Brazilians head to the polls on Sunday to elect their next president

The article, with notes

underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words dashed edge: in a quote, not counted tap a technique for why

3 paragraphs with no finding

Paragraph 4 of 28

“There won't be a Europe left”

↓
Trump’s words · not counted
Appeal to Fear · “There won't be a Europe left”Why › Warns of the total disappearance of Europe unless immigration policy changes, invoking a dire threat to push a specific policy response.
Paragraph 5 of 28↓
The article’s own words
Loaded LanguageWhy › Emotionally charged words chosen to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts.
Name CallingWhy › Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments.

10 paragraphs with no finding

Paragraph 16 of 28

“Clean as a newborn baby’s a\”

↓
Trump’s words · not counted
Exaggeration/Hyperbole · “Clean as a newborn baby’s a\”Why › Describing the pardoned truckers as 'clean as a newborn baby' is an extreme overstatement of their blamelessness

11 paragraphs with no finding

Paragraph 28 of 28

“There are only a few hours left before we shape the future of our nation for the next 30 or 40 years.”

↑
Bolsonaro’s words · not counted
False Urgency · “There are only a few hours left before we shape the future of our nation for the next 30 or 40 years.”Why › It stresses that only hours remain before a decision with decades-long consequences, pressuring voters to act without deliberation.

Only the words each finding rests on are shown here. Read the original ↗ · Open the full analysis →

Analyzed 2026-10-25 04:16 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.

Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →

Sign up free with just an email: a daily digest of the outlets you read, and 14 days of Pro.