Constitutional Amendment B: Proposal to Amend Utah Constitution - Statewide Initiatives

Utah · constitutional amendment · on the November 3, 2026 ballot. The ballot wording and the arguments for and against from the state’s official voter guide, in the state’s own words, each read the same way for rhetorical techniques. We don’t recommend a vote.

On the ballot

no rhetorical technique found

Shall the Utah Constitution be amended to require that citizen-proposed laws that increase taxes compared to existing law be approved by at least 60% of voters, instead of a simple majority?

From vote.utah.gov. Checked 2026-10-20. Confirm with your official ballot.

Argument for

By Sen. Lincoln Fillmore, Rep. Jason Kyle

no rhetorical technique found

Amendment B asks: How easy should it be for your neighbor to raise your taxes? Amendment B would require only statewide ballot initiatives that create new taxes, increase existing taxes or expand existing taxes to receive at least 60% voter approval before becoming law.

Why Amendment B Matters Taxes affect every Utahn, shaping family budgets, retirement income, businesses, housing costs, the cost of living, and the state’s economy. Because tax increases affect all Utahns, they should be adopted only if there is substantial support from the voters who ultimately pay them. Amendment B requires stronger voter agreement before new taxes are approved.

What Amendment B Does Requires statewide tax-increasing ballot initiatives to receive at least 60% voter approval before becoming law. Preserves Utah’s citizen initiative process and voters’ ability to propose measures on the ballot. Keeps the decision in the hands of Utah voters.

Accountability and Tax Policy The Utah Constitution will still protect the right to propose initiatives, place measures on the ballot and vote directly on public policy questions. Initiatives that increase taxes, however, deserve extra consideration because they directly affect every Utah taxpayer. Amendment B would ensure broad community support for potential tax increases.

If elected officials vote to raise taxes, voters know and can hold them accountable at the ballot box. Taxes imposed by elected bodies can be reversed by new legislators at any time, but statewide initiatives operate differently.

They are drafted only by proponents of the increase, there is no public input in the details, and cannot be revised or adjusted once passed, other than by another costly initiative. Tax increases have long-term consequences for family budgets and the economy, and should require broader public support before becoming law.

A Higher Bar for Higher Taxes The higher approval threshold is a meaningful and achievable standard. Utah voters have supported funding measures when they believed the benefits justified the costs, and many have received well over 60% of the vote. Amendment B does not prevent initiatives with new taxes or tax increases from succeeding.

It simply requires proponents to persuade a broader share of voters that a proposed tax increase is necessary and beneficial before asking taxpayers to pay more from their family budgets. Protecting Utah’s Decision-Making Amendment B ensures major tax changes demonstrate broad support among Utah voters.

Requiring a 60% vote encourages proponents to build support across communities, regions and political viewpoints before a tax increase becomes law. The Choice Belongs to Utah Voters Any proposal that will take more money from Utah families, workers and businesses should have widespread agreement from the people who will pay for it.

Amendment B provides that safeguard by requiring statewide tax-related ballot initiatives earn 60% voter approval before becoming law. The amendment does not prevent voters from approving tax hikes they support. It simply ensures proposals affecting taxpayers statewide have broad backing before they take effect. A vote FOR on Amendment B means higher standards for higher taxes.

From vote.utah.gov, the official voter guide.

Argument against

By Senator Luz Escamilla & Representative Angela Romero

Loaded Language

Vote NO on SJR 2. SJR 2 is an attack on ballot initiatives and our constitutional ability to govern ourselves. Utahns deserve the same rules that apply to their elected officials. The Utah Constitution protects the people’s power to reform their government and make laws directly through the initiative process.

Loaded Language · “is an attack on ballot initiatives” — Describing a legislative resolution as an 'attack' uses emotionally charged framing instead of neutral description.

SJR 2 would make that process harder by requiring 60% voter approval for certain citizen initiatives, setting a precedent that could eventually change the entire initiative process. The Legislature can often pass similar measures with a simple majority; voters should be held to the same standard.

Utah's initiative process exists so that citizens can act when they believe the government has failed to do so. We should not make that constitutional right harder to use. Do not be fooled, this is a power grab. Vote NO on SJR 2.

Loaded Language · “power grab” — The charged phrase 'power grab' frames the measure as illegitimate seizure of authority rather than describing its content.

From vote.utah.gov, the official voter guide.

Who’s behind it

Party positions: Utah Democratic Party: No position published · Utah Republican Party: No position published

Committees registered to support or oppose Constitutional Amendment B, and what they reported to Utah Lieutenant Governor's Office Campaign Financial Disclosures (disclosures.utah.gov). Checked 2026-10-21.

Before comparing the sides: each committee’s figures come from its own latest report, so they can cover different dates. Some committees work on more than one measure or other campaigns, and their totals include all of it. A side with no registered committee can still have supporters. How much a side raised says nothing about whether the measure is a good idea.

Supporting

No registered committee supporting Constitutional Amendment B found as of 2026-10-21.

Opposing

Utahns Protecting Our Constitution

Ballot measure committee

Raised $897,095 · spent $388,238 · as reported through Sep 25, 2026

Largest contributors as filed:

  • Utahns for Responsive Government · $186,372
    Other
  • Defend Utah's Ballot · $178,750
    Other
  • Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 · $100,637
    Labor union · federal PAC contributions, 2025–26: $37,344 to Democratic and $7,500 to Republican candidates and party committees, $5,000 to others (FEC)
  • Charles Maggelet · $100,000 · individual
  • Pivotal Next Gen · $100,000
    Other

Since then, $3,116 more reported in contributions of $1,000 or more, through Oct 19, 2026.

A rhetorical technique is about wording, not about whether a measure is a good idea or an argument is true. Ballot wording is written under each state’s own rules, and official arguments by the people the state names. All Utah measures →

Get notified about new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time