Chris Rabb won. Get what Chris Rabb says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Dennis Mahoney (independent) and Chris Rabb (Democrat) are the nominees for Pennsylvania's 3rd congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, Dennis Mahoney's campaign had raised $37,000 (through September 30, 2026) and Chris Rabb's campaign $1.5 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $2.0 million for Chris Rabb and $6,000 against.
Dennis Mahoney (IND), Chris Rabb (DEM).
10 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
No early voting (No early in-person voting; in-person mail ballot at county office once ballots are ready.)Source: pa.gov ↗
By mail
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Tue, Oct 27 (Application must be received by the county.); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (Received by the county election office by 8:00 p.m. on Election Day; postmarks do not count.) (passed)Source: pa.gov ↗Source: pa.gov ↗
Checked October 8, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Dennis Mahoney (IND)
Raised
$37K through 2026-09-30individuals $36K · PACs $0 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $1,001 · cash on hand $2,565
WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC— $617K supporting RabbLargest donors:
DEMOCRACY PAC $6.5M (32%); MOVEMENT VOTER PAC $2.2M (11%); ACCOUNTABLE JUSTICE ACTION FUND $2.0M (10%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Patty Ann Quillin $650K (3%), NOT Employed, NOT Employed; JORDAN/DELANEY FAMILY TRUST $450K (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)AMERICAN PRIORITIES (AP)— $455K supporting RabbLargest donors:
Mohammad Waqas $1.1M (14%), Showcase Commerce Inc., CEO; Omer Hasan $1.0M (13%), Retired; Hussain Mahrouq $925K (12%), MEI Group, CEO; FIG AND OLIVE ACTION $620K (8%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Afaq Ahmed $500K (7%), Self-Employed, InvestorJUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC— $260K supporting RabbLargest donors:
Saikat Chakrabarti $2.0M (34%), NEW Consensus, President; D BAILEY, JAMES $840K (14%); THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST UNDERSTANDING (IMEU) POLICY PROJECT $785K (13%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Allen Liu $650K (11%), NOT Employed, Retired; RASHIDA TLAIB FOR CONGRESS $550K (9%)CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC— $200K supporting RabbLargest donors:
BATTLEGROUND BLUE PAC $300K (11%)FREEDOM PA— $185K supporting RabbLargest donors:
SOLIDARITY VICTORY PAC $485K (63%); MOVEMENT VOTER PAC $160K (21%); AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES $100K (13%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)and 8 more
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01
34 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
A LOVE SUPREME PAC $2,000
A NEW POLICY PAC $5,000
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ FOR CONGRESS $2,000
BLUE MAJORITY PAC $2,000
CITIZENS FOR KRIS VALDERRAMA $250
CLEAN PAC $1,000
CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC $5,000
COURAGE PAC $2,000
COURAGE TO CHANGE $5,000
DEMOCRACY SUMMER LEADERSHIP PAC $2,000
FAIR SHOT PAC $2,000
FRASER FOR 15 $999
FRIENDS OF ELIZABETH FIEDLER $500
FRIENDS OF IZZY $500
INSPIRING LEADERSHIP HAS A NAME PAC $1,000
JANE FONDA CLIMATE PAC $5,000
JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC $10K
JUSTICE LEAGUE PAC $1,000
JVP ACTION PAC $2,922
LATEEFAH FOR CONGRESS $1,485
MEDICARE FOR ALL $5,000
OUR FIGHT OUR FUTURE $1,000
PA COMMUNITY PAC $5,000
PEACE, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND LEADERSHIP POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,500
PHILADELPHIA DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA $950
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in PA; or it ran mostly in PA and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.