Grab Them by the Constitution
1 of 1 checks found something
Flags are about wording, sourcing and context, not whether it’s true or which side is right. How we check
In the writer’s own words.
Tap a technique to see where it’s used.
What these techniques mean
The passages the findings rest on
underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words dashed edge: in a quote, not counted tap a technique for why
1 paragraph with no finding
“break the Supreme Court’s grip on democracy”
Loaded Language · “break the Supreme Court’s grip on democracy”Why ›
The phrase 'grip on democracy' casts the Supreme Court as a strangling force using emotionally charged wording rather than facts.10 paragraphs with no finding
Only the words each finding rests on are shown here. Read the original ↗ · Open the full analysis →
Analyzed 2026-10-12 04:01 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →