Trump Promised Transparency. His Administration Keeps Finding New Ways to Hide Records.

Open the full analysis → Read the original article at Reason →

Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check

Wording

16%of the article’s sentences use a rhetorical technique

Tap a technique to see where it’s used.

What these techniques mean

Repetition Saying the same point again to make it stick, not to add to it.Show the first one ↓

Conspiracy Appeal Implying hidden, coordinated wrongdoing without showing it.Show the first one ↓

Loaded Language Emotionally charged words that push a reaction instead of giving information.Show the first one ↓

Card Stacking Only the facts that support one side, presented as the whole picture.Show the first one ↓

Name Calling A label used to mock or discredit instead of an argument.Show the first one ↓

False Equivalence Show the first one ↓

ClaimsCheck the factual claims in this article →

What the model flagged

underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words tap a technique for why

“used that phrase over and over again”

↓

Repetition · “used that phrase over and over again”Why ›

The phrase 'most transparent president in history' is noted as being repeated over and over again by spokespeople, highlighting deliberate rhetorical repetition of a self-aggrandizing slogan.

↓

Conspiracy AppealWhy ›

Hidden plots, secret coordination, or shadowy actors invoked to explain away evidence.

“well-connected sex predator Jeffrey Epstein”

↓

Loaded Language · “well-connected sex predator Jeffrey Epstein”Why ›

The phrase 'well-connected sex predator' uses emotionally charged language to characterize Epstein, going beyond neutral factual description.

“While the JFK files included some genuinely shocking revelations, the UFO files were thin on substance”

↓

Card Stacking · “While the JFK files included some genuinely shocking revelations, the UFO files were thin on substance”Why ›

The sentence selectively contrasts the JFK files as having 'genuinely shocking revelations' against the UFO files being 'thin on substance,' framing the administration's transparency effort as partially hollow without full context.

↓

Name CallingWhy ›

Derogatory labels used to discredit a person or group rather than address their arguments.

“Nixon trying to shred his tapes and Hillary Clinton stashing her emails on a hidden server”

↑

False Equivalence · “Nixon trying to shred his tapes and Hillary Clinton stashing her emails on a hidden server”Why ›

Nixon's criminal obstruction (shredding tapes during Watergate) and Clinton's email server use are presented as equivalent acts of record concealment, ignoring the vastly different legal and factual contexts.

Read the original ↗ · Open the full analysis →

↑ Back to the results

Analyzed 2026-08-16 04:04 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.

Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →