Trump sees a ‘con’ in climate change. Xi sees cash.
1 of 1 checks found something
Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check
Tap a technique to see where it’s used.
What these techniques mean
What the model flagged
underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words tap a technique for why
“greatest con job ever”
↓Loaded Language · “greatest con job ever”Why ›
The phrase 'greatest con job ever' is emotionally charged language attributed to Trump, but its content carries strong rhetorical weight designed to trigger a reaction rather than convey facts.“greatest con job ever”
↓Exaggeration/Hyperbole · “greatest con job ever”Why ›
The superlative claim 'greatest con job ever' is an extreme overstatement that goes well beyond what evidence supports.“fewer and fewer people worldwide share Mr. Trump's belief”
↑Bandwagon Appeal · “fewer and fewer people worldwide share Mr. Trump's belief”Why ›
The sentence implies that because fewer and fewer people share Trump's view, his position is therefore wrong — using crowd consensus as an implicit argument against his stance.Analyzed 2026-09-04 04:06 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →