Prisoner release row proving to be Burnham's first big test as PM
1 of 1 checks found something
Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check
Tap a technique to see where it’s used.
What these techniques mean
What the model flagged
underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words tap a technique for why
“rapists and dangerous criminals”
↓Loaded Language · “rapists and dangerous criminals”Why ›
The terms 'rapists and dangerous criminals' are emotionally charged labels designed to provoke fear and outrage rather than provide neutral factual description.“planned to release rapists and dangerous criminals”
↓Appeal to Fear · “planned to release rapists and dangerous criminals”Why ›
The sentence implies that the opposing side was willing to release violent offenders into the public, creating anxiety about public safety to discredit them.“cop-killers and men involved in the grooming gang scandal”
↓Name Calling · “cop-killers and men involved in the grooming gang scandal”Why ›
Labelling individuals as 'cop-killers' and associating others with 'the grooming gang scandal' uses derogatory categorisation to inflame rather than inform.“emergency primary legislation as soon as Parliament returns in September”
↓False Urgency · “emergency primary legislation as soon as Parliament returns in September”Why ›
The phrase 'emergency primary legislation as soon as Parliament returns' frames the issue as requiring immediate, urgent action.“the only way to permanently exclude”
↑Black-and-White Fallacy · “the only way to permanently exclude”Why ›
The claim that legislation is 'the only way' to achieve the stated goal presents a binary framing that excludes other possible approaches.Analyzed 2026-08-08 04:01 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →