.@ASGWoodward to @FoxNews on the Justice Department's lawsuits against states with illegal policies designed to thwart…
.@ASGWoodward to @FoxNews on the Justice Department's lawsuits against states with illegal policies designed to thwart federal law enforcement: "You cannot have states regulating how federal law enforcement conducts immigration enforcement. That makes zero sense. It's in the Constitution itself that the Supremacy Clause shall allow federal law enforcement to do their jobs."
Posted on X 2026-10-13 by @TheJusticeDept · View on X →
The video says (transcribed automatically):
We also cannot have states regulating how federal law enforcement conducts immigration enforcement. That makes zero sense. It has long been, in fact, it's in the Constitution itself, that the Supremacy Clause shall allow federal law enforcement to do their jobs. And so in any state where there's either a mask ban or where sheriffs are told they cannot work cooperatively with federal law enforcement, or in addition, where states are refusing to issue license plates to federal vehicles, you will find... If you're refusing to issue license plates to federal vehicles, you will find the Department of Justice bringing affirmative lawsuits against those states to establish that the federal law is supreme and the law of the land. Yes.
What the model flagged
Analyzed 2026-10-13 14:30 UTC.
Findings may include language that is quoted rather than the speaker's own, and the model over-reads ceremonial language (tributes, anniversaries) as persuasion. Check each finding against the original.
No techniques were flagged.
Full analysis, paragraph by paragraph
The complete text as analyzed. Highlighted paragraphs are where the model found a technique.
.@ASGWoodward to @FoxNews on the Justice Department's lawsuits against states with illegal policies designed to thwart federal law enforcement: "You cannot have states regulating how federal law enforcement conducts immigration enforcement. That makes zero sense. It's in the Constitution itself that the Supremacy Clause shall allow federal law enforcement to do their jobs."
We also cannot have states regulating how federal law enforcement conducts immigration enforcement. That makes zero sense. It has long been, in fact, it's in the Constitution itself, that the Supremacy Clause shall allow federal law enforcement to do their jobs. And so in any state where there's either a mask ban or where sheriffs are told they cannot work cooperatively with federal law enforcement, or in addition, where states are refusing to issue license plates to federal vehicles, you will find... If you're refusing to issue license plates to federal vehicles, you will find the Department of Justice bringing affirmative lawsuits against those states to establish that the federal law is supreme and the law of the land. Yes.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — finding one is not a claim that the statement is false. How items are chosen →