Crimes to the Left of me, quiet to the Right
Read the original article at Washington Examiner →
What the model flagged
Analyzed 2026-08-30 04:02 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote below isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Findings may include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting. We flag manipulation techniques wherever they appear, including inside quotations — so check each quote against the original before drawing a conclusion about the outlet.
Black-And-White Fallacy 80%
The sentence creates a binary division between 'blue states' and 'red states', implying that political affiliation directly determines vulnerability to organized crime, ignoring the complexity of crime distribution — for example: 'blue states across America exposed a new scope of organized crime to which red states seem less vulnerable'
“blue states across America exposed a new scope of organized crime to which red states seem less vulnerable”
Appeal To Prejudice 75%
The framing exploits partisan in-group/out-group identity by associating 'blue states' with organized crime and 'red states' with safety, reinforcing political tribal divisions — for example: 'red states seem less vulnerable'
“blue states across America”
“red states seem less vulnerable”
Scapegoating 95%
The sentence directly blames minority and immigrant groups as a collective for large-scale fraud, attributing complex financial crimes to these demographic groups — for example: 'Minority and immigrant groups allegedly mounted massive fraud campaigns to steal millions of taxpayer dollars'
“Minority and immigrant groups allegedly mounted massive fraud campaigns to steal millions of taxpayer dollars”
Loaded Language 90%
Emotionally charged words like 'massive fraud campaigns' and 'steal' are used to provoke outrage rather than neutrally describe alleged conduct — for example: 'massive fraud campaigns to steal millions of taxpayer dollars'
“massive fraud campaigns”
“steal millions of taxpayer dollars”
Conspiracy Appeal 80%
The sentence implies a coordinated hidden scheme by minority and immigrant groups who allegedly believed they were protected by sympathetic governments, suggesting a shadowy arrangement — for example: 'relying on the belief that their actions would never be challenged by politically sensitive municipal and state governments'
“relying on the belief that their actions would never be challenged by politically sensitive municipal and state governments concerned about possible allegations of racial intolerance”
Card Stacking 72%
The sentence selectively presents the comparison to imply red states had smaller scandals, framing blue states as worse without providing full context or equivalent scrutiny — for example: implying red state scandals were less severe solely based on dollar amount without addressing other factors.
“none of them survived long enough to rake in more than $19 million”
Victim Blaming 90%
Moral responsibility shifted onto victims of violence or oppression.
Appeal To Fear 72%
The sentence implies that controversial crime/law enforcement policies will attract criminals to certain states, creating anxiety about the consequences of those policies — for example: 'Any criminal with access to current events is going to go to those states'
“Any criminal with access to current events is going to go to those states where the crime and law enforcement topic creates controversy”
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are manipulation techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →