Amendment 85: Plain Language Ballot Questions

Colorado · initiated constitutional amendment · on the November 3, 2026 ballot. The ballot wording and the arguments for and against from the state’s official voter guide, in the state’s own words, each read the same way for rhetorical techniques. We don’t recommend a vote.

On the ballot

no rhetorical technique found

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Constitution concerning ballot question language, and, in connection therewith, requiring all state and local ballot questions to be written in plain language and at no more than an 8th grade reading level and prohibiting a state statute from requiring language that conflicts with these requirements in ballot questions for citizen-initiated measures?

From coloradosos.gov. Checked 2026-10-20. Confirm with your official ballot (sample-ballot lookup).

Argument for

By Colorado Legislative Council Staff (State Ballot Information Booklet)

no rhetorical technique found

1) While ballot titles are supposed to be written as plainly as possible, this measure provides additional guidance as to what that means by requiring an eighth-grade reading level as the standard.

Providing a constitutional standard will help in crafting simple titles that voters may better understand when considering their vote, and may help them to navigate complicated and technical information when trying to understand a measure’s impact.

2) The measure creates a constitutional protection against the state legislature interfering with plain language in initiative ballot titles. Citizen initiatives are a way for the public to pass laws without restrictions created by the legislature. This measure ensures that no future legislature may add laws or change existing laws to create complicated or confusing initiative ballot titles.

From content.leg.colorado.gov, the official voter guide.

Argument against

By Colorado Legislative Council Staff (State Ballot Information Booklet)

no rhetorical technique found

1) This measure is unnecessary as state law already provides ample guidance for the preparation of ballot titles in plain language. Ballot titles must convey important information to voters about complex policies. This measure creates a constitutional standard with no guidance about how its requirements are different from current law.

This could lead to more challenges of initiative ballot titles, impacting the initiative process.

2) This measure puts vague and undefined language in the constitution, which could prevent the creation of laws to help voters better understand the effects of ballot measures. Laws that add language to ballot titles could be prohibited, even if that language provides critical information for voters.

The measure may lead to challenges of existing laws that help voters understand how their vote affects state and local programs and funding.

From content.leg.colorado.gov, the official voter guide.

Who’s behind it

Party positions: Colorado Democratic Party: No · Colorado Republican Party: No position published · Libertarian Party of Colorado: Yes · Colorado Forward Party: No position

Committees registered to support or oppose Amendment 85, and what they reported to Colorado Secretary of State TRACER (tracer.sos.colorado.gov). Checked 2026-10-20.

Before comparing the sides: each committee’s figures come from its own latest report, so they can cover different dates. Some committees work on more than one measure or other campaigns, and their totals include all of it. A side with no registered committee can still have supporters. How much a side raised says nothing about whether the measure is a good idea.

Supporting

BRIGHTER COLORADO

Ballot measure committee

Raised $3,270,775 · spent $2,760,499 · as reported through Oct 14, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • COMMON SENSE AMERICA · $2,000,000
    Other
  • GOPAC ELECTION FUND · $1,000,000
    Political action committee · federal PAC contributions, 2025–26: $0 to Democratic and $71,500 to Republican candidates and party committees (FEC)
  • COLORADO DAWN · $100,000
    501(c)(4) nonprofit
  • RADO CAPITAL · $25,000
    Company
  • STAVA, MATT · $25,000 · individual
    own contributions since Jan 1, 2020, federal (FEC): $0 to Democratic and $13,731 to Republican candidates and party committees; Colorado state (TRACER): $450 to Democratic and $0 to Republican candidates and party committees; $1,000 to candidates for nonpartisan offices

This committee is registered for more than one measure; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

Opposing

VOTE COMMON SENSE

Ballot measure committee

Raised $809,840 · spent $130,112 · as reported through Oct 14, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • GREEN ADVOCACY PROJECT · $200,000
    501(c)(4) nonprofit
  • COLORADO FUND FOR CHILDREN & PUBLIC EDUCATION · $115,000
    Other · Colorado state contributions since Jan 1, 2025: $4,500 to Democratic and $0 to Republican candidates and party committees; $16,059 to candidates for nonpartisan offices (TRACER)
  • CHAMBERS, MERLE · $100,000 · individual
    own contributions since Jan 1, 2020, federal (FEC): $4,614,737 to Democratic and $0 to Republican candidates and party committees, $24,106 to others; Colorado state (TRACER): $101,150 to Democratic and $0 to Republican candidates and party committees; $1,900 to candidates for nonpartisan offices
  • CONSERVATION COLORADO · $65,000
    501(c)(4) nonprofit · Colorado state contributions since Jan 1, 2025: $750 to Democratic and $0 to Republican candidates and party committees (TRACER)
  • COBALT ADVOCATES · $65,000
    501(c)(4) nonprofit · federal PAC contributions, 2025–26: $2,000 to Democratic and $0 to Republican candidates and party committees (FEC)

This committee is registered for more than one measure; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

PEOPLE FOR A FAIR COLORADO

Ballot measure committee

Registered; no financial report filed yet.

MAKE GOOD CHANGE

Ballot measure committee

“The People's Ballot is an unofficial voter guide to the 14 statewide ballot measures on Colorado's Nov. 3, 2026 general election ballot.” — its website

Registered; no financial report filed yet.

A rhetorical technique is about wording, not about whether a measure is a good idea or an argument is true. Ballot wording is written under each state’s own rules, and official arguments by the people the state names. All Colorado measures →

Get notified about new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time