Washington House District 4 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them

Amanda McKinney won · 53.9% to 45.9%, with an estimated 92% of the vote counted · Called by AP on Nov 5

John Duresky (Democrat) and Amanda McKinney (Republican) are the nominees for Washington's 4th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, John Duresky's campaign had raised $459,000 (through October 14, 2026) and Amanda McKinney's campaign $1.4 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $2.2 million for Amanda McKinney and $0 against.

John Duresky (DEM), Amanda McKinney (REP). 4 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy. Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.

Also on every Washington ballot: 3 statewide ballot measures → The ballot wording and the official arguments, read for rhetorical techniques.

Got a political text?

Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.

Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.

Money in this race

From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.

John Duresky (DEM)

Raised
$459K through 2026-10-14 individuals $450K · PACs $5,500 · party $2,000 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $897 · cash on hand $84K
Outside spending
none reported
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01
1 PAC gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • BENTON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE $5,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

Amanda McKinney (REP)

Raised
$1.4M through 2026-10-14 individuals $1.0M · PACs $262K · candidate's own money, incl. loans $64K · from the candidate's other committees $81K · cash on hand $217K
Outside spending
$2.2M supporting McKinney · latest reported 2026-10-27
Largest outside spenders
AMERICAN MISSION — $779K supporting McKinney Largest donors: LEADING THE FUTURE $22.5M (99%); LONSDALE ENTERPRISES INC. $250K (1%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) WASHINGTON RISING INC. — $701K supporting McKinney Largest donors: Robert Ramsey $500K (37%), First American Petroleum, Owner; Janie Plath $250K (18%), Retired, Retired; Peter Plath $250K (18%), Retired, Retired DEFEND AMERICAN JOBS — $507K supporting McKinney Largest donors: FAIRSHAKE $37.0M (>99%) (its largest donors: RIPPLE LABS INC. $48.0M, an organization; COINBASE $25.0M, an organization; COINBASE COMMERCE (EXCHANGE) $8.2M, an organization); RIPPLE LABS INC. $250K (1%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) AMERICAN LIBERTY FOUNDATION — $54K supporting McKinney Largest donors: AMERICAN LIBERTY ACTION FUND $355K (26%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); VOICE OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL $250K (18%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); THE GEO GROUP, INC. PAC $250K (18%); THE 2026 VICTORY COMMITTEE $148K (11%) (its largest donors: ANDREWS, GEORGE $409K); Phillip Frost $100K (7%), Opko Health INC, CEO CONSERVATIVES FOR AMERICAN EXCELLENCE INC. — $49K supporting McKinney Largest donors: CONSERVATIVE AMERICANS PAC $8.3M (49%); Kenneth Griffin $3.0M (18%), Citadel, Founder & CEO; Paul Singer $1.9M (11%), Elliott Investment Management, CO-CEO & President; FRIENDS OF JOE GRUTERS $1.2M (7%); ARDLEIGH IMPACT CORP. $750K (4%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) and 4 more
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01
27 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
  • AMERICA'S FIRST PAC $2,500
  • AMERICAN REVIVAL PAC $10K
  • ATI INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ATI-PAC) $2,000
  • BIG IDEAS CREATE EXCELLENCE PAC $2,000
  • BRANDON GILL FOR TEXAS $1,000
  • BUCKEYE LIBERTY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10K
  • CUT THE BULL PAC $2,000
  • ELECTING MAJORITY MAKING EFFECTIVE REPUBLICANS PAC $10K
  • ELECTING REPUBLICANS INDIANA PAC $1,500
  • EMMER FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • FIGHT ON PAC $2,500
  • INNOVATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • JESSICA STEINMANN FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • JIM JORDAN FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • JOE MITCHELL FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • KOCH, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (KOCHPAC) $5,000
  • LAND OF OPPORTUNITY PAC $2,500
  • MR. SOUTHERN MISSOURIAN IN THE HOUSE PAC $5,000
  • MVL PAC $1,000
  • RAPTOR PAC $5,000
  • RVFPAC $4,000
  • SCALISE FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • VALUE IN ELECTING WOMEN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10K
  • VICTORY AND FREEDOM PAC (VAF PAC) $2,500
  • WFW ACTION FUND INC $5,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

No campaign ads analyzed for this race yet.

What this page is

  • An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in WA; or it ran mostly in WA and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
  • Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
  • A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
  • Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
  • Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
  • Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.

Try Pro free for 14 days, no card. Claim checks on every article, and an email when the stories you follow change.