9 dead, including gunman, 2 children, after shooting in Erie, Pennsylvania

2 of 2 checks found something

Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check

Wording
7%1 of 15 paragraphs uses a rhetorical technique

In the writer’s own words.

Tap a technique to see where it’s used.

What these techniques mean
False Urgency · in 1 paragraph Pressing for a reaction now, as if there were no time to think.Show the first one ↓
Glittering Generalities · in 1 paragraph Vague, approving words with no specific claim behind them.Show the first one ↓
SourcesOne-sided: 6 attributed statements

Government 6

  • city officials · Government
  • city statement · Government
  • Erie Police Chief Rick Lorah · Government
  • investigators · Government
  • Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro · Government
  • Erie Mayor Daria Devlin · Government

This article's sourcing is heavily weighted toward local and state government officials (6 of 6 attributed statements). All sources are from US law enforcement or government entities. The article lacks independent voices such as community members, witnesses, family representatives, mental health experts, or independent analysts that could provide alternative perspectives or context to the incident.

The passages the findings rest on

underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words dashed edge: in a quote, not counted tap a technique for why

3 paragraphs with no finding

Paragraph 4 of 15

“Download the Straight Arrow app today” … “stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda”

The article’s own words
False Urgency · “Download the Straight Arrow app today”Why › The word 'today' adds mild time pressure to download the app, though it is a standard call to action.
Glittering Generalities · “stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda”Why › Vague, positive-sounding claims of being 'free from manipulation, bias or agenda' and offering 'stories that matter' carry no verifiable substance.

11 paragraphs with no finding

Only the words each finding rests on are shown here. Read the original ↗ · Open the full analysis →

Analyzed 2026-10-11 04:09 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.

Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →

Get notified as this improves — new detection models, the browser extension, and new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time