Crimes to the Left of me, quiet to the Right
1 of 1 checks found something
Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check
Tap a technique to see where it’s used.
What these techniques mean
What the model flagged
underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words tap a technique for why
“blue states across America exposed a new scope of organized crime to which red states seem less vulnerable”
↓Black-and-White Fallacy · “blue states across America exposed a new scope of organized crime to which red states seem less vulnerable”Why ›
The sentence creates a binary division between 'blue states' and 'red states', implying that political affiliation directly determines vulnerability to organized crime, ignoring the complexity of crime distribution.“blue states across America” … “red states seem less vulnerable”
↓Appeal to Prejudice · “blue states across America”, “red states seem less vulnerable”Why ›
The framing exploits partisan in-group/out-group identity by associating 'blue states' with organized crime and 'red states' with safety, reinforcing political tribal divisions.“Minority and immigrant groups allegedly mounted massive fraud campaigns to steal millions of taxpayer dollars”
↓Scapegoating · “Minority and immigrant groups allegedly mounted massive fraud campaigns to steal millions of taxpayer dollars”Why ›
The sentence directly blames minority and immigrant groups as a collective for large-scale fraud, attributing complex financial crimes to these demographic groups.“massive fraud campaigns” … “steal millions of taxpayer dollars”
↓Loaded Language · “massive fraud campaigns”, “steal millions of taxpayer dollars”Why ›
Emotionally charged words like 'massive fraud campaigns' and 'steal' are used to provoke outrage rather than neutrally describe alleged conduct.“relying on the belief that their actions would never be challenged by politically sensitive municipal and state governments concerned about possible allegations of racial intolerance”
↓Conspiracy Appeal · “relying on the belief that their actions would never be challenged by politically sensitive municipal and state governments concerned about possible allegations of racial intolerance”Why ›
The sentence implies a coordinated hidden scheme by minority and immigrant groups who allegedly believed they were protected by sympathetic governments, suggesting a shadowy arrangement.“none of them survived long enough to rake in more than $19 million”
↓Card Stacking · “none of them survived long enough to rake in more than $19 million”Why ›
The sentence selectively presents the comparison to imply red states had smaller scandals, framing blue states as worse without providing full context or equivalent scrutiny.Victim BlamingWhy ›
Moral responsibility shifted onto victims of violence or oppression.“Any criminal with access to current events is going to go to those states where the crime and law enforcement topic creates controversy”
↑Appeal to Fear · “Any criminal with access to current events is going to go to those states where the crime and law enforcement topic creates controversy”Why ›
The sentence implies that controversial crime/law enforcement policies will attract criminals to certain states, creating anxiety about the consequences of those policies.Analyzed 2026-08-30 04:02 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →