Supporting
Other
Raised $0 · spent $848,132 · as reported through Oct 14, 2026
Amendment 2
Louisiana · constitutional amendment · on the November 3, 2026 ballot. The ballot wording, in the state’s own words, each read the same way for rhetorical techniques. We don’t recommend a vote.
On the ballot
no rhetorical technique found
Do you support an amendment to allow a local taxing authority to continue to levy a lower millage rate without losing its ability to adjust to the maximum authorized millage rate from a prior year's reassessment? (Effective January 1, 2027) (Amends Article VII, Section 23(C))
From sos.la.gov. Checked 2026-10-20. Confirm with your official ballot.
The Louisiana Secretary of State and Legislature publish no official arguments for or against. The SOS amendments list gives only the Act and ballot question (the Public Affairs Research Council guide is not an official source).
Who’s behind it
Party positions: Louisiana Democratic Party: No position published · Republican Party of Louisiana: No position published
Committees registered to support or oppose Amendment 2, and what they reported to Louisiana Board of Ethics Campaign Finance Portal (ethics.la.gov/CampaignFinanceSearch, LEADERS e-filing system). Checked 2026-10-21.
Before comparing the sides: each committee’s figures come from its own latest report, so they can cover different dates. Some committees work on more than one measure or other campaigns, and their totals include all of it. A side with no registered committee can still have supporters. How much a side raised says nothing about whether the measure is a good idea.
Opposing
No registered committee opposing Amendment 2 found as of 2026-10-21.
A rhetorical technique is about wording, not about whether a measure is a good idea or an argument is true. Ballot wording is written under each state’s own rules, and official arguments by the people the state names. All Louisiana measures →