Florida House District 25 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them

Jared Moskowitz won · 51.3% to 46.6% · Called by AP on Nov 3

89 ads analyzed · 64 use a rhetorical technique, most often loaded language and glittering generalities.

The words doing the persuading

Paid for by OLIVER FOR CONGRESS “…Elon Musk's DOGE Caucus. He has SuperPAC and AIPAC money behind him. He's backed by the people he sold us out to, and we need every dollar we can get right now, because every door knocked this week…” Loaded Language See this ad →

See all 89 ads →

Peter Jassenoff (Libertarian), Jared Moskowitz (Democrat) and Scott Singer (Republican) are the nominees for Florida's 25th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. Jared Moskowitz is the incumbent. By their latest FEC reports, Peter Jassenoff's campaign had raised $10,000 (through June 30, 2026), Jared Moskowitz's campaign $5.7 million (through October 14, 2026) and Scott Singer's campaign $3.3 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $74,000 for Peter Jassenoff and $0 against; $2.4 million for Jared Moskowitz and $13.5 million against; $1.7 million for Scott Singer and $17.4 million against. Semblen has analyzed 89 ads in this race; 64 used at least one rhetorical technique, most often loaded language and glittering generalities.

Peter Jassenoff (LIB), Jared Moskowitz (DEM, incumbent), Scott Singer (REP). 6 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 89 ads analyzed, 64 with at least one technique in the copy. Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing. Updated 2026-10-27. 6 ads from other advertisers shown separately below.

Also on every Florida ballot: 3 statewide ballot measures → The ballot wording and the official arguments, read for rhetorical techniques.

How to vote in Florida

From Florida's official election office. Each line links to the official page it came from.

Registration Register by Mon, Oct 5 (29 days before the election) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
Early voting in person Sat, Oct 24 to Sat, Oct 31 (Mandatory start date (10th day before). Counties may start as early as Oct 19 (15th day before).) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
By mail Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Thu, Oct 22 (5 pm on the 12th day before the election. This is the deadline for a ballot to be mailed.); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (Received by 7 pm local time on Election Day; the postmark does not count) (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
Election Day Tue, Nov 3. Polls: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. local time (passed)Source: dos.fl.gov ↗
ID at the polls Current, valid photo ID with signatureSource: dos.fl.gov ↗

Checked October 6, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.

Something wrong or out of date? Tell us

A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.

Got a political text?

Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.

Findings

As of 2026-10-27. Counts are of distinct ads; the same text run many times is one ad.

Ads analyzed
89 · started running between 2026-08-06 and 2026-10-24
With at least one technique
64 of 89 (72%)
Most common techniques
Loaded Language · 40 adsGlittering Generalities · 30 adsName Calling · 27 ads
Reported Meta spend
$127,400–177,883 on all ads, $99,500–138,750 on flagged ads · Meta reports ranges; these are the sums of their ends
Example
“the people he sold us out to” — Loaded Language, paid for by OLIVER FOR CONGRESS · the flagged ad with the highest reported spend that shows the most common technique

Reading coverage of this race? Paste the link to see what it uses →

Embed this race on your site

A small box with these findings and the newest ads, updated as new ads are analyzed. Free for newsrooms, blogs and campaigns alike; it links back here.

Who is running these ads

By sponsor (10)
Paid for byAdsWith at least one techniqueMost common
OLIVER FOR CONGRESS3230 of 32 (94%)Loaded Language (23), False Urgency (19), Name Calling (17)
Jared Moskowitz for Congress2922 of 29 (76%)Glittering Generalities (17), Loaded Language (9), Black-and-White Fallacy (6)
The Fair Cost Project100 of 10 (0%)
America PAC77 of 7Appeal to Fear (6), Name Calling (6), Loaded Language (5)
Scott Singer for Congress41 of 4Bandwagon Appeal (1), Glittering Generalities (1)
ActJew21 of 2Appeal to Fear (1), Appeal to Prejudice (1), False Urgency (1)
Think Big21 of 2Glittering Generalities (1)
American Action Network11 of 1Exaggeration/Hyperbole (1), Loaded Language (1)
CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND11 of 1Loaded Language (1), Name Calling (1)
Free Enterprise Alliance10 of 1

Decide what counts

Not everyone would call every technique a problem. Untick the ones you'd call ordinary persuasion and the count updates.

72% of the 89 ads here use at least one of the techniques ticked below (64 ads).

Leaving out the softer ones (loaded language, glittering generalities, slogans, exaggeration, repetition): 58% of ads.

The words doing the work

The words that show up most in phrases our model flagged as loaded language or name calling in this race's ads, by number of ads.

  • democrat in 11 ads · e.g. “one of the most right-wing Democrats in Congress”, “DeSantis Democrat”
  • sold in 11 ads · e.g. “the people he sold us out to”, “He's sold us out”
  • people in 8 ads · e.g. “the people he sold us out to”, “He's betrayed the people again and again”
  • desantis democrat in 5 ads · e.g. “DeSantis Democrat”, “self-proclaimed "DeSantis Democrat”
  • establishment in 5 ads · e.g. “beat the establishment”, “the establishment”
  • MAGA in 5 ads · e.g. “vote with MAGA”, “MAGA Republicans”
  • drown in 4 ads · e.g. “drown us out with SuperPAC cash”, “drown us out”
  • money in 4 ads · e.g. “stop wasting our money”, “SuperPACs and dark money back him”

Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.

Money in this race

From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.

Peter Jassenoff (LIB)

Raised
$10K through 2026-06-30 individuals $10K · PACs $0 · cash on hand $60
Outside spending
$74K supporting Jassenoff · latest reported 2026-11-03
Largest outside spenders
OUR HERITAGE MATTERS — $74K supporting Jassenoff
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01

All filings at the FEC ↗

Jared Moskowitz (DEM, incumbent)

Raised
$5.7M through 2026-10-14 individuals $4.2M · PACs $945K · from the candidate's other committees $594K · cash on hand $1.2M
Outside spending
$13.5M opposing Moskowitz · $2.4M supporting Moskowitz · latest reported 2026-10-29
Largest outside spenders
NO GOING BACK PAC INC. — $13.2M opposing Moskowitz LCV VICTORY FUND — $816K supporting Moskowitz Largest donors: LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS, INC. $18.0M (81%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Amos Hostetter $600K (3%), Pilot House Associates LLC, Chairman; DEMOCRACY PAC $500K (2%); Giovanna Randall $375K (2%), Randall Apparel, Designer; Eric Laufer $375K (2%), Laufer Wind Group, Film Producer PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT — $461K supporting Moskowitz Largest donors: STOP REPUBLICANS $6.1M (22%) (its largest donors: FAHEY, EILEEN $2.7M; PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $2.5M); LAWALL, JOY $6.0M (22%); PROGRESSIVE TAKEOVER $3.5M (13%) (its largest donors: EVEY, JULIE $1.4M); STOP THESE OPPRESSIVE PEOPLE: TYRANTS RACISTS UNQUALIFIEDS MISOGYNISTS PROPAGANDISTS (STOP TRUMP) $3.0M (11%) (its largest donors: JOHNSTON, ERIC $1.3M); DEM TURNOUT 2024 $2.1M (8%) (its largest donors: KITCHEN, CAROL $1.2M) HMP — $340K supporting Moskowitz Largest donors: HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD $93.7M (39%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Reid G Hoffman $8.5M (4%), Greylock Partners, Partner; ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FUND $5.0M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Fred Eychaner $5.0M (2%), Retired; UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ISSUES FUND $4.8M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) THINK BIG — $322K supporting Moskowitz · 2 ads on this pageLargest donors: LEADING THE FUTURE $22.5M (98%); Ronald Conway $500K (2%), SV Angel, Founder and 12 more
Bundled through PACs
$652K through 2 PACs · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01 AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE — $648K from 492 gifts Lobbyist/registrant PAC SPIKE PAC — $4,500 from 2 gifts
171 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • ACADEMY OF RAIL LABOR ATTORNEYS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • AECOM PAC $2,000
  • AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
  • ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • ALTRIA GROUP, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ALTRIAPAC) $4,000
  • AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY PAC $1,000
  • AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE $2,500
  • AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (AMAZON PAC) $1,000
  • AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS $1,000
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (SKINPAC) $3,000
  • AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAPAC) $1,000
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC) $7,500
  • AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC) $5,000
  • AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY PAC $5,000
  • AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E $10K
  • AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION PAC $2,000
  • AMERICAN GAMING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC $1,000
  • AMERICAN HOTEL AND LODGING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE ('HOTELPAC') $2,500
  • AMERICAN INNOVATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AMI PAC) $1,500
  • AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • AMERICAN MOSAIC PAC $1,000
  • AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,000
  • AMERICAN PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (INSURING AMERICA PAC) $1,000
  • AMERICAN SPORTFISHING ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • AMERICAN SUGAR CANE LEAGUE OF USA INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,000
  • AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • AMERICANS FOR RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION LTD. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ARI PAC) $2,500
  • AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $10K
  • ARENTFOX SCHIFF CIVIC PARTICIPATION FUND (AFSPAC) $1,000
  • AT&T INC. EMPLOYEE FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AT&T EMPLOYEE FEDERAL PAC) $4,000
  • AXON ENTERPRISE INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • BACARDI USA INC. PAC $2,000
  • BGR PAC $1,500
  • BLUE MOMENTUM PAC $2,000
  • BRIDGE THE GAP PAC $5,000
  • CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP UNITED FOR VICTORY PAC $10K
  • CAREER EDUCATION COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $500
  • CENTENE CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CENTENE PAC) $2,000
  • COMCAST CORPORATION & NBCUNIVERSAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE - FEDERAL $2,500
  • CONCORDE CAREER COLLEGES AND UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC. PAC $1,000
  • CONQUERING CANCER PAC $1,000
  • COVINGTON AND BURLING LLP PAC $1,000
  • COZEN O'CONNOR POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
  • CSX CORPORATION GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND $1,000
  • CVS HEALTH PAC $1,000
  • DCCC $1,392
  • DEMOCRACY ACTION NOW PAC $1,500
  • DEMOCRACY SUMMER LEADERSHIP PAC $4,500
  • DEMOCRATS WIN SEATS (DWS PAC) $6,000
  • DMFI PAC $2,500
  • DUKE ENERGY CORP PAC $5,000
  • ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ELEVANCE HEALTH PAC) $7,500
  • EMPLOYEES OF RTX CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,000
  • ENGINEERS POLITICAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE (EPEC)/INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS $2,500
  • ENTERGY CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ENPAC) $1,000
  • ERIC LYNN FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • FAIR SHOT PAC $10K
  • FLORIDA EAST COAST INDUSTRIES, LLC GOOD GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE $3,500
  • FLORIDA SUGAR CANE LEAGUE PAC $1,000
  • FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, INC. FEDERAL PAC $3,000
  • FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
  • FUTURE FORUM PAC $3,000
  • GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GM PAC) $2,000
  • GOOGLE LLC NETPAC $3,000
  • GRAYROBINSON P.A. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • GRIDIRON-PAC $2,500
  • GUIDEWELL MUTUAL HOLDING CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GUIDEWELL PAC) $10K
  • HCA HEALTHCARE, INC. GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND $2,500
  • HMS SCRAP PAC $5,000
  • HOGAN LOVELLS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • HOLLAND & KNIGHT COMMITTEE FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT $1,000
  • HOPE PAC $3,000
  • HOULAPAC $1,000
  • HUMANA INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $6,000
  • INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • INFIN, A FINANCIAL SERVICES ALLIANCE, INC. PAC ('INFIN PAC') $5,000
  • INNOVATION FOR GOOD PAC $10K
  • INT'L UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS $2,500
  • INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC $3,500
  • INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUE $6,500
  • INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (INTA PAC) $2,000
  • JEFFRIES FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • JERSEY VALUES PAC $5,000
  • JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION CREWMEMBER GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND $2,000
  • JM FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC PAC $6,500
  • JOBS, EDUCATION, & FAMILIES FIRST JEFF PAC $10K
  • JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. PAC $2,500
  • JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS $2,500
  • JULIA BROWNLEY FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • JUSTICE LEAGUE PAC $2,000
  • KATHERINE CLARK FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • LA BAMBA PAC $2,500
  • LIFTOFF PAC $2,000
  • LOBO PAC $1,000
  • LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION EMPLOYEES' POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • LORI TRAHAN FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $1,000
  • MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS $5,000
  • MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY GROWERS PAC $1,500
  • MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE SUGAR PAC $1,000
  • MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC. PAC $3,000
  • NANCY PELOSI FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • NATIONAL ACTIVE AND RETIRED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COM (NARFE-PAC) $1,000
  • NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSC PAC $8,500
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NABPAC) $1,000
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS NALC COMMITTEE ON LETTER CARRIERS COPE $2,500
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $3,000
  • NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION NBWA PAC $5,000
  • NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION RETAILPAC $1,000
  • NATIONAL RURAL LETTER CARRIERS' ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,500
  • NATIONAL STONE, SAND & GRAVEL ASSOCIATION ROCKPAC $2,500
  • NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NCTAPAC) $1,000
  • NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATION $4,000
  • NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION ACTION FUND $7,500
  • NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $6,000
  • NIKE INC FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NIKE FEDERAL PAC) $8,500
  • NO LABELS PAC $10K
  • ORACLE AMERICA, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ORACLE PAC) $1,000
  • PAC FOR GOOD $3,500
  • PAC OF APPLES $2,000
  • PAC TO THE FUTURE $10K
  • PAKISTANI AMERICAN PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE PAK-PAC $2,500
  • PEOPLE IN RURAL AREAS TRANSFORM ELECTIONS (PIRATE) PAC $5,000
  • PETE AGUILAR FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION PAC $1,000
  • PLS FINANCIAL SVCS INC GOOD NEIGHBOR POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTE (PLS GOOD NEIGHBOR PAC) $2,500
  • POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES $2,500
  • POPULUS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. PAC $5,000
  • POWERPAC OF THE EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE $5,000
  • PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. ASSOCIATES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
  • PUGET PAC $1,500
  • QC HOLDINGS PAC $2,500
  • REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $4,000
  • RESIST RECLAIM REBUILD PAC $2,500
  • SCHAKOWSKY FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • SCHNEIDER FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • SCIENCE TRUTH AND EXPERTISE MATTER PAC $2,000
  • SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION) $2,500
  • SERVING OUR COUNTRY (SOC) PAC $1,000
  • SHORE PAC $1,000
  • SILICORN VALLEY PAC $7,000
  • SMART TD PAC $3,500
  • SOUTHERN COMPANY EMPLOYEES PAC $5,000
  • SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE & SPIRIT PAC $10K
  • SOUTHERN MINNESOTA BEET SUGAR COOPERATIVE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $2,000
  • SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA (PAC) $500
  • SUN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10K
  • SUNFLOWER SEEDS PAC $1,000
  • T-MOBILE US, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (T-PAC) $8,000
  • TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE TEPAC $2,500
  • TED LIEU FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • THE ADT SECURITY CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ADT PAC) $5,000
  • THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $6,000
  • THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND (GOODYEAR GOOD GOVERNMENT FUND) $1,000
  • THE HOME DEPOT INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • THE NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION ACTION COMMITTEE FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION (ACRE) $1,500
  • THE WESTERN SUGAR COOPERATIVE CORP PAC $1,000
  • TOMORROW PAC $1,000
  • TRANSDIGM GROUP INC. EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
  • TRUCKING POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS INC. $1,000
  • TWDC ENTERPRISES 18 CORP. EMPLOYEES PAC AKA 'THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY EMPLOYEES PAC' OR 'DISNEY PAC' $2,000
  • UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING & PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA) $5,000
  • UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND $2,500
  • UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. PAC $2,000
  • UNITED POSTMASTERS AND MANAGERS OF AMERICA POLITICAL FUND $1,500
  • UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, $10K
  • VILLAGEMD PAC $3,500
  • WALMART INC. PAC FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT $4,500

All filings at the FEC ↗

Scott Singer (REP)

Raised
$3.3M through 2026-10-14 individuals $1.9M · PACs $216K · party $5,000 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $724K · from the candidate's other committees $369K · cash on hand $467K
Outside spending
$17.4M opposing Singer · $1.7M supporting Singer · latest reported 2026-11-03
Largest outside spenders
HMP — $16.8M opposing Singer Largest donors: HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD $93.7M (39%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Reid G Hoffman $8.5M (4%), Greylock Partners, Partner; ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FUND $5.0M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Fred Eychaner $5.0M (2%), Retired; UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ISSUES FUND $4.8M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) DEFENDING OUR VALUES PAC — $857K supporting Singer Largest donors: PUBLIC FIRST ACTION, INC $4.9M (59%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); PUBLIC FIRST ACTION $3.0M (36%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); PUBLIC FIRST $300K (4%); Jan Leike $100K (1%), Anthropic, Researcher NO GOING BACK PAC INC. — $522K supporting Singer CITIZENS FOR A MORE AFFORDABLE FLORIDA — $261K opposing Singer NEW DEMOCRAT MAJORITY — $258K opposing Singer Largest donors: OPPORTUNITY FORWARD ALLIANCE $3.4M (56%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); EFFECTIVE GOVERNING COALITION $2.2M (38%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) and 6 more
Bundled through PACs
$3,500 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01 REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RJC-PAC) — $3,500 from 1 gift Lobbyist/registrant PAC
11 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • AMERICAN PRINCIPLES $1,500
  • ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ABC PAC) $5,000
  • CEMEX INC. EMPLOYEES PAC $1,000
  • JESSICA STEINMANN FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • JUST ELECT SUPER STARS PAC $1,500
  • RUDY FOR INDIANA $2,000
  • SCALISE FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • SHEEDER LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE $1,000
  • THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10K
  • TRUE NORTH PAC $5,000
  • U.S. ISRAEL PAC (USI PAC) $5,000

All filings at the FEC ↗

The ads

89 ads, newest first.

Paid for by Scott Singer for Congressfrom 2026-10-242 variantsspend $0–19821,000–26,998 impressions
Jared Moskowitz agreed to a private forum with no live coverage, but he still won’t agree to a televised debate. **And it’s clear why.** When he was confronted about his vote to keep Ilhan Omar on the Foreign Affairs Committee — all he could say was “let’s move on” ... Even after the forum ended, he walked out without talking to the press. I stayed and talked with every reporter who had a question. No wonder he won’t agree to a televised debate. District 25 voters deserve answers.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Scott Singer for Congressfrom 2026-10-23spend $0–994,000–4,999 impressions
Don’t forget to vote by Nov. 3rd! Scott Singer is Boca Raton’s 3X mayor who cut taxes seven times and cut red tape. Make a plan to vote. When you do, vote Scott Singer for Congress!
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Scott Singer for Congressfrom 2026-10-23spend $0–994,000–4,999 impressions
Scott Singer has delivered for South Florida families as Boca Raton’s three-term Mayor, now he’s running for Congress to fight for all of us in FL-25. Vote early today through Nov. 1, return your vote-by-mail ballot, or vote on Election Day, Nov. 3. However you vote, vote Scott Singer for Congress!
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Free Enterprise Alliancefrom 2026-10-182 variantsspend $1,000–1,19839,000–44,998 impressions
Tell Scott Singer to keep advocating for policies that keep Florida affordable.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUNDfrom 2026-10-162 variantsspend $1,200–1,39850,000–59,998 impressions
Jared Moskowitz has made up to $8 million in stock trades. Moskowitz’s trades are on his own financial disclosures. Getting rich in Congress. Raising our taxes. We can’t trust Jared Moskowitz.
Loaded LanguageName Calling60.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: Insinuates that members of Congress are enriching themselves through office, using an accusatory framing rather than facts. Flagged: “Getting rich in Congress”.

Name Calling: Discredits a named person with a blanket claim of untrustworthiness instead of addressing any specific argument or action. Flagged: “We can’t trust Jared Moskowitz.”.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Jared Moskowitz for Congressfrom 2026-10-137 variantsspend $0–6935,300–10,193 impressions
Just 7 months after Hamas massacred Israelis on October 7th, Scott Singer traveled to Qatar, a country that has hosted Hamas leaders, to expand cooperation between Qatar and Boca Raton and was photographed with a senior Qatari minister. The US Treasury has even identified a Qatar-based operative who transferred tens of millions of dollars to Hamas and its military wing. South Florida deserves a leader whose commitment to Israel never wavers, not someone who cozies up to Qatar. Jared Moskowitz has stood with Israel and fought antisemitism without apology, even when it meant taking heat from his own party. Vote Jared Moskowitz for Congress on or before November 3rd. JaredforFlorida.com

Black-and-White Fallacy: Frames the choice as only a leader with unwavering commitment to Israel or one who cozies up to Qatar, ignoring other positions. Flagged: “a leader whose commitment to Israel never wavers, not someone who cozies up to Qatar”.

Loaded Language: The phrase 'cozies up to' is a pejorative, emotionally charged insinuation of improper closeness rather than a factual description.

Glittering Generalities: Vague, flattering framing of a politician as principled and fearless, without specifics about what he actually did. Flagged: “stood with Israel and fought antisemitism without apology”.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Jared Moskowitz for Congressfrom 2026-10-135 variantsspend $0–495200–2,295 impressions
Scott Singer supports masked ICE agents kidnapping immigrant workers and children. He even celebrated when Trump tried to end birthright citizenship for children born in America to immigrant parents. Jared Moskowitz supports a common-sense immigration system that secures our borders, deports dangerous criminals, and treats people humanely. Jared believes ICE must follow the law and be held accountable when it fails to do so, while focusing enforcement on real threats, not raids at schools, grocery stores, or places of worship. Learn more at www.JaredForFlorida.com
Loaded Language40.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: 'Kidnapping' is an emotionally charged characterization of ICE detentions, chosen to provoke outrage rather than describe the facts.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by America PACfrom 2026-10-084 variantsspend $0–396400–3,996 impressions
Imagine how much damage 435 AOCs could do if they controlled Congress. That's what will happen if Jared Moskowitz wins. Stop him in his tracks. Make a plan to vote.

Appeal to Fear: Invites the reader to picture a vivid worst-case scenario of 'damage' to create anxiety.

Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Absurdly inflates a single politician's influence into an entire Congress of clones. Flagged: “435 AOCs”.

Loaded Language: Combative, aggressive phrasing frames the opponent as a threat to be halted. Flagged: “Stop him in his tracks”.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by America PACfrom 2026-10-084 variantsspend $200–5963,100–6,996 impressions
If you don't plan to vote, you're handing this election over to Jared Moskowitz and the radical socialists. Don't let them win. Make a plan to vote now.

Name Calling: Labels opponents 'radical socialists' to discredit them rather than address arguments.

Loaded Language: Uses the charged word 'radical' to provoke a negative reaction.

Appeal to Fear: Implies that not voting will cause an undesirable opponent to win, pressuring action through threat. Flagged: “you're handing this election over to Jared Moskowitz”.

Black-and-White Fallacy: Frames the election as a binary of stopping 'them' or letting them win.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by America PACfrom 2026-10-084 variantsspend $0–3962,200–5,996 impressions
This election will come down to one thing: stopping the radical socialists from taking control of our country. And it starts with stopping Jared Moskowitz. Find your polling location and make a plan to vote.

Name Calling: Labels opponents with the derogatory tag 'radical socialists' instead of addressing their arguments.

Loaded Language: Emotionally charged words like 'radical' and the framing of 'taking control of our country' provoke a reaction rather than convey facts.

Appeal to Fear: Suggests a threat that opponents will seize the country, creating anxiety to motivate action. Flagged: “stopping the radical socialists from taking control of our country”.

Black-and-White Fallacy: Reduces the whole election to a single issue, implying only one choice matters. Flagged: “This election will come down to one thing”.

Check this ad yourself →

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Other advertisers

Paid posts that ran in FL and name a candidate, from advertisers that aren't part of this race: news-style pages, campaigns for other offices, and others. They're shown here for completeness and not counted with the ads above. We show the same technique analysis; their claims are not checked.

DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESS: campaign for another office

Paid for by DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-08-15 to 2026-08-18spend $200–2996,000–6,999 impressions
Scott Singer wants your vote in CD-25, but his record shows he turned on President Trump when it mattered most. We need real, unwavering conservative leadership in Washington, not politicians who fold under pressure and then pretend they didn’t. I will fight for the America First agenda every single day.

Name Calling: Labels the opponent as a betrayer of Trump to discredit him rather than addressing specific arguments. Flagged: “he turned on President Trump when it mattered most”.

Black-and-White Fallacy: Frames the choice as either unwavering conservative leaders or politicians who fold, ignoring other options. Flagged: “real, unwavering conservative leadership in Washington, not politicians who fold under pressure”.

Loaded Language: Uses emotionally charged, derogatory wording to portray opponents as weak and dishonest. Flagged: “fold under pressure and then pretend they didn’t”.

Glittering Generalities: Uses a vague, positive slogan and a pledge of constant fighting without any specific policy content. Flagged: “I will fight for the America First agenda every single day”.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESS: campaign for another office

Paid for by DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-08-12 to 2026-08-18spend $700–79920,000–24,999 impressions
Yet another liberal Democrat stepped up to back Scott Singer. Singer proudly showcased the endorsement of Congressman Ted Deutch. Left-wing politicians do not cross the aisle to support true, tax-cutting conservatives. They validate insiders who will protect the status quo. FL-25 needs a proven business outsider who answers only to the people, not the political elite. Vote for me on or before August 18!

Name Calling: Uses the party/ideology label 'liberal Democrat' to discredit the endorsement and the candidate by association.

Black-and-White Fallacy: Presents only two camps, implying cross-party support is impossible for genuine conservatives. Flagged: “Left-wing politicians do not cross the aisle to support true, tax-cutting conservatives”.

Loaded Language: Charged terms like 'insiders' and 'protect the status quo' cast the candidate as part of a self-serving establishment.

Glittering Generalities: Uses vague, flattering claims such as 'proven' and 'answers only to the people' with no specifics.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESS: campaign for another office

Paid for by DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-08-12 to 2026-08-18spend $700–79940,000–44,999 impressions
I endorsed President Trump back in 2023 when career politicians were running away, and while Scott Singer was busy backing President Trump’s opponents. I am the only battle-tested Trump conservative running to represent South Florida's 25th District!
Name CallingGlittering Generalities100.0% of sentences flagged

Name Calling: Labels opponents as 'career politicians' who 'were running away' and a named rival as backing Trump's opponents, to discredit them rather than address arguments.

Glittering Generalities: Uses vague, flattering self-description ('battle-tested Trump conservative') as a rhetorical flourish without specific substance.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESS: campaign for another office

Paid for by DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-08-04 to 2026-08-184 variantsspend $500–89647,000–58,996 impressions
I will support President Trump and always put America First, because our community deserves better than Scott Singer. Watch my new ad and vote for me for South Florida's 25th District on or before August 18!
Glittering Generalities100.0% of sentences flagged

Glittering Generalities: Uses a vague, emotionally positive slogan and appeal to what the community 'deserves' without any specific policy substance. Flagged: “always put America First”.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESS: campaign for another office

Paid for by DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-07-29 to 2026-08-03spend $200–29915,000–19,999 impressions
I will support President Trump 100% and always put America First. South Florida families deserve better than a career politician like Scott Singer who answers to the political elite. Vote for me for South Florida's 25th District on or before August 18!
Glittering GeneralitiesName Calling100.0% of sentences flagged

Glittering Generalities: 'America First' is a vague, emotionally positive slogan offered without specific substance.

Name Calling: Labels the opponent a 'career politician' who answers to the 'political elite' to discredit him rather than address his positions.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESS: campaign for another office

Paid for by DAN FRANZESE FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-07-29 to 2026-08-082 variantsspend $500–69840,000–49,998 impressions
When you talk to everyday folks in our community, the message is always the same: people are ready to reject career politicians like Scott Singer. Vote for me for U.S. Congress in South Florida's 25th District on or before August 18!
Bandwagon AppealName Calling100.0% of sentences flagged

Bandwagon Appeal: Claims everyone in the community shares the same view, implying the opinion is correct because it is widely held. Flagged: “the message is always the same: people are ready to reject career politicians”.

Name Calling: Labels the opponent a 'career politician' to discredit him rather than address his positions.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

What this page is

  • An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in FL; or it ran mostly in FL and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
  • Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
  • A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
  • Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
  • Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
  • Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.

Try Pro free for 14 days, no card. Claim checks on every article, and an email when the stories you follow change.