Alabama Governor 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them

Tommy Tuberville (Republican) and Doug Jones (Democrat) are the candidates for governor of Alabama in the November 3, 2026 general election. Semblen has analyzed 42 ads in this race; 27 used at least one manipulation technique, most often loaded language and name calling.

Tommy Tuberville (REP), Doug Jones (DEM). On the ballot as listed by Alabama Secretary of State, State Certification of Republican Party Candidates, 2026 General, Alabama Secretary of State, State Certification of Democratic Party Candidates, 2026 General. 42 ads analyzed, 27 with at least one technique in the copy. Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing. Updated 2026-10-08.

Findings

As of 2026-10-08. Counts are of distinct ads; the same text run many times is one ad.

Ads analyzed
42 (Meta 41, YouTube 1) · started running between 2026-08-25 and 2026-10-08
With at least one technique
27 of 42 (64%)
Most common techniques
Loaded Language · 22 adsName Calling · 17 adsAppeal to Prejudice · 13 ads
Meta
27 of 41 (66%) flagged · Loaded Language (22), Name Calling (17), Appeal to Prejudice (13)
YouTube
0 of 1 flagged
Reported Meta spend
$85,500–108,283 on all ads, $54,500–68,131 on flagged ads · Meta reports ranges; these are the sums of their ends
Example
“spreading lies” — Loaded Language, paid for by Doug For Alabama · the flagged ad with the highest reported spend that shows the most common technique

Embed this race on your site

A small box with these findings and the newest ads, updated as new ads are analyzed. Free for newsrooms, blogs and campaigns alike; it links back here.

Who is running these ads

Each side is the campaign plus the groups backing it. How a group is placed is explained below the table.

SideAdsWith at least one techniqueMost common
Tuberville (R)3122 of 31 (71%)Loaded Language (18), Name Calling (13), Appeal to Prejudice (11)
Tuberville's campaign55 of 5Loaded Language (4), Appeal to Prejudice (3), Black-and-White Fallacy (3)
1 group backing Tuberville2617 of 26 (65%)Loaded Language (14), Name Calling (11), Appeal to Fear (8)
Jones (D)62 of 6Loaded Language (2), Appeal to Fear (1), False Urgency (1)
All from the campaign; no ads here from groups placed on this side.
Not placed on a side (2 sponsors)53 of 5Name Calling (3), Appeal to Prejudice (2), Loaded Language (2)

Read this before comparing the sides. Ads that attack an opponent use these techniques far more often than ads that introduce a candidate, whoever runs them, so the side running more attack ads shows a higher share. A technique is about wording, not about whether an ad is true. These are online ads only (Meta and YouTube), not television.

By sponsor (5)
Paid for bySideAdsWith at least one techniqueMost common
ALABAMA REPUBLICAN PARTYTubervillethe party's own committee2617 of 26 (65%)Loaded Language (14), Name Calling (11), Appeal to Fear (8)
Doug For AlabamaJonesthe campaign62 of 6Loaded Language (2), Appeal to Fear (1), False Urgency (1)
TUBERVILLE FOR GOVERNOR INCTubervillethe campaign55 of 5Loaded Language (4), Appeal to Prejudice (3), Black-and-White Fallacy (3)
New Southern Majority IE PAC—43 of 4Name Calling (3), Appeal to Prejudice (2), Loaded Language (2)
SOUTHEAST LEGAL MARKETING, LLC—10 of 1

How a group is placed: by its own filings with the Federal Election Commission. A group is with a candidate when it reported spending to support that candidate, or to oppose the other one in the general election. The parties' own committees are with their nominee. Spending against a candidate in a primary places a group nowhere, and neither does our reading of its ads: a group with no such filing is listed as not placed. The sponsor table gives the reason for each.

Decide what counts

Not everyone would call every technique manipulation. Untick the ones you'd call ordinary persuasion and the count updates.

64% of the 42 ads here use at least one of the techniques ticked below (27 ads).

Leaving out the softer ones (loaded language, glittering generalities, slogans, exaggeration, repetition): 64% of ads.

The words doing the work

The words that show up most in phrases our model flagged as loaded language or name calling in this race's ads, by number of ads.

  • lies in 4 ads · e.g. “Tommy's lies”, “lies about supporting veterans”
  • government in 3 ads · e.g. “make big government bigger”, “expand government control over your health care”
  • socialist in 3 ads · e.g. “Democrat Socialists”, “socialists”

Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.

Money in this race

Candidates for governor report their fundraising to Alabama's state campaign-finance office, not the FEC. This page doesn't cover those reports yet, so it shows no money figures.

The ads

42 ads, newest first. Video transcripts are shown as the model read them, without caption cues like [music].

Showing the 4 ads paid for by New Southern Majority IE PAC. Show all 42 ads

Paid for by New Southern Majority IE PACfrom 2026-09-302 variantsspend $5,500–6,498500,000–599,998 impressions
Tommy Tuberville wants Alabama to “do data centers.” Here’s what that sounds like. Prefer the sound of wildlife, running water, and lower electricity bills? It’s Alabama’s turn to be heard. Vote by November 3rd.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by New Southern Majority IE PACfrom 2026-09-302 variantsspend $6,600–7,698570,000–679,998 impressions
Tommy Tuberville says concerns about data centers are “bullcrap.” It should be up to Alabamians if a data center is built in their backyard. Not a shadowy developer. Not a billionaire tech CEO. And not a governor who already decided our concerns are bullcrap. Vote by November 3rd.

Loaded Language: The word 'shadowy' carries a sinister, conspiratorial connotation designed to trigger distrust rather than convey factual information — for example: shadowy developer and already decided our concerns are bullcrap.

Conspiracy Appeal: Describing a developer as 'shadowy' implies hidden, secretive, or sinister motives consistent with conspiracy framing — for example: 'shadowy developer'

Name Calling: Labeling someone a 'billionaire tech CEO' is used as a derogatory shorthand to discredit them by class association rather than addressing their arguments — for example: 'billionaire tech CEO'

Appeal to Prejudice: Invoking 'billionaire tech CEO' exploits in-group/out-group resentment, positioning wealthy tech elites as an out-group opposed to ordinary people — for example: billionaire tech CEO and our concerns are bullcrap.

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by New Southern Majority IE PACfrom 2026-09-22 to 2026-09-30spend $8,000–8,999500,000–599,999 impressions
Tommy Tuberville claimed he would donate every dime he made in Washington DC to veterans in Alabama. He hasn’t ... not even close. Veterans deserve better than Tommy’s lies. Alabama deserves a governor who stands by his word. Vote by November 3rd.

Appeal to Prejudice: Invokes veterans as a sympathetic in-group to generate emotional alignment against the named opponent — for example: "Veterans deserve better than Tommy's lies".

Name Calling: Uses the word 'lies' as a derogatory label to discredit Tommy rather than addressing specific policy disagreements — for example: "Tommy's lies".

Glittering Generalities: Uses vague, emotionally positive language about standing by one's word without specifying any concrete policy or action — for example: 'a governor who stands by his word'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

Paid for by New Southern Majority IE PACfrom 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-30spend $8,000–8,999700,000–799,999 impressions
Who lies about supporting veterans? Tommy Tuberville. Tommy Tuberville claimed he would donate every dime he made in Washington DC to veterans in Alabama. He lied. They deserve it, and Alabama deserves better. Vote by November 3rd.
Loaded LanguageName Calling40.0% of sentences flagged

Loaded Language: The word 'lies' is emotionally charged and accusatory, framing the subject as dishonest without presenting evidence — for example: 'lies about supporting veterans'

Name Calling: The sentence functions as a direct accusatory label applied to Tommy Tuberville, identifying him as the liar implied in the rhetorical question without substantiation — for example: 'Tommy Tuberville'

Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.

View in Meta's Ad Library ↗

What this page is

  • An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it ran mostly in AL and names a nominee for governor — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office (a U.S. Senate or House campaign included), or it also names AL's Senate nominees, in which case it is on the Senate race's page. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
  • The candidates are the ones certified for the November ballot, from the source linked at the top. Governors are state offices, so there are no FEC filings behind this page: no money figures, and outside groups are placed on a side only when they are a campaign or a party committee.
  • Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
  • A technique is a specific manipulative move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
  • Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. The check runs once and its result is shown to everyone afterwards. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
  • Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
  • Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.

Get notified as this improves — new detection models, the browser extension, and new features. Occasional email, no spam.

Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time