'I say worse things than that every day': Jimmy Carr issues hilarious defense of Shane Gillis
The article, with notes
underlined: technique found; pick one to highlight its words dashed edge: in a quote, not counted tap a technique for why
1 paragraph with no finding
Name Calling · “leftists and feminists”Why ›
Uses the labels 'leftists and feminists' to characterize critics as a bloc and discredit their accusations without engaging their substance.Loaded Language · “assailed”Why ›
The word 'assailed' frames the criticism as a violent attack, evoking sympathy for Gillis rather than neutrally reporting criticism.1 paragraph with no finding
Loaded Language · “excoriated”, “whores”Why ›
The emotionally charged verb 'excoriated' and the quoted slur 'whores' are chosen to provoke a reaction rather than convey neutral facts.11 paragraphs with no finding
Only the words each finding rests on are shown here. Read the original ↗ · Open the full analysis →
Analyzed 2026-10-21 04:14 UTC. Articles are sometimes updated after publication — if a quote here isn't in the current version, the piece has changed since.
Analyzed automatically with Semblen's fine-tuned model. These are rhetorical techniques, not political tilt — and finding one is not a claim that the article is false. Findings include language the outlet is quoting rather than asserting: we flag techniques wherever they appear, so check each quote against the original. The model has known false positives on strong-but-legitimate language, so treat each finding as a prompt to read closely, not a verdict. How articles are chosen →