesus"

He said I'm disrespecting Jesus. You want to know what actually disrespects Jesus? Kicking the sick off their health care to give tax cuts to billionaires. You know what actually disrespects Jesus is bombing innocent school children in Iran and sending our brave men and women off to die in another forever war. That is what disrespects Jesus.

Transfer: Invokes Jesus as a moral authority to frame the upcoming political arguments as religiously validated — for example: what actually disrespects Jesus, disrespects Jesus and what actually disrespects Jesus is bombing innocent school children.

Loaded Language: Uses emotionally charged words like 'kicking the sick' and 'billionaires' to provoke outrage rather than describe policy neutrally — for example: Kicking the sick off their health care, tax cuts to billionaires and bombing innocent school children in Iran.

Black-and-White Fallacy: Frames the policy as a simple binary — either you support health care for the sick or you give tax cuts to billionaires, ignoring more nuanced policy positions — for example: 'Kicking the sick off their health care to give tax cuts to billionaires'

Appeal to Fear: Evokes fear and grief by invoking the deaths of soldiers in a 'forever war' to generate an emotional response against a policy — for example: 'sending our brave men and women off to die in another forever war'

Appeal to Prejudice: Uses 'our brave men and women' to invoke in-group identity and patriotic sentiment to strengthen the emotional argument — for example: 'our brave men and women'

Repetition: The phrase 'disrespects Jesus' is repeated across sentences 2, 3, 4, and 5 as a rhetorical hammer to make the political framing feel morally absolute through familiarity — for example: 'That is what disrespects Jesus'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

We have a Texas-sized problem. A Senate Republican super PAC just reserved over $50 million in ads against us. And this is just through the end of the month. It is the single biggest investment from any outside group in any Texas Senate race ever. National Republicans are taking this race seriously because they know we are on a path to flipping this seat. But it’s a serious problem for us. Dropping this kind of money into Texas overnight has a real chance of derailing our movement if we don’t have the resources to fight back. To keep pace and avoid getting drowned out, we need to spend money nearly as fast as we can raise it. So I need to ask that if you can afford to make a donation, then please chip in at the link below.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I want you to hear directly from me...

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

The math is simple: James Talarico cannot win in Texas without Latino voters. Republicans know it. We know it. The only question is whether Voto Latino has the resources for a massive mobilization effort in the final stretch before Texas’ voter registration deadline. Donate today. Every dollar goes toward reaching and mobilizing progressive Latino voters.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

If winning in Texas is worth $35 to you, please contribute to our campaign before our legally required deadline on September 30th. Flipping a U.S. Senate seat in Texas is a massive undertaking. And when we close the books on the most important end-of-quarter fundraising deadline of this campaign, everyone will be looking to see whether we have the resources to actually take back Texas. So, we need a huge amount of donations before then to put up the biggest number possible. Thank you!

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

My Dad is a fighter...

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Imagine waking up on November 4th, the day after the midterm elections, and the headlines say: “James Talarico wins in Texas to take back the Senate majority for Democrats.” Think about how powerful that would be. It would mean this people-powered movement in Texas made history. A campaign fueled by grassroots donors beat the billionaires and corporate mega-donors to take back power for the people. Wouldn’t a small donation of $5 or whatever you can spare be worth it to make this a reality? If you can, click the link below to make that $5 contribution today. The only way we can win is with lots of people giving what they can to this grassroots movement.

Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence frames the contest as ordinary 'grassroots' people versus wealthy elites, exploiting in-group/out-group identity to cast the campaign as a populist triumph — for example: 'take back power for the people'

Loaded Language: Words like 'billionaires', 'mega-donors', and 'take back power' carry strong emotional charge designed to trigger resentment and enthusiasm rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'corporate mega-donors'

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'take back power for the people' invokes a vague but emotionally resonant ideal of popular sovereignty without specifying what power, from whom, or how — for example: 'take back power for the people'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

My Dad needs you. I'm Mattie, Ken Paxton's daughter... My Dad needs you. I'm Mattie, Ken Paxton's daughter...

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Why does James Talarico hate Christian values? Why does James Talarico hate Christian values?

Loaded Language: The word 'hate' is emotionally charged and presupposes a hostile disposition without evidence — for example: 'hate Christian values'

Appeal to Prejudice: The question frames 'Christian values' as an in-group identity marker, implying Talarico is an outsider or enemy of that group — for example: 'hate Christian values'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The question presupposes only two positions — either one supports Christian values or one hates them — leaving no room for nuance or alternative interpretations — for example: 'Why does James Talarico hate Christian values?'

Name Calling: The rhetorical question functions as a derogatory label by asserting without evidence that Talarico 'hates' a widely respected value system, discrediting him rather than addressing his arguments — for example: 'Why does James Talarico hate Christian values?'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Most politicians get to Washington, DC and start working for the people who funded their campaign. James Talarico got to Austin, remembered what $684 felt like, and capped insulin at $25. Different kind of politician. Most politicians get to Washington, DC and start working for the people who funded their campaign. James Talarico got to Austin, remembered what $684 felt like, and capped insulin at $25. Different kind of politician. Most politicians get to Washington, DC and start working for the people who funded their campaign. James Talarico got to Austin, remembered what $684 felt like, and capped insulin at $25. Different kind of politician.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Twisted

For years we've nurtured my daughter's love of sports and we did our best to keep her safe [music] on and off the field but James Talarico voted no to protect girls sports in Texas. [music] He wants girls competing against biological men. Talarico even said [music] our concerns are a far-right conspiracy. My daughter's safety is not the conspiracy. Talarico's twisted [music] trans agenda is unfair, unfair to girls and wrong for Texas. I'm Ken Paxton and I approve this message. Join my team give today.

Appeal to Fear: Framing the daughter's safety as under threat sets up an emotional fear response about children being in danger — for example: keep her safe on and off the field, He wants girls competing against biological men and My daughter's safety is not the conspiracy.

Card Stacking: Presents only the vote against the bill without context about what the bill contained or why someone might oppose it — for example: 'James Talarico voted no to protect girls sports in Texas'

Loaded Language: The phrase 'biological men' is an emotionally charged term used to trigger a reaction rather than neutrally describe the policy debate — for example: girls competing against biological men and Talarico's twisted trans agenda.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Attributes an extreme, sinister desire to Talarico without evidence that this is his stated goal — for example: 'He wants girls competing against biological men'

Name Calling: Uses the label 'far-right conspiracy' attributed to Talarico to discredit the opposing viewpoint by association with extremism — for example: our concerns are a far-right conspiracy and Talarico's twisted trans agenda.

Black-and-White Fallacy: Frames the issue as either protecting a daughter's safety or dismissing it as conspiracy, leaving no room for nuanced policy discussion — for example: 'My daughter's safety is not the conspiracy'

Repetition: The word 'unfair' is repeated twice in close succession for rhetorical emphasis — for example: 'unfair, unfair to girls'

Appeal to Prejudice: Appeals to Texas identity and in-group values to frame the opponent as an outsider threat — for example: 'wrong for Texas'

False Urgency: The call to 'give today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'give today'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Hey, it’s James, and I want to call a few of our supporters to personally say thank you. Our movement wouldn't be where it is today without grassroots supporters like you. The polls are leaning in our favor, but with dark money groups ramping up their spending against us, we need the resources to fight back. So chip in whatever you can to this ad, and I might give you a call!

Bandwagon Appeal: The sentence implies a large collective movement that the reader is already part of, subtly pressuring conformity and belonging through crowd identity — for example: 'Our movement'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 MAGA IS PANICKING ABOUT TEXAS, AND THEY SHOULD BE 🚨 Trump held an entire convention in Dallas to save Ken Paxton. >> Elon Musk dropped millions in Texas ads. >> The Senate Leadership Fund is spending frantically. >> Trump is begging Texans to show up. You know what that means? THEY KNOW THEY'RE LOSING. Talarico is LEADING. Texas Democrats are FIRED UP, and for the first time since 1994, a Democrat is within striking distance of flipping a Texas Senate seat. Texas Democrats have had ENOUGH, and to prove it: they are 300% matching every single dollar raised until Midnight. Your $10 becomes $30. Your $27 becomes $81. Your $50 becomes $150. MAGA IS SPENDING MILLIONS TO STOP THIS. MATCH THEM. 300%. RIGHT NOW. Rush a donation. It's time Texas goes blue. >>>

Loaded Language: The term 'PANICKING' is emotionally charged and chosen to mock and delegitimize the opposing group rather than convey neutral facts — for example: MAGA IS PANICKING

Name Calling: 'MAGA' is used as a derogatory label to identify and dismiss a political group rather than engage with their arguments — for example: MAGA IS PANICKING ABOUT TEXAS

Appeal to Fear: The phrase 'AND THEY SHOULD BE' implies a looming threat or consequence that justifies alarm, creating anxiety about what is coming — for example: AND THEY SHOULD BE

Conspiracy Appeal: Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 AN IMPEACHED FELON IS LOSING TEXAS TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHER. 🚨 Let's be very clear about what is happening right now. Ken Paxton: ❌ Impeached by his own Republican colleagues ❌ Accused of bribery and abuse of office ❌ Investigated by the FBI ❌ Caught hiding rental income on his financial disclosures ❌ Backed by Trump, Elon Musk, and every MAGA dollar they could throw at Texas James Talarico: ✅ Former public school teacher ✅ Leading in the polls ✅ Outraising an incumbent ✅ Hosting grocery drives while MAGA throws Billionaire Balls ✅ Building the coalition that flips Texas blue for the first time since 1994 TEXAS DEMS ARE FIRED UP AND ARE 300% MATCHING EVERY DOLLAR RAISED UNTIL MIDNIGHT. Your $10 becomes $30. Your $27 becomes $81. Your $50 becomes $150. Rush a Donation >>> It's time Texas goes blue >>>

Name Calling: The phrase 'impeached felon' is used as a derogatory label to discredit the subject rather than engage with policy arguments — for example: 'AN IMPEACHED FELON'

Loaded Language: The combination of alarm emojis and all-caps framing is designed to trigger an emotional reaction rather than convey neutral facts — for example: '🚨 AN IMPEACHED FELON IS LOSING TEXAS'

Appeal to Prejudice: Contrasting 'a public school teacher' against 'an impeached felon' invokes in-group identity by framing the teacher as a relatable everyman figure to generate sympathy and tribal alignment — for example: 'A PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHER'

False Urgency: The phrase 'right now' creates a sense of immediacy and urgency to frame the following accusations as a pressing crisis demanding immediate attention — for example: 'right now'

Card Stacking: The list selectively presents only negative facts and accusations against Paxton, mixing verified facts (impeachment, FBI investigation) with unresolved accusations (bribery) as if they carry equal weight, while omitting any context such as his acquittal in the Senate trial — for example: 'Accused of bribery and abuse of office'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Hey, it’s James, and we need a huge number of donations today. Here’s why: our campaign gets the lowest ad rate by law. Super PACs and dark money groups pay up to six times more for the same ad placements. Every dollar you donate can have six times the impact of Elon Musk’s or MAGA Inc.’s spending. We’re wiring money out this Friday for the next round of TV ads. If we fall short of our goals, we have to start making cuts. We can’t afford to lose momentum. I’m hoping that everyone who understands the stakes of taking back Texas will chip in whatever they can today.

False Urgency: The word 'today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'chip in whatever they can today'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'everyone who understands the stakes' implies an in-group of enlightened supporters versus those who do not understand, flattering the target audience into compliance — for example: 'everyone who understands the stakes'

Loaded Language: The phrase 'taking back Texas' implies the state has been lost or taken away, carrying strong emotional and political connotations designed to trigger a reaction — for example: 'taking back Texas'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I need your help. We're at the point of the race where we're spending money faster than we're raising it. So every dollar you donate today goes straight to work to pay for television ads, field organizers, and voter contact. But if we come up short of our goals, we have to cut things. And in a close race, we can't afford that. If we can hit our goals, we're going to win. So please donate right now, and when we do, know you played a big part. Thank you.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’m lowering my ask to just $1 today, and here’s why. This Senate race in Texas is likely going to be the most expensive and most competitive in the country this November. Flipping this seat and taking back the Senate majority will require an unprecedented number of donations. If a historic victory in Texas is worth even just $1 to you, please chip in right now.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

News just broke that SLF, Senate Republicans’ top super PAC, is going to spend $51 million against us in just the month of September This is the single biggest investment from any outside group in any Texas Senate race ever. National Republicans are taking this race seriously because they know we are on a path to flipping this seat. But it’s a serious problem for us. Dropping this kind of money into Texas overnight has a real chance of derailing our movement if we don’t have the resources to fight back. To keep pace and avoid getting drowned out, we need to spend money nearly as fast as we can raise it. So I need to make a humble request: If you can afford to make a donation, then please chip in using this link today:

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

$5. That’s the contribution amount I’m hoping you’ll make to our campaign to take back Texas today. $5 to take on the billionaire megadonors and their puppet politicians who want to defeat our movement. $5 to flip the Senate and take back our majority. I know $5 doesn’t seem like a lot, but when you contribute $5, and the next person who sees this ad does too, our collective people power will build the resources we need to win.

Name Calling: The terms 'billionaire megadonors' and 'puppet politicians' are derogatory labels used to discredit opponents rather than address their arguments — for example: puppet politicians

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our movement' creates a strong in-group identity, implying readers belong to a righteous collective under attack by powerful outsiders — for example: our movement

False Urgency: The framing of a small donation ($5) as necessary to 'take on' powerful enemies implies immediate action is required to prevent defeat — for example: want to defeat our movement

Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies that failure to act (donate) will result in the movement being defeated by powerful billionaires and their political puppets — for example: who want to defeat our movement

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Texas small business owners have questions for the candidates running to represent them in the U.S. Senate. They want to know where the candidates stand on the issues that affect their businesses, their employees and the communities they serve. This September, USHBC is giving those questions a place in the conversation. In Dialogue TEXAS is a two part Q&A series featuring Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and State Representative James Talarico. Each candidate will sit down separately with USHBC President & CEO Javier Palomarez to answer questions about the issues impacting small businesses. Both conversations will be streamed live. Save the dates: Attorney General Ken Paxton: Monday, Sept 28 Representative James Talarico: Wednesday, Sept 30 Event times and details will be available soon. Register for the livestream and we’ll send all event details directly to your inbox: https://www.ushbc.com/paxton-talarico-texas-senate-race#register Texas small business owners have questions for the candidates running to represent them in the U.S. Senate. They want to know where the candidates stand on the issues that affect their businesses, their employees and the communities they serve. This September, USHBC is giving those questions a place in the conversation. In Dialogue TEXAS is a two part Q&A series featuring Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and State Representative James Talarico. Each candidate will sit down separately with USHBC President & CEO Javier Palomarez to answer questions about the issues impacting small businesses. Both conversations will be streamed live. Save the dates: Attorney General Ken Paxton: Monday, Sept 28 Representative James Talarico: Wednesday, Sept 30 Event times and details will be available soon. Register for the livestream and we’ll send all event details directly to your inbox: https://www.ushbc.com/paxton-talarico-texas-senate-race#register

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

I’ll keep this quick. We need a huge number of donations today to flip this U.S. Senate seat in Texas. If everyone reading this right now made a contribution, we’d reach our goal in minutes. But I know not everyone can give right now, so if you care about taking back Texas AND can afford to chip in, then I need your support today. Thank you so much.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Texas must stay strong and hold the line. Radical Democrat James Talarico is pushing an agenda that doesn't represent Texas values. Sign our official pledge today to take a stand against his extreme platform, and we’ll send you a free limited-edition America 250 flag with your membership. Membership Terms and Conditions Apply

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive call to strength and resolve with no specific meaning or policy substance — for example: 'stay strong and hold the line'

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes Texas identity as an in-group that must defend itself, implying a threat from outsiders — for example: Texas must stay strong and Texas values.

Name Calling: Uses the derogatory label 'Radical Democrat' to discredit James Talarico rather than engage with his actual positions — for example: 'Radical Democrat James Talarico'

Loaded Language: The word 'Radical' is emotionally charged and designed to trigger a negative reaction rather than convey factual information — for example: Radical and extreme platform.

False Urgency: The word 'today' combined with a limited-edition incentive creates artificial time pressure to act without deliberation — for example: 'Sign our official pledge today'

Transfer: Offering an 'America 250 flag' borrows patriotic and national symbolism to lend legitimacy and emotional appeal to the political pledge — for example: 'free limited-edition America 250 flag'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Texas hasn't sent a Democrat to the Senate since 1988. Iowa hasn't since 2008. You can end both streaks this November. James Talarico built a coalition that beat expectations in the primary and is running the kind of campaign Texas Democrats have been waiting a generation for. Josh Turek won his statehouse seat by six votes in a county Trump carried by 20 points. Then won it again by five points in 2024. That's the difference a handful of doors knocked and a few dollars raised can make. Neither race is supposed to be winnable. That's what makes them worth every dollar. We're lowering our ask to $2, one for Texas, one for Iowa, because we'd rather have 500 people in this fight than 50. Will you chip in $2 to help Talarico and Turek make history and flip these seats blue?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Iowa. Texas. North Carolina. All 3 went for Trump in 2024. All 3 have Senate races to fill open seats previously held by Republicans. All 3 have a crucial part to play in the battle for Senate control. Winning all 3 would help secure a Democratic Senate majority. Will you please pitch in just $3 today to help Josh Turek, James Talarico, and Roy Cooper flip these 3 open Senate seats?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

James Talarico is running to ban dark money, gerrymandering, and stock trading by members of Congress. But he can't unrig this system alone. Chip in $5 to help me defeat my MAGA opponent Keith Self, who's bought out by billionaires like Elon Musk, and let's send James a partner in the House.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'dark money' is emotionally charged and designed to trigger a negative reaction rather than neutrally describe campaign finance — for example: dark money and bought out by billionaires like Elon Musk.

False Urgency: Implies that action is needed immediately because the candidate cannot succeed without outside help, creating pressure to act — for example: he can't unrig this system alone

Name Calling: The label 'MAGA' is used as a derogatory political tag to discredit the opponent rather than address his policy positions — for example: my MAGA opponent Keith Self

Appeal to Prejudice: The framing invokes an in-group identity of reform-minded voters against a corrupt out-group of billionaire-backed politicians — for example: let's send James a partner in the House

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton was impeached by his own party for bribery. Ken Paxton is the most corrupt politician in Texas. Ken Paxton was impeached by his own party for bribery. Ken Paxton is the most corrupt politician in Texas.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: most corrupt politician in Texas.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The superlative claim that Paxton is the 'most corrupt' politician in all of Texas is an extreme overstatement that goes beyond what the evidence of a single impeachment can support — for example: 'the most corrupt politician in Texas'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

BREAKING: A pro-Trump super PAC is dumping millions of dollars into Texas. MAGA Inc. just committed to spending $10 million on ad buys in Texas. Half to prop up Ken Paxton. Half to attack James Talarico. And we know this is just the start. Polls show the Senate race is a toss-up. James Talarico can win — and Republicans know it. Trump’s operation wouldn’t be dumping millions into Texas if they were confident about Paxton winning. We won’t be able to outspend Trump’s millions, but we can prove that Texans’ votes can’t be bought. With just weeks until early voting starts, we’re going all out to reach, register, and personally follow up with hundreds of thousands of Texas voters to make sure they’re ready to cast their ballots. We’re counting on supporters like you to make sure we have the resources to fund our organizing plans. Can you donate $10 today to help us fight back?

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Donald Trump, Greg Abbott, and Ken Paxton are all in on stopping Democrats in Texas – spending millions to protect their power. Trump's super PAC just confirmed a $10 million ad blitz to boost Paxton and attack Talarico. And we know this is just the start. And with Elon Musk – the richest man on Earth – spending $100 million in key battleground states like Texas, it’s clear that the wealthy are trying to use their money to decide who controls the U.S. Senate. This is what happens when those in power get scared: They try to buy what they can't win on merit. We're not backing down. Powered by People is on the ground every day registering voters and making sure Texans show up – because people power beats a billionaire's bank account. Chip in today to help us turn this people power into votes.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'buy what they can't win on merit' implies corruption and illegitimacy without providing evidence, using emotionally charged framing to discredit those in power — for example: implying bribery or corrupt purchasing of outcomes

Flag-Waving: Patriotic, religious, or in-group identity invoked to validate a position.

Slogans: Catchy phrase used to compress a complex position into an emotionally loaded shorthand.

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'people power beats a billionaire's bank account' frames the issue as ordinary Texans (in-group) versus wealthy elites (out-group), exploiting class-based identity to rally support — for example: people power vs. billionaire's bank account

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Here's Why

Billionaires are spending millions attacking me. Here's why. I don't take corporate PAC money. I'm running to ban dark money so billionaires can't buy our elections. Ban members of Congress from trading stocks and enriching themselves. Ban gerrymandering in every state and establish term limits so we can show career politicians the door. I'm James Talarico and I approve this message because if the billionaires are coming after us, we must be doing something right.

Appeal to Fear: Creates anxiety about powerful billionaires targeting the candidate to provoke a defensive reaction in voters — for example: framing billionaire spending as a personal attack.

Scapegoating: Identifies billionaires as the singular antagonistic force responsible for political opposition — for example: attributing all attacks to one class of people.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'buy our elections' uses emotionally charged language to imply corruption and illegitimacy — for example: buy our elections and enriching themselves.

Name Calling: The label 'career politicians' is used as a derogatory term to discredit incumbents rather than address policy — for example: 'show career politicians the door'.

Appeal to Prejudice: Uses 'us' to create an in-group identity of ordinary people versus billionaire outsiders, implying shared identity and solidarity — for example: 'if the billionaires are coming after us'.

Bandwagon Appeal: Implies that opposition from billionaires validates the candidate's righteousness, pressuring voters to align with the 'us' who are being attacked — for example: 'we must be doing something right'.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Follow the money in Texas politics, and the pattern becomes unmistakable. West Texas billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks are the primary bankrollers of hardline political action committees like Texans United for a Conservative Majority (TUCM), pouring millions into reshaping Texas government. Firsthand accounts link Wilks directly to the radical “Seven Mountains Mandate”—an extreme dominionist framework that seeks to capture cultural and governmental institutions to impose a rigid biblical worldview. That money trail leads right into local representation: • The PAC Cash: TUCM has funneled over $110,000 directly into Chris Spencer’s campaign coffers across the 2024 and 2026 cycles. • The Allied Machine: Dunn and Wilks are central financial pillars backing organizations like the True Texas Project and allied PAC networks that target rural public schools. • The Power Alignments: Spencer also operates as a hand-picked ally of Ken Paxton and Greg Abbott—who pumped nearly $700,000 into Spencer to push private school vouchers at the expense of rural public education. You are who you run with. When a candidate takes tens of thousands of dollars from political machines funded by far-right billionaires trying to mandate their theology into law, you get extreme political agendas, not independent community leadership. Financial Ties to the Dunn/Wilks. • PAC Funding Pipeline: Chris Spencer has received significant financial backing from Texans United for a Conservative Majority (TUCM), accepting $30,973 in the 2024 cycle and an additional $80,000 in the 2026 cycle (totaling over $110,000). • Billionaire Backers: Campaign finance records show that TUCM is overwhelmingly financed by West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks, with the Dunn and Wilks families accounting for roughly 84% of the PAC’s total contributions. • Network Successor: TUCM was formed as a successor PAC following fallout surrounding Defend Texas Liberty, serving as the primary vehicle for Dunn and Wilks to fund legislative candidates. Greg Abbott’s Voucher Machine • Primary Patron: While TUCM provided significant support, Governor Greg Abbott has served as Spencer’s single largest financial backer, contributing roughly $699,575—approximately two-thirds of Spencer's entire campaign funding across both cycles. • Targeting Voucher Opponents: Abbott endorsed and financed Spencer as part of his coordinated effort to replace House Republicans who voted against taxpayer-funded private school vouchers and Education Savings Accounts (ESAs). • Allied School-Choice Backing: In addition to Abbott's direct contributions, Spencer received $62,125 from the pro-voucher Family Empowerment Coalition PAC. The Ken Paxton Alignment • Shared Primary Objectives: Spencer ran with endorsements from both Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton against former incumbent Gary VanDeaver, who had voted to impeach Paxton and opposed school vouchers. • The Retribution Coalition: Spencer’s candidacy sat squarely at the confluence of the Paxton-defense apparatus and the Abbott voucher coalition, both of which were heavily supported by the Dunn/Wilks PAC infrastructure. How Extreme is the Seven Mountains Mandate? The Seven Mountain Mandate (7MM)—also known as the Seven Mountain Strategy—is a prominent theological and political strategy within Christian Dominionism. Propagated heavily by networks like the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), it calls on Christians to "take dominion" or control over seven core spheres of society: government, education, media, family, business, arts/entertainment, and religion. In Texas, this strategy has moved from the fringes into mainstream political arenas, sparking significant controversy. Critics, civil rights groups, and mainstream theologians view the extreme ideologies associated with the 7MM as a threat to pluralism, democracy, and marginalized groups. ________________________________________ 1. Controversies and Impact in Texas Texas has become a primary battleground for the Seven Mountain Strategy, where its influence is often felt across the Education, Family, and Government mountains: • The Education Mountain: In Texas school districts like Grapevine-Colleyville and Southlake, 7MM alignment has influenced major overhauls in local school board policies. This has led to strict crackdowns on discussions regarding systemic racism, sex education, and LGBTQ+ inclusion, which proponents brand as "demonic ideologies" that must be purged through "spiritual warfare". • The Government Mountain: High-profile Texas politicians and political donors have increasingly utilized the language of spiritual warfare. For instance, steps to push the Ten Commandments into public school classrooms and state leaders explicitly labeling the separation of church and state a "myth" are viewed by critics as direct applications of the 7MM playbook. ________________________________________ 2. Extreme Ideologies Regarding Women Within the strict application of 7MM theology, the "Family Mountain" is viewed through a rigid, patriarchal lens. Critics argue that the movement's extreme wing pushes ideologies that restrict women's rights: • Complementarianism and Female Subservience: The strategy emphasizes a return to a biblical hierarchy where men hold ultimate authority in the home, church, and government. Extremist elements of dominionism view secular feminism as a "demonic spirit" (frequently referred to in their rhetoric as the Jezebel spirit) that subverts the natural, God-given order. • Theocracy Over Bodily Autonomy: Under this worldview, laws regarding reproductive rights are not treated as public health or civil liberties matters, but as spiritual battles between divine law and demonic deception. Because the mandate aims to codify its specific religious tenets into state law, it leaves no room for reproductive freedom or secular frameworks of women's autonomy. ________________________________________ 3. Extreme Ideologies Regarding People of Color Civil rights organizations, including the Southern Poverty Law Center and progressive think tanks, argue that the Seven Mountain Mandate intersects heavily with White Christian Nationalism. The extreme ideologies toward people of color manifest in several ways: • Erasure of Systemic Racism: Prominent 7MM leaders argue that concepts like systemic racism, Critical Race Theory (CRT), or diversity initiatives are tools used by spiritual enemies to divide the nation. By framing the history of racial inequality as a "demonic delusion" rather than a historical reality, the movement actively opposes policies meant to protect civil rights or address historical discrimination. • Association with White Supremacy and Eurocentrism: Sociologists and religious historians point out that the 7MM frequently treats "Western culture" as a stand-in for "God's culture," which implicitly equates Christian dominion with the preservation of white societal dominance. Extreme variations of dominionism trace historical roots back to ideologies like British Israelism, which historically argued that only Anglo-Saxons were God's chosen people. • Justification of Historical Oppression: Religious scholars note that the core logic of the 7MM—that God explicitly designs strict societal hierarchies and mandates one group to rule over others—mirrors the exact theological justifications used by 19th-century white enslavers to argue that Black people were divinely intended for subjugation. ________________________________________ Summary of the Extremist Core At its furthest margins, the Seven Mountain Strategy views pluralism as weakness, compromise as betrayal, and coexistence as capitulation. Critics warn that by reducing complex social issues (like women's rights and racial equality) into binary battles between "godly" and "demonic" forces, the ideology effectively strip-mines the rights of any demographic that does not conform to its narrow, theocratic vision.

Conspiracy Appeal: The phrase 'follow the money' implies a hidden, sinister financial network operating beneath the surface of politics, inviting the reader to suspect coordinated secret influence — for example: Follow the money in Texas politics, and the pattern becomes unmistakable and That money trail leads right into local representation.

Loaded Language: The word 'hardline' is emotionally charged and used to frame the political action committees negatively rather than neutrally — for example: hardline political action committees and the radical "Seven Mountains Mandate"—an extreme dominionist framework that seeks to capture cultural and governmental institutions to impose a rigid biblical worldview.

Name Calling: Labeling the committees as 'hardline' functions as a derogatory descriptor intended to discredit them rather than describe their policy positions — for example: 'hardline political action committees like Texans United for a Conservative Majority.'

Card Stacking: The claim is attributed only to 'firsthand accounts' — a vague, unverified sourcing — yet is presented with the same assertive confidence as established facts, without noting the claim is unverified — for example: 'Firsthand accounts link Wilks directly to the radical "Seven Mountains Mandate."'

Appeal to Fear: The description of a framework that seeks to 'capture' institutions and 'impose a rigid biblical worldview' is designed to provoke fear about a theocratic takeover — for example: 'seeks to capture cultural and governmental institutions to impose a rigid biblical worldview.'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase functions as a guilt-by-association maxim, implying that a candidate's identity and values are defined entirely by their donors — exploiting in-group/out-group identity dynamics — for example: 'You are who you run with.'

Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two outcomes — either 'extreme political agendas' or 'independent community leadership' — ignoring any middle ground or nuance — for example: 'you get extreme political agendas, not independent community leadership'.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A 14-year-old girl was being sold out of a motel off I-35. Ken Paxton’s unit put her traffickers in prison. Because of Ken she’s home safe. Ken Paxton is fighting to keep our children safe.

Appeal to Fear: The framing implies children are under threat and require active protection, creating anxiety to generate support for Paxton — for example: 'keep our children safe'

Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'our children' invokes in-group identity to create emotional solidarity and tribal loyalty — for example: 'our children'

Glittering Generalities: 'Fighting to keep children safe' is a vague, emotionally positive framing with no specific policy or factual content — for example: 'fighting to keep our children safe'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Service

Politicians aren't supposed to serve themselves. >> They're supposed to serve us. >> I've spent my life serving others. First as a public school teacher, then as a lawmaker bringing both parties together to cap the cost of insulin, to cut property taxes, >> [music] >> and take on corruption. My faith teaches me to serve my neighbors. That's exactly what I'll do in the United States Senate. I'm James Talarico and I approve this message because public servants should actually serve the public.

Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'us' creates an in-group identity contrasting with self-serving politicians, implying the speaker uniquely represents the people — for example: They're supposed to serve us.

Glittering Generalities: Vague claim of lifelong service without specific substance, used as a rhetorical flourish to establish noble character — for example: spent my life serving others and public servants should actually serve the public.

Card Stacking: Selectively highlights bipartisan achievements and anti-corruption work while omitting any failures or controversies, presenting only a favorable one-sided record — for example: bringing both parties together to cap the cost of insulin, to cut property taxes, and take on corruption.

Transfer: Invokes religious authority to lend moral legitimacy to the candidate's political platform — for example: My faith teaches me to serve my neighbors.

Flag-Waving: Patriotic, religious, or in-group identity invoked to validate a position.

Slogans: Catchy phrase used to compress a complex position into an emotionally loaded shorthand.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

It all comes down to this: Talarico's entire campaign is a deception operation...

Loaded Language: The phrase 'deception operation' uses militaristic, emotionally charged language to frame a political campaign as a deliberate, coordinated fraud — for example: 'deception operation'

Name Calling: The sentence labels Talarico's entire campaign as a 'deception operation,' functioning as a derogatory characterization meant to discredit rather than argue on the merits — for example: 'Talarico's entire campaign is a deception operation'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The word 'entire' makes an absolute, sweeping claim that the whole campaign is deceptive without qualification or evidence — for example: 'entire campaign'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton's office let an admitted child molester walk free

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton is fighting to keep our children safe. Ken Paxton is fighting to keep our children safe.

Appeal to Fear: The framing implies children are under threat and that Paxton's actions are necessary to protect them, invoking parental anxiety to generate support — for example: 'keep our children safe'

Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'our children' invokes in-group identity, positioning the audience as a unified community whose children are being protected — for example: 'our children'

Glittering Generalities: 'Keep our children safe' is a vague, emotionally positive phrase that sounds noble but provides no specific information about what threat exists or what actions are being taken — for example: 'keep our children safe'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

WATCH - Brandon Gill's Urgent Message

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton got rich in office while we struggled to get by

Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'we' creates an in-group identity contrasted against Paxton as an out-group figure who enriched himself at the expense of ordinary people — for example: 'we struggled to get by'

Loaded Language: The phrase implies corrupt self-enrichment through office without providing factual basis, using emotionally charged framing to trigger resentment — for example: 'got rich in office'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

A 14-year-old girl was being sold out of a motel off I-35. Ken Paxton’s unit put her traffickers in prison. Because of Ken she’s home safe.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton and his scandals have been around forever

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Corrupt career-politician Ken Paxton is politics as usual

Name Calling: The label 'corrupt career-politician' is a derogatory tag used to discredit Ken Paxton rather than address any specific argument or policy — for example: 'Corrupt career-politician Ken Paxton'

Loaded Language: The word 'corrupt' is an emotionally charged term chosen to trigger a negative reaction rather than convey a specific factual claim — for example: 'Corrupt career-politician'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton was impeached for enriching himself

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton voted twice to protect animal abusers

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Hey, it’s James, and I'm reaching out to respectfully ask you to contribute to our campaign today. Republicans just wrapped up their midterm convention in Dallas, where they pummeled us with attacks. They are activated to beat us and bail out Ken Paxton, the most corrupt politician in Texas. I wish I didn’t have to ask again, but we’re facing $15 million from Ken Paxton’s dark money Super PAC, over a million from Elon’s PAC, and millions more from MAGA Inc.’s war chest. They are afraid of the movement we are building in Texas, and so I need your help to ramp up our ads and fight back against these attacks today.

Loaded Language: The word 'corrupt' is emotionally charged and designed to trigger a negative reaction toward Ken Paxton rather than convey a neutral factual assessment — for example: 'most corrupt politician'

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Calling Paxton 'the most corrupt politician in Texas' is an absolute superlative claim that goes beyond what evidence in the sentence supports — for example: 'the most corrupt politician in Texas'

Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'beat us' invokes an in-group/out-group framing, implying a coordinated effort against 'us' as a defined group — for example: 'activated to beat us'

Conspiracy Appeal: The word 'activated' implies a hidden, coordinated mobilization by shadowy actors working against the in-group — for example: 'They are activated'

Appeal to Fear: The sentence frames unnamed opponents as fearful and threatening, creating a sense of danger and urgency around unspecified 'attacks' to motivate action — for example: 'fight back against these attacks today'

False Urgency: The word 'today' combined with the call to action creates artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation and force an immediate response — for example: 'ramp up our ads and fight back against these attacks today'

Bandwagon Appeal: The phrase 'the movement we are building' implies a growing collective that the reader should join and support, leveraging crowd identity to pressure participation — for example: 'the movement we are building in Texas'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Abrir Puertas

Who's this guy in this white shirt? It was the first time that I had an adult [music] tell me that the world is hard and it won't be handed to you. I graduated from UT Austin. [music] Texas A&M University. I'm finishing my degree at UTSA. Soy James Talerico y apruebo este mensaje.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

King James

In the beginning, God was non-binary and he wasn't a Christian. And God said, "Let there be six genders and there were." Then God so loved the world that he gave us his only son, who was a radical feminist and never asked people to worship him. Look, I always think of myself as a Christian who hates Christianity. >> James Talarico, wrong for Texas. >> America is not a Christian nation. >> And wrong for America, too. >> I'm Ken Paxton and I approve this message.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

🚨 Texas Senate candidate Rep. James Talarico called billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban "one of the good ones" during a live healthcare panel at the Ridglea Theater in Fort Worth, with Cuban seated on the same stage. The remark came in response to a moderator's question about Talarico's criticism of billionaire influence in politics. Talarico, whose campaign website states he has "led the fight against the billionaire mega-donors and puppet politicians who have taken over Texas," drew a distinction between billionaires who influence politics through donations and Cuban, whom he framed alongside wealthy champions of working people like FDR and RFK. Cuban said of Talarico during the event, "I believe in him." The August 29 panel centered on the pair's joint "Breaking up Big Medicine" plan, announced one day earlier, which backs proposed antitrust legislation targeting healthcare monopolies. Talarico cited data showing 90% of all hospital beds are controlled by large hospital systems and that just three pharmacy benefit managers process roughly 80% of prescriptions nationwide. Cuban's Cost Plus Drug Company, founded in 2022, aims to lower generic prescription drug costs by cutting out pharmacy benefit managers entirely. Talarico, the Democratic nominee, faces Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton in November. The Cook Political Report shifted the race from "Lean Republican" to "Toss Up" on August 20. Fox News co-host Jessica Tarlov also appeared on stage at the Fort Worth event. Do billionaires who focus on consumer cost reform earn a different kind of trust from voters than those who donate to political campaigns? 👇 #JamesTalarico #MarkCuban #TexasSenate #BreakUpBigMedicine #TexasPolitics #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 President Trump held an RNC fundraiser in Houston for Texas Senate candidate Ken Paxton. Paxton says the event signals Republican resources are coming into the race, and he is now expanding campaign advertising statewide. The Texas Senate contest is rated a Toss-Up by the Cook Political Report, the first time the outlet has given that rating to a Texas Senate race since the Cruz vs. O'Rourke matchup in 2018. FEC filings show Democrat James Talarico holds a commanding fundraising lead, raising $72 million since the start of 2025 compared to Paxton's $16.8 million. California is Talarico's largest out-of-state donor state per FEC data. Paxton claims Talarico raised $11 to $12 million from California alone, though that specific figure is Paxton's own assertion from the interview. Republicans may have a new financial avenue. A recent Supreme Court ruling is expected to allow Paxton to draw on the national GOP's resources more freely. The RNC and aligned committees report a combined $1 billion available to spend in the coming months. An AdImpact analysis projects total spending across both campaigns and outside groups could reach roughly $440 million, which would make this the second-most expensive U.S. Senate race in history. Paxton won the GOP nomination by defeating four-term incumbent Sen. John Cornyn with 64% of the vote in the May runoff, one week after Trump endorsed him. A Democrat has not won a Texas statewide race in more than 30 years. What do you think: can Republican momentum and party resources close a $59 million fundraising gap in time? 👇 #KenPaxton #TexasSenate #JamesTalarico #Texas2026 #TrumpTexas #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paxton's Former “Top Cop” Endorses James Talarico

This is Ken Paxton. And this is Ken Paxton firing [music] an honest Texas Ranger. Here's what happened. David Maxwell spent five decades in law enforcement and was inducted into the Texas Ranger Hall of Fame. The best of the best. Let's just say he knows a bad guy when he sees one. So when he saw his boss, Ken Paxton, trading favors with a convicted felon, he had to speak up. He reported Ken Paxton to the FBI and Ken Paxton fired him for it. Ranger Maxwell testified Paxton's impeachment trial. >> I told him that uh Nate Paul [music] was a criminal. He was going to get himself indicted. >> Ken Paxton was impeached by his own party, but Ranger Maxwell isn't done speaking up against bad [music] guys. >> My name is David Maxwell. Ken Paxton ended my five decade career because I blew the whistle [music] on his corruption. I am supporting James Talarico for the US Senate. >> Vote for James Talarico. He's one of the good guys.

Loaded Language: The word 'honest' is emotionally charged, framing Maxwell as virtuous to contrast with Paxton — for example: honest Texas Ranger, knows a bad guy when he sees one and trading favors with a convicted felon.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The phrase 'the best of the best' is an extreme superlative used to elevate Maxwell's credibility beyond what the preceding sentence establishes — for example: 'The best of the best'

Repetition: The name 'Ken Paxton' is repeated twice in a single sentence to reinforce negative associations — for example: 'He reported Ken Paxton to the FBI and Ken Paxton fired him'

Name Calling: Calling Nate Paul 'a criminal' in a quoted statement is a derogatory label used to discredit by association — for example: 'Nate Paul was a criminal'

Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'one of the good guys' is a vague, emotionally positive label that conveys no specific policy or factual information — for example: 'He's one of the good guys'

Black-and-White Fallacy: Framing Talarico as 'one of the good guys' implicitly positions the political landscape as good vs. bad with no middle ground, mirroring the earlier 'bad guys' framing — for example: 'He's one of the good guys'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

Elon Musk and MAGA Inc. have started spending against our campaign in Texas. They’re coming to bail out Ken Paxton with the hundreds of millions of dollars they have at their disposal. Defeating our campaign is one of their top priorities. That should tell you how scared they are of what we are building. This is an all-hands-on-deck moment for our campaign to ramp up our advertising and compete with this kind of spending. So please donate whatever you can right now to our people-powered movement.

Name Calling: The label 'MAGA Inc.' is a derogatory framing that reduces a political movement to a corporate-sounding entity to discredit it rather than address its arguments — for example: MAGA Inc.

Appeal to Fear: The phrase frames wealthy outside forces 'coming' with vast resources to overwhelm the campaign, creating anxiety about being outgunned by powerful actors — for example: They're coming to bail out Ken Paxton with the hundreds of millions of dollars they have at their disposal.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The phrase 'hundreds of millions of dollars they have at their disposal' overstates the implied threat to amplify alarm beyond what the specific spending figure warrants — for example: hundreds of millions of dollars they have at their disposal.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Why Ken Paxton is too SCARED to debate James Talarico

This is Ken Paxton. And this is Ken Paxton chickening out of a debate. >> Are you ready to face Mr. Talarico in a debate sir? >> Here's what happened. Three TV networks set dates, times, and locations for debates between US Senate candidates James Talarico and Ken Paxton. James Talarico agreed immediately. Ken Paxton didn't. His handlers say he's just ironing out the details. They've been saying he's close to an agreement for weeks. But we know Ken [music] Paxton. He hasn't debated anyone since he was impeached for bribery. >> Uh yeah, so I mean >> He hasn't debated anyone since he was indicted for fraud. >> So I I mean I I >> He hasn't debated anyone since giving an Epstein-style sweetheart deal to an admitted child predator. >> This is not going the way it should. >> In fact, he hasn't debated anyone in over 12 years. We get it. Ken Paxton's billionaire handlers won't let him answer questions in public. They've got a lot riding on their favorite puppet becoming their own personal US Senator. And they know that if he opens his mouth, he'll lose the election. And they'll end up losing a whole lot of money. But go ahead. Prove us wrong, Ken. Show us your billionaire handlers will finally let you on stage. Vote for James Talarico. He is not chicken.

Name Calling: Describing Paxton as 'chickening out' is a derogatory label meant to humiliate rather than make a substantive argument — for example: chickening out of a debate, their favorite puppet becoming their own personal US Senator and He is not chicken.

Loaded Language: The word 'handlers' carries a derogatory connotation implying Paxton is controlled by others rather than acting independently — for example: His handlers, impeached for bribery and indicted for fraud.

Repetition: The phrase 'He hasn't debated anyone since' is repeated multiple times across sentences 11, 12, 13, and 15 to hammer home a negative impression through familiarity — for example: He hasn't debated anyone since he was impeached for bribery, He hasn't debated anyone since he was indicted for fraud and He hasn't debated anyone since giving an Epstein-style sweetheart deal to an admitted child predator.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim of 12+ years without debating is presented as a dramatic absolute to maximize negative impact — for example: 'he hasn't debated anyone in over 12 years'

Conspiracy Appeal: Implies a hidden coordinated effort by shadowy wealthy actors to prevent Paxton from speaking publicly — for example: Ken Paxton's billionaire handlers won't let him answer questions in public and They've got a lot riding on their favorite puppet becoming their own personal US Senator.

Appeal to Fear: Implies that Paxton's handlers are fearful of public exposure, reinforcing the conspiracy narrative and creating anxiety about hidden control — for example: 'if he opens his mouth, he'll lose the election'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

🚨 Stop scrolling! Do you live in Texas? If so, your last day to register to vote is October 5 and we have no time to waste. Here’s why registering to vote matters so much: ➡️ Texas will have one the closest Senate races in the country—determining if Democrats regain control of Congress. ➡️ There are 1.36 million unregistered Latinos within the state and their votes have the power to sway election outcomes. ➡️ The only way we beat politicians like Ken Paxton and other MAGA Republicans is by making sure Latino voters are registered, informed, and ready to turn out. That’s why we’re working overtime right now to meet people where they are and do the voter contact it takes to turn registration into real turnout. Rush $10 to help inform, register, and get Latino voters ready to show up to the polls. 🚨 Stop scrolling! Do you live in Texas? If so, your last day to register to vote is October 5 and we have no time to waste. Here’s why registering to vote matters so much: ➡️ Texas will have one the closest Senate races in the country—determining if Democrats regain control of Congress. ➡️ There are 1.36 million unregistered Latinos within the state and their votes have the power to sway election outcomes. ➡️ The only way we beat politicians like Ken Paxton and other MAGA Republicans is by making sure Latino voters are registered, informed, and ready to turn out. That’s why we’re working overtime right now to meet people where they are and do the voter contact it takes to turn registration into real turnout. Rush $10 to help inform, register, and get Latino voters ready to show up to the polls.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Rep. James Talarico stood with me in Arlington to fight an effort to cut 92 polling sites — nearly a third of Election Day locations. “Nothing terrifies them more than people who show up to vote and people who show up to hold elected officials accountable.” That’s why they are playing games: redistricting our maps, and now closing our polling places. Flipping Texas on November 3rd starts in Tarrant County, and they know it. Help us get there. #FlipTarrant #FlipTexas #AlisaSimmonsForCountyJudge #VotingRights #AllEyesOnTarrant

Conspiracy Appeal: The phrase implies a hidden, coordinated effort by an unnamed 'they' to manipulate elections through redistricting and polling place closures, suggesting sinister intent without naming or substantiating the actors — for example: 'they are playing games'

Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'our maps' and 'our polling places' invokes in-group identity, framing the actions as an attack on a specific community's political rights — for example: 'our maps'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Texas small business owners have questions for the candidates running to represent them in the U.S. Senate. They want to know where the candidates stand on the issues that affect their businesses, their employees and the communities they serve. This September, USHBC is giving those questions a place in the conversation. In Dialogue TEXAS is a two part Q&A series featuring Attorney General Ken Paxton and Representative James Talarico. Each candidate will sit down separately with USHBC President & CEO Javier Palomarez to answer questions about the issues small business owners are dealing with. Both conversations will be streamed live. Save the dates: Attorney General Ken Paxton: Monday, Sept 28 Representative James Talarico: Wednesday, Sept 30 Event times and details will be available soon. Register for the livestream and we’ll send all event details directly to your inbox: https://www.ushbc.com/paxton-talarico-texas-senate-race#register Ken Paxton James Talarico Javier Palomarez United States Hispanic Business Council

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

$443,000. That’s how much mega-donors paid to attend Trump’s fundraiser to support Ken Paxton in Houston. The only chance we have to compete with the mega-donors trying to buy this race is if lots and lots of people like you chip in small amounts. So please donate whatever you can to stop them from buying Texas. $443,000. That’s how much mega-donors paid to attend Trump’s fundraiser to support Ken Paxton in Houston. The only chance we have to compete with the mega-donors trying to buy this race is if lots and lots of people like you chip in small amounts. So please donate whatever you can to stop them from buying Texas.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton’s dark money super PAC just placed a $15 MILLION TV ad buy across Texas, which means we’re being outspent by more than 2 to 1. I’m going to be honest with you. If we don’t get a huge number of donations today, we risk being drowned out, losing our momentum, and starting to sink in the polls. Every dollar we raise right now is being spent instantly to fight back against these attacks on our movement and keep our ads on the air. If everyone watching this chipped in today, we’d have the resources to maintain our lead. But not everyone gives, so I'm hoping those who know the stakes and can afford to chip in will help out right now before it’s too late.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Watch - Students for Paxton Launch

Hi everyone. [music] My name is Ella Webb and I'm a Texas Tech student and also first-time voter. >> My name is Eli Christian. I'm a student at Texas A&M University. >> My name is Alexis Escamilla and I'm a student at UTRGV. >> [music] >> My name is Annie Lyons. I'm a student at TCU and a first-time voter. >> My name is Austin Marrou. I'm a student at the University of Texas [music] and a first-time voter. >> I'm Anthony Cepeda. And I voted to the University of North Texas. >> My name is Will French. I'm a student at Texas State University [music] and a first-time voter. >> My name is Justin. I'm a student at Angelo State University. >> Hi, my name is Avery [music] Watson and I'm a student at Tarleton State University. >> Hi, my name is Dalvin. I'm a senior at Southern Methodist [music] University. >> I'm Grace Boyle from Baylor University. I'm proud to support Ken Paxton in his race for US Senate. >> [music] >> I support Ken Paxton for US Senate because I believe that he will stand up for Texas, >> defend our America first values, [music] >> and protect the future of our country. >> I'm a first-time voter and a proud supporter of Ken Paxton for [music] US Senate.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

In Dialogue: Texas is a two part Q&A series. Both candidates for U.S. Senate in Texas, Attorney General Ken Paxton and Representative James Talarico will each sit down separately with USHBC’s Javier Palomarez and answer questions asked on behalf of America’s small business community. Event details coming soon. We invite everyone to watch the events streamed live. Register for the livestream at the link in our bio and all the event details will come straight to your inbox, so you don’t miss a thing. @kenpaxtontx @jamestalarico @ushispanicbusiness @sabrina_leeloo @patriota1931

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Most Corrupt

Ken Paxton is the most corrupt politician in Texas. Since taking office, Ken Paxton's net worth has increased 7,000%. He now owns 15 homes while most Texans can't afford one. Ken Paxton was impeached by his own party for taking bribes from wealthy donors while blocking overtime [music] pay for Texas workers and gutting our health care. We cannot afford Ken Paxton's corruption. I'm James [music] Talarico and I approve this message.

Loaded Language: The word 'corrupt' is emotionally charged and used to trigger a negative reaction rather than convey a specific fact — for example: most corrupt politician in Texas, taking bribes and gutting our health care.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Declaring someone the absolute 'most corrupt' politician in an entire state is an extreme superlative claim that goes beyond what evidence can support — for example: most corrupt politician in Texas and most Texans can't afford one.

Name Calling: Labeling Paxton as 'the most corrupt politician' is a derogatory label used to discredit him rather than address specific arguments — for example: 'most corrupt politician'

Card Stacking: An extraordinary and unverified claim (7,000% net worth increase) is presented as a standalone fact without sourcing or context, implying it is verified data — for example: net worth has increased 7,000% and impeached by his own party for taking bribes.

Appeal to Prejudice: Contrasts Paxton's alleged wealth with 'most Texans' to exploit in-group identity and stoke resentment — for example: 'while most Texans can't afford one'

Repetition: The word 'corrupt' or 'corruption' appears multiple times across the passage (sentences 1, 4, and 5) as a deliberate rhetorical device to make the association feel true through familiarity — for example: 'corrupt,' 'corruption'

Appeal to Fear: The phrase 'cannot afford' implies dire consequences if Paxton remains in power, creating anxiety to drive a specific response — for example: 'We cannot afford Ken Paxton's corruption'

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

I like our odds of defeating Ken Paxton and sending James Talarico to the Senate. But it won’t be a slam dunk. There’s a lot of work left to do. That’s why I’ll be out on the road with our organizers through election day registering Texans to vote and mobilizing them to turn out in November. Pitch in today so Powered by People can keep doing the work that will make a difference. Thank you.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

💥💥REPUBLICAN SENATOR AND TRUMP SUPPORTER John Cornyn Calls FELLOW REPUBLICAN Ken Paxton "lazy" and "not very compelling." August 28, 2026 at 7:10 pm EDT (From Political Wire) “Sen. John Cornyn slammed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton as a ‘lazy’ and ‘poor campaigner’ Friday. He explained why he won’t help the Republican Senate nominee in his race against Democrat James Talarico." Said Cornyn: !!️!!️!!️ “Paxton’s a poor campaigner. He’s lazy and doesn’t raise money. And he basically is not offering a very compelling case for his election.” 🔥🔥[PAXTON ALSO HAS A RATHER LONG AND UGLY HISTORY WITH LEGAL ISSUES AND OTHER ETHICAL QUESTIONS; TEXAS DOESN'T NEED A GUY LIKE THIS REPRESENTING THE STATE].🔥🔥 🔷🔷Time for a change. Talario for Texas in November.🔷🔷

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words are used to trigger a negative reaction toward Paxton rather than convey specific facts — for example: 'long and ugly history'

Name Calling: The phrase 'a guy like this' is a dismissive, derogatory label used to discredit Paxton without addressing specific arguments — for example: 'a guy like this'

Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence invokes Texas identity and in-group pride to argue Paxton is unworthy of representing 'the State', appealing to Texan identity rather than substantive argument — for example: 'Texas doesn't need a guy like this representing the State'

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Texas Democratic Senate candidate Rep. James Talarico is arguing that the SAVE America Act would prevent Black Americans from voting. He made the remarks at a campaign event, part of his ongoing outreach to Black voters across Texas. The SAVE Act, formally the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (S. 1383 / H.R. 22), would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. Acceptable documents would be limited largely to birth certificates, passports, and naturalization certificates. Driver's licenses, state IDs, and REAL ID cards would not qualify in most states. Research from the Brennan Center for Justice found over 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents, with people of color disproportionately represented in that group. In Kansas, where a similar law was already in effect, over 30,000 potential registrants were blocked in just two years, with 99% of them being U.S. citizens. Talarico's remarks drew immediate pushback online, including from conservative account Libs of TikTok. Supporters of the bill counter that more than 80% of Americans support requirements to ensure only citizens vote in federal elections. The House has passed the SAVE Act multiple times since 2024, most recently in February 2026, and set aside $10 billion in election administration incentives in its July 2026 budget resolution. Talarico, who defeated Rep. Jasmine Crockett in the Democratic primary, faces Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton in the November 2026 general election. Three consecutive polls show Talarico narrowly ahead, 47% to 45%. Do you think documentary proof of citizenship should be required to register to vote? 👇 #SAVEAct #JamesTalarico #TexasSenate #VotingRights #Texas2026 #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Ken Paxton Steals Pens

This is Ken Paxton. And this is Ken Paxton stealing someone's thousand dollar pen. Here's what happened. The incident happened at the Collin County Courthouse. The same courthouse where Paxton would later be indicted for investment fraud. Paxton walked up to the trays next to the metal detectors, rummaged through them, and came across someone else's expensive Mont Blanc pen. He decided to take it for himself. The pen belonged to Joe Joplin, [music] a local attorney who'd accidentally left it behind. It was a special gift from his wife. When Joe realized it was missing, he contacted courthouse security. This is the footage they pulled. Ken Paxton, [music] on camera, stealing this man's pen. After the police got involved, Joe got his pen back. He could have pressed charges, but he decided against it. Because Joe's a nice guy. He'd never take someone else's pen. But he also hasn't forgotten who took his. >> Hi, I'm Joe Joplin, and I endorse James Talarico for the United States Senate. >> Vote for James Talarico. He won't steal your pen.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

PawPaw

All right. This is my papa and Jimmy is my  grandson. As a Baptist preacher in South Texas,   he taught me to follow the two great  commandments. [music] Love God and   love your neighbor. I've tried to follow those  teachings. First as a public school teacher and   now as a Texas lawmaker [music] providing relief  to those struggling to afford their health care,   their housing, their groceries. That's loving  your neighbor. I'm James Talarico and I   approve [music] this message. Amen. [laughter]  You're never going to make it in Hollywood. No.

Watch on YouTube ↗ Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.

🚨 Texas Democratic U.S. Senate nominee James Talarico is calling the state's 2025 congressional redistricting map "the most aggressive attack on Black political power since Jim Crow," as the legal fight over Texas's redrawn district lines intensifies ahead of the November election. Talarico, who defeated U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett in the March Democratic primary with 52.5% of the vote, made the remarks amid growing scrutiny of a map that a majority of lower-court judges found likely constitutes unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, allowed the map to remain in place — a decision critics say will accelerate partisan redistricting across Southern states following the court's weakening of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in *Louisiana v. Callais*. Black and Latino communities in Texas are on track to see the first legislatively enacted reduction in their electoral power since the Voting Rights Act's passage in 1965, according to civil rights groups including the Texas NAACP and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Talarico has pledged $25 million toward outreach to Black voters as he faces Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton in a race where three consecutive polls show him leading 47%–45%. The redistricting dispute comes as Talarico and Rep. Crockett remain at odds following the primary — Crockett has called the race "a racist race" — though Talarico has publicly defended her before Black voter audiences in Houston. What does Texas's redistricting fight mean for minority voting power nationwide? 👇 #Texas #Redistricting #VotingRights #TXSen #Gerrymandering #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Texas Democratic U.S. Senate nominee James Talarico says he has learned as much about his faith from Islamic mystics and poets like Rumi as from Christian authors and writers. The remarks came during an April 2024 episode of *The State of Belief* podcast, where Talarico appeared alongside Texas Democratic State Rep. Salman Bhojani of Euless. Talarico said: "I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers." He also quoted 13th-century Islamic mystic Rumi — "in every religion there is love, yet love has no religion" — and said interfaith dialogue "doesn't water down your tradition, in fact it strengthens it." Talarico is a Presbyterian seminarian, current Texas State Rep. for District 50, and a former middle school teacher who holds a master's of divinity from Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary. The audio resurfaced after RNC Research posted the clip on July 27, 2026, as Talarico campaigns statewide. In a separate clip previously posted by RNC Research on June 23, 2026, Talarico was also heard saying, "I always think of myself as a Christian who hates Christianity." He has additionally referred to God as "nonbinary" and described Jesus as a "radical feminist." Talarico defeated Rep. Jasmine Crockett in the Democratic primary and will face Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton in November — a steep climb in a state where Democrats have not won a statewide race in decades. What do you make of Talarico's approach to faith and interfaith dialogue — does it help or hurt his chances with Texas voters? 👇 #JamesTalarico #TexasSenate #Texas #TexasPolitics #Election2026 #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Texas Attorney General and GOP Senate nominee Ken Paxton is calling out Democratic rival Rep. James Talarico over a 2022 speech in which Talarico declared, "prison is violence" and that "people don't belong in cages." In the speech, Talarico argued that "violence is a problem that cages will never solve," and added, "Poverty is violence. Pollution is violence. And yes, prison is violence." Paxton posted the remarks on X, saying he stands with law enforcement. Official House roll calls show Talarico voted against 2021 bail-tightening measures and against SB 4 in 2023, a bill that increased mandatory penalties for certain human-smuggling offenses. Talarico's campaign disputes the characterization, stating he "does not support defunding the police" and has "consistently voted to allocate billions to fund law enforcement." The exchange comes as Paxton — endorsed by President Donald Trump — works to define Talarico ahead of the November 3, 2026 general election. A July 2026 poll of 1,048 likely Texas voters showed Talarico leading Paxton 45% to 40%, his largest lead in any public poll during the general election period. The two are squaring off for the U.S. Senate seat previously held by four-term Republican incumbent John Cornyn, whom Paxton defeated in the GOP runoff. Where do you stand — should a candidate's past statements on criminal justice be front and center in a Senate race? 👇 #TexasSenate #KenPaxton #JamesTalarico #Texas2026 #CriminalJustice #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Texas Democratic U.S. Senate nominee James Talarico has publicly stated he supports reparations for slavery, describing the policy as part of his faith tradition and citing what he calls the lasting reverberations of slavery in modern-day Texas. Speaking at a candidate forum, Talarico outlined a reparations framework centered on specific economic policies — including tuition relief, home ownership grants, and baby bonds — aimed at building generational wealth in Black communities. He referenced freedman communities in Texas, including Sam Branch, Texas, as examples of the historical context he says informs his position. The video clip was posted by Lone Star Liberty PAC, a pro-Ken Paxton Super PAC registered in April 2025. Talarico is the Democratic nominee facing Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the November 2026 general election. Paxton defeated incumbent Sen. John Cornyn in the Republican primary runoff. The clip appears to originate from a direct Q&A exchange in which Talarico was asked whether he supports reparations and an anti-Black crime bill. Talarico, an eighth-generation Texan, former middle school teacher, and Presbyterian seminarian, defeated Reps. Jasmine Crockett and Ahmad Hassan in the March 2026 Democratic primary. As of February 2026, he had raised $20.7 million for his Senate campaign. Do you think reparations policies like baby bonds and tuition relief should be part of the national conversation heading into 2026? 👇 #JamesTalarico #TexasSenate #Reparations #TexasPolitics #KenPaxton #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico was unable to name the six genders he once claimed exist when pressed by an attendee at a campaign event. In 2021, during a Texas Legislature debate over a bill targeting transgender athletes, then-state Rep. Talarico stated, "Modern science recognizes that there are many more than two biological sexes — in fact, there are six." When an unidentified attendee from South Texas confronted him at a recent campaign event and asked him to name them, Talarico could not. A clip of the exchange went viral on conservative social media. Talarico has since walked back the remark. He told CBS News, "I know there are two sexes, men and women," adding that "there's a very small percentage of people who have these chromosomal abnormalities, and I believe that they deserve to be treated with dignity and respect." He has also acknowledged that some of his past comments on cultural issues "missed the mark." Republican opponent and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton — who defeated Sen. John Cornyn in a primary runoff — has taken to calling him "Six-Gender Jimmy," and Republicans have made the 2021 remark a centerpiece of their attacks heading into the Senate race. What do you think — does a candidate's ability to defend past statements matter to you when deciding who to vote for? 👇 #JamesTalarico #TexasSenate #KenPaxton #Texas #Politics #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

🚨 Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton pledged continued support for law enforcement at a press conference held during the annual Sheriff's Association of Texas meeting in Fort Worth. Paxton said he stood with police when it was not popular — and that he will always have officers' backs. Paxton was joined by 22 law enforcement officers at the event, including Tarrant County Sheriff Bill Waybourn and several current and former sheriffs from across Texas. The AG's office noted that his Democratic Senate opponent, Texas Rep. James Talarico, opposed a bill to tighten bail requirements for violent criminals, voted against mandatory minimum sentences for human traffickers, and voted against designating drug cartels as terrorist organizations. Talarico also said in 2020 that "our system of policing is deeply broken" and argued it should be replaced. Paxton, the 51st Attorney General of Texas, is not seeking a fourth term as AG and is instead running for U.S. Senate against incumbent Sen. John Cornyn's seat. The race between Paxton and Talarico is currently a statistical dead heat. Where do you stand on law enforcement policy heading into this Senate race? 👇 #KenPaxton #TexasPolitics #LawEnforcement #TexasSenate #BackTheBlue #Breaking

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗