Constitutional Measure No. 1

North Dakota · constitutional measure · on the November 3, 2026 ballot. The ballot wording, in the state’s own words, each read the same way for rhetorical techniques. We don’t recommend a vote.

On the ballot

no rhetorical technique found

(House Concurrent Resolution No. 3003, 2025 Session Laws, Ch. 614) This constitutional measure would amend and reenact section 9 of article III and section 16 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota.

The proposed amendment would require constitutional amendments submitted to the electors, by resolution adopted by the legislative assembly proposing a constitutional amendment and each initiative petition and measure proposing a constitutional amendment, to receive an affirmative vote of at least sixty percent of those voting on the question for enactment.

The estimated fiscal impact of this measure is none.

From sos.nd.gov. Checked 2026-10-20. Confirm with your official ballot.

North Dakota publishes no official arguments for or against. The Secretary of State's 2026 General Election ballot measure guide gives only neutral explanations of a yes/no vote and the fiscal impact.

Who’s behind it

Party positions: North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party: No position published · North Dakota Republican Party: No position published

Committees registered to support or oppose Constitutional Measure No. 1, and what they reported to North Dakota Secretary of State Campaign Finance Reporting System (CFRS), cfrs.sos.nd.gov (public data API). Checked 2026-10-21.

Before comparing the sides: each committee’s figures come from its own latest report, so they can cover different dates. Some committees work on more than one measure or other campaigns, and their totals include all of it. A side with no registered committee can still have supporters. How much a side raised says nothing about whether the measure is a good idea.

Supporting

No registered committee supporting Constitutional Measure No. 1 found as of 2026-10-21.

Opposing

Protect the North Dakota Constitution

Ballot measure committee

Raised $976,346 · spent $628,605 · as reported through Sep 24, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • The Fairness Project · $875,535
    501(c)(4) nonprofit
  • Western Leadership Fund · $50,000
    Other
  • National Education Association · $50,000
    Labor union · federal PAC contributions, 2025–26: $1,966,500 to Democratic and $11,000 to Republican candidates and party committees, $35,000 to others (FEC)
  • American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network · $761
    501(c)(4) nonprofit

Since then, $822,250 more reported in contributions of $1,000 or more, through Oct 17, 2026.

American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN)

501(c)(4) nonprofit

“American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network works daily to make cancer a national priority.” — its website

Raised $0 · spent $0 · as reported through Sep 24, 2026

A rhetorical technique is about wording, not about whether a measure is a good idea or an argument is true. Ballot wording is written under each state’s own rules, and official arguments by the people the state names. All North Dakota measures →

Get notified about new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time