CI-133

Montana · constitutional initiative · on the November 3, 2026 ballot. The ballot wording and the arguments for and against from the state’s official voter guide, in the state’s own words, each read the same way for rhetorical techniques. We don’t recommend a vote.

On the ballot

no rhetorical technique found

CONSTITUTIONAL INITIATIVE NO. 133 A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION The Montana constitution reserves to the people the powers of initiative and referendum. CI-133 amends the constitution to secure this fundamental right from interference by the government. Specifically, CI-133 requires impartial, predictable, open, and timely processes for ballot issues.

Petitions and ballot statements must be approved within 90 days of the initial submission, and legal challenges to ballot qualification must be resolved before the deadline for finalizing ballots.

CI-133 requires the state to allow ample time for signature gathering, prohibits disqualification of petitions because of minor or technical issues, allows voters to withdraw their signatures if they so choose, and prohibits the use of government resources to support or oppose a ballot measure.

From sosmt.gov. Checked 2026-10-20. Confirm with your official ballot (sample-ballot lookup).

Argument for

By Approval Committee: Raphael Graybill, Jason Small, Tara Veazey

Loaded LanguageBlack-and-White FallacyGlittering Generalities

Vote yes on CI-133 to protect your right to propose and vote on laws that affect your life without government interference. CI-133 guarantees a fair, transparent, and timely ballot measure process. What it means to vote YES on CI-133:

• YES on CI-133 protects the ballot measure process and safeguards your fundamental right to propose, vote on, and veto laws without government interference.

• YES on CI-133 bans the government from taking sides on ballot measures and using taxpayer money to sway your vote.

• YES on CI-133 requires impartial, predictable, open, and timely processes for approving petitions and ballot statements, resolving legal challenges, gathering signatures, and verifying signatures. Lobbyists and outside interests have too much influence in Helena. That’s why we need CI-133.

It protects citizens’ right to pass laws without interference from a government that caters to special interests and their money. Ballot measures give voters the power to keep the government accountable to us, not lobbyists. Ballot measures are how citizens come together to protect and preserve what makes Montana great.

Loaded Language · “a government that caters to special interests and their money” — Charged framing of government as catering to special interests and their money rather than neutral description.

Black-and-White Fallacy · “accountable to us, not lobbyists” — Frames government accountability as either to 'us' or to lobbyists, implying no other option.

Glittering Generalities · “protect and preserve what makes Montana great” — Vague, positive appeal to what 'makes Montana great' without specific meaning.

Montana citizens across the political spectrum have passed ballot measures to protect our right to hunt and fish, cap taxes, protect public lands, restrict lobbying, expand access to healthcare for kids, raise the minimum wage, and keep the government out of our private, family medical decisions.

By voting YES on CI-133, we protect the mechanism Montana citizens use to pass laws that protect and preserve Montana values. Ballot measures give Montanans the voice we need to act as a check on government overreach. Ballot measures aren’t just for passing laws, they allow citizens to veto bad laws when the government goes too far.

Glittering Generalities · “protect and preserve Montana values” — Invokes vague, positive 'Montana values' without saying what they are.

Loaded Language · “government overreach”, “bad laws”, “when the government goes too far” — 'Government overreach' is an emotionally charged phrase that frames government action as illegitimate without specifics.

We all deserve the chance to veto government overreach into our lives. CI-133 protects the right of "Citizens Veto" from government interference so we can have the final say without government putting its fingers on the scales. Vote YES on CI-133 to protect our citizen initiative process and preserve Montana for ourselves and future generations.

Loaded Language · “government overreach into our lives”, “government putting its fingers on the scales” — 'Government overreach into our lives' uses emotionally charged framing to provoke distrust of government.

Glittering Generalities · “preserve Montana for ourselves and future generations” — Vague noble appeals to protecting the process and preserving Montana for future generations carry little specific meaning.

From sosmt.gov, the official voter guide.

Argument against

By Rejection Committee: Senator Wylie Galt, Randy Brodehl, Representative Greg Overstreet, Charles Robison

Loaded LanguageConspiracy AppealCard StackingGlittering Generalities

Vote NO on Constitutional Initiative No. 133. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Montanans cherish our constitutional right to initiative and referendum, but CI-133 complicates our rights with a wordy and unnecessary amendment. It undermines representative government and invites abuse of the ballot process.

CI-133 is a trojan horse for billionaires and out-of-state special interests to simply purchase the laws they want. The fact that CI-133 is on the ballot, along with numerous other initiatives, is pretty good evidence that Montana has a healthy initiative process. Why would we “fix” a system that isn’t broken? Why complicate a process that works for Montanans? Just vote no.

Loaded Language · “trojan horse”, “purchase the laws they want” — 'Trojan horse' and 'purchase the laws' are emotionally charged framing of the measure as deceptive and corrupting.

Conspiracy Appeal · “CI-133 is a trojan horse for billionaires and out-of-state special interests” — Implies a hidden scheme in which the measure secretly serves billionaires and outside interests.

Card Stacking · “a system that isn’t broken” — Asserts the system is not broken and dismisses the case for reform without engaging counterarguments.

Glittering Generalities · “a process that works for Montanans” — Vague positive claim that the process 'works for Montanans' with no specifics.

CI-133 restricts the ability of elected officials and courts to protect voters from flawed or deceptive measures. It handcuffs the Attorney General, Secretary of State, and Montana Supreme Court from doing basic due diligence. Passing laws and constitutional amendments should not be taken lightly.

When an initiative passes, it becomes binding law for a minimum of two years before it can be changed or undone. Montana’s current process – including financial and legal reviews – ensures initiatives are constitutional, transparent, and won’t bankrupt the state.

CI-133 scraps these commonsense protections, making it easier for well-funded special interests and paid signature gatherers to place poorly-drafted measures on the ballot. The ballot initiative constitutional right was originally designed so Montana citizens can directly vote on popular ideas when elected officials aren’t responsive to voters’ desires.

Today, though, special interests have discovered the process also allows them to simply purchase the laws that they want, if they spend enough money. Ballot initiatives are becoming a “cottage industry,” according to the Helena Independent Record. It’s so common nowadays that it even has a standard price tag: $1 million.

“That’s why in at least the last four election seasons, nearly every proposal that has made it onto the ticket has done so with the added manpower of paid signature gatherers, most of whom are working for companies that collect north of $1 million for their work on a single initiative in Montana…a run-of-the-mill price these days,” reports the Helena IR. CI-133 follows the same pattern.

Out-of-state special interests spent $1 million to get CI-133 on your ballot, as the Helena IR also reported. One of us writing this argument against CI-133 – Sen. Wylie Galt – went through the initiative petition process earlier this year myself. While I ultimately decided not to pursue my initiative all the way to finish line, I can personally vouch that the process was not overly difficult.

As a rancher, I fix broken things all the time. Montana’s ballot initiative process is not broken. Our system works. CI-133 is unnecessary. CI-133 would remove all reasonable checks and balances on the ballot initiative process. That’s a winning proposal for groups with $1 million or more to spend buying the laws they want, but it’s a loser for Montanans who have to live under those laws.

Vote NO on CI-133.

From sosmt.gov, the official voter guide.

Who’s behind it

Party positions: Montana Democratic Party: No position published · Montana Republican Party: No position published

Committees registered to support or oppose CI-133, and what they reported to Montana Commissioner of Political Practices - Campaign Electronic Reporting System (CERS) public search, cers-ext.mt.gov. Checked 2026-10-21.

Before comparing the sides: each committee’s figures come from its own latest report, so they can cover different dates. Some committees work on more than one measure or other campaigns, and their totals include all of it. A side with no registered committee can still have supporters. How much a side raised says nothing about whether the measure is a good idea.

Supporting

Montana State AFL-CIO

Labor union

“THE MONTANA AFL-CIO is a federation of unions in The Last Best Place.” — its website

Raised $3,500 · spent $41,100 · as reported through Sep 30, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • MT Democratic Party · $2,500
    Political party
  • MDLCC · $1,000
    Political party

This committee does other political work too; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

American Opportunity Action

501(c)(4) nonprofit

Raised $0 · spent $1,380,000 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

This committee does other political work too; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

GISWF - Montana

501(c)(4) nonprofit

“Global Impact Social Welfare Fund, Inc. (GISWF) is a nonprofit corporation that supports philanthropic funding for social impact.” — its website

Raised $0 · spent $1,205,000 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

This committee does other political work too; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

Montanans Decide

Ballot measure committee

Raised $2,610,131 · spent $2,223,741 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • The Fairness Project · $1,207,495
    501(c)(4) nonprofit
  • GISWF - Montana · $605,000
    501(c)(4) nonprofit
  • American Opportunity Action · $580,000
    501(c)(4) nonprofit
  • Unite America PAC, Inc. · $200,000
    Political action committee · federal PAC contributions, 2025–26: $5,000 to Democratic and $10,000 to Republican candidates and party committees (FEC)
  • Montana Conservation Voters · $7,976
    501(c)(4) nonprofit

The Fairness Project

501(c)(4) nonprofit

“The Fairness Project is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to advancing social and economic justice via ballot measures.” — its website

Raised $0 · spent $1,937,495 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

This committee does other political work too; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

Wild Montana Action Fund

501(c)(4) nonprofit

Raised $188,350 · spent $125,404 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • Montanans Decide · $60,000
    Ballot measure committee
  • Wild Montana · $48,350
    501(c)(3) nonprofit
  • Earthjustice Action · $40,000
    501(c)(4) nonprofit
  • Montanans for Public Lands · $20,000
    Political action committee
  • Wild Montana Voter Fund · $20,000
    Political action committee

This committee does other political work too; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

Wild Montana

501(c)(3) nonprofit

Raised $0 · spent $57,245 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

This committee does other political work too; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

Montana Conservation Voters

501(c)(4) nonprofit

“Montana Conservation Voters is a 501(c)4 nonprofit organization.” — its website

Raised $6,000 · spent $22,991 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • Montanans Decide · $6,000
    Ballot measure committee

This committee does other political work too; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

Montanans for Choice Take Action

501(c)(4) nonprofit

Raised $0 · spent $678 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

This committee does other political work too; these are its whole totals, which its filings don’t divide by measure.

Planned Parenthood Advocates of Montana - Montanans Decide

501(c)(4) nonprofit, sponsored by Planned Parenthood Advocates of Montana (from the registered committee name)

Registered; no financial report filed yet.

Opposing

Flathead County Republican Women

Political party

Raised $15,479 · spent $11,683 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • Thompson, Ray · $1,350 · individual
  • Holz, Ron · $500 · individual
  • Autrey, Nancy · $420 · individual
  • Cahalen, Evelyn · $400 · individual
  • Doran, Ryan · $300 · individual

A political party committee registered on this measure. Its totals cover all its activity, including candidates; its filings don’t divide them by measure.

Young Republicans of Montana

Political party

Raised $90 · spent $0 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • Lewis and Clark County Young Republicans · $90
    Political party

A political party committee registered on this measure. Its totals cover all its activity, including candidates; its filings don’t divide them by measure.

Lewis and Clark County Young Republicans

Political party

Raised $8,253 · spent $3,675 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • Kohler, Robert · $3,999 · individual
  • Craggs, Brenton · $1,972 · individual
  • Cooper, Matthew · $500 · individual
  • Lewis And Clark County Republican Central Commitee · $400
    Political party
  • Marshal, James H · $300 · individual

A political party committee registered on this measure. Its totals cover all its activity, including candidates; its filings don’t divide them by measure.

A rhetorical technique is about wording, not about whether a measure is a good idea or an argument is true. Ballot wording is written under each state’s own rules, and official arguments by the people the state names. All Montana measures →

Get notified about new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time