Andy Burnham to embark on cost of living tour through the UK

Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check

Wording
11%of the article’s sentences use a rhetorical technique

Tap a technique to see where it’s used.

What these techniques mean
Loaded Language Emotionally charged words that push a reaction instead of giving information.Show the first one ↓
Exaggeration/Hyperbole Overstating something to make it seem bigger or worse.Show the first one ↓
Appeal to Fear Raising a threat to drive the reader’s view.Show the first one ↓
Conspiracy Appeal Implying hidden, coordinated wrongdoing without showing it.Show the first one ↓

What the model flagged

underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words tap a technique for why

“breathtaking hypocrisy” … “destroying jobs” … “driving up prices”

↓
Loaded Language · “breathtaking hypocrisy”, “destroying jobs”, “driving up prices”Why › Emotionally charged words are used to provoke a strong reaction rather than convey neutral facts.

“forcing businesses to close” … “destroying jobs” … “driving up prices for the public”

↓
Exaggeration/Hyperbole · “forcing businesses to close”, “destroying jobs”, “driving up prices for the public”Why › The claim that they are 'forcing businesses to close' and 'destroying jobs' presents an extreme characterisation of the policy's effects without evidential qualification.

“leaving people feeling unsafe in their communities” … “dangerous criminals onto our streets”

↓
Appeal to Fear · “leaving people feeling unsafe in their communities”, “dangerous criminals onto our streets”Why › The sentence creates vivid anxiety about personal safety and community security to trigger an emotional response against Labour.

“Labour are plotting to release dangerous criminals”

↑
Conspiracy Appeal · “Labour are plotting to release dangerous criminals”Why › The word 'plotting' implies secret, sinister coordination rather than open policy-making, suggesting a hidden agenda.

Read the original ↗ · Open the full analysis →

Analyzed 2026-08-10 04:02 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.

Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →

Get notified as this improves — new detection models, the browser extension, and new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time