Amish Shah won. Get what Amish Shah says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
51 ads analyzed · 25 use a rhetorical technique, most often name calling and appeal to fear.
The words doing the persuading
Paid for by DCCC“Trump lackey Jay Feely backs reckless tariffs and the Iran war, while still refusing to admit Trump…”Name CallingSee this ad →
Monica Alponte (Libertarian), Jay Feely (Republican) and Amish Shah (Democrat) are the nominees for Arizona's 1st congressional district in the November 3, 2026 general election. By their latest FEC reports, Monica Alponte's campaign had raised $9,000 (through October 14, 2026), Jay Feely's campaign $3.8 million (through October 14, 2026) and Amish Shah's campaign $5.7 million (through October 14, 2026). Outside groups have reported $99,000 for Monica Alponte and $0 against; $4.8 million for Jay Feely and $10.1 million against; $1.9 million for Amish Shah and $14.7 million against. Semblen has analyzed 51 ads in this race; 25 used at least one rhetorical technique, most often name calling and appeal to fear.
Monica Alponte (LIB), Jay Feely (REP), Amish Shah (DEM).
11 others filed with the FEC; any ads they ran are below. 51 ads analyzed, 25 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing. Updated 2026-10-28. 1 ad from other advertisers shown separately below.
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Fri, Oct 23 (Request ballot-by-mail by this date (11 days before Election Day)) (passed)Source: azsos.gov ↗Source: azsos.gov ↗
Election Day
Tue, Nov 3 (passed)
ID at the polls
One photo ID with name and address, or two non-photo documents (List #2 or 3)Source: azsos.gov ↗
Checked October 8, 2026. Rules can change; confirm with the official site before you go.
Something wrong or out of date? Tell us
A person reads every report and fixes errors the same day.
Where they stand
From each campaign's own website, summarised in plain English, with a quote where they gave one; under an issue, Senate votes for those who have cast them. Full detail and sources on each profile: Jay Feely · Amish Shah.
Economy and cost of livingFeely: stated · Shah: stated
Jay Feely (REP)
Feely says he wants to cut red tape, expand the Trump-era tax cuts, boost domestic manufacturing and bring down inflation and the cost of living so young families can afford to live in Arizona.
“I’ll fight to slash red tape, expand Trump-era tax cuts, unleash domestic manufacturing, and drive down inflation.”
Shah says he would fight to lower costs by rolling back tariffs, keeping groceries and essentials affordable, and ending the turmoil in Washington so job growth and business investment can recover.
“he will fight to lower costs by rolling back these crushing tariffs, making sure families can afford groceries and essentials”
Shah says he cut taxes for middle-class families and backed small businesses while in the State House. In Congress he says he would roll back tariffs, which he calls a tax on Arizona families.
Shah says he would expand health coverage, protect Medicare, lower prescription drug prices, reverse Medicaid cuts, and lower premiums. He also says he would take on drug companies over the price of medications like insulin.
“Amish will work to expand coverage, protect Medicare, and lower prescription drug prices.”
Social Security and MedicareFeely: no position · Shah: stated
Jay Feely (REP)
No stated position on their website.
Amish Shah (DEM)
Shah says he would protect Social Security and Medicare so every Arizona senior receives the benefits they paid for and earned. He also says he would reverse the Medicaid cuts.
“Dr. Shah will always stand up to protect Social Security and Medicare so that every Arizona senior receives the benefits they paid for and earned”
Immigration and the borderFeely: stated · Shah: stated
Jay Feely (REP)
Feely says he wants to finish the border wall, end the Biden/Harris border policies, and support mass deportations of violent offenders. He also says he would back police, Border Patrol and ICE agents and work to stop fentanyl from reaching neighborhoods.
“I’ll fight to finish the wall, dismantle the Biden/Harris open-borders agenda, and deliver results.”
Shah says only a woman and her provider should make decisions about reproductive health care. He says he would codify Roe v. Wade in Congress, and he cites his 100% pro-choice voting record and his work to protect access to the abortion drug mifepristone.
“he will continue protecting a woman’s right to choose in Congress by codifying Roe v. Wade”
Feely says he supports President Trump's energy agenda and wants more American oil, natural gas and clean coal. He says he would cut red tape, encourage exploration and build energy infrastructure, and he opposes the Green New Deal.
Shah says he would work to bring federal resources to Arizona communities and Tribes to build resilience against drought, enact conservation policies, and fight for Arizona's fair share of the Colorado River. He also says he would work to stop data centers from being built in his district.
Shah says he would fully fund police and stop the flow of fentanyl across the border. He cites his State House work supporting first responders and curbing illegal drugs, and endorsements from three law enforcement unions.
Feely says he would stop federal mandates that hurt schools, and would pass laws to keep boys from competing against girls in sports and protect girls' and women's sports.
“boys should not be competing against girls in sports.”
Shah says he would defend the Department of Education, push for more funding for public schools and better teacher pay, and lower the cost of higher education so students can get training without crushing debt.
“Amish will defend the Department of Education, champion increased funding for public schools, and push for better teacher pay”
Foreign policy and defenseFeely: stated · Shah: no position
Jay Feely (REP)
Feely says he would stand with Israel, strengthen the U.S.-Israel relationship and restore American support for it. He also says he would fight antisemitism at home, especially on college campuses.
“I will stand unapologetically with Israel and fight to strengthen the U.S.-Israel relationship.”
Elections and ethics in governmentFeely: no position · Shah: stated
Jay Feely (REP)
No stated position on their website.
Amish Shah (DEM)
Shah says he would uphold the Constitution and protect democratic institutions, combat partisan gerrymandering, work to eliminate dark money from politics, and stop corrupt politicians from enriching themselves in office.
“Amish will combat partisan gerrymandering, work to eliminate dark money from politics and stop corrupt politicians from enriching themselves in office.”
Something wrong or missing? Each profile has an Accurate? button under every issue; a person reads every note.
Got a political text?
Paste a campaign text message you’ve received. Semblen marks the persuasion techniques in its wording and lists the factual claims it makes. Take your name out first: what you paste is analyzed and kept like any text.
Findings
As of 2026-10-28. Counts are of distinct ads; the same text run many times is one ad.
Ads analyzed
51 · started running between 2026-08-12 and 2026-10-26
A small box with these findings and the newest ads, updated as new ads are analyzed. Free for newsrooms, blogs and campaigns alike; it links back here.
Follow Amish Shah in office
Amish Shah won. Get what Amish Shah says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
sex offenderin 3 ads· e.g. “would rather protect sex offenders”, “allow convicted sex offenders to run free”
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
From FEC filings for 2025–26. Outside spending is money a group spends on its own about a candidate — TV and online ads, mail, canvassing. It is not a donation to the campaign, and the candidate does not control it. Supporting means it was spent to help that candidate win; Opposing means it was spent to defeat them, usually on attack ads. Groups report it within 24 or 48 hours as the election nears. Raised is the campaign's own fundraising, as of its latest quarterly report. Largest donors come from each outside spender's own FEC receipts, with each donor's share of its itemized receipts; donors under $100,000 are not named. People are shown with the employer and occupation they reported. A donor that is itself a political committee is shown with its own largest donors. Companies and nonprofits don't report their funders to the FEC, so the trail ends there, and the page says so.
Monica Alponte (LIB)
Raised
$9,453 through 2026-10-14individuals $7,405 · PACs $0 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $2,048 · cash on hand $754
$3.8M through 2026-10-14individuals $1.9M · PACs $507K · party $5,000 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $416K · from the candidate's other committees $953K · cash on hand $183K
HMP— $6.4M opposing FeelyLargest donors:
HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD $93.7M (39%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Reid G Hoffman $8.5M (4%), Greylock Partners, Partner; ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FUND $5.0M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Fred Eychaner $5.0M (2%), Retired; UNITED ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ISSUES FUND $4.8M (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)SAFETY & AFFORDABILITY PAC INC.— $1.9M supporting FeelyAMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION PAC— $1.2M supporting FeelyLargest donors:
RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC $6.8M (100%)314 ACTION FUND— $979K opposing FeelyLargest donors:
Michael Bloomberg $6.4M (38%), Bloomberg LP, Executive; 314 ACTION $4.6M (28%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); MARTIN, JAMES W $2.1M (13%); KIMBARK FOUNDATION $500K (3%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); PETERSON SOLUTIONS FUND $285K (2%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC)GUARDRAILS ALLIANCE— $775K opposing FeelyLargest donors:
Juan Felipe Ceron Uribe $200K (27%), Openai, Research Engineer; Dylan Mavrides $100K (14%), Jane Street Capital, Quantitative Trader; Jacob Eliosoff $100K (14%), Calibrated Markets LLC, Investment Managerand 21 more
$5.7M through 2026-10-14individuals $4.1M · PACs $535K · party $340 · candidate's own money, incl. loans $467K · from the candidate's other committees $504K · cash on hand $206K
Outside spending
$14.7M opposing Shah · $1.9M supporting Shah· latest reported 2026-11-02
Largest outside spenders
SAFETY & AFFORDABILITY PAC INC.— $7.5M opposing ShahCLF— $3.1M opposing Shah
· 4 ads on this pageLargest donors:
AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK $64.3M (25%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); Elon Musk $30.0M (12%), Space Exploration Technologies Corp., CEO; Timothy Mellon $21.0M (8%), Self-Employed, Investments; Miriam Adelson $10.0M (4%), Adelson Drug Clinic, Physician; Paul E Singer $8.0M (3%), EMC, PresidentBOLD AMERICA— $1.7M opposing ShahLargest donors:
PROXIMO ACTION $2.9M (31%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP') $2.8M (30%); DEMOCRATS 2026 $1.2M (12%) (its largest donors: KOLBECK, PETER $290K); OPPORTUNITY FORWARD ALLIANCE $775K (8%) (an organization: its own funders aren't reported to the FEC); CHC BOLD PAC $600K (6%)PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY ACTION— $695K opposing ShahLargest donors:
EDW ACTION FUND $5.6M (>99%)PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT— $653K supporting ShahLargest donors:
STOP REPUBLICANS $6.1M (22%) (its largest donors: FAHEY, EILEEN $2.7M; PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $2.5M); LAWALL, JOY $6.0M (22%); PROGRESSIVE TAKEOVER $3.5M (13%) (its largest donors: EVEY, JULIE $1.4M); STOP THESE OPPRESSIVE PEOPLE: TYRANTS RACISTS UNQUALIFIEDS MISOGYNISTS PROPAGANDISTS (STOP TRUMP) $3.0M (11%) (its largest donors: JOHNSTON, ERIC $1.3M); DEM TURNOUT 2024 $2.1M (8%) (its largest donors: KITCHEN, CAROL $1.2M)and 29 more
Bundled through PACs
$4,250 through 1 PAC · FEC bulk data of 2026-11-01JSTREETPAC— $4,250 from 9 giftsLobbyist/registrant PAC
40 PACs gave directly — alphabetical; the legal limit is $5,000 per election
314 ACTION FUND $5,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE (AAEM) $5,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS (FAMMEDPAC) $5,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC POLITICAL COMMITTEE (OPHTHPAC) $5,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY (ENTPAC) $2,500
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NEUROSURGERYPAC) $5,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OB-GYNS PAC (OB-GYN PAC) $10K
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC PAC; AKA ACP SERVICES PAC $4,000
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION PAC $5,000
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION PAC (ACSPA) $2,500
AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
AMERICAN DREAM FOR ALL PAC $3,500
AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC, PAC $5,000
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC INFORMATION ASSOCIATION - OSTEOPATHIC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION PHYSICAL THERAPY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PT-PAC) $1,000
AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,000
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY (ASTRO PAC) $500
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ASA PAC) $5,000
ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION PAC $1,000
ARIZONA OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PAC $1,000
ASCO ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ASCO ASSOCIATION PAC) $2,500
ASIAN AMERICAN ACTION FUND $1,000
ASPIRE PAC $5,000
AT THE TABLE! $1,000
BLATTMAN FOR AZ $500
HEALTHCARE FOR ACTION PAC $2,500
HINDU AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (HAPAC) $5,000
INDIAN AMERICAN IMPACT FUND $5,000
MIDWEST VALUES PAC $2,500
NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE PAC (NEMPAC) / AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS (ACEP) $5,000
POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS--PAC OF AAOS $2,500
REVIVING AMERICAN JOBS AGAIN PAC DBA EQUAL OPPORTUNITY NOW $5,000
SEAN BOWIE FOR STATE SENATE $500
THE CENTER FOR FREETHOUGHT EQUALITY PAC $250
UNITED PILOTS PAC/UNITED AIRLINES MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL $5,000
Paid for by Feely For Congressfrom 2026-10-262 variantsspend $2,100–2,698130,000–155,998 impressions
Enough is enough. Amish Shah supports the largest tax increase in American History, costing you more than $4,000. I'll fight to CUT taxes, LOWER costs, and make sure Arizona families keep more of their hard-earned money.
Exaggeration/Hyperbole: Uses an absolute superlative claim that overstates the evidence and is presented without support. Flagged: “the largest tax increase in American History”.
Appeal to Fear: Raises anxiety about a personal financial threat to the reader to drive a vote against the opponent. Flagged: “costing you more than $4,000”.
Glittering Generalities: Uses vague, positive and emotive phrasing about families and their earnings with no specific policy detail. Flagged: “Arizona families keep more of their hard-earned money”.
Paid for by Feely For Congressfrom 2026-10-262 variantsspend $100–29815,100–20,998 impressions
I don't care which party I have to take on. I'll fight for YOU, not the politicians in Washington, and make sure you keep more of your hard-earned money.
Black-and-White Fallacy: Frames the choice as only the speaker fighting for 'YOU' versus the politicians in Washington, leaving no other options. Flagged: “I'll fight for YOU, not the politicians in Washington”.
Amish Shah won. Get what Amish Shah says in office by email, analyzed for rhetorical techniques, once sworn in. And an email if the result changes: a recount or a call reversed. One-click unsubscribe.
Confirming also makes your free Semblen account, with a 14-day Pro trial. No card.
Paid for by Metric Media LLCfrom 2026-10-26spend $0–99100–999 impressions
Steve Cortes backed Jay Feely for Congress after ICE announced a Phoenix arrest. Cortes said the case showed why Congress should support immigration enforcement.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by Metric Media LLCfrom 2026-10-26spend $0–99100–999 impressions
Yassamin Ansari promoted a Phoenix campaign fundraiser featuring Barbra Seville and Common Defense. Steve Cortes criticized the event and urged support for Jay Feely over Amish Shah.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by Metric Media LLCfrom 2026-10-26spend $0–99100–999 impressions
Steve Cortes cited two arrests announced by ICE in Phoenix while criticizing Amish Shah's border budget vote and contrasting it with Jay Feely's immigration enforcement pledges.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid for by Metric Media LLCfrom 2026-10-26spend $0–99100–999 impressions
Steve Cortes criticized Amish Shah's position on ICE as Arizona arrests rose. Shah says current ICE practices need to be curtailed, while Jay Feely pledges support for ICE, according to Smarter.vote.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Paid posts that ran in AZ and name a candidate, from advertisers that aren't part of this race: news-style pages, campaigns for other offices, and others. They're shown here for completeness and not counted with the ads above. We show the same technique analysis; their claims are not checked.
Grand Canyon Gazette: news-style page
Paid for by Grand Canyon Gazettefrom 2026-08-24 to 2026-08-312 variantsspend $0–1982,000–3,998 impressions
🚨 Arizona congressional candidate Dr. Amish Shah told a Democratic Socialists of America gathering that socialist ideas "weren't really part of the conversation before Bernie came around," crediting Sen. Bernie Sanders with reshaping the Democratic Party's platform.
Shah, an emergency physician and former Arizona state representative, is seeking the Democratic nomination for Arizona's 1st Congressional District in 2026. He previously ran in 2024, losing to incumbent Republican David Schweikert by roughly four percentage points. His general election opponent this cycle is former NFL kicker Jay Feely.
The NRCC has previously run ads highlighting Shah's documented ties to the DSA, including his appearance at a 2019 DSA event backing Sen. Sanders for president. Shah won the 2026 Democratic primary without the backing of the DCCC, defeating the committee's endorsed candidate.
What do you think: does a candidate's stated political influences matter when voters head to the polls? 👇
#AmishShah #Arizona #AZ01 #BernieSanders #Congress2026 #Breaking
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it comes from a national Senate group and ran mostly in AZ; or it ran mostly in AZ and names a candidate — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific rhetorical move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. Running a check and seeing its verdicts are part of Semblen Pro, because each check costs money to run; anyone can see which claims an ad makes. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.