Michael Alfonso won. Get what Michael Alfonso says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Michael Alfonso (Republican) and Fred Clark (Democrat) are the nominees for Wisconsin's 7th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, Michael Alfonso's campaign had raised $1.8 million (through October 14, 2026) and Fred Clark's campaign $864,000 (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $3.3 million for Michael Alfonso and $207,000 against.
Michael Alfonso (REP), Fred Clark (DEM).
7 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 0 ads analyzed, 0 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing.
Also on every Wisconsin ballot: 3 statewide ballot measures →The ballot wording and the official arguments, read for rhetorical techniques.
How to vote in Wisconsin
From Wisconsin's official election office. Each line links to the official page it came from.
Registration
Register by Wed, Oct 14 (Online/mail: 20 days before. In person at clerk until Friday before (Oct 30), or at polls on Election Day). Same-day registration: Proof of residence required (passed)Source: elections.wi.gov ↗
Early voting in person
Varies by county; check your county’s schedule (In-person absentee; each municipal clerk sets its schedule, starting up to 14 days before the election)Source: elections.wi.gov ↗
By mail
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Thu, Oct 29 (Received by municipal clerk by 5 p.m. on the 5th day before the election (online or mail)); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (Received by 8 p.m. on Election Day; postmarks do not count) (passed)Source: elections.wi.gov ↗Source: elections.wi.gov ↗
Checked October 8, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Michael Alfonso (REP)
Raised
$1.8M through 2026-10-14individuals $1.3M · PACs $414K · from the candidate's other committees $83K · cash on hand $427K
Outside spending
$207K opposing Alfonso · $3.3M supporting Alfonso· latest reported 2026-10-22
Largest outside spenders
NORTHWOODS FUTURE PAC— $3.2M supporting AlfonsoLargest donors:
DUFFY FOR WISCONSIN $1.5M (48%); Richard Uihlein $1.0M (32%), Uline, CEO & Owner; AMERICA FUND $250K (8%); Michael E Olshan $125K (4%), O-Corp Investments, Investor; FAIRWOOD PENINSULA ENERGY CORP $125K (4%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)AMERICAN FUTURE FUND POLITICAL ACTION— $207K opposing AlfonsoLargest donors:
AMERICAN FUTURE FUND $500K (100%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)AMERICANS 4 SECURITY PAC— $78K supporting AlfonsoLargest donors:
AMERICANS 4 SECURITY INC $2.5M (71%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Paul B Hofer III $150K (4%), Retired, Retired; HERMEUS CORP $100K (3%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Alexander Caedmon Karp $100K (3%), Palantir, CEO; Steven Mendell $100K (3%), HEI Hotels, OwnerTHANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER PAC— $30K supporting AlfonsoLargest donors:
Stephen A Wynn $500K (28%), Valmore GP, Executive; John Wade $350K (19%), AES Restaurant Group LLC, CEO; Roger S Penske $250K (14%), Penske Corporation, Chairman; Craig Duchossois $250K (14%), Retired, Retired; OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM $200K (11%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)MAHA PAC— $16K supporting AlfonsoLargest donors:
BOTANIC TONICS LLC $1.0M (34%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); MAHA ACTION, INC. $750K (26%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Wenceslao Casares $250K (9%), Xapo Bank, Chairman & Founder; VENNI CAPITAL LLC $100K (3%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); OPS INTERNATIONAL $100K (3%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)and 3 more
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in WI; or it ran mostly in WI and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.