Florida House District 22 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them

Pia Dandiya won · 51.9% to 48.1% · Called by AP on Nov 3

38 ads analyzed · 18 use a rhetorical technique, most often loaded language and glittering generalities.

The words doing the persuading

Paid for by Pia Dandiya for Congress “Politicians in Washington are weakening the programs that give millions of Americans a fighting chance. You paid into Social Security and Medicare your whole working life. It's a promise. Pia…” Loaded Language See this ad →

See all 38 ads →

Casey Askar (Republican) and Pia Dandiya (Democrat) are the nominees for Florida's 22nd congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, Casey Askar's campaign had raised $7.4 million (through October 14, 2026) and Pia Dandiya's campaign $4.6 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $750,000 for Casey Askar and $775,000 against; $1.3 million for Pia Dandiya and $10.0 million against. Semblen has analyzed 38 ads in this race; 18 used at least one rhetorical technique, most often loaded language and glittering generalities.

Casey Askar (REP), Pia Dandiya (DEM). 11 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 38 ads analyzed, 18 with at least one technique in the copy. Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing. Updated 2026-10-29.

Also on every Florida ballot: 3 statewide ballot measures → The ballot wording and the official arguments, read for rhetorical techniques.

How to vote in Florida

From Florida's official election office. Each line links to the official page it came from.

Registration Register by Mon, Oct 5 (29 days before the election) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
Early voting in person Sat, Oct 24 to Sat, Oct 31 (Mandatory start date (10th day before). Counties may start as early as Oct 19 (15th day before).) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
By mail Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Thu, Oct 22 (5 pm on the 12th day before the election. This is the deadline for a ballot to be mailed.); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (Received by 7 pm local time on Election Day; the postmark does not count) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
Election Day Tue, Nov 3. Polls: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. local time (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
ID at the polls Current, valid photo ID with signatureSource: dos.fl.gov ↗

Checked October 6, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.

Something wrong or out of date? Tell us

A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.

Got a political text?

Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.

Findings

As of 2026-10-29. Counts are of distinct ads; the same text run many times is one ad.

Ads analyzed
38 · started running between 2026-07-22 and 2026-10-26
With at least one technique
18 of 38 (47%)
Most common techniques
Loaded Language · 11 adsGlittering Generalities · 10 adsBandwagon Appeal · 2 ads
Reported Meta spend
$60,400–89,269 on all ads, $52,800–76,315 on flagged ads · Meta reports ranges; these are the sums of their ends
Example
“weakening the programs that give millions of Americans a fighting chance” — Loaded Language, paid for by Pia Dandiya for Congress · the flagged ad with the highest reported spend that shows the most common technique

Reading coverage of this race? Paste the link to see what it uses →

Embed this race on your site

A small box with these findings and the newest ads, updated as new ads are analyzed. Free for newsrooms, blogs and campaigns alike; it links back here.

Who is running these ads

By sponsor (9)
Paid for byAdsWith at least one techniqueMost common
Pia Dandiya for Congress1912 of 19 (63%)Glittering Generalities (8), Loaded Language (6), Bandwagon Appeal (2)
The Fair Cost Project91 of 9Loaded Language (1)
MomsRising Together31 of 3Exaggeration/Hyperbole (1), Glittering Generalities (1), Loaded Language (1)
CARBONARA FOR CONGRESS22 of 2Loaded Language (2), Name Calling (2), Glittering Generalities (1)
CASEY FOR CONGRESS10 of 1
CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND11 of 1Loaded Language (1)
GRAND OPPORTUNITY USA10 of 1
LCV VICTORY FUND10 of 1
RICK FOR ILLINOIS INC11 of 1Conspiracy Appeal (1)

Decide what counts

Not everyone would call every technique a problem. Untick the ones you'd call ordinary persuasion and the count updates.

47% of the 38 ads here use at least one of the techniques ticked below (18 ads).

Leaving out the softer ones (loaded language, glittering generalities, slogans, exaggeration, repetition): 21% of ads.

Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.

Money in this race

From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.

Casey Askar (REP)

Raised
$7.4M through 2026-10-14 individuals $384K · PACs $120K · candidate's own money, incl. loans $6.7M · from the candidate's other committees $225K · cash on hand $1.9M
Outside spending
$775K opposing Askar · $750K supporting Askar · latest reported 2026-10-29
Largest outside spenders
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION — $705K opposing Askar Largest donors: Jeff Yass $16.5M (34%), SIG, Managing Director; RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC $15.0M (30%); MARSHA FOR SENATE $4.8M (10%); RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC $2.5M (5%); RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC $2.5M (5%) (its largest donors: Richard E Uihlein $57.7M, Uline; RESTORATION OF AMERICA $1.7M, an organization; AMERICAN LEADERSHIP PAC $1.0M) CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC. — $403K supporting Askar NO GOING BACK PAC INC. — $332K supporting Askar RISING TIDE COLLECTIVE — $54K opposing Askar BUILDING TOGETHER — $17K opposing Askar and 2 more
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01

All filings at the FEC ↗

Pia Dandiya (DEM)

Raised
$4.6M through 2026-10-14 individuals $3.6M · PACs $340K · party $5,656 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $247K · from the candidate's other committees $425K · cash on hand $735K
Outside spending
$10.0M opposing Dandiya · $1.3M supporting Dandiya · latest reported 2026-10-31
Largest outside spenders
NO GOING BACK PAC INC. — $9.5M opposing Dandiya PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT — $396K supporting Dandiya Largest donors: STOP REPUBLICANS $6.1M (22%) (its largest donors: FAHEY, EILEEN $2.7M; PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $2.5M); LAWALL, JOY $6.0M (22%); PROGRESSIVE TAKEOVER $3.5M (13%) (its largest donors: EVEY, JULIE $1.4M); STOP THESE OPPRESSIVE PEOPLE: TYRANTS RACISTS UNQUALIFIEDS MISOGYNISTS PROPAGANDISTS (STOP TRUMP) $3.0M (11%) (its largest donors: JOHNSTON, ERIC $1.3M); DEM TURNOUT 2024 $2.1M (8%) (its largest donors: KITCHEN, CAROL $1.2M) STRONGER AMERICA TOGETHER — $307K opposing Dandiya VPP — $222K supporting Dandiya Largest donors: PAVE THE WAY, INC. $500K (41%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); PROCTOR, LINDA $487K (40%) FLORIDIANS FOR AFFORDABILITY, INC. — $219K supporting Dandiya and 14 more
Bundled through PACs
$3,500 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01 VOTE MAMA — $3,500 from 1 gift
24 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS PLASTYPAC $500
  • ASPIRE PAC $5,000
  • AT THE TABLE! $1,000
  • DEMOCRACY MOBILIZATION PROJECT PAC (DMP) $500
  • DEMOCRATS FOR EDUCATION REFORM $3,000
  • ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN $5,000
  • EMILYS LIST $5,000
  • FAIR SHOT PAC $10K
  • FRIENDS OF CHERI BUSTOS $1,000
  • HARVEST PAC $2,500
  • KATHERINE CLARK FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • LEE PAC $1,000
  • NEW DEMOCRACY FUND $3,500
  • NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION ACTION FUND $5,000
  • PATRIOT PAC $2,500
  • RAJA PAC REVIVING AMERICAN JOBS AGAIN $2,001
  • SCHNEIDER FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • SD PAC $10K
  • SERVE AMERICA PAC $1,000
  • SILICORN VALLEY PAC $1,000
  • SQUARE ONE POLITICS $1,000
  • THE IMPACT FUND $2,500
  • TOKUDA FOR HAWAII $2,000
  • VOTE MAMA $1,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

The ads

38 ads, newest first.

Paid for by Pia Dandiya for Congressfrom 2026-10-262 variantsspend $700–89862,000–72,998 impressions
It doesn’t matter if you’re a Republican or a Democrat. You’re getting crushed at the grocery store, gas station, and doctor’s office. I’ve brought people together to deliver results before, and I"ll do it again — to lower costs, protect Social Security and Medicare, and ban Congress from trading stocks.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by GRAND OPPORTUNITY USAfrom 2026-10-25spend $0–99100–999 impressions
Casey Askar or Pia Dandiya? See how each record scores on the issues, side by side. Then take the free 2-minute OppScore Challenge: answer 12 quick questions and find out which candidate in Florida's 22nd District actually matches you. Don't vote without taking the FREE OppScore Challenge.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by LCV VICTORY FUNDfrom 2026-10-166 variantsspend $5,800–7,194306,100–352,994 impressions
Florida has the highest home insurance in the country. Republicans gave insurance companies a $2 billion bailout and our bills barely moved.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUNDfrom 2026-10-146 variantsspend $2,700–3,694183,000–214,994 impressions
Why is Pia Dandiya smiling? Well, she’s worth millions. Cashed in big as a corporate lobbyist. But when Seniors got a break – a new $6,000 tax deduction – Pia Dandiya said NO WAY. Maybe $6,000 doesn’t matter to Pia Dandiya. But $6,000 means a lot to Florida Seniors.
Loaded Language50.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: 'Cashed in big' and 'corporate lobbyist' are charged phrases that imply profiteering and discredit her rather than state specific facts.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MomsRising Togetherfrom 2026-10-142 variantsspend $300–49820,000–29,998 impressions
Republican leaders in Congress made massive health care cuts. Now, half of Americans can't afford health care. Moms are fighting back for our families by voting for Democrat Pia Dandiya to make care affordable for all. PAID FOR BY MOMSRISING TOGETHER, MOMSPOWERELECTIONS.ORG, NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE’S COMMITTEE.

Loaded Language: The word 'massive' is used to emphasise the cuts emotionally rather than give specifics.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: The claim that half of Americans cannot afford health care is a sweeping overstatement presented without evidence and linked causally to the cuts. Flagged: “half of Americans can't afford health care”.

Glittering Generalities: Vague, emotionally positive framing of 'moms fighting back for our families' and 'care affordable for all' carries no specific policy content. Flagged: “Moms are fighting back for our families”.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MomsRising Togetherfrom 2026-10-14spend $0–992,000–2,999 impressions
As a mom, I know how hard it is to make ends meet when health care and childcare costs keep rising. But Republicans in Congress have slashed health care, and now half of Americans can't afford health insurance. Families deserve affordable care without the constant financial stress. That’s why I’m voting for Democrats like Pia Dandiya who are fighting for families like mine. PAID FOR BY MOMSRISING TOGETHER, MOMSPOWERELECTIONS.ORG, NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE’S COMMITTEE.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by MomsRising Togetherfrom 2026-10-14spend $0–999,000–9,999 impressions
As a mom, I know how hard it is to make ends meet when health care and childcare costs keep rising. Families deserve affordable care. But Republicans slashed care, and now half of Americans can't afford health insurance. That’s why I’m voting for Democrats like Pia Dandiya who will fight to make health care and childcare affordable for all. Join me! PAID FOR BY MOMSRISING TOGETHER, MOMSPOWERELECTIONS.ORG, NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE’S COMMITTEE.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Pia Dandiya for Congressfrom 2026-10-074 variantsspend $0–3963,200–6,996 impressions
Every family I talk to tells me the same thing: life in Florida just keeps getting more expensive. Washington has spent too long fighting instead of fixing it. I'm running to lower costs for everyone, from your insurance bill to your pharmacy counter.
Bandwagon Appeal100.0% of sentences flagged

Bandwagon Appeal: Claims that every family says the same thing to imply universal agreement and make the view seem self-evidently correct. Flagged: “Every family I talk to tells me the same thing”.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Pia Dandiya for Congressfrom 2026-10-074 variantsspend $200–59624,100–31,996 impressions
Floridians are dealing with real challenges like high insurance bills, rising rent and grocery prices that keep climbing. Washington is focused on partisan fighting. I'm running for Congress to cut through the noise and get things done in Florida for families and kids.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Pia Dandiya for Congressfrom 2026-10-074 variantsspend $100–4965,300–8,996 impressions
Too many Floridians are being priced out of the state they call home. I'll fight to bring down the cost of housing, property insurance, and prescription drugs. Florida should be a place where everyone can afford to live, work, and retire.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

What this page is

  • An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in FL; or it ran mostly in FL and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
  • Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
  • A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
  • Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
  • Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
  • Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.

Try Pro free for 14 days, no card. Claim checks on every article, and an email when the stories you follow change.