Burnham pressed on economy at first PMQs as borrowing costs surge
1 of 1 checks found something
Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check
Tap a technique to see where it’s used.
What these techniques mean
What the model flagged
underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words tap a technique for why
“spendthrift prime minister”
↓Name Calling · “spendthrift prime minister”Why ›
The term 'spendthrift' is a derogatory label applied to the prime minister to discredit them rather than engage with specific policy arguments.“clearly worried” … “spendthrift prime minister”
↓Loaded Language · “clearly worried”, “spendthrift prime minister”Why ›
The phrase 'clearly worried' and 'spendthrift' carry emotionally charged connotations designed to trigger concern and distrust rather than convey neutral facts.“he has a choice - higher taxes, more borrowing, or spending cuts”
↑Black-and-White Fallacy · “he has a choice - higher taxes, more borrowing, or spending cuts”Why ›
The sentence presents only three options for funding new promises, implying these are the only possible choices and ignoring other possibilities such as economic growth, efficiency savings, or combinations thereof.Analyzed 2026-09-03 04:02 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →