North Carolina House District 11 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them

Jamie Ager won · 57.1% to 41.3% · Called by AP on Nov 3

84 ads analyzed · 21 use a rhetorical technique, most often glittering generalities and loaded language.

The words doing the persuading

From the Ager side · Paid for by AGER FOR CONGRESS “…for a representative who cares about the issues our communities are facing. In Congress, you can count on me to keep my word and fight for every investment we can get.” Glittering Generalities See this ad →
From the Balkcom side · Paid for by Balkcom for Congress “…farmers by stopping China from buying our farmland. Now she’s running for Congress to deliver results for every Western North Carolina family. Vote Jennifer Balkcom for Congress!” Glittering Generalities See this ad →

See all 84 ads →

Jamie Ager (Democrat) and Jennifer Balkcom (Republican) are the nominees for North Carolina's 11th congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, Jamie Ager's campaign had raised $5.9 million (through October 14, 2026) and Jennifer Balkcom's campaign $399,000 (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $2.2 million for Jamie Ager and $5.4 million against; $1.0 million for Jennifer Balkcom and $8.2 million against. Semblen has analyzed 84 ads in this race; 21 used at least one rhetorical technique, most often glittering generalities and loaded language.

Jamie Ager (DEM), Jennifer Balkcom (REP). 7 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 84 ads analyzed, 21 with at least one technique in the copy. Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing. Updated 2026-10-28. 1 ad from other advertisers shown separately below.

Also on every North Carolina ballot: 3 statewide ballot measures → The ballot wording and the official arguments, read for rhetorical techniques.

How to vote in North Carolina

From North Carolina's official election office. Each line links to the official page it came from.

Registration Register by Fri, Oct 9 (5 p.m.; a mailed form must be received or postmarked by Oct 9; online only through NCDMV for license/ID holders). Same-day registration: at any early voting site in the voter's county Oct 15-31; not available on Election Day (passed)Source: ncsbe.gov ↗
Early voting in person Thu, Oct 15 to Sat, Oct 31 (ends 3 p.m.) (passed)Source: ncsbe.gov ↗
By mail Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Tue, Oct 20 (5 p.m.); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (received by the county board by 7:30 p.m. Election Day) (passed)Source: ncsbe.gov ↗Source: ncsbe.gov ↗
Election Day Tue, Nov 3. Polls: 6:30 a.m. - 7:30 p.m. (passed)Source: ncsbe.gov ↗
ID at the polls Photo ID required at check-in (exceptions available by form)Source: ncsbe.gov ↗
Registration repair Some registered voters have no N.C. driver's license/DMV ID number or Social Security number on file. If you're one of them, you may need to cast a provisional ballot and give that number when you vote, unless you add it first.Check if you need to update your registration ↗Source: ncsbe.gov ↗

Checked October 6, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.

Something wrong or out of date? Tell us

A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.

Got a political text?

Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.

Findings

As of 2026-10-28. Counts are of distinct ads; the same text run many times is one ad.

Ads analyzed
84 · started running between 2026-07-14 and 2026-10-26
With at least one technique
21 of 84 (25%)
Most common techniques
Glittering Generalities · 13 adsLoaded Language · 8 adsBlack-and-White Fallacy · 5 ads
Reported Meta spend
$60,900–89,409 on all ads, $20,700–29,231 on flagged ads · Meta reports ranges; these are the sums of their ends
Example
“you can count on me to keep my word and fight for every investment we can get” — Glittering Generalities, paid for by AGER FOR CONGRESS · the flagged ad with the highest reported spend that shows the most common technique

Reading coverage of this race? Paste the link to see what it uses →

Embed this race on your site

A small box with these findings and the newest ads, updated as new ads are analyzed. Free for newsrooms, blogs and campaigns alike; it links back here.

Who is running these ads

Each side is the campaign plus the groups backing it. How a group is placed is explained below the table.

SideAdsWith at least one techniqueMost common
Ager (D)7013 of 70 (19%)Glittering Generalities (7), Loaded Language (6), Black-and-White Fallacy (4)
Ager's campaign374 of 37 (11%)Glittering Generalities (3), False Urgency (2), Slogans (1)
10 groups backing Ager339 of 33 (27%)Loaded Language (6), Black-and-White Fallacy (4), Glittering Generalities (4)
Balkcom (R)65 of 6Glittering Generalities (3), Loaded Language (2), Appeal to Fear (1)
Balkcom's campaign43 of 4Glittering Generalities (2), Appeal to Fear (1), Black-and-White Fallacy (1)
1 group backing Balkcom22 of 2Exaggeration/Hyperbole (1), Glittering Generalities (1), Loaded Language (1)
Not placed on a side (5 sponsors)83 of 8Glittering Generalities (3)

Read this before comparing the sides. Ads that attack an opponent use these techniques far more often than ads that introduce a candidate, whoever runs them, so the side running more attack ads shows a higher share. A technique is about wording, not about whether an ad is true. These are online ads only (Meta and YouTube), not television.

By sponsor (18)
Paid for bySideAdsWith at least one techniqueMost common
AGER FOR CONGRESSAgerthe campaign374 of 37 (11%)Glittering Generalities (3), False Urgency (2), Slogans (1)
Working AmericaAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)130 of 13 (0%)
WELCOMEPACAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)60 of 6
Balkcom for CongressBalkcomthe campaign43 of 4Glittering Generalities (2), Appeal to Fear (1), Black-and-White Fallacy (1)
National Education Association—32 of 3Glittering Generalities (2)
PARKSPACAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)32 of 3Black-and-White Fallacy (2), Name Calling (2), Appeal to Fear (1)
AB PACAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)21 of 2Name Calling (1)
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC.(AFP ACTION)Balkcomreported spending to support Balkcom (FEC)22 of 2Exaggeration/Hyperbole (1), Glittering Generalities (1), Loaded Language (1)
CFFE PACAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)22 of 2Loaded Language (2), Bandwagon Appeal (1), Black-and-White Fallacy (1)
Fight for Working PeopleAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)22 of 2Black-and-White Fallacy (1), Glittering Generalities (1), Loaded Language (1)
Metric Media LLC—20 of 2
MomsRising TogetherAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)22 of 2Exaggeration/Hyperbole (2), Glittering Generalities (2), Loaded Language (2)
Campaign for Working Class CommunitiesAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)10 of 1
CONSERVING CAROLINA—10 of 1
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AM—11 of 1Glittering Generalities (1)
MAGGIE'S LIST—10 of 1
North Carolina Democratic PartyAgerthe party's own committee10 of 1
RP PACAgerreported spending to support Ager (FEC)10 of 1

How a group is placed: by its own filings with the Federal Election Commission. A group is with a candidate when it reported spending to support that candidate, or to oppose the other one in the general election. The parties' own committees are with their nominee. Spending against a candidate in a primary places a group nowhere, and neither does our reading of its ads: a group with no such filing is listed as not placed. The sponsor table gives the reason for each.

Decide what counts

Not everyone would call every technique a problem. Untick the ones you'd call ordinary persuasion and the count updates.

25% of the 84 ads here use at least one of the techniques ticked below (21 ads).

Leaving out the softer ones (loaded language, glittering generalities, slogans, exaggeration, repetition): 11% of ads.

The words doing the work

The words that show up most in phrases our model flagged as loaded language or name calling in this race's ads, by number of ads.

  • health in 3 ads · e.g. “kick nearly 39,000 people off their health insurance”, “massive health care cuts”
  • insurance in 3 ads · e.g. “kick nearly 39,000 people off their health insurance”, “greedy insurance companies”

Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.

Money in this race

From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.

Jamie Ager (DEM)

Raised
$5.9M through 2026-10-14 individuals $5.0M · PACs $371K · party $8,232 · from the candidate's other committees $441K · cash on hand $620K
Outside spending
$5.4M opposing Ager · $2.2M supporting Ager · latest reported 2026-11-02
Largest outside spenders
NO GOING BACK PAC INC. — $5.0M opposing Ager CFFE PAC — $533K supporting Ager · 2 ads on this pageLargest donors: PIVOTAL VENTURES $2.0M (56%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); OPPORTUNITY ACTION FUND $750K (21%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); GOVERNMENT THAT WORKS PAC $250K (7%); GREEN ADVOCACY PROJECT $250K (7%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); CHILDREN'S EQUITY FUND $100K (3%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) WELCOMEPAC — $461K supporting Ager · 6 ads on this pageLargest donors: Jason E Carroll $500K (17%), Hudson River Trading, Founder; THE WELCOME PARTY, INC. $450K (15%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Debra A Efroymson $300K (10%), Healthbridge, Regional Director; Samuel R Walton $290K (10%), Restoration Works LLC, Owner; David Nierenberg $232K (8%), THE D3 Family Funds, Investor PROJECT 218 — $439K supporting Ager Largest donors: DEMOCRACY MATTERS $5.9M (50%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Keith Behner $250K (2%), Retired; Amos Hostetter $250K (2%), Retired; James Millstein $250K (2%), Millstein & CO., Consultant; Samuel Walton $250K (2%), Restoration Works, Executive FIGHT FOR WORKING PEOPLE — $280K supporting Ager · 2 ads on this page and 25 more
Bundled through PACs
$79K through 4 PACs · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01 WELCOMEPAC — $44K from 13 gifts ZINC COLLECTIVE PAC — $24K from 8 gifts END CITIZENS UNITED — $7,000 from 2 gifts FAIR SHOT PAC — $4,500 from 2 gifts
69 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
  • 314 ACTION FUND $10K
  • ADAM GRAY FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • ADVANCING DEMOCRACY AND MOBILIZATION PAC $5,000
  • AG PAC $2,000
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC) $2,500
  • AMERICAN MOSAIC PAC $1,000
  • AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA $5,000
  • BEEPAC (BUILDING ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT PAC) $2,000
  • BEYOND THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS PAC $2,000
  • BLUE DOG POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10K
  • BLUE MOMENTUM PAC $2,000
  • BUILD AMERICA PAC $1,500
  • CA LUV PAC (CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP UNITED FOR VICTORY PAC) $10K
  • CAROLINA VICTORY FUND $3,500
  • COMMITTEE FOR A DEMOCRATIC FUTURE $2,000
  • COMMITTEE TO ELECT JARED GOLDEN $4,000
  • CONGRESS MAJORITY PAC $250
  • DEBORAH ROSS FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • DEFEAT EXTREMISTS $3,000
  • DEMOCRACY SUMMER LEADERSHIP PAC $5,000
  • DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY FUND $7,500
  • DR KIM SCHRIER FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • ELECT MORE DEMOCRATS PAC $1,000
  • END CITIZENS UNITED $2,500
  • ENGINEERS POLITICAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE (EPEC)/INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS $5,000
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND PAC (EDAF PAC) $1,000
  • FAIR SHOT PAC $10K
  • FIGHT FOR PROGRESS PAC $1,000
  • FLIP THE CONGRESS PAC $8,500
  • FOSTERING PROGRESS PAC $1,000
  • GETTING RESULTS BY ENGAGING THE GRASSROOTS PAC $1,000
  • HMP $5,000
  • HOPE PAC $1,000
  • INNOVATION FOR GOOD PAC $5,000
  • JAMIE RASKIN FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • JEFFRIES FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • JOBS, EDUCATION, & FAMILIES FIRST JEFF PAC $10K
  • JOHN AGER FOR NC SENATE 46 $999
  • KATHERINE CLARK FOR CONGRESS $2,000
  • LA BAMBA PAC $1,500
  • LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS ACTION FUND $3,600
  • LIFTOFF PAC $2,500
  • LORI TRAHAN FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $1,000
  • MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS $5,000
  • NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION ACTION FUND $5,000
  • NEW SOUTH LEADERSHIP PAC $2,000
  • NORTH CAROLINA SOYBEAN PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION NC SOYPAC $500
  • NOT SO OLD FASHIONED PAC $1,000
  • NRDC ACTION FUND INC PAC $1,000
  • PAC OF APPLES $1,000
  • PATRIOT PAC $2,500
  • PETE AGUILAR FOR CONGRESS $4,000
  • POLK COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY $250
  • POLK COUNTY DEMOCRATIC WOMEN $250
  • PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $5,000
  • SCHAKOWSKY FOR CONGRESS $1,000
  • SCHNEIDER FOR CONGRESS $3,000
  • SD PAC $10K
  • SERVICE FIRST PAC $4,000
  • SHORE PAC $1,000
  • STRICKLAND FOR WASHINGTON $1,000
  • SUNFLOWER SEEDS PAC $2,000
  • THE BENCH $3,500
  • TIMBER PAC $2,000
  • TOMORROW PAC $1,000
  • VICTORY IN NOVEMBER ELECTION PAC $1,000
  • VOTE SAVE AMERICA $5,000
  • VPP $1,000
  • WELCOMEPAC $7,500

All filings at the FEC ↗

Jennifer Balkcom (REP)

Raised
$399K through 2026-10-14 individuals $106K · PACs $245K · party $6,000 · from the candidate's other committees $42K · cash on hand $295K
Outside spending
$8.2M opposing Balkcom · $1.0M supporting Balkcom · latest reported 2026-10-30
Largest outside spenders
HMP — $3.7M opposing Balkcom Largest donors: HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD $93.7M (39%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Reid G Hoffman $8.5M (4%), Greylock Partners, Partner; ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FUND $5.0M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Fred Eychaner $5.0M (2%), Retired; UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ISSUES FUND $4.8M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) YOUR COMMUNITY PAC — $2.4M opposing Balkcom Largest donors: SIXTEEN THIRTY FUND $2.7M (62%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); NORTH FUND $900K (20%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY ACTION $515K (12%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); GOVERNMENT THAT WORKS PAC $250K (6%) EDF ACTION VOTES — $746K opposing Balkcom Largest donors: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ACTION FUND $10.7M (75%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Susan Z Mandel $2.5M (18%), NOT Employed, NOT Employed; Michael Bills $200K (1%), Bluestem Asset Management, Founder; Barbara Hostetter $100K (1%), Barr Foundation, Chair; Amos Hostetter $100K (1%), Pilot House Associates LLC, Chairman AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION — $481K supporting Balkcom · 2 ads on this pageLargest donors: KOCH INC $30.0M (33%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); STAND TOGETHER INC. $20.0M (22%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Jim C Walton $7.0M (8%), Self-Employed, Philanthropist; S Robson Walton $7.0M (8%), Retired, Retired; STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC $6.5M (7%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC) CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC. — $399K supporting Balkcom and 15 more
Bundled through PACs
none reported · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01

All filings at the FEC ↗

The ads

84 ads, newest first.

Paid for by AGER FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-10-26spend $300–39925,000–29,999 impressions
Join Jamie Ager, candidate for Congress, for our final Get Out the Vote rally before Election Day at The Mule on Monday, November 2nd starting at 6:00 PM. RSVP for free at Jamie4NC.com/Mule
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by AGER FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-10-26spend $300–39920,000–24,999 impressions
Join Jamie Ager, candidate for Congress, for a Halloween celebration at Wedge Brewery at Foundation on Wednesday, October 31st starting at 7:00 PM. RSVP for free at Jamie4NC.com/HalloweenNight1031
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Metric Media LLCfrom 2026-10-26spend $100–19910,000–14,999 impressions
The North Carolina Republican Party posted an NRCC ad criticizing Jamie Ager over a 2019 event at his family's Hickory Nut Gap Farm. The barn footage showing costumed performers is a dramatization.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by AGER FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-10-26spend $500–59930,000–34,999 impressions
Join Jamie Ager, candidate for Congress, for a meet-and-greet at Auction House Food Hall and Garden on Wednesday October 28th starting at 6:00 PM. RSVP for free at Jamie4NC.com/Fletcher1028
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Working Americafrom 2026-10-26spend $0–99100–999 impressions
Farmers work hard to put food on our table. Jamie Ager would know--he's a working family farmer himself.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by AGER FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-10-26spend $700–79915,000–19,999 impressions
A message for you from James Taylor
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by AGER FOR CONGRESSfrom 2026-10-26spend $300–39915,000–19,999 impressions
Join Jamie Ager, candidate for Congress, for an evening meet-and-greet in Waynesville at the Wells Event Center on Friday, October 30th, starting at 5:30 PM. Come get yourself some food and beverages for what should be a nice evening! RSVP for free at Jamie4NC.com/Waynesville103026
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Working Americafrom 2026-10-26spend $0–99100–999 impressions
North Carolina needs more construction jobs. That's why Jamie Ager wants to put crews to work to rebuild from Hurricane Helene.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by Metric Media LLCfrom 2026-10-26spend $100–1997,000–7,999 impressions
Breitbart News reported that Jamie Ager's Hickory Nut Gap Farm promoted an appearance by the Beer City Sisters. No public record found shows Ager's personal involvement in the festival.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by RP PACfrom 2026-10-262 variantsspend $0–19830,000–39,998 impressions
Jennifer Balkcom put our rural hospitals at risk. Thats why we need to vote for Jamie Ager.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Other advertisers

Paid posts that ran in NC and name a candidate, from advertisers that aren't part of this race: news-style pages, campaigns for other offices, and others. They're shown here for completeness and not counted with the ads above. We show the same technique analysis; their claims are not checked.

Pine & Cardinal: news-style page

Paid for by Pine & Cardinalfrom 2026-10-122 variantsspend $0–1982,000–3,998 impressions
🚨 Jamie Ager, the Democratic nominee for North Carolina’s 11th Congressional District, said people need access to good care when asked at a campaign meeting how universal health care would work. Ager called it “a good question,” noted there are “a lot of different versions” and said he did not have the answers. His campaign platform supports a public insurance option, not a government-only plan. What do you make of the exchange? #HealthCare #NC11 👇
no techniques found

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

What this page is

  • An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in NC; or it ran mostly in NC and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
  • Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
  • A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
  • Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
  • Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
  • Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.

Try Pro free for 14 days, no card. Claim checks on every article, and an email when the stories you follow change.