Kansas Governor 2026: the ads, and who's paying for them
Cindy Holscher (Democrat) and Ty Masterson (Republican) are the candidates for governor of Kansas in the November 3, 2026 general election. Semblen has analyzed 43 ads in this race; 16 used at least one manipulation technique, most often loaded language and name calling. Next date for voters: Registration deadline: Tue, Oct 13.
Cindy Holscher (DEM), Ty Masterson (REP).
On the ballot as listed by Ballotpedia. 43 ads analyzed, 16 with at least one technique in the copy.
Newest first. The paid-for-by line is the advertiser's own filing. Updated 2026-10-08.
Anyone can vote by mail; request a ballot by Tue, Oct 27 (The Tuesday of the week before the general election (K.S.A. 25-1122(f)(1)(B))); return it by Tue, Nov 3 (By statute, ballots must be received by close of polls (normally 7 pm; counties may set 6 am-8 pm hours). A court injunction may extend this to Friday Nov 6 for ballots postmarked by Election Day; the appeal is pending.)Source: sos.ks.gov ↗Source: sos.ks.gov ↗Source: ksrevisor.gov ↗
$291,700–361,038 on all ads, $113,800–141,924 on flagged ads · Meta reports ranges; these are the sums of their ends
Example
“who will fight for” — Loaded Language, paid for by AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY
· the flagged ad with the highest reported spend that shows the most common technique
Embed this race on your site
A small box with these findings and the newest ads, updated as new ads are analyzed. Free for newsrooms, blogs and campaigns alike; it links back here.
Follow Cindy Holscher vs. Ty Masterson
An email when new ads come in from either side or the outside groups: the techniques, the words doing the work, and who paid. And each debate's analysis the morning after. One-click unsubscribe.
Each side is the campaign plus the groups backing it. How a group is placed is explained below the table.
Side
Ads
With at least one technique
Most common
Holscher (D)
12
7 of 12 (58%)
Loaded Language (4), Name Calling (3), Appeal to Fear (2)
All from the campaign; no ads here from groups placed on this side.
Masterson (R)
14
0 of 14 (0%)
All from the campaign; no ads here from groups placed on this side.
Not placed on a side (9 sponsors)
17
9 of 17 (53%)
Loaded Language (8), Appeal to Prejudice (6), Name Calling (6)
Read this before comparing the sides. Ads that attack an opponent use these techniques far more often than ads that introduce a candidate, whoever runs them, so the side running more attack ads shows a higher share. A technique is about wording, not about whether an ad is true. These are online ads only (Meta and YouTube), not television.
How a group is placed: by its own filings with the Federal Election Commission. A group is with a candidate when it reported spending to support that candidate, or to oppose the other one in the general election. The parties' own committees are with their nominee. Spending against a candidate in a primary places a group nowhere, and neither does our reading of its ads: a group with no such filing is listed as not placed. The sponsor table gives the reason for each.
Decide what counts
Not everyone would call every technique manipulation. Untick the ones you'd call ordinary persuasion and the count updates.
37% of the 43 ads here use at least one of the techniques ticked below (16 ads).
Leaving out the softer ones (loaded language, glittering generalities, slogans, exaggeration, repetition): 33% of ads.
The words doing the work
The words that show up most in phrases our model flagged as loaded language or name calling in this race's ads, by number of ads.
agendain 3 ads· e.g. “keep his MAGA agenda out of the governor's office”, “extreme agendas”
extremein 3 ads· e.g. “extreme politics”, “extreme agendas”
lackeyin 3 ads· e.g. “MAGA lackey Ty Masterson”, “MAGA lackey”
MAGAin 3 ads· e.g. “MAGA lackey Ty Masterson”, “MAGA lackey”
politicianin 3 ads· e.g. “dishonest career politician”, “clean up the mess that the politicians have created”
Semblen is free to read and has no ads. If this page was useful, you can support it.
Money in this race
Candidates for governor report their fundraising to Kansas's state campaign-finance office, not the FEC. This page doesn't cover those reports yet, so it shows no money figures.
The ads
43 ads, newest first. Video transcripts are shown as the model read them, without caption cues like [music].
Showing the 1 ad paid for by Cannabis Justice Coalition Inc. Show all 43 ads
Paid for by Cannabis Justice Coalition Incfrom 2026-09-11 to 2026-09-19spend $200–29925,000–29,999 impressions
In a pivotal moment for Kansas legislation, the Cannabis Justice Coalition is convening an assembly of state leaders, candidates, legal experts, law enforcement, and community advocates for "The Future of Cannabis Reform in Kansas." This landmark forum, scheduled for Saturday, Sept. 19, from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the JOCO Arts & Heritage Center, promises to be a defining moment in shaping the trajectory of cannabis policy in the Sunflower State.
Guided by the esteemed Barry Grissom, Former US Attorney for the District of Kansas, the afternoon will deliver a dynamic and visionary dialogue on the massive legislative, economic, and social transformations that modern cannabis reform could bring to the region.
The event boasts an extraordinary lineup of political figures ready to tackle reform head-on, headlined by gubernatorial candidate Cindy Holscher. She will be joined by a powerful coalition of candidates for the Kansas House of Representatives, representing a united front ready to address the future of the state:
• Cindy Holscher - Governor
• Rob Hodgkinson - House District 4
• Henry Johns - House District 5
• Sherry Giebler - House District 14
• Allison Hougland - House District 15
• Stephanie Sawyer Clayton - House District 19
• Susan Ruiz - House District 23
• Jarrod Ousley - House District 24
• Heather Meyer - House District 29
• CeCe Harlin - House District 34
• Wanda Brownlee Paige - House District 35
• Zach Maier - House District 39
• Kristen Schultz - House District 43
• Kelsey Stock - House District 121
Amplifying the conversation, an exclusive expert panel will dive deep into the real-world impact of current policies and the urgent need for justice and modernization. This vital discussion features diverse, frontline perspectives from:
• Chris Wolfenbarger - Purple Heart Veteran
• Dolores Halbin - Cannabis Educator
• Eric Kirsch - Sheriff of Wabaunsee County
• Peter Andreone - Cannabis Attorney
This is more than just a panel discussion, it is a catalyst for change. The public and members of the press are highly encouraged to attend this event to hear firsthand where current and future leaders stand on the critical issue of cannabis reform.
no techniques found
Looks up the ad's factual claims in fact-checkers, primary sources and wire reporting. Takes up to a minute.
An email when new ads come in from either side or the outside groups: the techniques, the words doing the work, and who paid. And each debate's analysis the morning after. One-click unsubscribe.
An ad is on this page because its own "Paid for by" line is a campaign in this race; or it ran mostly in KS and names a nominee for governor — unless its sponsor is a campaign for some other office (a U.S. Senate or House campaign included), or it also names KS's Senate nominees, in which case it is on the Senate race's page. Ads from outside groups appear alongside the campaigns' own.
The candidates are the ones certified for the November ballot, from the source linked at the top. Governors are state offices, so there are no FEC filings behind this page: no money figures, and outside groups are placed on a side only when they are a campaign or a party committee.
Campaigns run one text as many separate ads. Identical text from the same sponsor is one card here, marked with its number of variants.
A technique is a specific manipulative move in the wording, found by our model and explained in one line. It is not a claim that the ad is false.
Claims are checked when a reader asks: press "Check this ad's claims" on a card. The check runs once and its result is shown to everyone afterwards. The ten ads with the most money behind them in each race are checked ahead of time.
Claim verdicts say what the cited sources say. A verdict that an ad is wrong or misleading is shown only when it cites an established fact-checker or an institutional record — Congress, a federal agency, a court — and its confidence is not low; a weaker one is not shown at all. Each verdict shows what it rests on and how confident it is. If we got one wrong, press Disagree: a verdict that readers dispute and no one defends comes down.
Video ads come from the campaigns' own YouTube channels; the transcript is analyzed. Meta ads are analyzed on their text; their video and images are not, yet.
Get notified as this improves — new detection models, the browser
extension, and new features. Occasional email, no spam.
Semblen LLC · 5900 Balcones Drive STE 100, Austin, TX 78731 · unsubscribe any time