Tina Smith (DEM, incumbent), Adam Schwarze (REP), Angie Craig (DEM), David Hann (REP), Margaret Flanagan (DFL), Mark York (REP), Melisa Lopez franzen (DEM), Michele Tafoya (REP), Royce White (REP), Tom Weiler (REP). 121 ads analyzed, 79 with at least one technique in the copy. Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
As of 2026-09-23. Counts are of distinct ads; the same text run many times is one ad.
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money groups spent on their own for or against a candidate, reported within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named.
🚨 Minnesota’s Senate Race is now a TOSS-UP 🚨 ⏰ If you’ve been waiting for the right time to join our fight against the MAGA money machine – now is the time. ⏰ 💚 Chip in any amount to join Team Peggy and take the lead against Trump’s hand-picked candidate! 💚
False Urgency: The clock emoji and phrase 'now is the time' create artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'now is the time'
Loaded Language: The phrase 'MAGA money machine' uses emotionally charged, derogatory language to trigger a reaction rather than describe a political entity factually — for example: 'MAGA money machine'
Bandwagon Appeal: The phrase 'join our fight' implies a collective movement already underway, pressuring the reader to conform and not be left out — for example: 'join our fight'
Name Calling: 'MAGA money machine' is a derogatory label used to discredit a political group rather than engage with their arguments — for example: 'MAGA money machine'
Our race is front and center, team! I need your help to fight back against the MAGA money machine and take the lead against Trump’s handpicked candidate. Please, chip in to our people-powered fight and help deliver big, bold change for Minnesota in November. - 💚 Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota.
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our race' and 'team' invokes in-group identity to rally supporters around a shared tribal identity — for example: Our race is front and center, team! and our people-powered fight.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'MAGA money machine' uses emotionally charged, derogatory language to frame the opposition as a corrupt, mechanized financial force — for example: 'MAGA money machine'
Name Calling: Labeling the opponent as 'Trump's handpicked candidate' is a derogatory framing designed to delegitimize the rival by associating them as a puppet rather than an independent actor — for example: 'Trump's handpicked candidate'
Appeal to Fear: The call to 'fight back' implies a threatening force that must be resisted, creating anxiety about the consequences of inaction — for example: 'fight back against the MAGA money machine'
Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'big, bold change' is vague and emotionally positive but carries no specific policy meaning, functioning as rhetorical flourish — for example: 'big, bold change for Minnesota'
False Urgency: The appeal to 'chip in' before 'November' implies a deadline-driven pressure to act immediately without deliberation — for example: 'chip in to our people-powered fight... in November'
Minnesota is a potluck state. Folks come from all walks of life and have different experiences, but we look out for each other. If it snows, we’ll help you shovel your driveway. If you move into the neighborhood, we’ll bring you a hotdish (what the rest of you call a casserole). And let me tell you this: I love a good hotdish. They’re the cornerstone of every gathering, from neighborhood parties to family reunions. That’s why, with less than 50 days until Election Day, I’m offering something special for a limited time: Make a donation of any amount to my U.S. Senate campaign, and I’ll send you my own tried-and-true Wild Rice Hotdish recipe! Donate to help us win big in this battleground race, and in return, you’ll get one of my special recipes to bring to your next potluck! It's a little taste of Minnesota, straight from my kitchen to yours. Thanks for being a part of our movement!
Hey, it’s Michele & it's late in the 4th Quarter in MN. We built out a playbook with all the X’s & O’s to bring home the win!
This is our LAST major fundraising deadline before the election. Can you help us reach our goal?
Michele Tafoya: Our FINAL end-of-quarter deadline before the election is just DAYS away! Please, help us beat my socialist opponent!
False Urgency: The capitalized 'FINAL' and 'DAYS' create artificial time pressure to force immediate action without deliberation — for example: FINAL end-of-quarter deadline is just DAYS away
Name Calling: The label 'socialist' is used as a derogatory political slur to discredit the opponent rather than address their actual positions — for example: my socialist opponent
Michele Tafoya: You wouldn’t trust a QB who’s never won a game, so why trust a politician who consistently fumbles the ball?
It’s Michele Tafoya - we’re SO close to reaching our FINAL major fundraising goal ahead of the election!
Peggy Flanagan fumbled the ball BIG time. Minnesota needs a proven leader who has a plan to win for the American People.
Name Calling: Uses a derogatory sports metaphor to discredit Peggy Flanagan without addressing any specific policy or argument — for example: 'fumbled the ball BIG time'
Glittering Generalities: Uses vague, emotionally positive language like 'proven leader' and 'win for the American People' without specifying any concrete plan or policy — for example: 'a plan to win for the American People'
Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes 'the American People' as an in-group identity to imply the current leadership does not serve them — for example: 'win for the American People'
Peggy Flanagan does not get to pick and choose which parts of the Walz-Flanagan administration she takes responsibility for. She is second-in-command. When billions of taxpayer dollars were stolen through fraud, Minnesotans deserved accountability from their leaders. Peggy Flanagan does not deserve a promotion. She deserves a pink slip.
Peggy Flanagan is hiding from the fraud. She let it happen. Minnesotans have noticed. That's why this race is a statistical tie. I've been in every corner of this state, and I keep hearing the same thing: people are done making excuses for their leaders. We have the chance to change that. In-person and mail-in absentee voting starts THIS FRIDAY ⬇️ https://www.sos.mn.gov/elections-voting/other-ways-to-vote
Loaded Language: The word 'hiding' implies guilt and deception without evidence, emotionally charging the claim — for example: hiding from the fraud and She let it happen.
Name Calling: The sentence attributes fraudulent concealment directly to a named individual as a label rather than a substantiated argument — for example: Peggy Flanagan is hiding from the fraud
This is a MUST-WIN Senate race to flip the Senate blue. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running a people-powered campaign for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. I’m the ONLY candidate in this race who rejects corporate PAC money, and I need your help. Will you pitch in $3 before our end-of-quarter deadline to counter Republican attacks and make sure people power wins? This is a MUST-WIN Senate race to flip the Senate blue. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running a people-powered campaign for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. I’m the ONLY candidate in this race who rejects corporate PAC money, and I need your help. Will you pitch in $3 before our end-of-quarter deadline to counter Republican attacks and make sure people power wins?
Hey everyone – it’s Peggy! I’m so proud of the movement that we’ve built and all we’ve done together – but we can’t let up now. In just a few days, I’m facing my first end-of-quarter deadline for our general election campaign for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. Fully funding this final sprint is crucial to beating Donald Trump and flipping the Senate blue, but it’s expensive. Before our deadline expires, please pitch in $3 to keep us moving full steam ahead. Hey everyone – it’s Peggy! I’m so proud of the movement that we’ve built and all we’ve done together – but we can’t let up now. In just a few days, I’m facing my first end-of-quarter deadline for our general election campaign for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. Fully funding this final sprint is crucial to beating Donald Trump and flipping the Senate blue, but it’s expensive. Before our deadline expires, please pitch in $3 to keep us moving full steam ahead.
It’s Peggy Flanagan here, and I’m running a different kind of campaign. I know a lot of folks say it, but I’m showing it. So I need to be honest with you: Fundraising has been tough. The summer months tend to be slow, and since I rely fully on grassroots supporters like you, we need to pick up the pace heading into September. If you’re with us, please rush a donation before our end-of-quarter deadline and join our people-powered movement. It’s Peggy Flanagan here, and I’m running a different kind of campaign. I know a lot of folks say it, but I’m showing it. So I need to be honest with you: Fundraising has been tough. The summer months tend to be slow, and since I rely fully on grassroots supporters like you, we need to pick up the pace heading into September. If you’re with us, please rush a donation before our end-of-quarter deadline and join our people-powered movement.
You don't have to go far in Minnesota to see what Peggy Flanagan and Tim Walz have done to our state. We can do so much better than this. It's time to bring back common sense. Our chance to change Minnesota comes November 3rd. If you want a safer Minnesota, vote Michele Tafoya for U.S. Senate.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'done to our state' implies harm or damage through emotionally charged framing without specifying any actual policy or action, suggesting negative consequences through implication — for example: 'done to our state'
Glittering Generalities: The phrase invokes 'common sense' as a vague, universally appealing concept without specifying what policies or actions it refers to, functioning as an emotionally positive but substanceless rhetorical appeal — for example: 'common sense'
False Urgency: The phrase 'It's time' implies an artificial deadline or pressing need to act, nudging the audience toward urgency without providing evidence that immediate action is required — for example: 'It's time to bring back'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies that voting for Tafoya is the only path to a safer Minnesota, excluding all other options or candidates — for example: implying only one choice leads to safety
Appeal to Fear: The framing implies Minnesota is currently unsafe and danger will persist unless this specific action is taken — for example: leveraging fear of crime or insecurity to drive a vote
🖐️Wait, stick with me! 🖐️ I know you probably see a lot of these messages – but our campaign needs your attention. This race is on track to be the MOST EXPENSIVE in Minnesota history. We need all the resources we can get to reach voters across the state and win BIG. If you can afford to spare a couple of bucks, please make a donation to our campaign now. 🖐️Wait, stick with me! 🖐️ I know you probably see a lot of these messages – but our campaign needs your attention. This race is on track to be the MOST EXPENSIVE in Minnesota history. We need all the resources we can get to reach voters across the state and win BIG. If you can afford to spare a couple of bucks, please make a donation to our campaign now.
Two names. One choice. Peggy Flanagan was lieutenant governor while billions in taxpayer dollars were lost to fraud. She was in office while Minnesota students fell behind. And while party bosses tell you what to believe, I’ll tell you what I believe: women are women, men are men, and reality isn’t negotiable. I don’t answer to party bosses. I answer to the people of Minnesota.
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence frames gender as a binary, non-negotiable reality with no room for nuance or alternative understanding — for example: 'women are women, men are men, and reality isn't negotiable'
Appeal to Prejudice: The contrast between 'party bosses' telling people what to believe versus the speaker's direct appeal positions the audience as independent thinkers aligned with the speaker's in-group against an elite out-group — for example: 'while party bosses tell you what to believe, I'll tell you what I believe'
Name Calling: The term 'party bosses' is a derogatory label used to discredit political opponents as authoritarian controllers rather than engaging with their arguments — for example: 'party bosses tell you what to believe'
In Minnesota, you often hear, “Vote blue, no matter who.” But a reasonable question is, "What has voting blue done for you?" ✅ The DFL squandered an $18 billion budget surplus. ✅ The DFL increased the cost of government by 40%. ✅ The DFL looked the other way while fraudsters stole $9 billion of your tax dollars. ✅ The DFL allowed Minnesota schools to deteriorate. Twenty years ago, our schools were the envy of the nation, consistently ranking in the top 10 for test scores and graduation rates. We had the highest ACT scores in the nation. But Minnesota now ranks 21st in the nation for education – and the downward slide continues. Voting blue has left Minnesota less affordable, less competitive, and falling behind in every economic and educational category. No wonder 65% of Minnesotans say they think the state is on that wrong track. Now the DFL wants to give us more of the same – or worse – in the form of Amy Klobuchar (Tim Walz 2.0) and Bonnie Westlin-endorsed radical U.S. Senate candidate Peggy Flanagan. As your State Senator, I will address taxes, government spending, fraud, education and all the core issues that transcend party lines. Don't vote blue. Vote for you. Learn more at https://www.kpformn.com/ #KPforMN
Loaded Language: The word 'fraudsters' is a derogatory, emotionally charged label designed to trigger outrage rather than neutrally describe alleged wrongdoers — for example: fraudsters
Scapegoating: The DFL (Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party) is singularly blamed for a complex fraud situation, implying direct complicity through inaction — for example: The DFL looked the other way
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'your tax dollars' is used to personally implicate the reader and stoke in-group resentment against the out-group (DFL), framing the issue as a personal theft from the audience — for example: your tax dollars
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim of '$9 billion' stolen is presented as established fact without qualification or sourcing, potentially overstating the scale of the fraud to maximize outrage — for example: stole $9 billion
Name Calling: The label 'radical' is applied to Peggy Flanagan as a derogatory tag to discredit her rather than address her policy positions — for example: 'radical U.S. Senate candidate Peggy Flanagan'
Fraud scandals are stealing your money. Not some nebulous government fund. Your tax dollars. You worked for it. You deserve to know it's protected, not handed to fraudsters with no guardrails in place. I've got a plan to fix that, and it starts with mandatory prison time. Not a slap on the wrist.
Loaded Language: The word 'fraudsters' is emotionally charged and designed to trigger fear and outrage rather than convey a neutral factual description — for example: fraudsters
Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies that without action, the reader's protected assets will be handed over to fraudsters, creating anxiety to drive a specific response — for example: handed to fraudsters with no guardrails in place
Minnesota is in play. Peggy Flanagan had her chance. The result? Billions in fraud, higher taxes, and a government that failed to protect taxpayers. She was second-in-command while these failures happened. Now she wants a promotion to the U.S. Senate. Minnesota deserves a senator who will demand accountability and put Minnesota first.
Glittering Generalities: The sentence uses vague, emotionally positive concepts like 'accountability' and 'Minnesota first' that sound noble but carry no specific policy meaning — for example: 'demand accountability and put Minnesota first'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'put Minnesota first' invokes in-group identity to imply that the current or opposing senator does not prioritize Minnesotans, exploiting local pride — for example: 'put Minnesota first'
Peggy Flanagan wanted to "reimagine" public safety. Reimagine it into what, exactly? Because from where Minnesotans are standing, it looks a lot like nobody's in charge.
Safe streets are not a Republican idea or a Democrat idea. Minneapolis used to be a city you could walk through at midnight without thinking twice. Eight years of the Walz-Flanagan administration took that away from us. We need to empower our police officers with the tools, training, and respect they've earned, and they'll make our streets safe again. I'm proud to have the support of the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association and the Police Officers Federation of Minneapolis.
Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive language about empowering police and making streets safe again without specifying any concrete policy — for example: 'empower our police officers with the tools, training, and respect'
Appeal to Fear: The implied premise that streets are currently unsafe creates anxiety designed to make the proposed solution feel urgent and necessary — for example: 'make our streets safe again'
50 days to Election Day. The race is inside the margin of error. Commonsense leadership—not more of the same after years of Peggy Flanagan’s failed oversight and stolen tax dollars. Absentee voting opens Friday. Don’t wait.
Loaded Language: The phrase uses emotionally charged words to discredit Peggy Flanagan rather than present factual argument — for example: 'stolen tax dollars'
Name Calling: Peggy Flanagan is labeled as responsible for 'failed oversight and stolen tax dollars' as a derogatory characterization rather than a substantiated argument — for example: 'Peggy Flanagan's failed oversight'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two options: 'commonsense leadership' or 'more of the same,' implying no middle ground or alternative exists — for example: 'Commonsense leadership—not more of the same'
Glittering Generalities: 'Commonsense leadership' is a vague, emotionally positive phrase used as rhetorical flourish without any specific policy substance — for example: 'Commonsense leadership'
This election is about common sense versus crazy. Peggy Flanagan has shown Minnesotans she does not care about our tax dollars. She is second-in-command, with a front-row seat to an administration whose failures allowed billions of taxpayer dollars to be stolen through fraud. Fraudsters got rich. Minnesota taxpayers got stuck with the bill.
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence reduces the election to only two options — 'common sense' and 'crazy' — eliminating any nuanced positions or middle ground — for example: framing a complex political contest as a binary between rationality and irrationality.
Loaded Language: The word 'crazy' is a derogatory, emotionally charged label used to dismiss one side of the political contest rather than engage with its arguments — for example: labeling an entire political position as 'crazy'.
Glittering Generalities: 'Common sense' is a vague, emotionally positive term used to make one side sound inherently reasonable and virtuous without specifying any concrete policy or position — for example: invoking 'common sense' as a rhetorical flourish.
Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'our tax dollars' and 'Minnesotans' invokes an in-group identity to position Flanagan as an outsider who disregards the community she serves — for example: 'our tax dollars'
Card Stacking: The sentence presents the claim of 'billions stolen through fraud' as established fact without qualification or counterargument, stacking the framing entirely against the administration — for example: 'whose failures allowed billions of taxpayer dollars to be stolen through fraud'
Minnesotans cannot afford to have Tim Walz's mini-me, Peggy Flanagan, in the Senate. You deserve better than the same failures, same fraud, and same ultra-partisan politics that got us here. Minnesota deserves a fresh start, not more of the same. The best is yet to come for Minnesota. Let’s win this in November.
Name Calling: The term 'mini-me' is used as a derogatory label to dismiss Peggy Flanagan as a mere copy of Tim Walz rather than engaging with her qualifications or positions — for example: Tim Walz's mini-me
Appeal to Fear: The phrase 'cannot afford to have' implies dire consequences for Minnesotans if Flanagan is elected, creating anxiety to drive a specific political response — for example: Minnesotans cannot afford to have
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words are used to provoke a negative reaction toward the current political situation rather than convey specific facts — for example: 'fraud' and 'ultra-partisan'
Repetition: The word 'same' is deliberately repeated three times in quick succession to rhetorically hammer home a sense of stagnation and failure — for example: 'same failures, same fraud, and same ultra-partisan politics'
Glittering Generalities: Vague optimistic claim with no specific meaning or evidence to support it, used as rhetorical flourish — for example: 'The best is yet to come'
False Urgency: Creates a sense of urgency around a specific deadline to mobilize action without deliberation — for example: 'win this in November'
Peggy Flanagan backed out of an interview at the State Fair. But skipping an interview won’t make the questions go away. She has been second-in-command for eight years while Minnesota faced massive fraud and government failures. Minnesotans deserve answers. Peggy Flanagan cannot hide from her record.
Peggy Flanagan wasn’t a bystander. She was second in command of an administration that ignored warning signs, failed to protect taxpayer dollars, and allowed massive fraud to flourish on its watch. Peggy Flanagan does not deserve a promotion. She deserves a pink slip.
I have two kids. When I saw the direction this country was headed, I had a choice: stay comfortable in a career I love, or speak up. Matt Calkins made that same choice. He resigned from the Seattle Times rather than be muzzled. Speaking up costs you. But is it worth it? You bet it is. Minnesota, you're worth fighting for. I won't stay silent now. I won't stay silent in Washington.
Glittering Generalities: The phrase invokes a vague, emotionally positive sentiment of worthiness and struggle without specifying any concrete policy or action — for example: 'worth fighting for'
False Urgency: The word 'now' implies an immediate, pressing moment requiring action, creating artificial urgency without specifying what the silence would be about — for example: 'I won't stay silent now'
Repetition: The phrase 'I won't stay silent' is repeated across sentences 2 and 3 to reinforce a rhetorical commitment through familiarity — for example: 'I won't stay silent now. I won't stay silent in Washington.'
Peggy Flanagan says the fraud is not her problem. Blame the governor, she says. She was Tim Walz's right hand for eight years, on a taxpayer paycheck the whole time. When he was out campaigning with Kamala Harris, she was the one in charge. Minnesota deserves accountability, not excuses.
The matchup is SET, and I’ve got my playbook ready for a showdown in Minnesota this fall!
My Sunday nights just got MUCH busier once again, but this year I’m jumping into the action!
Football season is BACK – AND I’m preparing for a big time matchup in Minnesota this fall myself!
Spotted in Plymouth this week... The DFL Monolith is at it again... City council. Mayor. House. Senate. Congress. Governor. U.S. Senate. Same team. Same corner. Same energy. Same lack of independent thought. ❌ Peggy Flanagan for U.S. Senate: Medicare for All. Washington theater. Political persona shape-shifter. Executive incompetence. Minnesota families pay the tab. ❌ Jesse Vavreck for City Council: Indivisible West Metro Endorsed. When's the next paid protestor meeting? ❌ Ginny Klevorn for State House: More spending, gun-owner insurance mandates. That’s not public safety. That’s a press release. ❌ Amy Klobuchar for Governor: She claims she will add 10,000 homes and perform a “Day 1 audit” of state government. But that would simply address the problems she and years of DFL rule created, and a fraud scandal so large the incumbent had to drop out. Sorry, Amy, you don’t get credit for mopping the floor you flooded. #Walzthirdterm ❌ Bonnie Westlin for State Senate: Guns, climate and other woke virtue signaling. Fraud, taxes and results were optional extras. District 42 sent a senator to St. Paul to represent our priorities, but we got a progressive copycat. ❌ Kelly Morrison for Congress: More gun control, more healthcare central planning and the same DFL vote. Physician in the bio; party-line in the job. ❌ Clark Gregor for Mayor: Climate plans and a half-cent sales tax so visitors can fund the next rec complex. Growth is fine. A new tax is still a new tax. ❌ Julie Pointner for City Council: Incumbent, same color scheme, same corner. Local government shouldn't be a copy-and-paste job. What these signs represent isn’t a marketplace of ideas. It’s an echo chamber. These predictable progressive politicians only embrace philosophies that match and reinforce their own – and we're the ones who pay the price. It's that kind of political groupthink that squandered an $18 billion state budget surplus, increased the cost of government by 40%, enabled more than $9 billion in fraud and eroded the trust of the MN taxpayer. District 42 doesn’t need more yard signs. It doesn't need more blind partisanship. It needs common sense and a change in leadership, and I’d be honored to have your support. Kevin Peterson, Republican for Minnesota State Senate District 42 kpformn.com #MNSenate #SD42 #Plymouth #MapleGrove #KPforMN
Name Calling: The term 'Monolith' is used as a derogatory label to portray the DFL (Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party) as a single-minded, unthinking bloc rather than engaging with their actual positions — for example: 'DFL Monolith'
Loaded Language: The phrase 'at it again' carries a dismissive, contemptuous connotation implying repeated wrongdoing without specifying what the wrongdoing is — for example: 'at it again'
Appeal to Fear: The phrase implies that Minnesota families will bear a financial burden as a consequence of Flanagan's policies, invoking anxiety to drive opposition — for example: Minnesota families pay the tab
Conspiracy Appeal: The rhetorical question implies a hidden, coordinated, and financially motivated scheme behind the political group's activities, suggesting a sinister secret operation — for example: 'When's the next paid protestor meeting?'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence flatly denies that the described policies constitute public safety, implying there is only one valid definition of public safety and these proposals categorically fail it — for example: 'That's not public safety'
Scapegoating: Blames Klobuchar and the DFL party broadly for complex housing and governance problems, as well as a fraud scandal — attributing systemic issues to a single political group. — for example: the problems she and years of DFL rule created and mopping the floor you flooded.
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Claiming that accountability on fraud, taxes, and results were treated as 'optional extras' is an extreme overstatement unsupported by specific evidence — for example: 'optional extras'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our priorities' invokes in-group identity to imply the senator betrayed the community's values, contrasting 'us' against a progressive outsider — for example: 'our priorities'
Card Stacking: Multiple damaging statistics and claims are stacked together without context, counterarguments, or verification of whether these outcomes were caused by the referenced political behavior — for example: 'squandered an $18 billion state budget surplus, increased the cost of government by 40%, enabled more than $9 billion in fraud'
Glittering Generalities: 'Common sense' is a vague, emotionally positive phrase used as rhetorical flourish without specific policy substance — for example: common sense
I recently received this interesting text in response to one of my campaign efforts promoting my campaign and policy platform: "Sorry Kevin, I think you're in over your skis on this one. Bonnie (Westlin) is beloved in this district and the Progressive Plymouth Moms are a force to be reckoned with." Candidly, before receiving this text from who I assume is a Progressive Plymouth Moms member, I was not aware the group existed. And I found this way of engaging via text a bit odd. So, I did some digging. Meet the Progressive Plymouth Moms, an invitation-only Facebook group "of moms in the Plymouth, MN area" that operates "under the basis of several shared progressive beliefs." I wonder which ones they've selected... Their private group Facebook page states: "In a progressive context, nonpartisan means our group doesn’t endorse specific candidates or parties inside this space, and we don’t allow campaigning. Instead, we focus on values, facts, equity, and respectful civic engagement, the things that matter no matter who’s running." Wow. So much for "respectful civic engagement.” (Oh, and by the way, the correct idiom is "OUT over your skis," not "IN over your skis." If you are going to try to mock someone's volunteerism, at least get it right.) And for a group that purports to be "non-partisan" and "doesn't endorse specific candidates or parties," "Bonnie is beloved" sure sounds like an endorsement to me. (Of course, the supposedly "non-partisan" PPM also endorsed progressives candidates Julie Joseph and Milind Sohoni for the Wayzata School Board last year, but that's another discussion.) In the spirit of collaboration, I welcome their feedback. What are the Progressive Plymouth Moms' thoughts on the following issues? ☑️ Should the state government have spent the $18B surplus? ☑️ Should the state government have increased the cost of government by 40%? ☑️ Do you trust the tax dollars you pay to state government are spent responsibly? Please read this article before answering: https://ow.ly/qeU950ZLHQw ☑️ What do you think of Bonnie endorsing Peggy Flanagan? https://ow.ly/34jO50ZLHQx ☑️ Is there anything this group would like to collaborate on during my campaign? Please reach out. I'd be happy to take part in some respectful civic engagement. Learn more at https://ow.ly/vARz50ZLHQy #KPforMN
Loaded Language: The word 'purports' is used to cast doubt on the group's stated identity, implying deception — for example: purports to be
Repetition: The term 'non-partisan' is placed in scare-quote-style skeptical framing twice within the passage to reinforce the implication that the group is dishonest about its identity — for example: supposedly 'non-partisan'
Card Stacking: The sentence selectively presents past endorsements of progressive candidates as evidence of bias while omitting any context about whether the group has also supported non-progressive candidates — for example: also endorsed progressives candidates Julie Joseph and Milind Sohoni
Who is Bonnie Westlin? 👇👇👇 Bonnie Westlin endorses Peggy Flanagan's DFL – your taxes, their priorities, zero results. Flanagan and Westlin represent a portion of the DFL that has become too progressive. Is Bonnie Westlin the kind of politician we want to be representing our district in St. Paul? #KPforMN
Loaded Language: The phrase 'zero results' is an emotionally charged absolute dismissal designed to trigger frustration rather than convey factual assessment — for example: zero results
Black-and-White Fallacy: The framing of 'your taxes, their priorities' creates a stark binary opposition implying taxpayers and the DFL are fundamentally opposed with no common ground — for example: your taxes, their priorities
Appeal to Prejudice: The contrast between 'your' (the reader/taxpayer) and 'their' (the DFL) exploits in-group/out-group identity to suggest the DFL serves only itself at the expense of ordinary people — for example: your taxes, their priorities
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Claiming 'zero results' is an absolute overstatement that ignores any policy outcomes, however debatable, attributable to the DFL — for example: zero results
🚨 Lisa Demuth has promised to “fight for the MAGA agenda.” Michele Tafoya has said she is “in line with President Trump.” Minnesota’s Political Contribution Refund gives you a powerful way to fight back. Eligible Minnesotans can donate up to $75—or $150 per couple—and receive a full refund from the state. Make your fully refundable $75 contribution today. Help the Minnesota DFL reach voters, organize statewide, and keep Trump’s harmful agenda out of Minnesota. 💙💪
🚨 Trump’s national megadonors are preparing to pour millions into Minnesota to elect Lisa Demuth, Michele Tafoya, and the rest of the MN GOP ticket. 💰 We can fight back with the power of Minnesota’s Political Contribution Refund. Eligible Minnesotans can donate up to $75—or $150 per couple—and receive a full refund from the state. Make your refundable $75 contribution today. Help us compete with Republican spending, reach voters across the state, and keep Minnesota blue. 🗳️💙
"Steep tax hikes eyed across metro" The consequences of the 2023 DFL "trifecta" are coming home to roost -- your taxes are going up. Tim Walz, Peggy Flanagan, Bonnie Westin and the rest of the fiscally irresponsible Democrats in the state legislature blew through an $18 billion budget surplus -- YOUR money -- in 2023 and STILL raised your taxes by $10 billion over four years. That kind of reckless, irresponsible spending must stop. I’ll stand up for Plymouth families to oppose increases in government spending -- and unnecessary increases to YOUR taxes. #KPforMN
Loaded Language: The phrase 'coming home to roost' is an emotionally charged idiom implying inevitable negative consequences and punishment, framing the DFL's legislative majority in a negative light — for example: consequences coming home to roost
Appeal to Fear: The direct second-person statement 'your taxes are going up' is designed to create personal financial anxiety in the reader, triggering an emotional response against the named political party — for example: your taxes are going up
Name Calling: The term 'trifecta' placed in scare quotes is used to frame the DFL's legislative majority as something suspicious or illegitimate rather than a standard political term — for example: 2023 DFL "trifecta"
Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'YOUR money' in caps directly appeals to the reader's in-group identity as a taxpayer being wronged by an out-group of politicians — for example: YOUR money
Card Stacking: The sentence presents specific financial figures as damning facts while omitting any context about what the surplus was spent on or what the tax increases funded, selectively framing the data to support one conclusion — for example: blew through an $18 billion budget surplus and STILL raised your taxes by $10 billion
🎯 Donald Trump and National Republicans are laser-focused on flipping this seat red. 💰 This race is on track to be the most expensive in state history. 🚨 Republicans have raked in more than $55 million to flip this seat and hold onto their MAGA Senate Majority. It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and with everything on the line, I need your help to fight back. Pitch in today. >> 🎯 Donald Trump and National Republicans are laser-focused on flipping this seat red. 💰 This race is on track to be the most expensive in state history. 🚨 Republicans have raked in more than $55 million to flip this seat and hold onto their MAGA Senate Majority. It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and with everything on the line, I need your help to fight back. Pitch in today. >>
Wait – do you know just how important Minnesota is to flipping the Senate blue? It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and Tim Scott just called our race one of Republicans’ TOP flip opportunities. Please chip in whatever you can today to help us win big and flip the Senate blue. Wait – do you know just how important Minnesota is to flipping the Senate blue? It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and Tim Scott just called our race one of Republicans’ TOP flip opportunities. Please chip in whatever you can today to help us win big and flip the Senate blue.
Hey, do you have a second? This can’t wait. It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and Donald Trump and National Republicans are laser-focused on flipping this seat red. Will you chip in $5, $10, or more to help us start the general election off strong, elect a real leader for Minnesotans, and help flip the Senate for Democrats? Thank you. 💚 Hey, do you have a second? This can’t wait. It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and Donald Trump and National Republicans are laser-focused on flipping this seat red. Will you chip in $5, $10, or more to help us start the general election off strong, elect a real leader for Minnesotans, and help flip the Senate for Democrats? Thank you. 💚
Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. Right now, I need your support to fight back against the corporate special interests and MAGA billionaires bankrolling my MAGA opponent’s campaign. If you’re able, will you chip in any amount today to help power our grassroots operation? We’re going to have to hustle, but together, we’re unstoppable. Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. Right now, I need your support to fight back against the corporate special interests and MAGA billionaires bankrolling my MAGA opponent’s campaign. If you’re able, will you chip in any amount today to help power our grassroots operation? We’re going to have to hustle, but together, we’re unstoppable.
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: corporate special interests and MAGA billionaires bankrolling.
Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments. — for example: MAGA billionaires and MAGA opponent's campaign.
False Urgency: The phrase 'Right now' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: Right now, I need your support
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing of 'us' (the supporter) versus 'MAGA billionaires' exploits in-group/out-group identity to rally the audience against a defined enemy — for example: fight back against the corporate special interests and MAGA billionaires
Repetition: The loaded label 'MAGA' is repeated twice within a single sentence to reinforce a negative association through familiarity — for example: MAGA billionaires...my MAGA opponent's campaign
Appeal to Fear: The framing of 'corporate special interests and MAGA billionaires bankrolling' the opponent implies a threatening, powerful enemy that must be fought, creating anxiety to motivate action — for example: fight back against the corporate special interests and MAGA billionaires
I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I don’t have Trump’s billionaire buddies or corporate cash to keep our state blue and flip the Senate, so I need you. Republicans have raised more than $55 MILLION to flip this seat red and buy this seat for MAGA Michele Tafoya. We’ve got the grassroots support to go toe to toe with Tafoya in November – but now we need the resources. Please chip in whatever you can today to help us win big and flip the Senate blue. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I don’t have Trump’s billionaire buddies or corporate cash to keep our state blue and flip the Senate, so I need you. Republicans have raised more than $55 MILLION to flip this seat red and buy this seat for MAGA Michele Tafoya. We’ve got the grassroots support to go toe to toe with Tafoya in November – but now we need the resources. Please chip in whatever you can today to help us win big and flip the Senate blue.
We’re not putting up with Trump’s chaos any longer. We’re fighting back – and I need your help. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to get big money out of our politics, rip ICE apart, lower costs, and deliver for working families. Chip in whatever you can today to power our fight through November. We’re not putting up with Trump’s chaos any longer. We’re fighting back – and I need your help. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to get big money out of our politics, rip ICE apart, lower costs, and deliver for working families. Chip in whatever you can today to power our fight through November.
Loaded Language: The word 'chaos' is an emotionally charged term used to characterize Trump's actions negatively rather than describing specific policies or events — for example: 'chaos'
False Urgency: The phrase 'any longer' implies a threshold has been reached and immediate action or change is required, creating artificial urgency — for example: 'not putting up with...any longer'
Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. 💚 My Ojibwe name is Gizhiiwewidamookwe – which means "Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice Woman." So let me be loud and clear: my MAGA opponent, Michele Tafoya, will deliver for one person and that’s Donald Trump. I’ll deliver for the people of Minnesotan. Please chip in whatever you can today to power our fight through November. Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. 💚 My Ojibwe name is Gizhiiwewidamookwe – which means "Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice Woman." So let me be loud and clear: my MAGA opponent, Michele Tafoya, will deliver for one person and that’s Donald Trump. I’ll deliver for the people of Minnesotan. Please chip in whatever you can today to power our fight through November.
Have you been waiting for the right moment to get involved in our grassroots campaign? This is it. It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and the MAGA cash is rolling in big time for my opponent, Michele Tafoya. If you’re able, will you chip in any amount today to help power our grassroots operation? We’re going to have to hustle, but together, we’re unstoppable. Have you been waiting for the right moment to get involved in our grassroots campaign? This is it. It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and the MAGA cash is rolling in big time for my opponent, Michele Tafoya. If you’re able, will you chip in any amount today to help power our grassroots operation? We’re going to have to hustle, but together, we’re unstoppable.
Donald Trump and Tim Scott are eyeing Minnesota’s U.S. Senate race as a top flip opportunity for Republicans. Please chip in NOW to kick off the general election strong, keep Minnesota true blue, and flip the Senate for Democrats. Thank you, 💙 Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota.
Another stop on my rural economy tour: Wadena County! Honored to be part of the Farmers Union Processing + Meats grand opening with Senator Tina Smith, Minnesota Farmers Union President Gary Wertish, and many local leaders. This new 10,000-square-foot meat processing facility will help meet the needs of our livestock producers.
Peggy Flanagan just fought off $20 million in dark money attacks to become Minnesota’s Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate. But now, Republicans are calling Minnesota one of their top FOUR flip opportunities across the country. And Donald Trump’s billionaire besties are already flooding the state with dark money cash to prop up Peggy’s MAGA opponent. Peggy isn’t accepting a dime of corporate PAC money, so we are relying on you. Please chip in $5, $10, or more to help us build the resources we need to fight back and keep Minnesota blue.
Loaded Language: Multiple emotionally charged terms are used to trigger negative reactions rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'billionaire besties', 'dark money cash', 'MAGA opponent'
Conspiracy Appeal: The phrase implies shadowy, hidden financial coordination by powerful actors working behind the scenes to manipulate an election — for example: 'flooding the state with dark money cash'
MAGA extremists and billionaires are funding our opponent’s campaign because they know if they can buy this seat for her, she’ll be just another vote for Trump’s cruelty and chaos. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I will never bend to Donald Trump. I will always stand with you. I know what it’s like to have my voice go unheard. As a Native woman, my voice has never been represented in the U.S. Senate before. The status quo says there’s no way I could make it there. Together, we’re defying the odds. Chip in NOW to help me win BIG.
Name Calling: The term 'MAGA extremists' is a derogatory label used to discredit a group rather than engage with their arguments — for example: MAGA extremists
Loaded Language: Words like 'cruelty' and 'chaos' are emotionally charged terms designed to trigger a negative reaction rather than convey factual information — for example: Trump's cruelty and chaos
Conspiracy Appeal: The sentence implies a coordinated, sinister plot by shadowy wealthy actors to 'buy' a political seat and control the candidate's votes — for example: they know if they can buy this seat for her
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing exploits in-group/out-group identity by portraying the opponent as a tool of outside extremists and billionaires against 'our' interests — for example: funding our opponent's campaign
Black-and-White Fallacy: The framing implies there are only two positions: bending to Trump or opposing him, leaving no room for nuance or compromise — for example: never bend to Donald Trump
Glittering Generalities: The vague pledge to 'stand with you' uses emotionally positive language without specifying any concrete policy or action — for example: I will always stand with you
Bandwagon Appeal: The word 'Together' implies a collective movement, creating a sense of shared identity and crowd momentum to pressure the reader into participating — for example: Together, we're defying the odds.
False Urgency: The capitalized 'NOW' creates artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation and force an immediate financial response — for example: Chip in NOW to help me win BIG.
It’s Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. The path to flipping the Senate blue starts right here. And Republicans know it. But I’m not accepting a dime of corporate PAC money, so to build the resources we need to fight back against MAGA Republicans and their billionaire backers, I need your help. Please chip in whatever you can afford today to keep MN blue and flip the Senate for Democrats in November.
Peggy Flanagan is fighting to hold Trump accountable for the chaos and cruelty he sent to Minnesota. Michele Tafoya will never. She stood by Trump even as he sent thousands of ICE agents to terrorize Minnesotans. Chip in NOW to defeat Michele Tafoya and send Peggy Flanagan to the U.S. Senate. >>
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: terrorize Minnesotans.
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that Trump 'sent thousands of ICE agents' to a single state is an extreme overstatement that inflates the scale of the action beyond what evidence typically supports — for example: 'sent thousands of ICE agents'
Most voters start paying attention right after Labor Day – but we need your support now. It’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and extremist billionaires have already spent millions to drown out our message. Please, if you can, chip in before September 7 to secure our victory in November.
Name Calling: The phrase 'extremist billionaires' uses a derogatory label to discredit political opponents rather than addressing their arguments — for example: 'extremist billionaires'
Loaded Language: The phrase 'drown out our message' uses emotionally charged language to imply suppression and silencing, triggering a reaction rather than conveying neutral facts — for example: 'drown out our message'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies that powerful outside forces are actively working to suppress the campaign's voice, creating anxiety about being overwhelmed by wealthy opponents — for example: 'extremist billionaires have already spent millions to drown out our message'
False Urgency: The specific deadline of 'September 7' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without careful deliberation — for example: 'chip in before September 7'
Peggy Flanagan is fighting to hold Trump accountable for the chaos and cruelty he sent to Minnesota. Michele Tafoya will never. She stood by Trump even as he sent thousands of ICE agents to terrorize Minnesotans. Chip in NOW to defeat Michele Tafoya and send Peggy Flanagan to the U.S. Senate. >> Peggy Flanagan is fighting to hold Trump accountable for the chaos and cruelty he sent to Minnesota. Michele Tafoya will never. She stood by Trump even as he sent thousands of ICE agents to terrorize Minnesotans. Chip in NOW to defeat Michele Tafoya and send Peggy Flanagan to the U.S. Senate. >>
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts. — for example: terrorize Minnesotans.
Time is running out. September 7, Labor Day, could be our last chance to take our grassroots movement to the next level. We’re fighting to challenge corporate power, defeat Trump’s billionaire allies, and deliver bold, progressive change – from Medicare for All to universal childcare and federal paid family leave. But we need your help now to make sure voters are hearing us. Please chip in whatever you can before September 7 to build a grassroots movement strong enough to win in November.
False Urgency: The phrase creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without allowing for careful deliberation — for example: Time is running out. and could be our last chance to take our grassroots movement to the next level.
Bandwagon Appeal: Referencing 'our grassroots movement' implies a large collective already in motion, subtly pressuring the reader to join or risk being left behind — for example: 'our grassroots movement'
Peggy Flanagan here, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I need your help to take our campaign to the next level before Labor Day. Once we hit Labor Day, we’ll be in the final stretch to win this general election – and right now, we’re up against extremist billionaires trying to drown out our message of bold, progressive change. Please chip in whatever you can before September 7 to push past these outside attacks and build a people-powered movement strong enough to win in November.
False Urgency: The phrase 'final stretch' combined with 'right now' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action — for example: 'Once we hit Labor Day, we'll be in the final stretch'
Name Calling: The label 'extremist billionaires' is a derogatory compound label used to discredit opponents rather than address their arguments — for example: 'extremist billionaires'
Loaded Language: Words like 'extremist' and 'drown out' are emotionally charged to trigger a reaction against opponents, while 'bold, progressive change' is used to emotionally elevate the speaker's cause — for example: 'extremist billionaires trying to drown out our message'
Appeal to Fear: The framing implies that powerful moneyed interests are actively suppressing the audience's voice, creating anxiety about being silenced — for example: 'extremist billionaires trying to drown out our message'
💪 300 events later, our movement is stronger than ever before! 💰 But... Tafoya’s MAGA allies are pouring MILLIONS into this race. ⏰ We need to act NOW if we’re going to take back the Senate! Donate now to help us keep up our momentum and send a fighter for the people to the U.S. Senate!
Bandwagon Appeal: Implies the movement is large and growing stronger, pressuring the reader to feel part of a winning collective — for example: 'our movement is stronger than ever before'
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The superlative claim 'stronger than ever before' is an overstatement used to energize supporters beyond what evidence supports — for example: 'stronger than ever before'
Name Calling: The label 'MAGA allies' is used as a derogatory tag to discredit the opposition rather than address their arguments — for example: 'Tafoya's MAGA allies'
Appeal to Fear: The emphasis on 'MILLIONS' being poured into the race is designed to create anxiety about being outspent and overwhelmed by the opposition — for example: 'pouring MILLIONS into this race'
False Urgency: The capitalized 'NOW' and the framing of an immediate deadline create artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation — for example: 'We need to act NOW'
Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'take back the Senate' invokes a vague but emotionally resonant goal of reclaiming power without specifying what that means in practice — for example: 'take back the Senate'
New here? I’m Peggy Flanagan, and I would love to have you on our team! 💚 But first, I thought I’d share a little bit about myself. Not the polished, status quo politician version – but my real story. I was raised by a single mom in St. Louis Park, and just like so many Minnesotans and working families across the country, we relied on Medicaid, food stamps, and a Section 8 housing voucher to get by. I owe everything I am to those experiences. They shaped my fight for working families like my own, first as Minnesota’s Lieutenant Governor, and now as your Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. That’s what makes our campaign different. We’re not just fighting against Trump and his allies; we’re fighting to deliver bold change for folks in Minnesota and across the country. If you’re with me, join our team today by chipping in whatever you can. Your support helps us organize now, and win in November.
Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'bold change' is vague and emotionally positive without specifying any concrete policy or action — for example: bold change
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'folks in Minnesota and across the country' invokes an in-group identity of ordinary, relatable people to build solidarity — for example: folks in Minnesota
MAGA extremists and billionaires are funding our opponent’s campaign because they know if they can buy this seat for her, she’ll be just another vote for Trump’s cruelty and chaos. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I will never bend to Donald Trump. I will always stand with you. I know what it’s like to have my voice go unheard. As a Native woman, my voice has never been represented in the U.S. Senate before. The status quo says there’s no way I could make it there. Together, we’re defying the odds. Chip in NOW to help me win BIG. MAGA extremists and billionaires are funding our opponent’s campaign because they know if they can buy this seat for her, she’ll be just another vote for Trump’s cruelty and chaos. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I will never bend to Donald Trump. I will always stand with you. I know what it’s like to have my voice go unheard. As a Native woman, my voice has never been represented in the U.S. Senate before. The status quo says there’s no way I could make it there. Together, we’re defying the odds. Chip in NOW to help me win BIG.
Name Calling: The label 'MAGA extremists' is a derogatory term used to discredit the opposing side rather than address their arguments — for example: MAGA extremists
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words like 'cruelty' and 'chaos' are used to trigger a negative emotional reaction rather than convey factual information — for example: Trump's cruelty and chaos
Conspiracy Appeal: The sentence implies a hidden coordinated plot by wealthy actors to 'buy' a political seat and install a puppet candidate, suggesting sinister behind-the-scenes manipulation — for example: they know if they can buy this seat for her
Appeal to Fear: The sentence warns that if the opponent wins, she will enable 'cruelty and chaos,' creating anxiety about dire consequences to motivate voters — for example: she'll be just another vote for Trump's cruelty and chaos
Black-and-White Fallacy: The statement implies there are only two positions: bending to Trump or opposing him, leaving no room for nuance or compromise — for example: never bend to Donald Trump
Glittering Generalities: The vague pledge to 'stand with you' uses emotionally positive language without specifying any concrete policy or action — for example: I will always stand with you
Bandwagon Appeal: The word 'Together' implies a collective movement already in motion, pressuring the reader to feel part of a group effort — for example: Together, we're defying the odds.
False Urgency: The capitalized 'NOW' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: Chip in NOW to help me win BIG.
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing exploits in-group/out-group identity by portraying the opponent as a puppet of wealthy outside extremists versus the implied authentic community candidate — for example: 'she'll be just another vote'
Peggy Flanagan is facing her biggest challenge yet: Michele Tafoya, MAGA’s hand-picked recruit. We need your help right now to defend our progressive movement and keep Minnesota blue this November. Michele Tafoya is already raking in millions from Trump’s billionaire besties – but since Peggy doesn’t accept any corporate PAC money, she’s relying on you. Our movement is funded by people like you, chipping in what you can today. Peggy Flanagan is facing her biggest challenge yet: Michele Tafoya, MAGA’s hand-picked recruit. We need your help right now to defend our progressive movement and keep Minnesota blue this November. Michele Tafoya is already raking in millions from Trump’s billionaire besties – but since Peggy doesn’t accept any corporate PAC money, she’s relying on you. Our movement is funded by people like you, chipping in what you can today.
Name Calling: Tafoya is labeled as 'MAGA's hand-picked recruit,' a derogatory political label designed to discredit her rather than address her positions — for example: MAGA's hand-picked recruit
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Describing this as Flanagan's 'biggest challenge yet' is an overstatement used to dramatize the stakes without factual basis — for example: biggest challenge yet
False Urgency: The phrase 'right now' and 'this November' create artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: We need your help right now
Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'progressive movement' is a vague, emotionally positive label used as rhetorical flourish without substantive policy content — for example: defend our progressive movement
Appeal to Prejudice: The appeal to 'our progressive movement' and 'keep Minnesota blue' invokes in-group identity to rally supporters based on tribal affiliation rather than argument — for example: keep Minnesota blue
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged phrases are used to frame the opponent negatively and the favored candidate positively — for example: 'raking in millions' and 'billionaire besties'
Card Stacking: Selectively presents Tafoya as funded by billionaires while presenting Peggy as grassroots-funded, omitting any context about Peggy's own funding sources or the full financial picture — for example: 'since Peggy doesn't accept any corporate PAC money'
Appeal to Fear: Framing the situation as needing to 'defend' the movement implies the movement is under threat, creating anxiety to drive action — for example: defend our progressive movement
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies a binary choice: either support the billionaire-backed candidate or support the grassroots candidate, leaving no middle ground — for example: 'raking in millions from Trump's billionaire besties – but since Peggy doesn't accept any corporate PAC money'
MAGA extremists and billionaires are funding our opponent’s campaign because they know if they can buy this seat for her, she’ll be just another vote for Trump’s cruelty and chaos. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I will never bend to Donald Trump. I will always stand with you. I know what it’s like to have my voice go unheard. As a Native woman, my voice has never been represented in the U.S. Senate before. The status quo says there’s no way I could make it there. Together, we’re defying the odds. Chip in NOW to help me win BIG. MAGA extremists and billionaires are funding our opponent’s campaign because they know if they can buy this seat for her, she’ll be just another vote for Trump’s cruelty and chaos. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I will never bend to Donald Trump. I will always stand with you. I know what it’s like to have my voice go unheard. As a Native woman, my voice has never been represented in the U.S. Senate before. The status quo says there’s no way I could make it there. Together, we’re defying the odds. Chip in NOW to help me win BIG. MAGA extremists and billionaires are funding our opponent’s campaign because they know if they can buy this seat for her, she’ll be just another vote for Trump’s cruelty and chaos. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I will never bend to Donald Trump. I will always stand with you. I know what it’s like to have my voice go unheard. As a Native woman, my voice has never been represented in the U.S. Senate before. The status quo says there’s no way I could make it there. Together, we’re defying the odds. Chip in NOW to help me win BIG. MAGA extremists and billionaires are funding our opponent’s campaign because they know if they can buy this seat for her, she’ll be just another vote for Trump’s cruelty and chaos. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I will never bend to Donald Trump. I will always stand with you. I know what it’s like to have my voice go unheard. As a Native woman, my voice has never been represented in the U.S. Senate before. The status quo says there’s no way I could make it there. Together, we’re defying the odds. Chip in NOW to help me win BIG.
Name Calling: The term 'MAGA extremists' is a derogatory label used to discredit a group rather than engage with their arguments — for example: MAGA extremists
Loaded Language: Words like 'cruelty' and 'chaos' are emotionally charged to trigger a negative reaction rather than convey factual information — for example: Trump's cruelty and chaos
Conspiracy Appeal: The sentence implies a coordinated hidden plot by wealthy actors to 'buy' a political seat and control the candidate's votes — for example: they know if they can buy this seat for her
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing exploits in-group/out-group identity by portraying the opponent as a puppet of outside extremists and billionaires, implying she does not represent ordinary people — for example: she'll be just another vote for Trump's cruelty and chaos
Glittering Generalities: A vague, emotionally positive pledge of solidarity that carries no specific meaning or policy substance, designed to generate emotional attachment — for example: 'I will always stand with you'
Bandwagon Appeal: The word 'Together' implies collective momentum and shared identity to pressure the reader into feeling part of a group effort — for example: Together, we're defying the odds.
False Urgency: The capitalized 'NOW' creates artificial time pressure to prevent deliberation and compel immediate financial action — for example: Chip in NOW to help me win BIG.
Black-and-White Fallacy: The framing implies only two positions exist: bending to Trump or opposing him, leaving no room for nuance or compromise — for example: never bend to Donald Trump
BREAKING: A recent poll shows that I am leading against my MAGA opponent, Michele Tafoya, by just 3%. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to serve you, not the corporate special interests who want to buy this election, and I need your help to take the lead. Please rush an urgent donation to help us win this neck-and-neck race. BREAKING: A recent poll shows that I am leading against my MAGA opponent, Michele Tafoya, by just 3%. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to serve you, not the corporate special interests who want to buy this election, and I need your help to take the lead. Please rush an urgent donation to help us win this neck-and-neck race.
Name Calling: The phrase 'corporate special interests' is used as a derogatory label to discredit opposing financial backers without addressing specific arguments — for example: corporate special interests
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing of 'serve you' versus 'corporate special interests' creates an in-group/out-group dynamic, positioning the candidate as the champion of ordinary people against shadowy elites — for example: serve you, not the corporate special interests
Loaded Language: The phrase 'buy this election' uses emotionally charged language implying corruption and illegitimacy to provoke a reaction — for example: buy this election
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence frames the choice as binary: either Flanagan who serves 'you', or the corporate special interests, leaving no room for nuance or other options — for example: serve you, not the corporate special interests
Free yard signs are now available! Together, let's blanket Minnesota and spread the word! If you want to help spread the message, we'll deliver you a free sign. Let's make sure nobody in this state can drive down their own street without seeing it. Minnesotans were robbed by fraud, failed leadership, and career politicians who refuse to take responsibility. I'm running to follow the facts, restore accountability, and get results. Interested in a sign? Let us know 👇 https://american-voters.typeform.com/tafoya-signs Free yard signs are now available! Together, let's blanket Minnesota and spread the word! If you want to help spread the message, we'll deliver you a free sign. Let's make sure nobody in this state can drive down their own street without seeing it. Minnesotans were robbed by fraud, failed leadership, and career politicians who refuse to take responsibility. I'm running to follow the facts, restore accountability, and get results. Interested in a sign? Let us know 👇 https://american-voters.typeform.com/tafoya-signs Free yard signs are now available! Together, let's blanket Minnesota and spread the word! If you want to help spread the message, we'll deliver you a free sign. Let's make sure nobody in this state can drive down their own street without seeing it. Minnesotans were robbed by fraud, failed leadership, and career politicians who refuse to take responsibility. I'm running to follow the facts, restore accountability, and get results. Interested in a sign? Let us know 👇 https://american-voters.typeform.com/tafoya-signs
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words like 'robbed', 'fraud', 'failed', and 'career politicians' are used to provoke outrage rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'robbed by fraud'
Scapegoating: Complex governance or policy failures are blamed on a single identifiable group ('career politicians') rather than acknowledging systemic or multifaceted causes — for example: 'career politicians who refuse to take responsibility'
Name Calling: The label 'career politicians' is used as a derogatory term to discredit a group without engaging with specific arguments or evidence — for example: 'career politicians who refuse to take responsibility'
Donald Trump and his billionaire allies are making life harder for Minnesotans. Peggy Flanagan is running for U.S. Senate to fight back. Peggy is Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, a member of the White Earth Nation, and the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate in this race. She has the experience and courage to take on tough fights—and if elected, she’ll become the first Native American woman ever to serve in the U.S. Senate. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️ Donald Trump and his billionaire allies are making life harder for Minnesotans. Peggy Flanagan is running for U.S. Senate to fight back. Peggy is Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, a member of the White Earth Nation, and the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate in this race. She has the experience and courage to take on tough fights—and if elected, she’ll become the first Native American woman ever to serve in the U.S. Senate. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️ Donald Trump and his billionaire allies are making life harder for Minnesotans. Peggy Flanagan is running for U.S. Senate to fight back. Peggy is Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, a member of the White Earth Nation, and the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate in this race. She has the experience and courage to take on tough fights—and if elected, she’ll become the first Native American woman ever to serve in the U.S. Senate. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️ Donald Trump and his billionaire allies are making life harder for Minnesotans. Peggy Flanagan is running for U.S. Senate to fight back. Peggy is Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, a member of the White Earth Nation, and the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate in this race. She has the experience and courage to take on tough fights—and if elected, she’ll become the first Native American woman ever to serve in the U.S. Senate. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️
Name Calling: The phrase 'billionaire allies' is used as a derogatory label to discredit Trump and his associates by implying they are a wealthy elite acting against ordinary people — for example: 'billionaire allies'
Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence frames the issue as wealthy outsiders harming a specific in-group (Minnesotans), exploiting local identity to generate resentment — for example: 'making life harder for Minnesotans'
Scapegoating: Trump and his 'billionaire allies' are blamed as a single identifiable group for the broad, unspecified hardships faced by Minnesotans — for example: 'Donald Trump and his billionaire allies are making life harder for Minnesotans'
Glittering Generalities: The vague call to 'fight back' invokes a noble but undefined sense of resistance without specifying any concrete policy or action — for example: 'to fight back'
Claims checked
“Peggy Flanagan is running for U.S. Senate to fight back.”
Checked as: Peggy Flanagan is running for U.S. Senate. No authoritative evidence found
insufficient_tier
Verdict right?
“the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate in this race”
Checked as: There is a Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate in a U.S. Senate race. Supported by news.ballotpedia.org
source ↗Confidence: high
Verdict right?
“a member of the White Earth Nation”
Checked as: Peggy Flanagan is a member of the White Earth Nation (or White Earth Band of Ojibwe) Supported by reuters.com
source ↗Fact-checker citedConfidence: high
Verdict right?
BREAKING: Our race was ranked the top 10 most competitive Senate primaries of 2026. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota – and I’m not surprised. Crypto billionaires and dark money groups are spending $142,857 a day to defeat our movement, and this race is going to come down to how we respond. Please chip in $10 right now to help us secure a victory. Hey, I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in what is set to be Minnesota's most expensive Senate race ever. Right now, crypto billionaires and dark money groups are spending $142,857 a day to defeat our movement. But I’m in this fight for you — not them. And I need your help right now. If you can, please chip in just $10 before tomorrow at midnight so we can put it to good use on the ground and secure a victory in November.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'dark money groups' is emotionally charged, designed to evoke suspicion and fear rather than convey neutral factual information — for example: dark money groups
Conspiracy Appeal: The framing of 'crypto billionaires and dark money groups' working together to 'defeat our movement' implies a shadowy, coordinated effort by powerful hidden actors — for example: Crypto billionaires and dark money groups are spending $142,857 a day to defeat our movement
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our movement' invokes in-group identity, framing the audience as part of a collective under attack by wealthy outsiders — for example: defeat our movement
False Urgency: The statement that 'this race is going to come down to how we respond' creates artificial pressure implying an immediate, decisive response is required — for example: this race is going to come down to how we respond
In the Senate, Michele Tafoya will crack down on corruption, stop illegal immigrants from voting and keep men out of women's sports. Washington needs Minnesota common sense. Vote Tafoya for Senate!
Loaded Language: The phrase 'crack down on corruption' uses emotionally charged language to imply widespread wrongdoing without specifying evidence — for example: 'crack down on corruption'
Card Stacking: The sentence bundles a vague anti-corruption claim with two specific culture-war issues, presenting them as equivalent and uncontested policy priorities while omitting any counterargument or context — for example: 'stop illegal immigrants from voting and keep men out of women's sports'
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing of 'illegal immigrants from voting' and 'men out of women's sports' exploits in-group identity and cultural anxieties to appeal to a specific voter base's fears about outsiders and social change — for example: 'stop illegal immigrants from voting'
Slogans: Catchy phrase used to compress a complex position into an emotionally loaded shorthand.
Matt Little and Peggy Flanagan refuse to take money from corporations — because they work for us, not big donors. We need fighters who will stand up to Trump and the billionaire special interests attacking our democracy. That’s why the DFL and Minnesota progressives are voting for Peggy Flanagan for U.S. Senate and Matt Little for Minnesota's 2nd Congressional District. ✅ Early Voting runs through Monday, August 10 ✅ Election Day is Tuesday, August 11
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words like 'fighters', 'attacking', and 'democracy' are used to provoke a strong emotional response rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'billionaire special interests attacking our democracy'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence frames Trump and billionaire interests as active threats attacking democracy, creating anxiety to motivate a specific political response — for example: 'billionaire special interests attacking our democracy'
Scapegoating: Trump and 'billionaire special interests' are singled out as the source of threats to democracy, assigning blame to a specific group for broad systemic problems — for example: 'the billionaire special interests attacking our democracy'
Bandwagon Appeal: The sentence implies that a broad coalition of 'DFL and Minnesota progressives' are already voting for these candidates, creating social pressure to conform — for example: 'the DFL and Minnesota progressives are voting for'
Claims checked
“Matt Little and Peggy Flanagan refuse to take money from corporations”
No authoritative evidence found
Verdict right?
“the DFL and Minnesota progressives are voting for Peggy Flanagan for U.S. Senate and Matt Little for Minnesota's 2nd Congressional District”
Checked as: The DFL and Minnesota progressives are voting for Peggy Flanagan for U.S. Senate and Matt Little for Minnesota's 2nd Congressional District. No authoritative evidence found
Verdict right?
“Early Voting runs through Monday, August 10”
No authoritative evidence found
Verdict right?
“Election Day is Tuesday, August 11”
No authoritative evidence found
Verdict right?
Democrats, don’t miss this election! Peggy Flanagan is the only DFL-endorsed candidate for U.S. Senate and Matt Little is the only DFL-endorsed candidate for Minnesota's 2nd House District. Minnesota needs leaders who will stand up to Donald Trump and ICE. We need Peggy Flanagan and Matt Little fighting for us in Washington. ✅ Early Voting runs through Monday, August 10 ✅ Election Day is Tuesday, August 11
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'stand up to' frames Trump and ICE as adversaries of Minnesotans, invoking an in-group/out-group identity where 'real' Minnesotans are defined by opposition to these figures — for example: stand up to Donald Trump and ICE and fighting for us in Washington.
Peggy Flanagan is the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate for U.S. Senate—and she knows firsthand what working families are up against. As Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, Peggy has delivered results that make life better for Minnesotans—from helping raise the minimum wage and securing paid family and medical leave to historic investments in education, health care, and housing. Now, she’s running for Senate to make life more affordable, protect our health care and freedoms, and take on the corporations and billionaires that have rigged Washington against everyday people. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️ Peggy Flanagan is the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate for U.S. Senate—and she knows firsthand what working families are up against. As Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, Peggy has delivered results that make life better for Minnesotans—from helping raise the minimum wage and securing paid family and medical leave to historic investments in education, health care, and housing. Now, she’s running for Senate to make life more affordable, protect our health care and freedoms, and take on the corporations and billionaires that have rigged Washington against everyday people. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️ Peggy Flanagan is the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate for U.S. Senate—and she knows firsthand what working families are up against. As Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, Peggy has delivered results that make life better for Minnesotans—from helping raise the minimum wage and securing paid family and medical leave to historic investments in education, health care, and housing. Now, she’s running for Senate to make life more affordable, protect our health care and freedoms, and take on the corporations and billionaires that have rigged Washington against everyday people. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️ Peggy Flanagan is the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate for U.S. Senate—and she knows firsthand what working families are up against. As Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, Peggy has delivered results that make life better for Minnesotans—from helping raise the minimum wage and securing paid family and medical leave to historic investments in education, health care, and housing. Now, she’s running for Senate to make life more affordable, protect our health care and freedoms, and take on the corporations and billionaires that have rigged Washington against everyday people. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️
Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive phrases like 'make life more affordable,' 'protect our health care and freedoms' are used as rhetorical flourishes without specific policy substance — for example: 'protect our health care and freedoms'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'everyday people' invokes an in-group identity contrasted against an out-group of elites, implying the candidate represents ordinary citizens against powerful others — for example: 'everyday people'
Scapegoating: Corporations and billionaires are blamed as a singular cause for Washington being 'rigged,' attributing complex systemic problems to a specific group — for example: 'corporations and billionaires that have rigged Washington'
Loaded Language: The word 'rigged' is emotionally charged, implying deliberate corruption and manipulation to provoke outrage — for example: 'rigged Washington'
Free tees are now available when you contribute to my campaign! If you want to help spread the message, we'll send you a free tee. Let's blanket Minnesota with a message Washington can't ignore. Minnesotans were robbed by fraud, failed leadership, and career politicians who refuse to take responsibility. I'm running to follow the facts, restore accountability, and get results. Free tees are now available when you contribute to my campaign! If you want to help spread the message, we'll send you a free tee. Let's blanket Minnesota with a message Washington can't ignore. Minnesotans were robbed by fraud, failed leadership, and career politicians who refuse to take responsibility. I'm running to follow the facts, restore accountability, and get results. Free tees are now available when you contribute to my campaign! If you want to help spread the message, we'll send you a free tee. Let's blanket Minnesota with a message Washington can't ignore. Minnesotans were robbed by fraud, failed leadership, and career politicians who refuse to take responsibility. I'm running to follow the facts, restore accountability, and get results.
False Urgency: The call to 'blanket' with a message implies an urgent, large-scale mobilization that must happen now to force a response — for example: blanket Minnesota with a message Washington can't ignore
Bandwagon Appeal: The framing implies a mass collective action ('let's blanket') to pressure through sheer volume and crowd participation — for example: Let's blanket Minnesota
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words like 'robbed', 'fraud', 'failed', and 'career politicians' are used to provoke outrage rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'robbed by fraud'
Scapegoating: Complex problems are blamed on a single identifiable group — career politicians — rather than acknowledging systemic or multifaceted causes — for example: 'career politicians who refuse to take responsibility'
Name Calling: The label 'career politicians' is used as a derogatory term to discredit a group without engaging with specific arguments or evidence — for example: 'career politicians who refuse to take responsibility'
Claims checked
No checkable factual claims in this ad.
Are you paying attention yet? Thanks to Governor Tim Walz, our tax dollars in Minnesota will now be used to buy transgender dolls with "swappable genitalia." This should infuriate every taxpayer. It seems like every day we are in the news for some absurd reason thanks to radical Democrats in this state. How much longer are we going to put up with this?
Loaded Language: The phrase 'swappable genitalia' is presented in a way designed to provoke disgust and outrage rather than neutrally describe a product — for example: emotionally charged framing of a toy feature
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our tax dollars' invokes in-group identity to stoke resentment, implying that 'real' taxpayers are being wronged by a policy benefiting an out-group — for example: our tax dollars
Appeal to Fear: The sentence 'This should infuriate every taxpayer' is a direct emotional manipulation designed to provoke anger and anxiety about government spending, overriding rational deliberation — for example: This should infuriate every taxpayer
Scapegoating: Governor Tim Walz is singled out and blamed directly for a policy framed as an outrage, attributing a complex government decision to one individual to provoke targeted resentment — for example: Thanks to Governor Tim Walz
Name Calling: The term 'radical Democrats' is a derogatory label used to discredit political opponents rather than engage with their arguments — for example: radical Democrats
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The phrase 'every day' is an overstatement implying constant, unrelenting negative coverage caused by the named group — for example: every day we are in the news
The America 250 Block Party Minnesota Celebration at the State Capitol this past weekend was a fantastic opportunity to talk with voters about bringing accountability, integrity, and common sense back to Washington. I would be honored to have your support in the August 11 primary and the opportunity to fight for Minnesota in the U.S. Senate. Thank you to the Center of the American Experiment for hosting such a great event!
We’re just one week away from the primary! Let me tell you, this campaign has been nothing short of incredible. We've traveled across Minnesota, attended fairs, parades, and community events, and met so many wonderful people along the way. Now it's time to finish what we've started. Over the next seven days, let's leave it all on the field. Talk to your friends, call your neighbors, and most importantly, make your plan to vote by August 11.
Folks, we can do this! For the second consecutive KSTP/SurveyUSA poll, our lead is growing thanks to you! We’re now at 41% and pulling away from every other candidate. But polls don't win elections. People do. Let's finish strong on August 11!
Career politicians in Washington treat the Second Amendment like a problem to be managed. It is not a problem. It is a right. The Founders knew exactly what they were doing. So do Minnesotans. That right does not expire. And I will never vote to take it away.
Name Calling: The phrase 'career politicians' is a derogatory label used to discredit lawmakers without engaging with their actual policy positions — for example: career politicians
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing implies an in-group of true Second Amendment supporters versus out-group Washington elites who dismiss their rights — for example: Career politicians in Washington
Transfer: Invokes the authority and wisdom of the Founding Fathers to lend legitimacy to the speaker's political position — for example: 'The Founders knew exactly what they were doing.'
🚨 BAD NEWS: MAGA Michele Tafoya and her leadership PAC just outraised us. Republicans are flooding Minnesota with money because they know this race will be one that decides who controls the U.S. Senate. We're not about to let them buy this seat. We need to raise $25,000 before MIDNIGHT to close the gap, fight back, and keep reaching voters before the primary. [URGENT HELP NEEDED] Please rush a donation now >>
I know your feed is flooded with campaign messages right now, and you’re probably questioning which candidates are being truthful and which are being.... hyperbolic. But this isn’t the latter. My election is just days away, this is real. So I seriously need your help. Will you join our fight and pitch in right now to help us win big in the next two weeks? I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and our race is shaping up to be Minnesota's most expensive Senate race EVER. Pitch in to help us respond to the dark money attacks coming our way:
DFL endorses: Peggy Flanagan for U.S. Senate, Keith Ellison for Attorney General, and Ilhan Omar for U.S. House. DFL endorses: Peggy Flanagan for U.S. Senate, Keith Ellison for Attorney General, and Ilhan Omar for U.S. House.
Reject pro-amnesty Never Trumper Michele Tafoya. Send conservative veteran Adam Schwarze to the U.S. Senate to fight for us.
Name Calling: Derogatory labels are applied to Michele Tafoya to discredit her rather than address her positions — for example: 'pro-amnesty Never Trumper'
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged political labels are used to trigger a negative reaction toward the subject — for example: 'pro-amnesty'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'fight for us' invokes in-group identity, implying Schwarze represents 'our people' against an implied out-group — for example: 'fight for us'
Glittering Generalities: The label 'conservative veteran' uses vague but emotionally positive identity markers to generate approval without substantive policy detail — for example: 'conservative veteran'
This is REAL. If you join our fight today, we CAN win big against extremist billionaires. It’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and right now, dark-money super PACs are spending $142,857 against me per DAY. I’m proud that these folks know I can’t be bought. But they have very deep pockets, and I’m not taking a dime of corporate PAC money. I need your help: Pitch in now to fight back and win this race. This is REAL. If you join our fight today, we CAN win big against extremist billionaires. It’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and right now, dark-money super PACs are spending $142,857 against me per DAY. I’m proud that these folks know I can’t be bought. But they have very deep pockets, and I’m not taking a dime of corporate PAC money. I need your help: Pitch in now to fight back and win this race.
False Urgency: The word 'today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'join our fight today'
Bandwagon Appeal: The framing of 'our fight' implies a collective movement the reader should join, pressuring conformity through group identity — for example: 'join our fight'
Name Calling: The label 'extremist billionaires' is a derogatory compound label used to discredit opponents rather than address their arguments — for example: 'extremist billionaires'
Loaded Language: The word 'extremist' is emotionally charged and designed to trigger a negative reaction toward the opposing group — for example: 'extremist billionaires'
With our democracy and our rights on the line, we need to keep Minnesota blue to stand up to Trump. Angie Craig is the only Democrat we can trust to keep Minnesota in Democratic hands. That’s why Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey and elected leaders around the state are supporting Angie.
Appeal to Fear: The phrase 'on the line' implies democracy and rights are under imminent threat, creating anxiety to drive a specific political action — for example: 'our democracy and our rights on the line'
False Urgency: The framing implies an urgent, immediate need to act before something is lost, pressuring the audience without deliberation — for example: 'we need to keep Minnesota blue'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two options: keep Minnesota blue or lose democracy and rights, ignoring any middle ground or alternative outcomes — for example: 'keep Minnesota blue to stand up to Trump'
Glittering Generalities: Vague emotionally positive terms like 'democracy' and 'rights' are invoked as rhetorical flourish without specifying what specific rights or democratic principles are at stake — for example: 'our democracy and our rights'
Name Calling: Trump is invoked as a singular antagonist to be 'stood up to,' functioning as a derogatory label implying he is a threat rather than addressing specific policies — for example: 'stand up to Trump'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'we can trust' invokes in-group identity, implying a shared community of Democrats who must rally around a single figure — for example: we can trust
Claims checked
“Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey and elected leaders around the state are supporting Angie.”
Checked as: Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey and elected leaders around the state are supporting Angie (Craig). No authoritative evidence found
Verdict right?
Peggy Flanagan is the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate for U.S. Senate—and she knows firsthand what working families are up against. As Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, Peggy has delivered results that make life better for Minnesotans—from helping raise the minimum wage and securing paid family and medical leave to historic investments in education, health care, and housing. Now, she’s running for Senate to make life more affordable, protect our health care and freedoms, and take on the corporations and billionaires that have rigged Washington against everyday people. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️ Peggy Flanagan is the Minnesota DFL-endorsed candidate for U.S. Senate—and she knows firsthand what working families are up against. As Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, Peggy has delivered results that make life better for Minnesotans—from helping raise the minimum wage and securing paid family and medical leave to historic investments in education, health care, and housing. Now, she’s running for Senate to make life more affordable, protect our health care and freedoms, and take on the corporations and billionaires that have rigged Washington against everyday people. Vote for Peggy Flanagan in the primary election by August 11. 🗳️
Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive phrases like 'make life more affordable,' 'protect our health care and freedoms' are used as rhetorical flourishes without specific policy substance — for example: 'protect our health care and freedoms'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'everyday people' invokes an in-group identity contrasted against an out-group of elites, implying the candidate represents ordinary citizens against powerful others — for example: 'everyday people'
Scapegoating: Corporations and billionaires are blamed as a singular cause for Washington being 'rigged,' oversimplifying complex systemic issues — for example: 'corporations and billionaires that have rigged Washington'
Loaded Language: The word 'rigged' is emotionally charged, implying deliberate corruption and manipulation to provoke outrage — for example: 'rigged Washington'
Millionaires like Michele Tafoya get richer while YOU sacrifice. Watch and learn how Tafoya profited from the war with Iran.
Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence creates a sharp in-group/out-group divide between 'millionaires like Michele Tafoya' and 'YOU', implying ordinary people are being exploited by the wealthy — for example: YOU sacrifice
Loaded Language: The word 'sacrifice' is emotionally charged, implying ordinary people are suffering while elites profit — for example: while YOU sacrifice
False Urgency: The imperative 'Watch and learn' creates a sense of urgency and commands immediate action to consume the content — for example: Watch and learn
Name Calling: Tafoya is implicitly labeled as someone who 'profited from the war', framing her as a war profiteer without substantiation — for example: Tafoya profited from the war with Iran
Hi friends, it’s Peggy Flanagan. I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota because my story has always been a Minnesota story – and this campaign is too. Let me explain. Here in Minnesota, we watch out for our neighbors. We always have, and we always will. Now, I’m running my campaign the same way – neighbor to neighbor, powered by the people. Together, we’re making change happen. Not with checks from corporations or extremist billionaires, but with people like you, giving what you can when you can. Please chip in $20, or whatever you can spare, to organize and win this race together. Thank you. Hi friends, it’s Peggy Flanagan. I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota because my story has always been a Minnesota story – and this campaign is too. Let me explain. Here in Minnesota, we watch out for our neighbors. We always have, and we always will. Now, I’m running my campaign the same way – neighbor to neighbor, powered by the people. Together, we’re making change happen. Not with checks from corporations or extremist billionaires, but with people like you, giving what you can when you can. Please chip in $20, or whatever you can spare, to organize and win this race together. Thank you.
Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes a regional in-group identity to create a sense of shared community values exclusive to Minnesotans — for example: 'Here in Minnesota, we watch out for our neighbors'
Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive assertion of timeless communal virtue with no specific meaning or substance — for example: We always have, and we always will and neighbor to neighbor, powered by the people.
Bandwagon Appeal: The word 'Together' implies a collective movement already in motion, pressuring the reader to join in — for example: 'Together, we're making change happen'
Name Calling: The label 'extremist billionaires' is a derogatory label used to discredit donors to the opposing side rather than address policy arguments — for example: 'extremist billionaires'
Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents only two sources of political support — corrupt wealthy donors or ordinary people — ignoring the full spectrum of funding realities — for example: 'Not with checks from corporations or extremist billionaires, but with people like you'
False Urgency: The call to 'chip in' to 'win this race' implies time-sensitive pressure to act immediately without deliberation — for example: 'to organize and win this race together'
Loaded Language: The word 'extremist' is emotionally charged and designed to trigger a negative reaction toward the opposing side's donors — for example: extremist billionaires.
Here's the latest: our race for U.S. Senate in Minnesota was just ranked in the top 10 most competitive Senate primaries of 2026. Our election is just days away, polls show this race is TIED, and Crypto billionaires and dark money groups are spending $142,857 a DAY to defeat me. I’m Peggy Flanagan, and I’m in this fight for YOU – not them. If you’re able, please chip in $10 right now to secure our victory and take back the Senate majority. Thank you. Here's the latest: our race for U.S. Senate in Minnesota was just ranked in the top 10 most competitive Senate primaries of 2026. Our election is just days away, polls show this race is TIED, and Crypto billionaires and dark money groups are spending $142,857 a DAY to defeat me. I’m Peggy Flanagan, and I’m in this fight for YOU – not them. If you’re able, please chip in $10 right now to secure our victory and take back the Senate majority. Thank you.
False Urgency: The phrase 'just days away' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action or donations — for example: 'Our election is just days away'
Appeal to Fear: The vivid, specific dollar figure of outside spending is framed to generate anxiety about being overwhelmed by powerful outside forces — for example: 'spending $142,857 a DAY to defeat me'
Loaded Language: The term 'dark money groups' is emotionally charged language designed to trigger suspicion and fear rather than convey neutral factual information — for example: 'dark money groups'
Conspiracy Appeal: The framing of 'Crypto billionaires and dark money groups' coordinating to defeat a single candidate implies a shadowy, sinister plot by hidden powerful actors — for example: 'Crypto billionaires and dark money groups are spending $142,857 a DAY to defeat me'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The phrase 'for YOU – not them' creates a binary opposition between the speaker's supporters and an unnamed opposing group, leaving no room for nuance — for example: 'for YOU – not them'
Appeal to Prejudice: The contrast between 'YOU' and 'them' exploits in-group/out-group identity, implying the speaker is exclusively aligned with the reader against a shadowy other group — for example: 'for YOU – not them'
Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'secure our victory and take back the Senate majority' uses vague, emotionally positive language about winning and reclaiming power without substantive policy detail — for example: 'secure our victory and take back the Senate majority'
Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota! When I was 15-years-old, I got my first job: hosting at La Casita, the hot pink Mexican restaurant on Highway 394 in Golden Valley. I relied on that job to support myself through college. Just like so many of us, I needed to work to live. But our leaders in Washington don’t know that struggle — and they aren’t working to fix it. That’s why I’m running for Senate, to bust my butt for working families in Washington. And right now, I need your support. There are less than 20 days left in this race, and we need to win. Please chip in $5, $10, or whatever you can afford to power this campaign in our final sprint. I’m Peggy Flanagan, running for Senate to bust my butt for working families in Washington. And right now, I need your support. Extremist billionaires are flooding this race with dark money to stop our movement for working people. Since I don’t accept a dime of corporate PAC money, I need your help to finish strong. Please chip in $5, $10, or whatever you can afford to power this campaign in our final sprint.
False Urgency: The phrase 'right now' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: right now, I need your support and I need your help to finish strong.
Name Calling: The label 'extremist billionaires' is a derogatory tag used to discredit opponents rather than address their arguments — for example: 'Extremist billionaires'
Loaded Language: Words like 'extremist', 'flooding', and 'dark money' are emotionally charged to trigger alarm and resentment rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'flooding this race with dark money'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies a powerful, sinister force is actively working to destroy 'our movement for working people,' creating anxiety to compel action — for example: 'to stop our movement for working people'
Conspiracy Appeal: The framing of shadowy 'extremist billionaires' secretly 'flooding' a race with 'dark money' implies a hidden, coordinated sinister plot — for example: 'Extremist billionaires are flooding this race with dark money'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our movement for working people' constructs an in-group identity (working people) against an out-group (billionaires), exploiting class-based identity — for example: 'our movement for working people'
Card Stacking: The claim of not accepting 'a dime of corporate PAC money' is presented as a moral credential while omitting any counterbalancing information, selectively framing the speaker as uniquely virtuous — for example: 'I don't accept a dime of corporate PAC money'
It’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota. A brand new poll just dropped. We are TIED with our opponent. It’s a dead heat. I’m backed by Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, and I’m building a movement powered by working people, for working people. That means every undecided voter, every door knocked, every dollar matters. Help us reach these remaining undecided voters and swing this (very close!) race in our direction. Chip in $10 or $15 now to help us take the lead. >>
Bandwagon Appeal: The phrase 'building a movement' implies a growing collective force that the listener should want to be part of, creating social pressure to join — for example: building a movement powered by working people
Appeal to Prejudice: The repeated framing of 'working people' creates an in-group identity that implicitly excludes others (elites, non-workers), appealing to class-based identity — for example: powered by working people, for working people
Repetition: The phrase 'working people' is repeated twice in close succession for rhetorical emphasis rather than informational necessity — for example: working people, for working people
Peggy is backed by Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Tina Smith. Her opponent is backed by crypto bros and AIPAC. That’s why dark money groups are spending $142,857 a day to defeat Peggy. They think they can buy this U.S. Senate seat with deceptive ads and AI deepfakes. But we know better. This movement is powered by you – help us reach undecided voters to take the lead in this final sprint.
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts.
Name Calling: Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments. — for example: crypto bros.
Conspiracy Appeal: The framing implies hidden, shadowy actors coordinating large sums of money against a candidate, suggesting a secretive sinister plot — for example: 'dark money groups are spending $142,857 a day to defeat Peggy'
Appeal to Fear: The sentence warns that powerful outside forces can corrupt the democratic process by purchasing a Senate seat through manipulation, creating anxiety about electoral integrity — for example: 'buy this U.S. Senate seat with deceptive ads and AI deepfakes'
BREAKING: This race is deadlocked. Peggy is running to end the status quo in Washington and deliver bold, progressive change. That’s why corporate special interests are flooding Minnesota with ads attacking her. Now, this race is TIED, and we need your help. Please chip in whatever you can right now to make sure we have the resources to reach the 16% of undecided voters across Minnesota so we can win in less than 20 days.
Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive phrases are used to describe the candidate's platform without any specific policy substance — for example: 'bold, progressive change'
Conspiracy Appeal: Implies a coordinated, sinister effort by shadowy powerful actors to undermine the candidate, framing opposition as a hidden plot rather than legitimate political activity — for example: 'corporate special interests are flooding Minnesota with ads attacking her'
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged terms are used to cast the opposition in a negative light and trigger a reaction rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'flooding Minnesota'
That’s right, the Minnesota U.S. Senate primary race is neck-and-neck. We need your help to send Peggy Flanagan, a true fighter for working people, to the U.S. Senate. If you’re ready to end the status quo in Washington, stand up to billionaires and special interests, and deliver bold, progressive change, join Team Peggy and chip into our campaign now. Every dollar helps us reach undecided voters in this final sprint.
False Urgency: Framing the race as 'neck-and-neck' creates artificial urgency and pressure to act immediately — for example: implying the outcome is on a knife's edge to motivate donations or action
Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'true fighter for working people' uses vague, emotionally positive language to create a noble image without providing specific policy substance — for example: 'true fighter for working people'
Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words like 'billionaires', 'special interests', and 'bold, progressive change' are used to trigger a reaction rather than convey neutral facts — for example: 'stand up to billionaires and special interests'
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing of 'us' versus 'billionaires and special interests' exploits in-group/out-group identity to rally supporters against a defined enemy — for example: 'stand up to billionaires and special interests'
Far-left Democrats didn't have the spine to stop the criminals who stole millions from Minnesotans. As your Senator, Michele Tafoya will: ✅ Pass tougher prison sentences ✅ Deport noncitizen fraudsters ✅ Strip federal funding from states that won't do audits
Name Calling: The label 'Far-left Democrats' is a derogatory political label used to discredit the group rather than engage with their actions substantively — for example: Far-left Democrats
Loaded Language: The phrase 'didn't have the spine' is emotionally charged language designed to demean and provoke contempt rather than convey factual information — for example: didn't have the spine and criminals who stole millions.
Scapegoating: The sentence places sole blame on 'Far-left Democrats' for failing to stop a complex criminal situation, reducing a multifaceted issue to a single group's alleged failure — for example: Far-left Democrats didn't have the spine to stop the criminals
Claims checked
No checkable factual claims in this ad.
August 11th Primary Alert: Minnesota For nearly three decades, Michele Tafoya built a reputation for calling it like she sees it on the big stages in sports, and was repeatedly ranked as one of the most respected and trusted figures in sports media. Now Michele is bringing that same straight-talking approach to politics. She believes Minnesota deserves better than the corruption and fraud scandals that have dominated national headlines and embarrassed the state she loves. After years of asking tough questions on the sidelines, Michele is stepping up to lead on issues of accountability, fiscal responsibility, secure borders, and law and order — and Maggie’s List is proud to stand behind her as she does it. You can learn more here: https://bit.ly/3QTaRQ0
Glittering Generalities: The sentence strings together vague, emotionally positive buzzwords that sound noble but carry no specific policy meaning — for example: 'accountability, fiscal responsibility, secure borders, and law and order'
Why do Republicans want to run against Peggy Flanagan? Because she’s beatable and she gives Republicans the best chance of winning the Senate race and keeping the Senate majority in GOP hands. With Donald Trump and Republicans coming for our democracy and our rights, we need a Democrat who can win. That’s not Peggy Flanagan.
Appeal to Fear: The sentence warns that Trump and Republicans are threatening democracy and rights, creating anxiety to pressure voters into a specific electoral choice — for example: framing political opposition as an existential attack on rights
Loaded Language: The phrase 'coming for our democracy and our rights' uses emotionally charged language to frame political opponents as aggressors threatening fundamental freedoms — for example: 'coming for our democracy'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies the only solution to the threat posed by Republicans is electing a winning Democrat, presenting a binary choice that excludes other possibilities — for example: 'we need a Democrat who can win'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our democracy and our rights' invokes in-group identity, implying Republicans are outsiders attacking the group's shared values — for example: 'our democracy and our rights'
Name Calling: The blunt dismissal of Peggy Flanagan without substantive argument functions as a discrediting label, reducing her candidacy to a simple negative assertion — for example: 'That's not Peggy Flanagan'
Claims checked
No checkable factual claims in this ad.
🚨 NEW 📺 AD: The “Quality Learing Center” made Minnesota a national embarrassment. Despite repeated warnings, far-left Minnesota Democrats didn’t have the spine to stand up to fraudsters stealing our tax dollars. No more excuses. No more cover-ups. It's time to protect taxpayers. And hold people accountable.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'national embarrassment' is emotionally charged language designed to trigger shame and outrage rather than convey factual information — for example: national embarrassment
Name Calling: The label 'far-left' is a derogatory political tag used to discredit the Democrats rather than address their actions on the merits — for example: far-left Minnesota Democrats
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our tax dollars' invokes an in-group identity of taxpaying citizens being victimized by outsiders and spineless politicians, exploiting us-vs-them sentiment — for example: stealing our tax dollars
False Urgency: The declarative 'No more' framing implies a crisis point has been reached and immediate action is required — for example: No more excuses and It's time.
Conspiracy Appeal: 'Cover-ups' implies hidden, coordinated wrongdoing by unnamed actors — for example: 'No more cover-ups'
Glittering Generalities: 'Protect taxpayers' is a vague, emotionally positive appeal that sounds noble but specifies no concrete policy or action — for example: 'It's time to protect taxpayers'
Governor Tim Walz has pardoned an illegal immigrant who violated a 10-year-old girl. This disgusting individual was set to be deported, thanks to the Trump administration, until Tim Walz decided to swoop in and protect this creep. America First means keeping our nation and our nation's future safe, and Democrats have made it completely clear that they couldn’t care less about protecting the great people of this country and the great people of Minnesota. As your senator, I'll send the message that you cannot come into our country, hurt our kids, and walk away without justice.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'illegal immigrant' is a politically charged label used to trigger an emotional reaction rather than using neutral legal terminology such as 'undocumented person' or 'non-citizen' — for example: illegal immigrant
Appeal to Fear: The combination of a pardoned criminal, an undocumented person, and a child victim is framed to provoke fear and outrage about public safety and government decisions — for example: pardoned an illegal immigrant who violated a 10-year-old girl
Scapegoating: The sentence implicitly links immigration status to criminal behavior, reinforcing a narrative that blames immigrants for harm to children — for example: illegal immigrant who violated a 10-year-old girl
Name Calling: The subject is referred to with derogatory labels rather than by name or neutral description, designed to discredit rather than inform — for example: 'disgusting individual' and 'creep'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'America First' and 'great people of this country' invokes in-group identity to distinguish 'real' Americans from Democrats — for example: America First
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two positions: either you support 'America First' safety or you 'couldn't care less' about protecting people, leaving no middle ground — for example: couldn't care less about protecting
Glittering Generalities: Vague emotionally positive phrases like 'America First' and 'keeping our nation safe' are used as rhetorical flourish without specific policy substance — for example: America First means keeping our nation and our nation's future safe
Repetition: The phrase 'great people' is repeated twice in close succession to reinforce in-group identity through familiarity — for example: the great people of this country and the great people of Minnesota
Minnesota is in a leadership crisis, and the whole country can see it. Recycling the same career politicians between different offices is not a solution. I love this state, and I believe it’s worth rescuing. Unexpected things happen when you put the right team together and go to work. I want to talk to every Minnesotan, regardless of party, and make the case for why we can win this and turn Minnesota around.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'leadership crisis' uses emotionally charged language to frame the situation as dire and urgent — for example: 'leadership crisis'
Bandwagon Appeal: The claim that 'the whole country can see it' implies universal agreement to pressure the reader into accepting the premise — for example: 'the whole country can see it'
Name Calling: The term 'career politicians' is used as a derogatory label to discredit incumbents without addressing their specific records or arguments — for example: 'career politicians'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies that the only alternative to 'recycling' current politicians is a fundamentally different choice, dismissing any nuanced options — for example: 'is not a solution'
If you wonder why your grocery bill is so high, start here. States are refusing to hand over the real food stamp fraud numbers. Not because the numbers are messy. Because they're hiding one of the root causes of the affordability issues you face every single day. Minnesota needs a Senator willing to go get the truth. I'm running to hold fraudsters and career politicians accountable for stealing your taxpayer dollars.
Name Calling: The terms 'fraudsters' and 'career politicians' are derogatory labels used to discredit opponents without substantiating specific wrongdoing — for example: 'fraudsters and career politicians'
Loaded Language: The phrase 'stealing your taxpayer dollars' uses emotionally charged language to provoke outrage and imply criminal conduct without providing evidence — for example: 'stealing your taxpayer dollars'
Appeal to Prejudice: The use of 'your taxpayer dollars' frames the audience as victimized in-group members whose money is being taken by an out-group of corrupt insiders — for example: 'your taxpayer dollars'
We are losing businesses. We are losing lifelong Minnesotans, who simply can’t take it anymore. We have politicians who are more welcoming to illegal immigrants than American born citizens. We have a massive deficit, largely brought on by fraud in our state. The same career politicians here in Minnesota who got us into this mess are not coming to save us, which is exactly why I'm trying to do something about it. I would be honored to earn your vote, Minnesota. It’s time for change.
Appeal to Fear: The sentence implies a dire, ongoing exodus of long-term residents driven by unbearable conditions, creating anxiety about the state's decline without specifying the cause — for example: 'losing lifelong Minnesotans, who simply can't take it anymore'
Loaded Language: The phrase 'simply can't take it anymore' uses emotionally charged language implying extreme suffering or desperation to provoke an emotional reaction rather than convey specific facts — for example: 'simply can't take it anymore'
Appeal to Prejudice: The sentence exploits in-group/out-group identity by contrasting 'American born citizens' (the in-group) with 'illegal immigrants' (the out-group), implying politicians are betraying their own people — for example: prioritizing outsiders over true Americans
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that politicians are categorically 'more welcoming' to illegal immigrants than to American-born citizens is an extreme overstatement unsupported by specific evidence — for example: framing a complex policy debate as a clear-cut betrayal of citizens
Name Calling: The phrase 'career politicians' is used as a derogatory label to discredit a group of people rather than addressing their specific actions or policies — for example: career politicians
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies only two options: the career politicians who caused the mess and will not fix it, or the speaker who will — presenting a binary choice that excludes other possible actors or solutions — for example: not coming to save us, which is exactly why I'm trying to do something about it
For years, I walked the sidelines when the stakes were the highest, and that job taught me how leadership really works. I’m running for U.S. Senate to bring that experience to Washington and deliver the real results Minnesota deserves.
Common sense won today. It’s crazy we even have to celebrate this, but the Supreme Court has ruled that men do not belong in women's sports. This is a victory for common sense, but the fight isn't over. Girls deserve fairness. Girls deserve privacy. Girls deserve adults who fight for them. That's exactly why I'm not standing on the sidelines anymore. I'm running for Senate to make sure Minnesota always fights for common sense.
Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'common sense' is used as a vague, emotionally positive term implying that one side holds obvious, rational truth while opponents lack basic reasoning — for example: Common sense won today.
False Urgency: The phrase 'the fight isn't over' implies ongoing urgency and pressure to continue acting, discouraging complacency — for example: the fight isn't over
Repetition: The phrase 'Girls deserve' is repeated across sentences 2, 3, and 4 as a deliberate rhetorical device to reinforce an emotional appeal through familiarity — for example: Girls deserve fairness
Appeal to Fear: The implication that girls currently lack adults who fight for them creates anxiety about their vulnerability and implicitly pressures the audience to act — for example: Girls deserve adults who fight for them
Billions in taxpayer money went missing, and it wasn't the Senate or a state agency that caught it. It was a private citizen with a camera, asking questions nobody in office bothered to ask. And when he testified, Democrat senators barely even showed up to listen. That tells you everything about who's actually watching out for your money, and who isn't. Minnesota, you deserve leaders who take your tax dollars as seriously as you do.
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that 'billions' went missing and that neither the Senate nor any state agency caught it is presented as established fact without evidence or qualification, overstating institutional failure — for example: billions went missing undetected by all oversight bodies
Card Stacking: The sentence presents the failure of institutional oversight as total and absolute, omitting any context about existing investigations, audits, or partial accountability measures — for example: it wasn't the Senate or a state agency that caught it
Appeal to Prejudice: Contrasts the heroic 'private citizen' against corrupt or negligent officials, flattering the common person while denigrating institutional actors to stoke anti-establishment sentiment — for example: a private citizen with a camera, asking questions nobody in office bothered to ask
Loaded Language: The phrase 'nobody in office bothered to ask' implies deliberate negligence or indifference by all elected officials, using emotionally charged framing rather than neutral reporting — for example: nobody in office bothered to ask
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence implies a binary division between those who watch out for your money and those who don't, leaving no room for nuance or middle ground — for example: 'who's actually watching out for your money, and who isn't'
Minnesotans are tired of fraud in our state. That’s why a new poll shows us tied with Peggy Flanagan. I am proud to be the anti-fraud candidate in this race. I'm going to follow the facts, ask the hard questions, and hold every single person responsible accountable. That's why I'm in this race. And that's why we're going to win it.
Loaded Language: The term 'anti-fraud' implicitly labels opponents or the current system as fraudulent without providing evidence, using emotionally charged framing to position the speaker favorably — for example: 'anti-fraud candidate'
I called this out last week, the moment I found out: Tim Walz pardoned a convicted child rapist, days before he was set to be deported. Peggy Flanagan stood right beside him. Secretary Rubio rightly did what our own governor wouldn’t. He held the criminal accountable and made sure justice was served for that innocent girl. Minnesotans don’t need leaders who stand beside predators. They need ones who protect our people. That’s exactly why I’m running.
Loaded Language: The word 'rightly' is an emotionally charged judgment that frames Rubio's action as unambiguously correct while implicitly condemning the governor — for example: rightly did what our own governor wouldn't, the criminal accountable and that innocent girl.
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents a binary contrast implying the governor failed where Rubio succeeded, leaving no room for nuance or alternative explanations — for example: 'did what our own governor wouldn't'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'our people' invokes in-group identity to create a sense of tribal loyalty and contrast with the implied out-group of leaders who 'stand beside predators' — for example: 'protect our people'
🚨 NEW POLL 🚨 This poll confirms what we're hearing across Minnesota. Our campaign has the momentum and resources to compete against Peggy Flanagan and Angie Craig. We are built to win and elect Minnesota's first conservative to the U.S. Senate in 20 years.
Today, I officially filed to run for the United States Senate! Minnesotans are looking for a common-sense leader, not another career politician. I’m running to bring new leadership to Washington and put Minnesota first.
Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents only two options — a 'common-sense leader' or a 'career politician' — ignoring the many other possibilities for what a leader could be — for example: a career politician can also be a common-sense leader
Name Calling: Uses the label 'career politician' as a derogatory term to discredit opponents without addressing their actual positions or records — for example: 'not another career politician'
Bandwagon Appeal: Claims all Minnesotans share this desire, implying broad consensus to pressure agreement — for example: 'Minnesotans are looking for'
Glittering Generalities: Uses vague, emotionally positive phrases like 'new leadership' and 'put Minnesota first' that sound noble but carry no specific policy meaning — for example: 'put Minnesota first'
Hey friends, it’s Peggy Flanagan. My Native name means 'Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice woman,' and I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to use that voice for working people – not special interests. That’s why I’m not taking any corporate PAC money. This is a people-powered campaign, and I need your help to overcome the dark money trying to stop us. Please chip in whatever you can today to power our grassroots campaign to victory. Thank you. Hey friends, it’s Peggy Flanagan. My Native name means 'Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice woman,' and I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to use that voice for working people – not special interests. That’s why I’m not taking any corporate PAC money. This is a people-powered campaign, and I need your help to overcome the dark money trying to stop us. Please chip in whatever you can today to power our grassroots campaign to victory. Thank you.
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'working people – not special interests' draws a sharp in-group/out-group distinction, implying the candidate represents ordinary, virtuous people against a shadowy opposing group — for example: working people vs. special interests
Loaded Language: The phrase 'dark money' is emotionally charged, designed to trigger suspicion and fear rather than convey specific factual information — for example: dark money
Conspiracy Appeal: The phrase 'dark money trying to stop us' implies hidden, sinister actors working covertly against the campaign without naming or substantiating them — for example: dark money trying to stop us
False Urgency: The word 'today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: chip in whatever you can today
Bandwagon Appeal: The appeal to a 'grassroots campaign' implies broad popular participation to pressure the reader into joining the crowd — for example: power our grassroots campaign to victory
Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan, and I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to push back against the special interests leaving working families behind. My Ojibwe name means 'Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice woman,' and today, I’m using that voice to build a grassroots movement capable of defeating the extremist billionaires rigging our politics. If you’re with me – if you believe in the strength of this people-powered movement – please chip in today. Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan, and I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to push back against the special interests leaving working families behind. My Ojibwe name means 'Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice woman,' and today, I’m using that voice to build a grassroots movement capable of defeating the extremist billionaires rigging our politics. If you’re with me – if you believe in the strength of this people-powered movement – please chip in today.
Name Calling: The phrase 'extremist billionaires' applies a derogatory label to a group without substantiating the claim — for example: extremist billionaires
Conspiracy Appeal: The claim that billionaires are 'rigging our politics' implies a hidden, coordinated sinister plot by shadowy powerful actors — for example: rigging our politics
Loaded Language: The word 'extremist' is emotionally charged and chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey a factual description — for example: extremist billionaires rigging our politics
Bandwagon Appeal: The phrase 'people-powered movement' implies a large collective force that the reader is invited to join, creating social pressure to conform by contributing — for example: people-powered movement
False Urgency: The phrase 'chip in today' creates artificial time pressure to act immediately without deliberation — for example: chip in today
Black-and-White Fallacy: The conditional 'If you're with me' frames the choice as binary — either you support the movement (and donate) or you do not, leaving no middle ground — for example: If you're with me
Wait, stop scrolling! This will be fast, and it’s important. It’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S Senate in Minnesota. The dark money ads are out of control. AIPAC, crypto bros, and an AI billionaire are teaming up to spend over $142,000 a day on attack ads against me. They know I’m a threat to their corporate agenda. The truth is, I don’t answer to them. I answer to you. If you believe that this seat belongs to working people—not the highest bidder—I hope you’ll pitch in $20 today to help us fight back. Thank you. Wait, stop scrolling! This will be fast, and it’s important. It’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S Senate in Minnesota. The dark money ads are out of control. AIPAC, crypto bros, and an AI billionaire are teaming up to spend over $142,000 a day on attack ads against me. They know I’m a threat to their corporate agenda. The truth is, I don’t answer to them. I answer to you. If you believe that this seat belongs to working people—not the highest bidder—I hope you’ll pitch in $20 today to help us fight back. Thank you.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'dark money' is emotionally charged and carries strong negative connotations designed to trigger distrust and alarm rather than neutrally describe campaign finance — for example: 'dark money ads'
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The phrase 'out of control' is an extreme overstatement used to amplify the perceived threat beyond what a neutral description would convey — for example: 'out of control'
Conspiracy Appeal: The sentence implies a coordinated, shadowy alliance of powerful actors secretly 'teaming up' to target a single individual, evoking the idea of a hidden sinister plot — for example: 'teaming up to spend over $142,000 a day on attack ads against me'
Appeal to Fear: The specific dollar figure combined with the framing of a coordinated attack is designed to create anxiety about the overwhelming power of moneyed interests targeting the speaker — for example: 'spend over $142,000 a day on attack ads against me'
Name Calling: The term 'crypto bros' is a derogatory label used to dismiss and discredit a group rather than describe them neutrally — for example: 'crypto bros'
Appeal to Prejudice: Positions the speaker as exclusively accountable to 'you' (the in-group audience), reinforcing an us-vs-them identity dynamic — for example: I answer to you and working people—not the highest bidder.
Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents only two options for who the seat can belong to — working people or the highest bidder — ignoring any other possibilities — for example: 'working people—not the highest bidder'
False Urgency: The call to 'pitch in $20 today' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'pitch in $20 today'
Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan. My Ojibwe name means 'Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice woman,’ and today, I’m using that voice to call out MAGA extremism — loudly and clearly. But I need your help. Your support helps us build a grassroots campaign strong enough to be heard above the noise. Please pitch in whatever you can today to join our grassroots movement, hold MAGA Republicans accountable, and fight for progressive change. Thank you. Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan. My Ojibwe name means 'Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice woman,’ and today, I’m using that voice to call out MAGA extremism — loudly and clearly. But I need your help. Your support helps us build a grassroots campaign strong enough to be heard above the noise. Please pitch in whatever you can today to join our grassroots movement, hold MAGA Republicans accountable, and fight for progressive change. Thank you.
Name Calling: The term 'MAGA extremism' is a derogatory label applied to a political group to discredit them rather than address specific policies or arguments — for example: 'MAGA extremism'
Appeal to Prejudice: The invocation of her Ojibwe identity and name is used to establish in-group authenticity and moral authority, framing her critique as rooted in a culturally distinct and legitimate voice against an out-group — for example: 'My Ojibwe name means Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice woman'
Claims checked
No checkable factual claims in this ad.
Right now, there are no Native voices in the U.S. Senate. I’m Peggy Flanagan, and I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to change that. If you believe all voices deserve a seat at the table, please pitch in today. Let’s make history. Right now, there are no Native voices in the U.S. Senate. I’m Peggy Flanagan, and I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota to change that. If you believe all voices deserve a seat at the table, please pitch in today. Let’s make history.
Claims checked
“there are no Native voices in the U.S. Senate”
Checked as: There are no Native American senators currently serving in the U.S. Senate. Contradicted by senate.gov
source ↗Primary sourceConfidence: high“The names of current senators appear in bold print.”
Verdict right?
“I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota”
Checked as: Someone is running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota Supported by apnews.com
source ↗Confidence: high
Verdict right?
When Tim Walz tasked Peggy Flanagan with investigating housing fraud, Flanagan failed to do her job and, as a consequence, millions in fraud went undetected. Flanagan’s conduct as lieutenant governor was called a “dereliction of duty.” Flanagan failed Tim Walz. And she’s failed Minnesota too.
Claims checked
“Flanagan failed to do her job and, as a consequence, millions in fraud went undetected”
Checked as: Flanagan failed to do her job, and as a consequence, millions in fraud went undetected. No authoritative evidence found
Verdict right?
“Tim Walz tasked Peggy Flanagan with investigating housing fraud”
No authoritative evidence found
Verdict right?
Peggy Flanagan claims she doesn’t take corporate PAC money. But the truth is Flanagan took money from Big Pharma to fund her special interest group – even as the pharmaceutical companies force Minnesotans to pay more and more for prescription drugs. Minnesota voters deserve a Senator who will stand up to Big Pharma – not cozy up to the giant drug companies.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'Big Pharma' and 'giant drug companies' are emotionally charged labels designed to trigger negative reactions toward pharmaceutical companies rather than convey neutral factual information — for example: 'Big Pharma'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two options for a Senator: either 'stand up to' or 'cozy up to' pharmaceutical companies, ignoring any nuanced middle-ground positions — for example: 'stand up to Big Pharma – not cozy up to the giant drug companies'
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'Minnesota voters deserve' invokes in-group identity to frame the political message as representing the rightful interests of a specific community — for example: 'Minnesota voters deserve'
Claims checked
“Flanagan took money from Big Pharma to fund her special interest group”
Checked as: Flanagan received money from pharmaceutical industry interests to fund a special interest group she controls or is associated with. No authoritative evidence found
Verdict right?
Hi folks, it’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate. This will be quick, but I’ve got important news to share. I’m about to go up on the airwaves with my very first ad of this campaign. Super PACs funded by AIPAC and the cryptocurrency industry are spending $142,000 a DAY to flood the airwaves with lies. With voters already casting ballots, it’s essential that we get our message of bold, progressive change out across the state. So this is the moment I need you the most. Can you pitch in $5 today to keep my ads on the air and make sure every Minnesotan knows the choice in this race? Thank you. Hi folks, it’s Peggy Flanagan, running for U.S. Senate. This will be quick, but I’ve got important news to share. I’m about to go up on the airwaves with my very first ad of this campaign. Super PACs funded by AIPAC and the cryptocurrency industry are spending $142,000 a DAY to flood the airwaves with lies. With voters already casting ballots, it’s essential that we get our message of bold, progressive change out across the state. So this is the moment I need you the most. Can you pitch in $5 today to keep my ads on the air and make sure every Minnesotan knows the choice in this race? Thank you.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'flood the airwaves with lies' uses emotionally charged language to characterize opponent spending as deceptive and overwhelming — for example: 'flood the airwaves with lies'
Appeal to Fear: The framing of massive daily spending by named outside groups is designed to create anxiety about being overwhelmed by powerful, well-funded adversaries — for example: '$142,000 a DAY to flood the airwaves with lies'
False Urgency: The phrase 'With voters already casting ballots, it's essential' creates artificial time pressure to prompt immediate action without deliberation — for example: 'With voters already casting ballots, it's essential'
Glittering Generalities: The phrase 'bold, progressive change' uses vague, emotionally positive language that sounds inspiring but carries no specific policy meaning — for example: 'bold, progressive change'
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Emphasizing '$142,000 a DAY' in all caps dramatizes the figure to amplify outrage beyond neutral reporting — for example: $142,000 a DAY
I’ve been working to clean up Washington since day one.
Michele Tafoya refused deportations for criminal illegal aliens. Pro-amnesty Tafoya puts illegals first and America last.
Loaded Language: The phrase 'criminal illegal aliens' uses emotionally charged terminology designed to trigger a negative reaction rather than neutrally describe undocumented immigrants — for example: criminal illegal aliens and illegals first and America last.
Name Calling: The label 'Pro-amnesty' is used as a derogatory political tag to discredit Tafoya rather than engage with her actual position — for example: 'Pro-amnesty Tafoya'
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents a binary framing that one must either put 'illegals first' or 'America first,' leaving no room for nuanced immigration policy positions — for example: 'puts illegals first and America last'
Appeal to Prejudice: The framing of 'America last' invokes in-group/out-group identity, implying Tafoya is betraying 'real Americans' in favor of outsiders — for example: 'puts illegals first and America last'
If you believe in a people-powered campaign, please chip in $20, or whatever you can spare, today so we can organize and win this race together. If you believe in a people-powered campaign, please chip in $20, or whatever you can spare, today so we can organize and win this race together.
Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan. I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I want to get real with you for a minute. The stakes are incredibly high right now, and we need real Democrats and real fighters. This November, we get to decide whose voices are heard in the U.S. Senate: working families or Trump’s billionaire besties. So personally, I think we’re way past the time for status quo politicians. That’s why I’m in this race, and that’s why I need your support. I’ve always been a progressive fighter – and I’m not backing down now. As the only candidate in this race not taking any corporate PAC money, I need your help. Please donate $15, $20, or even $50 to power our fight today. Thank you. Hey, it’s Peggy Flanagan. I’m running for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, and I want to get real with you for a minute. The stakes are incredibly high right now, and we need real Democrats and real fighters. This November, we get to decide whose voices are heard in the U.S. Senate: working families or Trump’s billionaire besties. So personally, I think we’re way past the time for status quo politicians. That’s why I’m in this race, and that’s why I need your support. I’ve always been a progressive fighter – and I’m not backing down now. As the only candidate in this race not taking any corporate PAC money, I need your help. Please donate $15, $20, or even $50 to power our fight today. Thank you.
False Urgency: The phrase 'incredibly high right now' creates artificial time pressure to bypass deliberation — for example: incredibly high right now
Appeal to Prejudice: The phrase 'real Democrats' implies an in-group of authentic members versus inauthentic ones, exploiting identity loyalty — for example: real Democrats
Glittering Generalities: The term 'real fighters' is a vague, emotionally positive label that sounds noble but carries no specific policy meaning — for example: real fighters
Black-and-White Fallacy: The sentence presents only two options for whose voices are heard — working families or billionaires — ignoring the complexity of political representation — for example: working families or Trump's billionaire besties
Name Calling: The phrase 'billionaire besties' is a derogatory, dismissive label used to discredit political opponents rather than engage with their positions — for example: Trump's billionaire besties
Loaded Language: The term 'status quo politicians' is used as a pejorative to emotionally frame incumbents or moderates as obstacles rather than neutral descriptors — for example: status quo politicians
All my life, I’ve been a fighter.
Michele Tafoya and the NRSC are fighting tooth and nail to flip this seat and block us from taking back the majority. To be honest, I’m getting worried. If we lose my race in Minnesota, the odds of gaining a Democratic Senate majority become nearly impossible. We can’t slow down now in this neck-and-neck race for Senate. Please please please: Chip in a few dollars right now to help me win in Minnesota and defeat Trump’s ally MAGA Michele >>
False Urgency: The repeated 'please' and 'right now' create artificial time pressure to prompt immediate donation without deliberation — for example: 'Chip in a few dollars right now'
Repetition: The word 'please' is repeated three times in immediate succession to create emotional pressure and urgency — for example: 'Please please please'
Name Calling: The label 'MAGA Michele' is a derogatory political tag used to discredit the opponent rather than address her policy positions — for example: 'MAGA Michele'
Appeal to Prejudice: Framing the opponent as 'Trump's ally' invokes in-group/out-group identity to trigger partisan loyalty and motivate action against a perceived enemy — for example: "Trump's ally MAGA Michele"
Donald Trump just landed his prized recruit in this race. Her name is Michele Tafoya — but I'm calling her what she is: MAGA Michele. With the GOP's $300 million war chest behind her, she can flip this seat red. Now I'm not going to sugarcoat it: Every day that passes, Tafoya raises more money and Republicans get closer to flipping this seat. We have to keep up the fight — will you chip in $5 or anything you can right now?
Name Calling: The author dismisses Michele Tafoya by attaching a derogatory political label ('MAGA Michele') rather than engaging with her arguments or positions — for example: 'MAGA Michele'
It’s Cheryl and Angie. 👋 Angie’s running in the most competitive race for U.S. Senate in Minnesota history. Can you help her keep this seat blue and flip the Senate? Pitch in $5 or more to help Angie win this toss-up race.
Get notified as this improves — new detection models, the browser extension, and outlet scorecards. Occasional email, no spam.
Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time