Question 2: Temporary Appointments on the Commission on Judicial Disabilities

Maryland · Constitutional Amendment · on the November 3, 2026 ballot. The ballot wording, in the state’s own words, each read the same way for rhetorical techniques. We don’t recommend a vote.

On the ballot

no rhetorical technique found

Authorizing temporary substitute appointments to the Commission on Judicial Disabilities when a member is recused or disqualified, or when a member's term expires. In these situations, the Commission Chair may recall a former member of the Commission, or the Governor, at the request of the Commission Chair, may appoint a temporary substitute member or extend the term of a current member until a permanent replacement is appointed. Only individuals who meet the constitutional eligibility requirements may be recalled or appointed to the Commission.

A vote FOR this amendment means that temporary appointments to the Commission are allowed if a member is recused, disqualified, or if a member's term ends without a replacement. The Commission Chair can temporarily fill an opening on the Commission with a former member. The Governor can, at the request of the Commission Chair, pick a temporary substitute to fill an opening on the Commission or extend the term of a current member until a replacement is appointed. Only individuals who meet the constitutional eligibility requirements may be recalled or appointed to the Commission.

A vote AGAINST the amendment means that current membership rules for the Commission stay the same. Temporary appointments are not allowed if a member is recused, disqualified, or if a member's term ends.

(Amending Article IV of the Maryland Constitution)

From elections.maryland.gov. Checked 2026-10-20. Confirm with your official ballot (sample-ballot lookup).

Maryland publishes no official arguments for or against. The State Board of Elections posts the ballot language, and the Department of Legislative Services publishes neutral State Ballot Question Summaries.

Who’s behind it

Party positions: Maryland Democratic Party: No position published · Maryland Republican Party: No position published

Committees registered to support or oppose Question 2, and what they reported to Maryland State Board of Elections Campaign Reporting (campaignfinance.maryland.gov, public API api-campaignfinance.maryland.gov). Checked 2026-10-21.

Before comparing the sides: each committee’s figures come from its own latest report, so they can cover different dates. Some committees work on more than one measure or other campaigns, and their totals include all of it. A side with no registered committee can still have supporters. How much a side raised says nothing about whether the measure is a good idea.

Supporting

Fight Back Agenda

Ballot measure committee

Raised $0 · spent $0 · as reported through Oct 4, 2026

This committee is registered for more than one measure; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

Opposing

No registered committee opposing Question 2 found as of 2026-10-21.

A rhetorical technique is about wording, not about whether a measure is a good idea or an argument is true. Ballot wording is written under each state’s own rules, and official arguments by the people the state names. All Maryland measures →

Get notified about new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time