Trump’s Crackpot Media Ban Takes Wild New Turn
1 of 2 checks found something
Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check
Plus 1 paragraph where people quoted use charged words. Shown, not counted.
SourcesOne-sided: 2 attributed statements
- The New York Times · Organizations and media
- Emily Covington, Justice Department spokesperson · Government
The article's sourcing is heavily weighted toward US government and mainstream media reporting. Only one government official statement is directly quoted (DOJ spokesperson). The article relies primarily on The New York Times reporting and anonymous sources ('six people with knowledge of the situation'). No perspectives from the investigated networks, legal analysts, or independent voices are included in these attributed statements.
The passages the findings rest on
underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words dashed edge: in a quote, not counted tap a technique for why
4 paragraphs with no finding
“as a result of their constant ‘reporting’ FAKE NEWS!”
Loaded Language · “as a result of their constant ‘reporting’ FAKE NEWS!”Why ›
The all-caps charged label 'FAKE NEWS' and the sarcastic scare quotes around 'reporting' are used to provoke hostility toward the outlets instead of citing specific inaccuracies.15 paragraphs with no finding
Only the words each finding rests on are shown here. Read the original ↗ · Open the full analysis →
Analyzed 2026-10-11 04:07 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →