Illinois Governor 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them
JB Pritzker (Democrat), Darren Bailey (Republican) and Collin Corbett (independent) are the candidates for governor of Illinois in the November 3, 2026 general election. JB Pritzker is the incumbent. Semblen has analyzed 42 ads in this race; 18 used at least one manipulation technique, most often name calling and loaded language.
JB Pritzker (DEM, incumbent), Darren Bailey (REP), Collin Corbett (IND).
On the ballot as listed by Illinois State Board of Elections, Candidate List, General Election 11/3/2026. 42 ads analyzed, 18 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing. Updated 2026-10-08. 1 ad from other advertisers shown separately below.
18 of 40 (45%) flagged · Name Calling (17), Loaded Language (16), Appeal to Prejudice (10)
YouTube
0 of 2 flagged
Reported Meta spend
$482,300–613,621 on all ads, $368,800–460,713 on flagged ads · Meta reports ranges; these are the sums of their ends
Example
“extreme ideas” — Name Calling, paid for by JB for Governor
· the flagged ad with the highest reported spend that shows the most common technique
Embed this race on your site
A small box with these findings and the newest ads, updated as new ads are analyzed. Free for newsrooms, blogs and campaigns alike; it links back here.
Follow the Illinois Governor race
An email when new ads come in from either side or the outside groups: the techniques, the words doing the work, and who paid. And each debate's analysis the morning after. One-click unsubscribe.
Leaving out the softer ones (loaded language, glittering generalities, slogans, exaggeration, repetition): 43% of ads.
The words doing the work
The words that show up most in phrases our model flagged as loaded language or name calling in this race's ads, by number of ads.
extremein 7 ads· e.g. “too extreme for Illinois”, “extreme ideas”
ideain 3 ads· e.g. “extreme ideas”, “dangerous ideas”
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
Candidates for governor report their fundraising to Illinois's state campaign-finance office, not the FEC. This page doesn't cover those reports yet, so it shows no money figures.
The ads
42 ads, newest first. Video transcripts are shown as the model read them, without caption cues like [music].
Republican Leader ENDORSES JB Pritzker: “I’m Not Going to Waste My Vote.”
Paid for by JB Pritzkervideo · 1:09from 2026-10-05
Hello, I'm Jim Durkin. I'm a Republican and I've been a leader in the Republican Party for many years. I believe in responsible fiscal stewardship, fairness, and respect for all.
I proudly served Illinois in the General Assembly for over two decades as a representative and as the House Republican Leader for a decade. We have two choices for governor this November, J.B. Pritzker or my former colleague Darren Bailey who served under me.
It's unfortunate, but I cannot cast my vote for my party's nominee. I served with Darren Bailey in Springfield and I know what he is and isn't capable of. Bailey stands for exclusion over inclusion and his politics are of subtraction over addition.
His politics don't work for me nor the Republican Party I know. He's never accomplished anything for Illinois and he's not cut out for the job. Frankly, he cannot be trusted to lead our state.
I may not agree with J.B. on everything, but he's a good person and he has delivered on matters important to me and to the state. Things like common sense firearm regulation, 12 credit upgrades, and investing in our state's infrastructure.
In this election, I'm not going to waste my vote. I'm voting for Governor J.B. Pritzker.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
Watch on YouTube ↗Transcript above is auto-generated; the analysis is of the spoken words.
Follow the Illinois Governor race
An email when new ads come in from either side or the outside groups: the techniques, the words doing the work, and who paid. And each debate's analysis the morning after. One-click unsubscribe.
Paid posts that ran in IL and name a candidate, from advertisers that aren't part of this race: news-style pages, campaigns for other offices, and others. They're shown here for completeness and not counted with the ads above. We show the same technique analysis; their claims are not checked.
Chicago Impact News: news-style page
Paid for by Chicago Impact Newsfrom 2026-09-11 to 2026-09-23spend $100–19920,000–24,999 impressions
DuPage County can now invest directly in affordable and missing-middle housing after Gov. JB Pritzker signed the NITA Act. The law also confirmed that DuPage's previously approved capital projects survived the state's nearly $56 billion FY2027 budget process, so existing funding keeps flowing instead of expiring. See what it means for the county.
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it ran mostly in IL and names a nominee for governor — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office (a U.S. Senate or House campaign included), or it also names IL's Senate nominees, in which case it is on the Senate race's page. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
The candidates are the ones certified for the November ballot, from the source linked at the top. Governors are state offices, so there are no FEC filings behind this page: no money figures, and outside groups are placed on a side only when they are a campaign or a party committee.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific manipulative move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. The check runs once and its result is shown to everyone afterwards. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.
Get notified as this improves — new detection models, the browser
extension, and new features. Occasional email, no spam.
Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time