Project 2025: As midterms near, Trump’s window for action might be closing
1 of 1 checks found something
Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check
Tap a technique to see where it’s used.
What these techniques mean
What the model flagged
underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words tap a technique for why
“radical move” … “send shockwaves across the economy”
↓Loaded Language · “radical move”, “send shockwaves across the economy”Why ›
The word 'radical' is emotionally charged and used to frame Trump's action negatively, while 'shockwaves' amplifies alarm.“uncertainty for manufacturers, states, regulators everywhere”
↓Appeal to Fear · “uncertainty for manufacturers, states, regulators everywhere”Why ›
The sentence predicts sweeping economic disruption affecting manufacturers, states, and regulators everywhere to provoke anxiety.“send shockwaves across the economy” … “regulators everywhere”
↓Exaggeration/Hyperbole · “send shockwaves across the economy”, “regulators everywhere”Why ›
Claiming the move will send 'shockwaves across the economy' with uncertainty affecting 'everywhere' is an extreme overstatement.“Big Oil”
↑Name Calling · “Big Oil”Why ›
'Big Oil' is a derogatory label used to discredit the policy's beneficiaries rather than engage with substantive arguments.Analyzed 2026-08-07 04:01 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →